Pakistan Donor Directory
Pakistan Donor Directory
Pakistan Donor Directory
The NGORC Donor Directory collects and disseminates information about donors that are providing financial and other
assistance to the non-governmental sector in Pakistan. This is the third edition following releases in 1994 and 1998.
This edition reveals some interesting new trends. International private foundations appear for the first time. Indigenous
foundations are also gearing up their efforts. Many of these prefer to retain their anonymity, however, and discourage
publicity of any sort. NGORC is engaging with these publicity shy grant makers to encourage them to recognize that through a
more transparent style they will increase their effectiveness. Pakistan’s corporate sector is also poised to divert more and more
funds towards social development.
I would like to thank all those that have participated in putting together this directory for taking time to fill the questionnaire
and helping make the directory a useful publication. I would like to put on record the work done by Mr. Mohammad Anwar,
Research Assistant, towards collection and processing of data, Ms. Rabia Baig, Manager Information and Research for leading
the study, and Ms. Kamyla Marvi Tapal for writing the overview of the donor sector in Pakistan.
I sincerely hope that the citizen sector and other stakeholders would find this humble effort of NGORC useful and relevant.
We are optimistic that this small initiative will go a long way to promote a productive relationship between NGOs and donors
for sustainable development in Pakistan.
Qadeer Baig
Deputy Director
List of Donor Organizations Page #
i
List of Donor Organizations Page #
ii
List of Donor Organizations Page #
iii
Acronyms and Abbreviations
iv
Acronyms and Abbreviations
v
Acronyms and Abbreviations
vi
Acronyms and Abbreviations
vii
Introduction
NGO Resource Centre is a non-funding support organization that provides management education related services to build
capacity of citizen organizations. On the basis of credible data on the citizen sector, it undertakes policy dialogue to promote an
enabling policy environment. The objective of the NGO Resource Centre is to (a) enhance capacity and professionalism in citizen
organizations of Pakistan and (b) promote an enabling policy environment for private voluntary initiative in the public interest.
For accurate and authentic collection and dissemination of information, NGORC develops directories on themes relevant to the
citizen sector. Over the years NGORC has produced directories of Donor Organizations (this version being an update),
Intermediary NGOs, Training Organizations for the Citizen Sector and Social Research Organizations in Pakistan. Earlier the
Centre conducted a census of NGOs registered with the Social Welfare Department.
This directory encompasses five kinds of donors – namely bilaterals, multilaterals, embassies and high commissions,
international/ local private foundations and the corporate sector. This updated version of the directory also includes an overview
of the donor sector in Pakistan as important partners in development.
Annex II offers tips on how to contact donors and a specimen of project proposal form (Annexure III).
Methodology
The first step towards the compilation of this directory was to update the list of donors. The earlier list of donors available with
NGORC was revised and enhanced. Based on the information collected in the earlier directories, a questionnaire (Annex IV) was
prepared to elicit the required ‘organizational’ and ‘procedural’ information from relevant donors. The questionnaire was pre-
tested with two potential donors in order to ensure clarity of thought and clear understanding of the tool.
In August 2002, the questionnaires along with introductory letters were sent out to the 102 organizations in the list (Annex I).
Data collection (via mail and email) and data entry continued through the months of September and October 2002. Of the 102
organizations contacted fifty-two responded within the stipulated time. Information sent to NGORC was transferred to templates
and sent back to respective organizations for verification. By November, the data had been verified, processed and statistical
tables had been generated. Soon after, the first draft of the report was ready along with the article on Partners in Development: An
overview of donor funding to NGOs in Pakistan.
viii
Limitations
The recent developments in Afghanistan and its repercussions on the international and national scenario had lead many donor
organizations to temporarily suspend non-essential activities. It was for this reason that the donor directory project was
postponed till later in the year 2002. Also most international foundations were difficult to locate as they did not have local offices;
however correspondence was managed through email.
Indigenous donors – both private foundations and corporations - were also not easy to reach. Some craved anonymity and others
were not able to furnish the required information.
Data collection is always a daunting task. Often for participating organizations, it is not easy to visualize the benefits of partaking
in surveys and therefore have to be cajoled and ‘nudged’. This often involves intense follow-up.
Definition of Terminologies
Technically a ‘donor’ is an institution or person who donates resources to another individual or institution. The resources that are
donated may be financial, physical, technical, material or human. In the development sector, donors are often institutions that
provide monetary grants or aid to government and NGOs1.
In Pakistan’s social development context, the term ‘donor’ usually means a foreign bilateral or multilateral agency, UN agency,
international NGO or the Banks. It does not usually refer to indigenous philanthropic organizations, corporate sector donors or
individual donors. However, in the broader sense these do constitute ‘donor’.
For the purpose of this study, a donor is defined as “an organization, government or private funding projects or organizations of
the citizen sector in Pakistan, through which the people of Pakistan directly or indirectly benefit. Furthermore these must have a
commitment towards funding social development (as opposed to welfare, relief and charity) and future plans to continue doing
so.
1
Kamal Simi, The NGO Donor Axis: Suggestions Towards Codes of Conduct for NGOs and Donors in Pakistan, UN Pakistan.
ix
Partners in Development
An Overview of the Donor Funding to NGOs in Pakistan
Over the last decade or so international donor agencies have increasingly given greater prominence to the role of NGOs in social
welfare and development of the civil society. This prominence has not only been in the form of greater financial amounts being
given in grants to NGOs but also as a proportion of the total aid given to countries.
This increase in funding both in real and relative terms has seen a substantial growth of NGOs all over the world and especially in
the developing nations of the South. Pakistan too, which has a relatively young NGO sector has seen growth in the number of
NGOs over the last decade. Today, over three hundred intermediary organizations provide social services through a network of
grassroots, and many more local community-based organizations (CBOs) are working to address basic social needs at the
community level. According to the SPDC/JHU/AKF Report of April, 2002 there are almost 45,000 active organizations in the non-
profit sector. These organizations vary greatly in terms of their size, competence, and transparency, focus and impact. They
address a varying range of issues from education, income generation, micro-finance, irrigation, and health, to democracy and
rights.
Similarly the last decade and a half has also seen an increase in the number of donors in Pakistan. Over 50 percent of the donors in
this directory have begun operating in Pakistan after 1980 and now a number of UN agencies, CIDA have offices and staff based
in Islamabad. This local presence enables them to better understand the local scenario as well as more easily interact with their
recipient partners. Yet with increasing possibilities through the Internet to develop relationships many donors, small and large
provide funds to Pakistan without being based in the country. Examples of such are the Packard Foundation, the Ford Foundation
and the Bill Gates Foundation.
Many reasons are cited for why donors provide support to NGOs: the donor–NGO relationship is a mutually beneficial one. In
fact the reasons may be as many as the donors; Some common cited include:
x
• Governments as well as civil society organizations in the donor countries feel a social responsibility towards the developing
countries. Colonialism is seen as being a reason for the North-South divide and many seek to redress this balance through
assistance and aid. Those providing support targeted at vulnerable groups such as children and women increasingly see
NGOs as being more efficient, cost-effective, better able to hit the target of vulnerable groups.
• With increasing globalization most countries of the North have developed strong commercial interests in the South. The South
not only provides them with potential human and natural resources but also potentially expansive markets. A strong civil
society can bring about a stable environment for business. In addition a developing nation will provide a market with greater
purchasing power.
• Through development sector relationships, the North increases its understanding of the South which advances its
geographical outreach.
• The North has a political and ideological commitment to democracy. More and more so, development ideals such as
participation, equality, empowerment, and good governance are being promoted. Moreover, there is an increasing trend
towards supporting advocacy within the civil sector.
International philanthropic foundations such as the Ford Foundation and the David and Lucille Packard Foundation are also
extending upon the tradition of philanthropy from the private to the social sector and are increasingly contributing vast sums of
money towards philanthropy in the South.
While local philanthropy is also a potentially vast source of resources for NGOs it remains largely based on individual initiatives,
and is only beginning to get organized in the sense of organized philanthropy in the North. Yet some local donors such as the
Rangoonwala Fund and the Infaaq Foundation do provide funds to CBOs. Corporations such as Unilever Pakistan Ltd, Engro and
Shell and business association such as the Rotary and Lions, and the German and British Women’s Associations also provide
funds to smaller NGO initiatives.
xi
Funding amounts vary depending upon the donor policies and the capacity of the NGO to utilize funds. NGOs having a sound
track record and an effective organizational structure with proper accounting, monitoring and evaluation systems in place are
more likely to receive larger and repeated grants. NGOs that are able to show the effectiveness of their programs are also more
likely to receive grants. Yet many donors have windows with small grants for organizations just starting out. Similarly different
donors have different policies on whether or not they will support an NGO beyond one project cycle. Some donors prefer to work
with seed grants encouraging recipients to find alternative sources of funding, while other donor-NGO partnerships tend to be
longer term with an emphasis on organizational development and institution building.
