Capital Adequacy: Risk Acceptable - Not Acceptable - Probability of Failure Maximum Loss Acceptable (Catastrophic)

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

CAPITAL ADEQUACY

Overriding regulatory requirements Board of an Insurance Co. responsibility to determine Co.s risk appetite Risk acceptable not acceptable probability of failure Maximum loss acceptable (catastrophic) FSA requires probability of failure ( one chance / 200 ) Risk appetite statement says criteria investment policy reinsurance policy Appropriate level of capital to hold risk base capital

Minimum capital requirement (MCR), base capital resources requirement higher of a flat monetary figure premium based and claims based 15% - 25% of gross premium written Solvency ll directives risk base replacement for solvency l, FSA believes that MCR is insufficient Adequate having regard to the size and nature of the business Insurer to determine capital resources requirement (CRR) individual capital assessment (ICA) Calculating the ICA encourages management to take responsibility of its own business not externally exposed

Major sources of risk include credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, insurance risk, concentration risk, residual risk, business risk, interest rate risk

MAINTAINING CAPITAL ADEQUACY


Monitor the adequacy, in excess of the regulatory requirement, no violation Issue new shares Issue long term debt Switching out of assets which are not allowed Reducing the business Purchasing reinsurance

SOLVENCY LL
Fundamental review of the capital adequacy Effective risk management process Demonstrate adequate financial resource Demonstrate adequate system of governance Supervisory review process Public disclosure and regulatory reporting Roll of actuary non life should also hire indispensable to an adequate system of governance Implementation on 2012 ICA, ECR enable the FSA to give ICG to firms if appropriate Recommended a capital requirement for a particular firm

You might also like