Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    c11 TM Proj Present Eval

    Uploaded by

    spsurya2013
    This document is an evaluation form for oral team project presentations. It contains 16 criteria for evaluating student presentations on a scale of 0 to 10. The form asks evaluators to score teams on how clearly they introduced themselves and their topic, the quality of their public speaking skills, how well their visual/audio aids enhanced the presentation, whether their project's hardware and performance claims were substantiated, and whether the results would be useful outside of course requirements. Evaluators are asked to return completed forms within 3 days to help advisors provide feedback to student teams.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    c11 TM Proj Present Eval

    Uploaded by

    spsurya2013
    11 views3 pages
    This document is an evaluation form for oral team project presentations. It contains 16 criteria for evaluating student presentations on a scale of 0 to 10. The form asks evaluators to score teams on how clearly they introduced themselves and their topic, the quality of their public speaking skills, how well their visual/audio aids enhanced the presentation, whether their project's hardware and performance claims were substantiated, and whether the results would be useful outside of course requirements. Evaluators are asked to return completed forms within 3 days to help advisors provide feedback to student teams.

    Original Title

    c11 Tm Proj Present Eval (1)

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an evaluation form for oral team project presentations. It contains 16 criteria for evaluating student presentations on a scale of 0 to 10. The form asks evaluators to score teams on how clearly they introduced themselves and their topic, the quality of their public speaking skills, how well their visual/audio aids enhanced the presentation, whether their project's hardware and performance claims were substantiated, and whether the results would be useful outside of course requirements. Evaluators are asked to return completed forms within 3 days to help advisors provide feedback to student teams.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    11 views3 pages

    c11 TM Proj Present Eval

    Uploaded by

    spsurya2013
    This document is an evaluation form for oral team project presentations. It contains 16 criteria for evaluating student presentations on a scale of 0 to 10. The form asks evaluators to score teams on how clearly they introduced themselves and their topic, the quality of their public speaking skills, how well their visual/audio aids enhanced the presentation, whether their project's hardware and performance claims were substantiated, and whether the results would be useful outside of course requirements. Evaluators are asked to return completed forms within 3 days to help advisors provide feedback to student teams.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    ORAL TEAM PROJECT PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM

    Please complete one form for each team. Score the team's performance in each of the
    following categories on a 0 to 10 scale, 10 = STRONG AGREEMENT,
    0 = STRONG DISAGREEMENT, and 5 = NEUTRAL. Please complete and RETURN
    THESE FORMS TO THE TEAM ADVISOR no more than three (3) working days after
    the presentations. Thank you.
    Team Members: ___________________________________________________
    Project Title or Topic: ________________________________________________
    Advisor: __________________________________________________________
    1.

    The team members clearly and appropriately introduced themselves or each other.
    Score: ______________

    2.

    The project title or topic was clearly and understandably stated.


    Score: ______________

    3.

    Had this presentation been for a group of engineering and management


    professions in an industrial setting, the team members would have been
    appropriately dressed and groomed.
    Score: ______________

    4.

    The need that this project is to satisfy was clearly stated.


    Score: ______________

    5.

    The original quantitative specifications for the project were clearly presented and
    reviewed in detail.
    Score: ______________

    6.

    The presentation clearly illustrated that quantitative performance measurements


    were taken on the finished project and a discussion of those measurements was
    given.
    Score: ______________

    7.

    The presentation contained a clear and meaningful discussion and comparison


    between the completed projects measured performance and the original
    specifications.
    Score: ______________

    8.

    The presentation clearly indicated which of the original specifications were met and
    which were not.
    Score: ______________

    9.

    All of the teams members demonstrated public speaking technique (eye contact,
    body language, audience facing, sound level, etc.) that were developed to a level
    consistent with what might be expected of college seniors.
    Score: ______________

    10. Visual and/or audio aids were well prepared, planned, organized and significantly
    enhanced the presentation.
    Score: ______________
    11. The team brought the physical hardware of their finished (or near finished) project
    to the presentation and identified, described and discussed the various parts,
    control and other remarkable features of this hardware to an extent which gave
    reasonable assurance that hardware had actually been built, operated and tested
    and that its performance clearly substantiated the claims made in the oral
    presentation.
    Score: _______________
    12. The team clearly stated an estimate of the proportion of the project that they had
    completed as based on the goals that were stated in their class project proposal.
    Score: _______________
    13. The presentation was neither too long nor too short for the allotted 25 minute time
    interval.
    Score: _______________
    14. The presentation was well planned, organized and executed.
    Score: _______________
    15. Aside from satisfying the course requirements, the results of this project should
    have genuine utility.
    Score: _______________
    16. Should the situation arise that student groups from each of the engineering
    colleges in the state of Michigan were to present their senior projects to a
    representative of engineers and managers from industry, you would
    enthusiastically recommend that this group and its project be chosen to represent
    the department (i.e., Electrical & Computer Engineering) at such an event?
    Score: _______________

    17. OPTIONAL: You may be able to assist the teams advisor in evaluation by grading
    the individual members. If you choose to do so, please enter grades below.
    Name: ______________________________

    Grade: __________

    Name: _____________________________

    Grade: __________

    Name: _____________________________

    Grade: __________

    Name: _____________________________

    Grade: __________

    EVALUATORS NAME (optional): ______________________________


    If you would permit disclosure of this form to the student team members, please
    indicate so here: ___________________________________________
    Comments:
    ___________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________

    You might also like