Sometimes donors also provide loans to NGOs. This is particularly so within the micro finance sector. Recently the World Bank
and the Asian Development Bank provided a loan to the Khushali Bank so that they in turn could provide small-scale loans for
the development of micro-enterprise. Similarly the Pakistan Poverty Alleviation Fund (PPAF) set up by the Government of
Pakistan in partnership with the World Bank, extend loans to NGOs. These loans are often given in conjunction with grants that
support capacity building of partner NGOs.
Apart from financial support, donors also provide technical assistance through provision of expertise in special areas,
contribution in kind (vehicles, buildings, machinery etc.) and providing capacity-building opportunities to recipient
organizations. These may come as part of the financial assistance package or may be requested for separately from the donors. For
example UNAIDS will often provide support for members of NGOs working within the HIV/AIDS sector to attend international
conferences.
The donors are increasingly becoming more stringent on monitoring and evaluation. This can range from the submission of
reports by the NGOs, to ‘missions’ (visits) by the donors to the project area to see the utilization of the grant money or to more
extensive evaluation missions where programs and projects are evaluated by external evaluators. Donors too have at times played
an active role in advocating an enabling environment for NGOs as in their advocacy efforts against the NGO Bill in 1996. Similarly
the Country Assistance Strategies of the World Bank, and the Asian Development Bank have encouraged participation of
stakeholders during the strategy formulation process.
So what is the role of the state within this NGO-donor relationship? The state plays an important role in the creation of an
enabling environment for the civil society. In addition, the government provides benefits (such as tax or customs duties
exemptions) to NGOs. On the other hand, International donors, based in Pakistan, do sign protocols/ Memorandum of
Understanding with the government and when they give funds to an NGO they are required to inform the Economic Affairs
Division (EAD).
xii
Operating partnership combing donor, NGO and government are also becoming more common. Donors finance the relationship
so that the government and the NGO can derive mutual benefits. Donors sometimes provide money to the government or to
credible NGOs to set up social investment funds, which then provides financial and technical support to other NGOs. Two
examples of such social investment funds are of CIDA providing money to the Aga Khan Foundation for Pakistan Social
Institutions Development Programme (PAKSID), and of USAID who provided an endowment for Trust for Voluntary
Organizations (TVO).
Changing Priorities
Most donors have their own sectoral and geographical preferences (please see thematic matrix on page xii). Over the years,
development ideologies and priority areas continue to change and adapt. Development funding has moved from a more
charitable approach, to one that aimed at economic betterment to more recently, an approach that promotes empowerment. So,
for example, work with women has moved from a ‘include’ women-in-development approach to one of gender empowerment
which focuses on promoting gender equality. Population reduction theories and strategies have shifted their focus to family
planning, to now a wider and more empowering reproductive health approach. Donors not only change their priority areas but
also how much they will give and their preferences for partnership (directly to NGOs or through government, long term or small
projects). Sometimes donors will entirely close down their program in one country while new donors are always coming in to
identify new areas of support.
There are multiple reasons for these changes. Always, to some measure donor country foreign policy affects its development aid.
Thus the Labour government in the UK saw a substantial increase in grants to developing countries, while the present American
government’s policies regarding organizations who provide abortion services has seen a substantial decrease in funds to many
reproductive health organizations. The donor’s changing financial or economic status also affects their ability to fund. Following
11th September, corporate sector donors whose stock values fell had to reduce the amount that they were able to commit in the
future. International conferences such as the conference on sustainable development in South Africa influence and shape
development agendas and governments and donors make commitments which they later strive to meet. Southern countries are
increasingly beginning to effectively mobilize and lobby donor agencies towards the agendas of the South. Thus, for example, the
International Forum for Capacity Building aims to provide greater voice to NGOs to negotiate with donors.
Recipient country politics also influence donor funding policies and procedures. Donors sometimes use funds as political leverage
and increase and withdraw assistance to influence policies of the government of the time. Following the testing of nuclear
weapons in Pakistan in 1998, the donor community came down strong on the funds that were not only being provided to the
Government but also to NGOs. Finally, international tools for monitoring development such as the Human Development Index
and other social indicators too influence which fields a donor will prioritize. Similarly donors will often commission in-country
research or needs assessments to assess new strategic directions.
xiii
The NGO – Donor Relationship – A Critique
Without the substantial funds that have been received by NGOs from donors it would perhaps have been impossible for NGOs to
become providers of social and economic services on the scale they do. There is no doubt that donor funding sometimes does
allow NGOs to work on issues which are at times not prioritized on the domestic agenda. The vulnerable are often marginalized
when there are so many conflicting demands on limited resources. Foreign funding can give voice to interest groups who
otherwise would be stifled in a closed political environment. NGOs also tend to prefer raising funds from international donors
because they are better organized through a systematic approach to facilitate the relationship (69 percent of the donors within this
directory state that they have specific guidelines and forms).
But the NGO-donor sector has its weaknesses and both must be aware of their limitations so that both strive to continually
improve. There is no doubt that while international donor agencies can be strong proponents of transparency and democracy,
sometimes their own systems can be inflexible and not entirely transparent. What is right for the recipient of aid must be right for
the donor. Donors must meet the standards of performance that they expect recipient governments or organizations to achieve.
International agencies have a tendency to support projects rather then programs, which makes it very difficult for NGOs to
maintain and build upon their human expertise over time or for them to secure their administrative costs. This weakens
institutional learning as well as the NGOs chances for institutional growth over the long term. Official funding compromises the
performance of NGOs in development activities such as institutional development and advocacy that require long-term strategies
with few short-term outputs.
Donor agencies are sometimes criticized for policies that in reality only serve the economic interests of their own countries. Thus
policies which only allow for vehicles to be imported from specified countries or technical assistance to be secured from
consultants of specified countries may not be the most effective way to meet the local needs as they may cause delays and other
complications.
Several successful NGO initiatives have suffered because of their over-dependence on foreign donor support. The NGO
community and development sector in general has not yet been able to tap into the vast financial and voluntary resources
available within the local communities. This is especially the case in Pakistan where recent studies by the Aga Khan Development
Network (AKDN) show that during 1997-8 Pakistani’s gave Rs. 30 billion in money alone, for philanthropic purposes. This is 5
times more than Pakistan received in outright grants from foreign aid. The NGO sector must become better adept at including
local philanthropists into the NGO-donor partnership. It is in this way that we will move towards greater self-reliance and
sustainability. Therefore, it is essential for NGOs to diversify their sources of funding not only between different donors but also
between different types of donor.
xiv
The acceptance of increasing amounts of donor funds, which usually come with complex requirements for project appraisal,
reporting, evaluation and accounting, presents even larger NGOs with difficulties. This official funding and its requirements can
sometimes skew the accountability of NGOs away from grassroots and other internal constituencies.
Donor agencies usually are convinced to support development NGOs, as they can reach people and places that governments often
cannot and their bottom-up approach helps communities to express their needs and use their own abilities. However, many
governments in developing countries feel that with the vast amounts of aid money flowing through NGOs, these organizations
are becoming competitors to what would normally be government’s responsibilities. NGOs often, rather than addressing these
legitimate fears - usually respond by being very critical of the government. For the future development of the country, it is
imperative that the NGO-government relationships improve so that they are partners in development rather then competitors for
resources.
