Performance of A 4-Switch, 3-Phase Inverter Fed Induction Motor (IM) Drive System
Performance of A 4-Switch, 3-Phase Inverter Fed Induction Motor (IM) Drive System
Performance of A 4-Switch, 3-Phase Inverter Fed Induction Motor (IM) Drive System
Web Site: www.ijettcs.org Email: [email protected], [email protected] Volume 2, Issue 2, March April 2013 ISSN 2278-6856
Performance of a 4- switch, 3-phase inverter fed induction motor (IM) drive system
Prof. Suraj R.Karpe1
1
Abstract: This project proposes the performance of a 4switch, 3-phase inverter fed induction motor (IM) drive system for high performance industrial drive systems. The reduction of the number of power switches from six to four improves the cost-effectiveness, volume-compactness and reliability of the three phase inverters. This reduces the cost of the inverter, the switching losses, and the complexity of the control algorithms and interface circuits to generate 6 PWM logic signals. Furthermore, the proposed control approach reduces the computation for real-time implementation. In this paper, a simulation model of the drive system is developed and analyzed in order to verify the effectiveness of the approach. The complete vector control scheme for the IM drive fed from the proposed 4S3P inverter is implemented in real-time using digital signal processor for a prototype 1 hp motor. Theoretical and experimental results of the proposed drive verify the robustness of the drive. A performance comparison of the proposed IS3P inverter fed drive with a conventional 6S3P inverter fed drive is also mode in terms of speed response and total harmonic distortion (THI)) of the stator current. Simulation results show that the proposed drive system provides a fast speed response and good disturbance rejection capability.
The proposed method provides a simple way to select either three, or four vectors to synthesize the desired output voltage during the switching period. In the proposed approach, the selection between three or four vectors is parameterized by a single variable .The influence of different switching patterns on output voltage symmetry, current waveform, switching frequency and common mode voltage is examined. The paper also discusses how the use of the wye and delta connections of the motor windings affects the implementation of the pulse width modulator.
2. PROPOSED TECHNOLOGY
The block diagram of the proposed system is shown in Fig.1.The drive system consists of a 3 phase AC supply, 3 phase Diode bridge Rectifier, 3 phase four switch Inverter, 3-phase Induction Motor and controlled circuits (Xilinx processor and Driver circuit). The standard AC power supply is converted to a DC by using a 3-phase diode bridge rectifier. A voltage source FSTPI is used to convert the DC voltage to the controlled AC voltage. The output of FSTPI is fed to 3-phase induction motor. VHDL program is used in Xilinx software to generate the controlled PWM pulses at different duty ratio for FSTPI to drive the Induction Motor at different speeds.
Keywords: FPGA-Field Programmable Gate Array, FSTPI- Four Switch Three Phase Inverter, IM-Induction Motor, PWM-Pulse Width Modulation, THD-Total Harmonic Distortion.
1. INTRODUCTION
A standard three-phase voltage source inverter utilizes three legs [six-switch three-phase voltage source inverter, with a pair of complementary power switches per phase. The fstpi structure generates four active vectors in the plane, instead of six, as generated by the sstpi topology. A reduced switch count voltage source inverter [four switch three-phase voltage source inverter uses only two legs, with four switches. Several articles report on fstpi structure regarding inverter performance and switch control. This paper presents a general method to generate pulse width modulated (pwm) signals for control of fourswitch, three phase voltage source inverters, even when there are voltage oscillations across the two dc-link capacitors. The method is based on the so called space vector modulation, and includes the scalar version. This permits to implement all alternatives, thus allowing for a fair comparison of the different modulation techniques. Volume 2, Issue 2 March April 2013
3. FSTPI
Page 63
Scope
1
C
SaU
m E m E
c1
SbU
ir,is (A)
A B C Vabc Iabc Tm A m B C a b c <Rotor current ir _a (A)> <Stator current is _a (A)> <Rotor speed (wm)>
Vin
-Krpm N (rpm )
c2
m E
SaL
SbL
E
wm Pulses is_abc
Page 65