Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Img 0003

    Uploaded by

    gsanchez2014
    The document appears to be a rubric for evaluating a persuasive essay on whether the atomic bombs should have been dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The rubric assesses several elements of the essay including the thesis statement, sequencing of arguments, evidence and examples used, analysis, grammar and spelling, and sources. For each element, the rubric provides descriptors to evaluate the essay as excellent, good, average, or poor.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Img 0003

    Uploaded by

    gsanchez2014
    8 views1 page
    The document appears to be a rubric for evaluating a persuasive essay on whether the atomic bombs should have been dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The rubric assesses several elements of the essay including the thesis statement, sequencing of arguments, evidence and examples used, analysis, grammar and spelling, and sources. For each element, the rubric provides descriptors to evaluate the essay as excellent, good, average, or poor.

    Original Title

    IMG_0003

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document appears to be a rubric for evaluating a persuasive essay on whether the atomic bombs should have been dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The rubric assesses several elements of the essay including the thesis statement, sequencing of arguments, evidence and examples used, analysis, grammar and spelling, and sources. For each element, the rubric provides descriptors to evaluate the essay as excellent, good, average, or poor.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    8 views1 page

    Img 0003

    Uploaded by

    gsanchez2014
    The document appears to be a rubric for evaluating a persuasive essay on whether the atomic bombs should have been dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The rubric assesses several elements of the essay including the thesis statement, sequencing of arguments, evidence and examples used, analysis, grammar and spelling, and sources. For each element, the rubric provides descriptors to evaluate the essay as excellent, good, average, or poor.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    t'our Rubric Persuasive Essay: Drop the bomb?

    ilt',\l
    Percuasive
    Teacher Name:

    *
    The thesis statement outlines some all of the main points to be but does not name the thesis statement does name the topicAND not preview what will

    tr.

    Otto

    Student Namg:

    CATEGORY

    Focus or Thesis Statement

    thesis statement the topic of the and ouflines the

    thesis statrament the topic of the

    Sequencing
    makes it easy and

    few of the support details or Many of the support provided in a fairly arguments are not in an expeded ils or arguments are order that makes it or logical order, distracting the not in an expected or easy to follow reader and making the essay seem order, distracting author\\Ys tmin of the reader and making the

    Evidence and Examples

    Most of the evidenoe and and explanations that show how piee of evidence and explanations
    girren that show how piece of evidence

    least one of the pieces of and exannples evidence and examples is relevant are NOT relevantAND/OR and has an explanation that shows are not explained. how that piece ofevidence supports author\\Ys position.

    the author\\\'s

    Analysis

    is present but back to the

    is present at some point in essay and may not tie directly completely off-topic. to the thesis but does make an aryument with the evidence,

    eplains and/or
    effectively counters it make thesis stronger. i but analysis is
    very efuctive-

    , resulting in a paragraph

    counterargument nor rebukes iL The counter may be missing.

    Srammar &

    1-2 enors

    ipelling

    spelling

    makes 3-4 errors in or spelling that distract the

    makes rnore than 4


    rn

    grammar or

    that distract the readerfrom the content.

    iources

    quotes, statistics and are credible and cited

    Most soures used for quotes, statistics and facts statistics and facts are credible and are credible and most are cited coneclly,

    Many sources are suspect (not credible) AND/OR are not cited conectly.

    ate Created: Jan 06,

    &
    (.tr.# oL
    tJ tq
    r

    f3
    -1S
    )

    tp://rubistar.4reachers.orslindex.php?soeen=customizeTemprateprint&

    (':\,!

    1\

    .,\
    L

    YPase

    of2

    t\.*a Ui,kA

    .{;l"'4vf.?,)-i\ws (gl- tr tf\It1,7x^N

    You might also like