Finally the NGO sector must realize its own social responsibility. With the changing political scenarios in the world, international
agencies cannot be seen as an unending source of funds, nor must the sector fall into the trap that it is only the international
donors to whom they are accountable. The NGO sector is ultimately responsible for the impact of its work. It must change lives, it
must contribute towards changing the future of our country and it must be driven by vision. We must build upon the windows of
opportunity that external and local donors provide us today so that tomorrow we are able to do the same for others.
xv
Thematic Areas – Matrix
ActionAid
EJ- GRA
Concern
AusAID
AKF, P
Accum
CFLI–
CIDA
DFID
Fund
CWS
ADB
CRS
DIL
EC
Thematic Areas
1 Advocacy/ Research _ _ _ _ _
2 Agriculture/Food _ _ _ _ _ _
3 Arts/ Culture _ _
4 Children _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
5 Communications/ Media _ _
6 Democracy _ _ _ _
7 Drug Abuse _ _ _ _ _
8 Disaster Management _ _ _ _
9 Economy _ _ _ _
10 Education _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
11 Emergency Relief _ _ _ _ _ _
12 Energy _ _
13 Environmental/NRM _ _ _ _ _
14 Forestry _ _ _
15 Gender _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
16 Girl Child _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
17 Good Governance _ _ _ _ _ _
18 Health _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
19 Housing _ _ _
20 Human Rights _ _ _ _ _ _ _
21 Humanitarian Relief _ _ _ _
22 Industrial Relations/Labour _
23 Information Dissemination _ _ _ _
24 Information Technology _ _
25 Infrastructure Development _ _ _ _
26 Institution Strengthening _ _ _ _ _ _ _
xvi
CFLI– CIDA
Accum Fund
ActionAid
EJ- GRA
Concern
AusAID
AKF, P
DFID
CWS
ADB
CRS
DIL
EC
Thematic Areas
27 Legal Aid _ _ _
28 Micro Credit _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
29 Poverty Alleviation _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
30 Rape and Violence _ _ _ _
31 Religion _ _
32 Reproductive Health _ _ _ _ _ _ _
33 Rural Development _ _ _ _ _ _ _
34 Sports & Recreation _ _
35 Trafficking & Migrants _ _
36 Vocational Training _ _ _ _
37 Water Supply & Sanitation _ _ _ _ _ _ _
38 Women _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
39 Youth _ _ _
40 Others _ _ _
xvii
MSDF-
UNDP
UNDP
Lolyd
GEF-
JICA
JBIC
FNSt
GG -
GTZ
FAO
KfW
GEP
FES
ILO
CIF
Thematic Areas
1 Advocacy/ Research _ _ _
2 Agriculture/Food _ _
3 Arts/ Culture
4 Children _ _
5 Communications/ Media _ _ _ _
6 Democracy _ _ _ _ _
7 Drug Abuse _
8 Disaster Management _
9 Economy _ _ _ _ _
10 Education _ _ _ _ _
11 Emergency Relief
12 Energy _ _ _
13 Environmental/NRM _ _
14 Forestry _
15 Gender _ _ _ _ _ _
16 Girl Child _
17 Good Governance _ _ _ _ _ _
18 Health _ _ _ _ _
19 Housing
20 Human Rights _ _ _ _ _
21 Humanitarian Relief
22 Industrial Relations/Labour _ _
23 Information Dissemination _ _ _
24 Information Technology _
25 Infrastructure Development _
26 Institution Strengthening _ _ _ _ _
xviii
MSDF-
UNDP
UNDP
Lolyd
GEF-
JICA
JBIC
FNSt
GG -
GTZ
FAO
KfW
GEP
FES
ILO
CIF
Thematic Areas
27 Legal Aid
28 Micro Credit _ _
29 Poverty Alleviation _ _ _
30 Rape and Violence
31 Religion
32 Reproductive Health _ _ _
33 Rural Development _
34 Sports & Recreation
35 Trafficking & Migrants
36 Vocational Training _ _
37 Water Supply & Sanitation _ _ _
38 Women _ _
39 Youth _ _ _
40 Others _ _ _ _
xix
NATPOW
SCF-USA
OXFAM
SCF-UK
NORAD
SAP-Pk
PAGE-
SDC -
PPAF
CIDA
CHIP
Shell
RNE
TAF
SSI
Thematic Areas
1 Advocacy/ Research _ _ _ _ _ _
2 Agriculture/Food _
3 Arts/ Culture _ _
4 Children _ _ _ _ _ _
5 Communications/ Media
6 Democracy _ _ _ _
7 Drug Abuse _
8 Disaster Management _ _
9 Economy _
10 Education _ _ _ _ _ _ _
11 Emergency Relief _ _ _
12 Energy
13 Environmental/NRM _ _ _ _
14 Forestry
15 Gender _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
16 Girl Child _ _ _
17 Good Governance _ _ _ _ _ _
18 Health _ _ _ _ _ _
19 Housing
20 Human Rights _ _ _ _ _ _ _
21 Humanitarian Relief _ _
22 Industrial Relations/Labour
23 Information Dissemination _ _
24 Information Technology
25 Infrastructure Development _ _
26 Institution Strengthening _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
27 Legal Aid _ _ _ _
xx
NATPOW
SCF-USA
OXFAM
SCF-UK
NORAD
SAP-Pk
PAGE-
SDC -
PPAF
CIDA
CHIP
Shell
RNE
TAF
SSI
Thematic Areas
28 Micro Credit _ _
29 Poverty Alleviation _ _ _ _ _
30 Rape and Violence _
31 Religion _
32 Reproductive Health _ _ _ _ _ _
33 Rural Development _ _ _ _ _ _ _
34 Sports & Recreation
35 Trafficking & Migrants _ _
36 Vocational Training _ _ _
37 Water Supply & Sanitation _ _ _ _ _
38 Women _ _ _ _ _ _
39 Youth _ _ _ _
40 Others _ _ _
xxi
UNESCO
UNICEF
Trocaire
Unilever
UNDCP
UNFPA
USAID
UNDP
WHO
TWB
Total
WFP
WPF
TVO
Thematic Areas
1 Advocacy/ Research _ _ _ _ _ _ 20
2 Agriculture/Food _ _ 11
3 Arts/ Culture _ _ _ _ 8
4 Children _ _ _ _ 22
5 Communications/ Media _ 7
6 Democracy _ _ 15
7 Drug Abuse _ _ 9
8 Disaster Management _ _ _ 10
9 Economy _ _ 12
10 Education _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 30
11 Emergency Relief _ _ _ _ 13
12 Energy _ 6
13 Environmental/NRM _ _ _ _ 15
14 Forestry _ 5
15 Gender _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 33
16 Girl Child _ _ _ _ 17
17 Good Governance _ _ _ _ 22
18 Health _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 29
19 Housing _ 4
20 Human Rights _ _ _ _ _ 24
21 Humanitarian Relief _ _ _ _ 10
22 Industrial Relations/Labour _ 4
23 Information Dissemination _ _ _ _ 13
24 Information Technology _ _ 5
25 Infrastructure Development _ _ _ 10
26 Institution Strengthening _ _ _ _ _ _ 27
27 Legal Aid 7
xxii
UNESCO
UNICEF
Trocaire
Unilever
UNDCP
UNFPA
USAID
UNDP
WHO
TWB
Total
WFP
WPF
TVO
Thematic Areas
28 Micro Credit _ _ _ _ 16
29 Poverty Alleviation _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 26
30 Rape and Violence _ _ _ 8
31 Religion _ 4
32 Reproductive Health _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 25
33 Rural Development _ _ _ _ 19
34 Sports & Recreation 2
35 Trafficking & Migrants _ 5
36 Vocational Training _ _ _ _ _ 14
37 Water Supply & Sanitation _ _ _ _ _ 20
38 Women _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 28
39 Youth _ _ _ _ _ 15
40 Others _ 11
xxiii
ActionAid Pakistan
(AAPk)
House # 7, Street 17, F–8/3
Islamabad
Telephone: (051) 2264689, 2282954, Fax: (051) 2260678
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.actionaidpakistan.org
1
Sectoral Focus by Funding Target Groups
Resource Management Trafficking & Migrants
Gender Vocational Training
Good Governance Water Supply and Sanitation
Health Women
Human Rights Youth
Information Dissemination
2
Donors Requirements Donors Obligations
a) Transparency of implementation process a) Monitoring
b) Transparency of accounts b) Evaluation
c) Monthly/ Quarterly/ Annual Reports c) Technical advise
d) Monitoring d) Timely disbursement of funds
e) Evaluation
f) Audit
g) Adherence to proposal
h) Financial contribution
i) Community participation
j) Sustainability strategy
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language Yes
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Study AAPk country strategy • No Consistency; and
• Low or no viewed impact
3
Acumen Fund
4
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Past track record a) Grants/ Loans a) Operational
b) Innovation, potential for broad social b) Capital
impact, outstanding leadership, c) Institutional development
significant problem with unmet need,
path to sustainability, acumen value
added
5
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines No
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
6
Aga Khan Foundation (Pakistan)
{AKF (P)}
• To make it possible for poor people to act in ways that will lead to long-term improvements in their income and health, in the
environment and in the education of their children.
• To provide communities with a greater range of choices and the understanding necessary to take informed action.
• To enable beneficiaries to gain the confidence and competence to participate in the design, implementation and continuing operation of
activities that affect the quality of their lives.
• To put institutional, management and financial structures in place to ensure that programme activities are sustainable without
Foundation assistance within a reasonable time-frame.
