Electropolishing Guide

Electropolishing Using Ionic Liquids
John Collins C-Tech Innovation Ltd Chester, UK
What is Electropolishing?
Opposite to electroplating i.e. dissolves metal off. Metal preferentially removed from peaks to create a smoother (polished surface). Done for visual effect, decreased wear, better hygene and improved corrosion resistance. Vast majority of industrial electropolishing carried out on austenitic stainless steel.
Before
After
Current Industrial Electropolishing
Uses sulphuric and phosphoric acids Low current efficiency (10 20%) due to O2 evolution at anode. Leads to a mist of H2SO4 - corrosive Polishing mechanism involves film formation at the anode. Current process involves tank containing 1-50 tonnes of electrolyte Large amounts of Fe/Cr containing acidic effluent and sludge are currently produced.
Ethaline 200
Range of liquids have been studied but it is only the glycol based liquids which show polishing characteristics. Optimum liquid is Ethaline 200 1ChCl + 2 (HOCH2)2 Fortuitous due to cost, toxicity, availability and physical characteristics
Physical Property Viscosity (cP) Conductivity (mScm1) Density (gcm-3) Acid 54 20 1.76 Ethaline 200 48 5.99 1.1
Electropolishing
Electropolished Pre-polished
Electropolishing
Electropolished Unpolished
Mechanism
To optimise the process conditions it is necessary to understand the dissolution mechanism Electrode Mx+ In water a film is known to form at the electrode surface, but the nature of the film and the mass rate limiting species are disputed
Cl-, Glycol or H2O Film
Voltammetry
Apparently different polishing method 316 Stainless steel at 10 mV s-1 H2SO4
Ionic liquid (ChCl + 2 (HOCH2)2)
Impedance spectroscopy
No evidence of film formation therefore confirming that mechanism is different Using an ionic liquid saturated with Fe/Cr shows a similar response to that in a fresh solution metal transport not mass limiting Electropolishing is equally good when liquid is saturated.
See University of Leicester for more details of possible polishing mechanisms
Effect of Water
water content / wt %
Ionic liquids are hygroscopic but the adsorption of water is slow and reaches an equilibrium composition of c.a. 5 wt% when the bath is at 45 oC. Up to 5 % water does not detract from the polish quality (in fact it improves it) Above 10 wt% the liquids do not electropolish.
12
10
25 C o 45 C o used at 45 C
0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
time / days
Hull Cell Tests
Optimum polishing obtained at 70 > c.d. >50 mAcm-2 C.f. >100 mAcm-2 in acid
At low c.d. the surface became dull due to pitting Partial oxide coverage leads uneven metal dissolution
300 Series
Polished
up
Unpolished
p
Polishing
Unpolished
Polished
AFM images
300 Series Results o Excellent results on a small scale, pressed components with internal surfaces. o On larger scale testing, results are virtually identical. o Electro-polishing achieves results comparable to acid-based polishing media. o Results on cast pieces very good compared with conventional electropolishing.
300 Series Process Uniform removal of oxide film before polishing is critical to the quality of the polishing. Initial work used a higher potential etch before the polish. While this worked well at laboratory studies, it was not suitable for production. The pre-etch has been replaced by addition of around 1% of a simple additive. Process conditions :
Current density 50 100 mA/cm2 @ typically 6V Time 10 15 minutes Temperature 35C No agitation Stainless steel cathodes Current Efficiency 80-90% with marginal gassing.
Pre-Treatment
Conventional
Degrease ? Pickle (Nitric/HF) ? Rinse
Ethaline based
Degrease Pickle (HCl 5%) Rinse & Dry
Scale-up
Currently operating on 1300 kg at Anopol in Birmingham Standard tank, pump and fittings (PE, PP and nylon) Stainless steel cathodes Titanium anode jig
Negligible gassing at anode
Scale-up
Mobile demonstrator: Three detachable units Degrease rinse, rinse Pickle rinse, rinse Electropolish rinse, rinse
Features: Cascade rinse Extraction Air agitation Low-ripple rectifier Temp. control and filtration
Scale-up
Automated modular system (50 l)

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. phosphoric acid degreaser rinse electropolish rinse spray rinse nitric acid passivation spray rinse rinse
Encoder rings polished at 6V for 10 minutes
Recycling
Metal Iron Chromium Nickel Saturation conc. / ppm 66746 9150 3135
Ionic liquid has high solubility for metal ions The iron glycolate complex forms a sludge at the base of the tank that can be filtered and isolated The liquid still operates despite use for > 1 year
Recycling
Recycling process has been developed using water to precipitate the metal
Water is then distilled from the liquid No electrolytic breakdown products have been detected Process results in a loss of glycol primarily through precipitation with the iron and some physical loss through distillation
Process Benefits
Improved current efficiency (90+%) (economic)

Benign liquid ChCl/glycol (social) Less gas evolution (environmental) Metal recoverable (environmental) Electrolyte regeneration (environmental). Better surface finish (market) Non-corrosive (social). Also suitable for high nickel alloys (market)
Nickel Alloys New process developed for high performance Ni/Co alloys Big-end bearing fixing bolts for an F1 engine manufactured All trials on polishing of high Ni content alloys have all been successful!. One of the most reliable / consistent IL electropolishing processes. Good solubility of Ni oxide in Ethaline
ONGOING E200 can polish Titanium but high potentials and high current densities are required to remove the oxide layer. Additives can reduce the potential required to strip the oxide. Uniform oxide removal is the key to successful titanium polishing.
Titanium
Polishing
Conclusions and future work Reliable / consistent electropolishing of
pressed and cast 300 series stainless steel parts in Ethaline 200. Simple additives give excellent finish comparable to current industrial process (aqueous acid), scale-up successful for small pieces and castings Polishing of high Ni content alloys successful and consistent. Very encouraging results continue for polishing of Ti and Ti alloys. Demonstrator unit built which will initially be used within the IONMET consortium.
Acknowledgements
EU FP6 NMP programme for funding of IONMET. University of Leicester for much of the work presented here. In particular Prof Andy Abbott, Dr Karl Ryder and Dr Katy Mckenzie. Jacques Halut of Protection de Metaux, France for some of the work on titanium. Dr Karen Brace and Pete Eddowes at C-Tech for assistance with titanium and stainless steel polishing. Brian Swain & Daniel Wheeler of Anopol.

Electropolishing Guide

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Electropolishing Guide

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Electropolishing Guide

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Electropolishing Using Ionic Liquids

John Collins C-Tech Innovation Ltd Chester, UK

Current Industrial Electropolishing

Cl-, Glycol or H2O Film

Apparently different polishing method 316 Stainless steel at 10 mV s-1 H2SO4

Ionic liquid (ChCl + 2 (HOCH2)2)

Hull Cell Tests

Negligible gassing at anode

Automated modular system (50 l)

Encoder rings polished at 6V for 10 minutes

Improved current efficiency (90+%) (economic)

Conclusions and future work Reliable / consistent electropolishing of

You might also like