• Building self-reliance and forging new attitudes, skills, and organizational
7
Sectoral Focus by Funding Target Groups
Children/ Girl Child Micro Credit Women
Education Poverty Alleviation Children
Gender Reproductive Health Low income groups
Health Rural Development
Institution Strengthening Women
8
Donors Requirements Donors Obligations
a) Transparency of implementation process a) Monitoring
b) Transparency of accounts b) Evaluation
c) Quarterly Reports c) Technical advise
d) Monitoring d) Assistance in networking
e) Evaluation e) Planning and designing support
f) Audit f) Timely disbursement of funds
g) Adherence to proposal g) Systems development
h) Sustainability h) Capacity building
i) Human resource development
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
9
Asian Development Bank
(ADB)
10
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Grants/ Loans
b) Technical assistance
Note: Asian Development Bank primarily works with the Federal and Provincial Governments, through which NGOs are also involved.
11
Australian Agency for International Development
(AusAID)
12
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Loans a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Information sharing, advises b) Institutional development
c) Past track record c) Provision of equipment
13
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website Not as yet
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Improvement in the quality of the proposal; • Selection criteria not addressed;
• Clear project design; • Sustainability doubtful;
• Community participation; and • Not registered;
• Sustainability of benefits • Project information inadequate;
• Rationale unclear; and
• Weak design
14
Canada Fund for Local Initiatives
Canadian International Development Agency
(CFLI - CIDA)
House # 18, Bazar Road, G–6/4
PO Box 2934
Islamabad
Telephone: (051) 2279138-41, Fax: (051) 2279137
Website: www.acdi.gc.ca
15
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Thematic focus a) Grants a) Operational
b) Capacity b) Technical assistance b) Capital
c) Governing body c) Training/ Skill development c) Institutional development
d) Past track record
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project Depends on case to case
16
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website Yes
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language (Urdu & English) Yes
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Project implementation plan; • If they lack donor requirements; and
• Project budget; and • Geographical focus changes every 2 years
• Analysis of the problem/ need
17
Catholic Relief Services
(CRS)
18
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants/ Loans a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance b) Capital
c) Training/ Skill development c) Institutional development
d) Provision of equipment
e) Information sharing, inputs
19
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language Yes
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Clarity in Objectives; and • Lack of funds; and
• Lack of indicators • Reputation of NGO
20
Church World Service – Pakistan/ Afghanistan
CWS – P/A
21
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Financial assistance
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance
c) Capacity c) Training/ Skill development
d) Past track record d) Provision of equipment
e) Good governance e) Information sharing, advises
f) Having wide impact
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project Depends on case to case
Level of funding Depends on project to project
Duration of funding 1-3 Years
Time lag between application and approval 60-90 Days
22
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines -
Available on Website -
Are proposals accepted through the Website -
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language -
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Not viable;
• Not having wide impact;
• Non innovative
• Prior commitment to on-going projects;
• Non-availability of funds
23
Concern Pakistan
(CP)
24
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants/ Loans a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance b) Capital
c) Capacity c) Training/ Skill development c) Institutional development
d) Past track record d) Provision of equipment
e) Geographical focus e) Information sharing, advise
f) Transport and vehicles
25
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines No
Available on Website N/A
Are proposals accepted through the Website N/A
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
Note: We are not purely a funding organization but seek local partnerships to implement programmes
26
Department for International Development
(DFID)
27
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Technical assistance a) Operational
b) Capacity b) Training/ Skill development b) Institutional development
c) Past track record d) Information sharing, inputs, advise
d) Geographical focus
28
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website -
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Not linked to strategic areas • Not linked to strategic areas
29
Developments in Literacy
(DIL)
30
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Training/ Skill development b) Capital
c) Capacity c) Provision of equipment c) Institutional development
d) Governing body d) Information sharing, advise
e) Past track record e) Transport and vehicles
f) Geographical focus
g) Potential for project sustainability,
h) satisfactory accounting and
monitoring systems
i) regular and comprehensive quarterly
reporting
31
Donors Requirements Donors Obligations
a) Transparency of implementation process a) Monitoring
b) Transparency of accounts b) Evaluation
c) Monthly/ Quarterly/ Annual reports c) Assistance in networking
d) Monitoring d) Planning and designing support
e) Evaluation e) Timely disbursement of funds
f) Community participation f) Training
g) Financial contribution g) Capacity building
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines No
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Documentation; • Availability of funds; and
• Audit reports; • Not meeting DIL’s eligibility criteria
• Details of other donors; and
• Constitution
32
Embassy of Japan – Grassroots Assistance Programme
(GRA)
33
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants Depends on case to case
b) Geographical focus b) Training/ Skill development a) Operational
c) Provision of equipment b) Capital
d) Transport and vehicles c) Institutional development
e) Infrastructure development
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project Depends on case to case
34
Donors Requirements Donors Obligations
f) Audit
g) Adherence to proposal
h) Community participation
i) Sustainability
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website Yes
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Project details; and • Incomplete GRA application forms; and
• A concrete outcome for future development is • Not fulfilling the desired requirements
required
35
European Union – Delegation of the European Commission in Pakistan (EC)
Within the overall framework of the EU’s assistance programmes, a clear distinction is to be drawn between Economic Cooperation and
Development Cooperation. Development Cooperation consists of grant aid from the Union to its partners, directed towards poverty
alleviation, the fight against illiteracy, the improvement of health standards and the promotion of human rights. Economic cooperation on the
other hand aims at developing partnerships between the private sectors of the EU and its partners for the mutual benefit of the participating
parties.
36
Sectoral Focus by Funding Target Groups
Advocacy/ Research Humanitarian Relief Women
Agriculture/ Food Industrial Relations / Labour Children
Arts / Culture Information Dissemination Youth
Children/ Girl Child Information Technology Minorities
Communications/ Media Infrastructure Development Low income groups
Democracy Institution Strengthening
Drug Abuse International Relations
Disaster Management Legal Aid
Economy Micro Credit
Education Poverty Alleviation
Emergency Relief Rape and Violence
Energy Religion
Environment / NRM Reproductive Health
Forestry Rural Development
Gender Sports & Recreation
Good Governance Trafficking & Migrants
Health Vocational Training
Housing Water Supply and Sanitation
Human Rights Women/ Youth
37
Funding Cycle and Procedure
Funding cycle begins First Quarter of Year
RO eligible for another project after one year No
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project Yes
Level of funding Minimum Euro 300,000
Maximum Euro 1.5 M
Duration of funding 1-3 Years
Time lag between application and approval 8-12 months
Time lag between approval and disbursement 2-3 months
Will donor acknowledge receipt of proposal No
Will donor inform organization if project is not approved No
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website Yes
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
38
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Activity description and budget preparation • Thematic focus not relevant to Pakistan
39
Food & Agricultural Organization
(FAO)
40
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance b) Institutional development
c) Training/ Skill development
d) Provision of equipment
e) Information sharing, inputs, advises
f) Transport and vehicles
41
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website Yes
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
42
Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung
(FES)
43
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Technical assistance a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Training/ Skill development
c) Past track record c) Information sharing, advise
44
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines No
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language Yes
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Incompatibility with our objectives
45
Friedrich Naumann Stiftung
(FNSt)
46
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Training/ Skill development -
b) Thematic focus b) Information sharing, advise
c) Past track record c) Support seminars and workshops
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines No
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
47
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Lack of clarity that what will be the outcome of project
or process; and
• Activities without follow-up
48
Gender Equality Project
DFID funded, British Council managed (GEP)
49
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Thematic focus a) Grants for activities, research and a) Operational
b) Capacity publications, participation in conference, b) Capital
c) Past track record workshops, seminars, study visits c) Institutional development
d) Projects have to be innovative and
strategic
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project No
Level of funding Maximum Approx
£ 100,000
Duration of funding 1-2 Years
Time lag between application and approval 3 Months
Time lag between approval and disbursement 1 Month
Will donor acknowledge receipt of proposal Yes
Will donor inform organization if project is not approved Yes
50
Donors Requirements Donors Obligations
f) Audit f) Timely disbursement of funds
g) Adherence to proposal g) System development
h) Financial contribution h) Capacity building
i) Sustainability strategy i) Human resource development
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website Yes
Are proposals accepted through the Website Yes
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language Yes
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Projects need to be more innovative and strategic, which • Do not conform to the laid down criteria in the project
can be up-scaled and replicated, not simply a guidelines
continuation of on-going activities
51
German Technical Cooperation
(GTZ)
52
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Thematic Focus a) Grants a) Operational
b) Capacity b) Technical assistance b) Capital
c) Governing body c) Provision of equipment c) Institutional development
d) Past track record d) Information sharing, inputs, advise
e) Geographical focus
Level of funding -
Duration of funding Up to 3 years
Time lag between application and approval -
Time lag between approval and disbursement Depends
Will donor acknowledge receipt of proposal Yes
Will donor inform organization if project is not approved Yes
53
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines No
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
54
Global Environment Facility – Small Grants Programme
United Nations Development Programme
(GEF/SGP - UNDP)
55
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Institutional development
c) Capacity
d) Governing body
e) Past track record
f) Geographical focus
56
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website Yes
Are proposals accepted through the Website Yes
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Involving stakeholders in project design, monitoring • Lack of NGO capacity;
and evaluation; and • Credibility of the organization;
• Understanding and linking local environment issues • Lack of sustainability of proposal activities; and
with programme themes • Lack of community participation
57
Governance and Gender Unit
United Nations Development Programme
(UNDP)
58
Funding Cycle and Procedure
Funding cycle begins Varies from project to project
Level of funding -
Duration of funding 1-3 Years
Time lag between application and approval -
Time lag between approval and disbursement -
Will donor acknowledge receipt of proposal Yes
Will donor inform organization if project is not approved -
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website -
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language -
59
International Labour Organization
(ILO) – Specialized agency of UN System
60
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants/ Loans
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance
c) Capacity c) Training/ Skill development
d) Past track record d) Provision of equipment
e) Information sharing, advise
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project Depends on case to case
Level of funding -
Duration of funding Upto 5 years
Time lag between application and approval Depends on case to case
61
Donors Requirements Donors Obligations
f) Audit f) Timely disbursement of funds
g) Adherence to proposal g) System development
h) Financial contribution h) Capacity building
i) Community participation i) Human resource development
j) Sustainability strategy
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Case to case
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
62
Japan Bank for International Cooperation
(JBIC)
63
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants a) Capital
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance b) Institutional development
Level of funding -
Duration of funding 1-3 Years
Time lag between application and approval 30-45 Days
Time lag between approval and disbursement 15-20 Days
Will donor acknowledge receipt of proposal Yes
Will donor inform organization if project is not approved Yes
64
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines No
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
65
Japan International Cooperation Agency
(JICA)
66
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants/ Loans a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance b) Capital
c) Capacity c) Training/ Skill development c) Institutional development
d) Provision of equipment
67
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines No
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Explanation for sustainability in proposed project
Note: As JICA is a bilateral government aid organization of Japan, it requires the endorsement of the recipient government for any proposal
even for NGOs
68
John M. Lloyd Foundation
69
Funding Cycle and Procedure
Funding cycle begins December & July
RO eligible for another project after one year Yes
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project No
Level of funding Minimum US $ 2500
Maximum US $ 20,000
Duration of funding 1 Year
Time lag between application and approval 90 Days
Time lag between approval and disbursement 15 Days
Will donor acknowledge receipt of proposal Yes
Will donor inform organization if project is not approved Yes
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website Yes
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
70
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Applicants should be sure to include budgetary • Not significant scope/ impact
information, i.e the total organizational budget, the
project budget, and the length of time anticipated to
complete the project
71
Kreditanstalt fur Wiederaufbau
(KfW)
72
Funding Cycle and Procedure
Funding cycle begins -
RO eligible for another project after one year -
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project -
Level of funding -
Duration of funding -
Time lag between application and approval -
Time lag between approval and disbursement -
Will donor acknowledge receipt of proposal Yes
Will donor inform organization if project is not approved Yes
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines -
Available on Website Yes
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
73
Micro-Finance Social Development Fund/
Community Investment Fund
(MSDF/CIF)
74
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration MSDF provides support to NGOs for a) Operational
b) Thematic focus delivering capacity building services to
c) Capacity poor communities ii) CIF provides grant
d) Governing body financing for development of community
e) Past track record based infrastructure practices
f) Geographical focus
g) Gender sensitive operations
75
Donors Requirements Donors Obligations
e) Evaluation e) Timely disbursement of funds
f) Audit f) Timely payment of fees for services delivered
g) Adherence to proposal
h) Community participation
i) Gender sensitive
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• They need considerable support in developing a good • In most cases NGOs do not have institutional capacities
proposal budgeting etc to deliver specific services outsourced under MSDF/
CIF
76
National Trust for Population Welfare
(NATPOW)
77
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants/ Loans a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance b) Capital
c) Capacity c) Training/ Skill development c) Institutional development
d) Governing body d) Provision of equipment
e) Past track record e) Information sharing, inputs, advise
f) Geographical focus
g) Sustainability, community
participation, financial contribution
RO eligible for another project after one year Depends on case to case
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project Depends on case to case
78
Donors Requirements Donors Obligations
a) Transparency of implementation process a) Monitoring
b) Transparency of accounts b) Evaluation
c) Monthly/ Quarterly/ Annual reports c) Technical advise
d) Monitoring d) Assistance in networking
e) Evaluation e) Planning and designing support
f) Audit f) Timely disbursement of funds
g) Adherence to proposal g) Systems development
h) Financial contribution h) Capacity building
i) Community participation
j) Sustainability strategy
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language Yes
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Non-realistic budgeting; • Incomplete project proposal; and
• Logical Framework Analysis; • Repetition/ duplication of services in the project areas
• Unspecific project implementation methodology;
• Overall impact of the projects are not clearly defined;
and
• Reporting system for providing evaluation of the
project activities are not spelled out
79
Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation
(NORAD)
80
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants/ Loans a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Information sharing, inputs, advise b) Capital
c) Capacity c) Institutional development
d) Past track record (Based on assessment of each proposal)
81
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines No
Available on Website N/A
Are proposals accepted through the Website Yes
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• A realistic goal; • Proposals not invited through a dialogue with the
• Hierarchy; and Embassy are normally not approved. The number of
• Measurable indicators new partners taken up is very limited.
Note: The Embassy has a positive role when selecting partners that play a strategic role in development within their field.
82
OXFAM – Oxford Committee for Famine Relief (OXFAM)
House # 44, Street 59, I–8/3
Islamabad
Telephone: (051) 4449791, 4449445, Fax: (051) 4449790
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.oxfam.org.uk
83
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants/ Loans a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance b) Capital
c) Capacity c) Training/ Skill development c) Institutional development
d) Past track record d) Information sharing, advise
e) Geographical focus
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project Depends on case to case
84
Donors Requirements Donors Obligations
h) Sustainability strategy h) Capacity building
i) Human resource development
It depends per situation. We may intervene in all the areas
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language Yes
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• The areas/gaps requiring improvement in the proposal • Any project other than gender work (Violence Against
submitted by NGOs vary from proposal to proposal. Women/Domestic Violence/Harassment at Work
Some don’t give basic information about their Place/ Females Education) and Humanitarian
organization. Some do not clearly express the project Response; and
activities, objectives and the expected outcomes etc. • If any issue of integrity is involved then the proposal is
Monitoring and evaluation procedure is usually not also turned down
clearly expressed etc.
85
Pakistan Poverty Alleviation Fund
(PPAF)
86
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants/ Loans a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance
c) Capacity c) Training/ Skill development
d) Past track record d) Provision of equipment
e) Geographical focus e) Information sharing, advise
f) External audit f) Transport and vehicles
g) Poor focus
87
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website -
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language -
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Capacity in preparation of proposals/ implementation • RO’s not meeting eligibility criteria and/ or lacking
plans & need improvements performance
88
Programme for the Advancement of Gender Equality
Canadian International Development Agency
(PAGE - CIDA)
89
Sectoral Focus by Funding Target Groups
Advocacy/ Research Information Dissemination Women
Economy Poverty Alleviation Children
Education/ Literacy Reproductive Health Youth
Gender Rural Development Minorities
Girl Child Trafficking & Migrants Low income groups
Good Governance Violence Against Women Men
Health Vocational Training
Human Rights
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project No
Level of funding Varies
Duration of funding Up to 3 Years
Time lag between application and approval 6 to 8 months
Time lag between approval and disbursement Three weeks
Will donor acknowledge receipt of proposal Yes
Will donor inform organization if project is not approved Yes
90
Donors Requirements Donors Obligations
a) Transparency of implementation process a) Monitoring
b) Transparency of accounts (separate bank account) b) Evaluation
c) Quarterly/ Annual reports c) Technical advise
d) Monitoring d) Assistance in networking
e) Evaluation e) Planning and designing support
f) Audit f) Timely disbursement of funds
g) Financial contribution by RO g) Capacity building
h) Community participation h) Human resource development
i) Sustainability strategy
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language (Urdu & English) Yes
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Better expression of results to be achieved • If they do not meet the criteria laid down in the country
programme framework of CIDA Pakistan Programme
and PAGE.
91
Royal Netherlands Embassy
(RNE)
92
Funding Cycle and Procedure
Funding cycle begins January to December
RO eligible for another project after one year Depends on case to case
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project No
Level of funding -
Duration of funding Depends upon Proposals
Time lag between application and approval -
Time lag between approval and disbursement -
Will donor acknowledge receipt of proposal Yes
Will donor inform organization if project is not approved Yes
93
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines -
Available on Website -
Are proposals accepted through the Website -
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language Depends
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
94
Save the Children – UK
(SC-UK)
95
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance b) Institutional development
c) Training/ Skill development
d) Provision of equipment
e) Information sharing, advise
96
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
97
Save the Children – US
(SC-US)
98
Funding Cycle and Procedure
Funding cycle begins -
RO eligible for another project after one year Yes
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project Depends on case to case
Level of funding -
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
99
Shell Pakistan Limited
(SPL)
100
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants/ Loans a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance b) Institutional development
c) Past track record c) Training/ Skill development
d) Geographical focus d) Provision of equipment
e) Information sharing, inputs
f) Transport and vehicles
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project Depends on case to case
101
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines No
Available on Website Yes
Are proposals accepted through the Website Yes
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language Yes
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Donors capacity to support • If funds have already been allocated
102
Sight Savers International
(SSI)
103
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration with government a) Grants a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance b) Capital
c) Capacity c) Training skill development c) Institutional development
d) Governing body d) Information sharing, advise
e) Past track record
f) Geographical focus
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project Depends on case to case
Level of funding -
Duration of funding 1-3 Years
Time lag between application and approval 6 Months
Time lag between approval and disbursement 1-3 Months
Will donor acknowledge receipt of proposal Yes
Will donor inform organization if project is not approved Yes
104
Donors Requirements Donors Obligations
h) Financial contribution h) Human resource development
i) Community participation
j) Sustainability strategy
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Attention to our requirements, as stated in the request • Capacity of organization
itself
105
South Asia Partnership Pakistan
(SAP-Pk)
106
Sectoral Focus by Funding Target Groups
Advocacy/ Research Institution Strengthening Women
Agriculture Legal Aid Children
Democracy Micro Credit Youth
Education Poverty Alleviation Minorities
Environment/ NRM Religion Low income groups
Gender Rural Development Farmers
Good Governance Vocational Training
Health Water Supply and Sanitation Women
Human Rights Youth
Information Dissemination
107
Funding Cycle and Procedure
Time lag between application and approval 150 days
Time lag between approval and disbursement 60 days
Will donor acknowledge receipt of proposal Yes
Will donor inform organization if project is not approved Yes
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website Yes
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language Yes
108
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted to Basis on which most proposals are turned down
DO
• Gaps in projects design; • Lack of organizational capacity;
• Unclear objectives, methodology; • Lack of women’s involvement;
• Unclear time plan; • Non-compliance with the SAP-PK’s funding policy;
• Un clear sustainability plan • Duplication of activities with some areas with other
• Un clear community, organizational contribution; and partner organization;
• Budget is not clear or without details • Track record of the organization does not support
project idea; and
• Lack of capacity/ expertise in the relevant project area/
sector
109
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) through Civil Society
HID Programme (CHIP)
110
Sectoral Focus by Funding Target Groups
Advocacy Information Dissemination Women
Children/ Girl Child Legal Aid Low income groups
Education (non-formal) Institution Strengthening
Environment/ Natural Resource Poverty Alleviation
Management Rural Development
Gender Vocational Training
Good Governance Women
Human Rights
111
Funding Cycle and Procedure
Time lag between approval and disbursement Activity Dependent
Will donor acknowledge receipt of proposal Yes
Will donor inform organization if project is not approved Yes
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language Yes
112
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Emphasis is on activities; • Not in SDC’s geographical focus; and
• Proposals lack clarity of purpose/ objectives; and • Proposals have sector focus other than that of SDC
• Lack clear/ concise information
113
The Asia Foundation
(TAF)
38 Khayaban-e-Iqbal, F – 7/3
Islamabad
Telephone: (051) 2650523, Fax: (051) 2650736
E-mail: [email protected]
Web: www.asiafound.org
114
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants/ Loans a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance b) Institutional development
c) Past track record
d) Geographical focus
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project Depends on case to case
Level of funding -
Duration of funding 1-6 Years
Time lag between application and approval 1 Month
Time lag between approval and disbursement 15 Days
Will donor acknowledge receipt of proposal Yes
Will donor inform organization if project is not approved Yes
115
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines No
Available on Website N/A
Are proposals accepted through the Website Yes
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language Yes
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Depending on funding
116
The World Bank (WB)
20-A Shahrah-e-Jamhuriat, G– 5
Islamabad
Telephone: (051) 2279641-7, Fax: (051) 2279648-9
E-mail: [email protected]
Web: www.worldbank.org.pk
117
Sectoral Focus by Funding Target Groups
Emergency Relief Rape and Violence
Energy Religion
Environment / NRM Reproductive Health
Forestry Rural Development
Gender Vocational Training
Good Governance Water Supply and Sanitation
Health Women
Housing Youth
118
Funding Cycle and Procedure
Time lag between approval and disbursement -
Will donor acknowledge receipt of proposal Yes
Will donor inform organization if project is not approved Yes
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines No
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
119
Trocaire
120
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants/ Loans a) Capital
b) Thematic focus b) Training/ Skill development
c) Capacity c) Information sharing, inputs
d) Governing body
e) Past track record
121
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• We expect a clear and well-planned proposal; and • We do not fund heavy construction costs of hospitals or
• Proposals should include a logical framework and a primary and secondary schools;
budget. • We limit funding of health care to small rural health
schemes, preventive medicine and co-ordination of
voluntary health services. Trocaire gives priority to
informal and functional types of education/ skills.
122
Trust for Voluntary Organizations
(TVO)
123
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance b) Capital
c) Capacity c) Training/ Skill development c) Institutional development
d) Governing body d) Provision of equipment
e) Past track record e) Information sharing, advise
f) Geographical focus f) Transport and vehicles
124
Donors Requirements Donors Obligations
e) Evaluation e) Timely disbursement of funds
f) Audit f) System development
g) Adherence to proposal g) Capacity building
h) Financial contribution h) Human resource development
i) Community participation
j) Sustainability strategy
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language Yes
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Relationship between proposed project activity and • Poor need assessment for the project; and
budget • Lacking of anticipating the project objectives
125
Unilever Pakistan Limited
(UPL)
1st Floor, Avari Plaza, Fatima Jinnah Road
Karachi
Telephone: (021) 5660062-9, Fax: (021) 5680918
E-mail: [email protected]
126
Funding Cycle and Procedure
Funding cycle begins Yearly budgeting
RO eligible for another project after one year Yes
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project Depends on case to case
Level of funding -
Duration of funding 1-3 Years
Time lag between application and approval -
Time lag between approval and disbursement -
Will donor acknowledge receipt of proposal Yes
Will donor inform organization if project is not approved Yes
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language Yes
127
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Lack of funds; and
• Projects that are not transparent/ auditable
128
United Nations Children Fund
(UNICEF)
129
Sectoral Focus by Funding Target Groups
Girl Child Women
Good Governance Youth
Health
130
Donors Requirements Donors Obligations
a) Transparency of implementation process a) Monitoring
b) Transparency of accounts b) Evaluation
c) Annual reports c) Technical advise
d) Monitoring d) Assistance in networking
e) Evaluation e) Timely disbursement of funds
f) Audit f) Capacity building
g) Adherence to proposal g) Human resource development
h) Financial contribution
i) Community participation
j) Sustainability strateg
k) Rights based organizations
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Lack of cohesion and compatibility with the objectives
of the country programme
131
United Nations Development Programme
(UNDP)
9th Floor, Saudi Pak Tower
Islamabad
Telephone: (051) 2800133, Fax: (051) 2800031-4
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.un.org.pk/undp
132
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance b) Institutional development
c) Capacity
d) Past track record
e) Geographical focus
133
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website -
Are proposals accepted through the Website Yes
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language -
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Involving stakeholders in design, monitoring and • Lack of community participation; and
evaluation • Lack of sustainability of project activities
134
United Nations Drug Control Programme
(UNDCP)
135
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants a) Operational
b) Capacity b) Technical assistance
c) Governing body c) Training/ Skill development
d) Past track record d) Provision of equipment
e) Information sharing, advise
136
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
137
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
(UNESCO)
Note: UNESCO primarily works with the Government, through which NGOs are also involved.
138
United Nations Population Fund
(UNFPA)
139
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants/ Loans a) Institutional development
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance
c) Capacity c) Provision of equipment
d) Past track record d) Transport and vehicles
e) Geographical focus
140
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website Yes
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Proposal should be focused, clearly define objectives, • If activities defined in the proposal do not fall within
activities; and the UNFPA mandate
• When where how and by whom
141
United States Agency for International Development
(USAID)
142
Funding Cycle and Procedure
Funding cycle begins October 1
RO eligible for another project after one year Depends on case to case
RO eligible for assistance within one funding cycle for another project Depends on case to case
Level of funding -
Duration of funding 1-3 Years
Time lag between application and approval 30 days
Time lag between approval and disbursement -
Will donor acknowledge receipt of proposal Yes
Will donor inform organization if project is not approved Yes
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website Yes
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
143
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Attention to our requirements, as stated in the request • Capacity of organization
itself
144
World Food Programme
(WFP)
145
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants/ Loans
b) Thematic focus b) Training/ Skill development
c) Capacity c) WFP uses food aid in Pakistan to
d) Governing body support health, education and creating
e) Past track record assets for rural women projects in
f) Geographical focus Pakistan
g) The selected districts have been
targeted on the basis of food insecurity.
RO have to be present in the selected
districts.
Level of funding -
Duration of funding 1-3 Years
Time lag between application and approval -
Time lag between approval and disbursement -
Will donor acknowledge receipt of proposal Yes
Will donor inform organization if project is not approved Yes
146
Donors Requirements Donors Obligations
a) Transparency of implementation process a) Monitoring
b) Transparency of accounts b) Evaluation
c) Monthly/ Quarterly/ Annual reports c) Technical advise
d) Monitoring d) Planning and designing support
e) Evaluation e) Timely disbursement of funds
f) Audit f) Systems development
g) Adherence to proposal g) Capacity building
h) Financial contribution
i) Community participation
j) Sustainability
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language Yes
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Country programme (2002-2004) is concentrated in 34
districts in Pakistan. The proposals by RO located
outside these districts are not entertained by WFP
147
World Health Organization
(WHO)
148
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Registration a) Grants/ Loans a) Operational
b) Thematic focus b) Technical assistance b) Capital
c) Capacity c) Training/ Skill development c) Institutional development
d) Governing body d) Provision of equipment
e) Past track record e) Information sharing, advise
f) Geographical focus f) Transport and vehicles
149
Donors Requirements Donors Obligations
a) Transparency of implementation process a) Monitoring
b) Transparency of accounts b) Evaluation
c) Monthly/ Quarterly/ Annual reports c) Technical advise
d) Monitoring d) Assistance in networking
e) Evaluation e) Planning and designing support
f) Audit f) Timely disbursement of funds
g) Adherence to proposal g) Systems development
h) Financial contribution h) Capacity building
i) Community participation i) Human resource development
j) Sustainability
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website Yes
Are proposals accepted through the Website Yes
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
150
World Population Foundation
(WPF)
151
Criteria for Eligibility Type of Support Provided Donor Position on Cost
a) Capacity a) Grants/ Loans a) Operational
b) Past track record b) Technical assistance b) Capital
c) Geographical focus c) Training/ Skill development
d) Provision of equipment
e) Information sharing, inputs
152
Proposal Submission
Any specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes
Available on Website No
Are proposals accepted through the Website No
Accept proposals in Urdu or other language No
Areas/ Gaps requiring improvement in proposals submitted Basis on which most proposals are turned down
to DO
• Need based; and • Performance in the past; and
• Evidence based • Interaction with the past and present donors
153
Annex I
List of Organizations Contacted
1. ABN Amro Bank Ltd
2. ActionAid Pakistan (AAPk)
3. Acumen Fund, USA
4. Aga Khan Foundation Pakistan (AKF,P)
5. Agro-Forestry Foundation for Poverty Alleviation
6. Ali Shabbir Trust
7. Amir Sultan Chinoy Foundation
8. Asian Development Bank (ADB)
9. Australian Agency for International Development (AusAId)
10. Aziz Tabba Foundation
11. Bahaduryar Jang Foundation
12. British High Commission (BHC)
13. Canadian International Development Agency, Canada Fund for Local Initiatives (CIDA - CFLI)
14. Catholic Relief Services (CRS)
15. Church World Service – Pakistan/ Afghanistan CWS – P/A
16. Climax Foundation
17. Concern Pakistan (CP)
18. Dar-ul-Islam Al-Khairyia Foundation
19. Developments in Literacy (DIL)
20. Department for International Development (DFID)
21. Embassy of the Republic of Austria
22. Embassy of the Republic of Finland
23. Embassy of the French Republic
24. Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany
25. Embassy of Japan – Grassroots Assistance Programme (GRA)
26. Embassy of the Republic of Italy
27. Embassy of Sweden
28. Embassy of Switzerland
29. European Union – Delegation of the European Commission in Pakistan (EC)
154
Annex I
List of Organizations Contacted
30. Fancy Foundation
31. Food & Agricultural Organization (FAO)
32. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES)
33. Friedrich Naumann Stiftung (FNSt)
34. Gender Equality Project – DFID funded, British Council managed (GEP)
35. German Technical Cooperation (GTZ)
36. Global Environment Facility – Small Grant Programme – UNDP
37. Governance and Gender Unit – UNDP
38. Habib Foundation
39. Haji Yaqoob Wali Mohammad Gandhi Foundation
40. Hamza Foundation
41. Hans Sidesal Foundation (HSF)
42. Henrich Boll Foundation (HBF)
43. High Commission of Australia
44. ICI Pakistan Foundation
45. Infaq Foundation
46. International Catholic Migration Commission (ICMC)
47. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
48. International Labour Organization (ILO)
49. International Monetary Fund (IMF)
50. International Organization for Migration (IOM)
51. Islamic Relief
52. Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC)
53. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
54. John M Lloyd Foundation
55. KfW Bank
56. Micro-Finance Social Development Fund/ Community Investment Fund (MSDF/CIF)
57. Multi-Support Unit/SAP
58. Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD)
155
Annex I
List of Organizations Contacted
59. National Trust for Population Welfare (NATPOW)
60. OXFAM – Oxford Committee for Famine Relief (OXFAM)
61. Pakistan Poverty Alleviation Fund (PPAF)
62. Pepsi Foundation Pakistan
63. Plan International
64. Polka Foundation
65. Programme for the Advancement of Gender Equality (PAGE)
66. Reckitt & Coleman Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd
67. Royal Danish Embassy
68. Royal Netherlands Embassy (RNE)
69. Save the Children – UK (SC-UK)
70. Save the Children – US (SC-US)
71. Sharf-e-Hayat Foundation
72. Shell Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd
73. Shirazi Foundation
74. Sight Savers International (SSI)
75. South Asia Partnership Pakistan (SAP-PK)
76. Stanndard Charted Bank Limited
77. Strengthening Participatory Organization (SPO)
78. Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)
79. Civil Society HID Programme International (CHIP)
80. The Asia Foundation (TAF)
81. The British Council
82. The Royal Embassy of Belgium
83. The Sterling Foundation
84. The World Bank (WB)
85. Trocaire
86. Trust for Voluntary Organizations (TVO)
87. UNAIDS/ Pakistan (UNAIDS)
156
Annex I
List of Organizations Contacted
88. Unilever Paksitan (Pvt.) Ltd
89. United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF)
90. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
91. United Nations Drug Control Programme (UNDCP)
92. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
93. United Nations Information Centre (UNIC)
94. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO)
95. United Nations Joint Logistics Centre
96. UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian (UNCH)
97. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)
98. United Nations Special Mission for Afghanistan
99. Voluntary Services Overseas (VSO)
100. World Food Programme (WFP)
101. World Population Foundation (WPF)
102. World Health Organization (WHO)
157
Annex II
1. A diversity of income sources is the best way to become financially independent. Due to their non-profit status, many NGOs
may not immediately be in the position to generate enough income to allow them to decrease their dependence on external funding,
however costrecovery, volunteerism and money derived from private donations, for example, can be an important source of revenue.
When drawing out a financial plan, consider alternative options to international donors. An ability to find some portion of funding
through alternative sources will always strengthen your chances of raising funds with international donors.
2. Do not place all you eggs in one basket. There are several international donors from different levels and with different policies. Diversify
your donor base and invest time in building relationships with more than one donor at a time. Spread your risks and build a more stable
financial base. This way if one donors policies change or they are no longer willing to provide funds then you have other partnerships to
rely on. At the same time working with too many donors can be time consuming and difficult to manage.
3. Identifying and even contacting donors does not necessarily have to wait for the completion of the proposal. You can start identifying
donors as soon as the initial design, or the basic idea, is complete. The first stage in identifying a donor is to find out about as many
agencies as possible that might have an interest in funding your project, especially those donors that have funded similar projects to
yours. Understand the donors requirements and their priority interests before approaching them with concept papers or proposals. Most
donors have web sites or information materials describing their sectoral interests and priorities. This directory also aids you to identify the
areas of interest of donors.
4. Get donors to appreciate and understand your strategic choices rather then developing proposals aiming to appease donors and their
priorities.
5. Allow for time. It is not easy to generate funds. Raising funds for small projects can take 6 to 8 months and for larger projects (of 3 to 5
years duration) over a year. It may be better to approach a donor with a one-year proposal, establish links and a rapport and then apply
for a longer-term proposal.
158
Annex II
Submitting Proposals
6. NGOs need to invest more in their own organizational development. This means more attention to research, learning, monitoring and
evaluation, so that the all-important link between performance measurement and accountability can be strengthened. Above all, it means
be clear about the over all direction of the organization and its function in society. Do not develop and raise funds for projects which are
devoid of a larger programmatic goal.
7. Some donors (especially larger ones) do prefer submission of concept papers that can save time for all parties. Find out if the agency
would be interested in a short (2-5 page) concept paper before submitting a detailed proposal.
8. Before making an application do read the donors requirements thoroughly and ensure that all are met through your application. Donors
often reject proposals because they are incomplete. Before sending the proposal double check to ensure full compliance with the donor’s
requirements.
9. Be specific and to the point in your communication with donors. When few sentences will suffice, do not write a page.
10. Once you have submitted your proposal do try and identify a contact persons and follow up periodically with them. However respect the
donor’s procedures and norms.
11. Wait for final approval of the grant, in writing, before embarking upon project activities.
12. Do not hesitate to negotiate the terms of the contracts. You are developing a partnership, the terms of which may be adjusted by
both partners upon mutual agreement. One example of this is if there are multiple donors funding a programme then often joint
reporting on the whole program, may be acceptable to the donors.
13. Develop written contracts. This ensures that there is a clear understanding of the roles and responsibilities of both partners. Most donors
have standardized contracts or letters of agreement. Ensure that any adjustments that are made are done so in writing and approved by
both parties.
14. Once a proposal has been accepted be fully aware and mindful of your obligations/ responsibilities. Ensure that contractual obligations
are fully met. Your reputation with one donor is often communicated to others and your ability to perform and your effectiveness is the
best way of increasing your chances for future funding. Work hard at demonstrating credibility and maintaining trust.
159
Annex II
15. Be transparent. If savings are made in one sphere, request your donor to adjust budget lines elsewhere. If you have money left over
then request no cost extensions. If you do not conduct certain activities explain why, and suggest alternative courses of action. Do
not try and make such adjustments on your own without written approval from the donor.
160
Annex III
SPECIMEN1
Section One
Name __________________________________________________________________
Address ________________________________________________________________
Telephone ______________________________________________________________
Fax ____________________________________________________________________
Email __________________________________________________________________
Name __________________________________________________________________
Designation _____________________________________________________________
V. Does the organization have a written strategic/ management plan? (Tick the relevant box)
1
With due acknowledgements to CIDA
161
Annex III
Project Proposal Form
Application Form
Yes ___ No ____
If yes, please attach a copy. In addition, please attach organizations’ brochure/introductory flyers
If no, please provide _ page write up on organization’s vision in the next five years.
VI. Who is responsible for implementing the proposed project and submitting narrative and financial reports?
VII. Certification
I hereby certify that the information given in this form is true to the best of my knowledge.
162
Annex III
Project Proposal Form
Application Form
Section Two
I. Describe the history, goals and objectives of the organization – (1/2 page)
II. Describe the current work and funding agencies/ donors of the organization. Please also provide details if funds for this proposed
project have been requested from sources other than donor (1 page)
IV. How does the proposed project contribute to the organization’s mandate? – (1/2 page)
163
Annex III
Project Proposal Form
Application Form
VI. How will the proposed project be sustained after this funding ends?
VII. Please provide a detailed budget of the proposed project. Please use the following format as an example for describing breakdown of
overhead and programme costs, sources of funding (including contribution from the requesting organizations as well as other sources, if
relevant).
164
Annex III
165
Annex III
Total 1+2+3
Grand Total
Donor Contribution
Own Contribution
Contribution from other sources, if relevant
Total Project Cost
2
Non-monetary contribution like premises/ office space, staff, volunteers’ time, etc.
166
Annex IV
Acronym:_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
3. Name and Designation of Contact Person (s) for liaison with Recipient Organization (RO):
______________________________________________________________________________
167
Annex IV
8. Number of Project proposals received during 2001 ________ Percentage Accepted ________
168
Annex IV
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
169
Annex IV
170
Annex IV
25. Is the RO eligible for assistance for another project after one funding cycle
a) Yes b) No c) Depends on case to case
171
Annex IV
26. Is the RO eligible for assistance for another project within one funding cycle
a) Yes b) No c) Depends on case to case
172
Annex IV
30. Will donor inform RO if project is not approved Yes _______ No _______
31. Does Donor have specific proposal forms/ guidelines Yes ______ No _______
32. Are these forms available on Donors website Yes _______ No _______
33. Are proposals accepted through your website Yes _______ No _______
34. Do you accept proposals in Urdu or other languages Yes _______ No _______
_____________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
173
Annex IV
36. What are some areas/ gaps that need improvement in proposals submitted to your DO?
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
37. How would you rate your overall experience of supporting NGOs in Pakistan
(a) Very Good _____ (b) Good ______ (c) Satisfactory ______ (d) Not Satisfactory ______
The views expressed in this directory, reviews etc are those of the authors, and statement of fact appearing in the directory are made on
the responsibility of the participating organizations alone and not to imply the endorsement of NGO Resource Centre.
174
Annex V
Statistical Tables
City in Pakistan/ Location of Donors
Islamabad 44 84.6
Outside Pakistan 4 7
Karachi 3 5.7
Lahore 1 1.9
Total 52 100
Outside
Pakistan
Karachi
Lahore
85%
175
Annex V
Statistical Tables
Sub Offices in Pakistan
Yes 16 30.7
No 36 69.2
Total 52 100
USA 13 25
UK 9 17
Pakistan 5 9.6
Germany 4 7.6
Japan 3 5.7
Switzerland 3 5.7
Italy 3 5.7
Canada 2 3.8
Netherlands 2 3.8
Misc. 8 15.3
Total 52 100
176
Annex V
Statistical Tables
Started Operations in Pakistan
1950 – 1960 13 25
1961 – 1970 5 9.6
1971 – 1980 3 5.7
1981 – 1990 11 21.1
1991 – 2000 10 19.2
2001 on 5 9.6
No Response 5 9.6
Total 52 100
Type of Donor
177
Annex V
Statistical Tables
Local
Nonprofits
21% Embassy/
Consulate
Other
23%
178
Annex V
Statistical Tables
100
87 Women
80 73 69 Low income
group
60 Children
44 42
37 Youth
40
20 Minorities
Others
0
Geographical Coverage
National 48 92.3
Provincial 1 1.9
Districts 1 1.9
International 1 1.9
No Response 1 1.9
Total 52 100
179
Annex V
Statistical Tables
Costs cover by Donors
100
Operational
77
80 69
60
42 Institutional
40 Development
20
Capital
0
180
Annex V
Statistical Tables
100 83
63 62 56 52
50
23
13
0
181
Annex V
Statistical Tables
Duration of Funding
182
Annex V
Statistical Tables
Donors Requirements
Donors Obligations
183
Annex V
Statistical Tables
Donors Requirements
Communication
Donor Practices
184
Annex V
Statistical Tables
Experience of supporting NGOs in Pakistan
Experience of Supporting to
NGOs in Pakistan Good
2%
13%
Satisfactory
No Response
17% 47%
Very Good
Not
21% Satisfactory
185
Annex V
Statistical Tables
Thematic Focus
186
Annex V
Statistical Tables
Thematic Focus
187
Annex V
Statistical Tables
Thematic Areas
Gender Education
Health Women
Institution Strengthening Poverty Alleviation
Reproductive Health Human Rights
Children Good Governance
80
63
58 56 54
60 52 50
48 46
42 42
40
20
188