التحديات التي تواجه رأى مراجعي الحسابات حال إصدار تقرير

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15

2010/2009

Abstract
The research aims primarily to highlight on the challenges that faced the
auditors when they are issuance an opinion on the financial statements for
environmental sensitivity companies , in particular, these companies mostly do
not disclose about negative environmental information because their potential
impact on the extent of going concern assumption , On the other hand the impact
of the repercussions of such information on the decisions of prospective and
existing investors , knowing that most of the descriptive information that may
lead to distortion in the professional estimate and its impact on the type of report
to be released
1

The paper was reviewed for a number of Foreign Studies that dealt with
some of the challenges and varied among themselves only with the researcher
believes that the most important challenges that omitted these studies are
educated about mechanisms that support their professional estimate because the
audit process governed by the running cost (fees) based on the hours planned to
complete the audit process , which have an impact on the type of report for such
companies.
The applied study concluded on a sample of companies that belong to
environmentally sensitive sector , a sector cement industry that the majority of
reports issued by the offices of accounting and local members of the accounting
firms and a global review free of any reservation on the audit of such
companies, which means that environmental aspects in Egypt , no elevate for
attention by the auditors due to a number of challenges can be summed up some
of the following: low cultural awareness of the importance of environmental
auditing, the high cost of the review process compared to fees, the absence of
strict legislation against the companies, the lack of a standard review or guide
focus on issues of the environment and duties of the Auditor to be verified.
Based on the foregoing , the researcher is presenting a series of
recommendations are as follows:
1.
Review the need to develop programs consistent with the
nature of the industry such firms.
2.
Qualification and training of auditors on how to verify the
non-financial environmental information and their impact on the
assumption of continuity.
3.
Need to focus on accounting and auditing environmental
polychlorinated colleges trade at Egyptian universities to graduate
accounting auditors future than they have the scientific background
that qualifies them to measure the role of measurement and
disclosure, and then review the environmental information of
financial and non-financial.

:

Environmentally Intensive Companies



.

SAS No 54 ( AICPA )
2

1998


) . (Roussey , 1992
) ( Joseph F. Brazel , 2007



.



1862 -


.




.

Triple-bottom-
line


1970 )
(Robins , 1991

:


,



) (28 .
3


















.
:
-1
-2

-3

-4

:




) : 1998 ,
( 24-13



2004 2006 .
:
4





1992
178
) 1992Qui ,
(rke, Brendan 1994
1985 .
) (Denis Desautels , 1993 : P 43
Environment E Economy
Effectiveness . Efficiency

:





.

:




.

:
:
:
:

.
:

.

:
5

:
.1
.



.

:
.1

.2
.
.3
.
.4
.5

.1
.
Water Environment Federation
( ) www.wef.org/GovesnmentAffairs

,
,
,

.



.
www.iccwbo.org



.
) ( ICC , 1991


.
) IIA Research foundation
( study,92

.
) 1998 ,
: ( 8 :

.
)Gray and
(CAOLISON , 1991
.
7

) (Maltby , 1995, P16




.
))



(( .
) . (
)(Cambpell and Byington , 1995
:
-1 .
-2 .
-3
. .
-4 .
-5
.
-6 .

.2
.
: 2-1 )(Peter Letma and Roges k . Doost 2000 ,



.
8


.

1997 :
-1 3 6
. 19
-2 10 25 100
.
-3 .
-4
-5 .

,
.

),,,(



.
: 2-2 (Sylvia Van Leeuwen , 2004) :

.

Receipts

.


.


.
) SAIS) Supreme Audit Institutions
SAIS

.
9


.
: 2-3 )( Chritina Chiana , Margaret Lightbody ,2004


1990
.

.

2001
%76
passing fad
%77 .


.
%52
Audit Practitioners
.
%25 ,
, %23


.



,



.



.
10



.

.
: 2-4 )( Menmet Ozbirecikli ,2007
"
" CPAS



1970 2000 .
:
: CPAS

.
: CPAS

.
: 1970
1989
1990 2000


CPAS
CPAS
.
: ,
CPAS

.
: 2-5 ): ( Anita Jose and Shang Meilee , 2007

200
.
:
, , ,
11

, , ,
.

:
-1
% 60 %40


%29
.
-2
.
,


%27
%21



: 2-6 )(Venkataraman et all , 2008
legal
liability
Initial Public
, (Offering (IPO IPO
.
,


) ( IPO
.
IPO

.

12

.3
.



.
.
:

2003

Deloitte

2004

Deloitte

2005

Deloitte

2006

Deloitte


2003

KMPG

2004

KMPG

2005

KMPG

2006

KMPG

2003

KMPG

2004

KMPG

2005

KMPG

2006

KMPG
2003

Horwath
2004

Horwath
2005

Horwath
2006

Horwath
13

2003

2004

2005
2006

.4


Deloitte

Ernst & Young


Ernst & Young
Deloitte



) (1



.



) (
.





:

.
:

.1
.

.2

.

.3

1

)
(
2008
14

.5

1.
Anita Jose and Shang Mei Lee , " Environmental Reporting of Global
Corporations : A Content Analysis Based on Website Disclosures " , Journal Of
Business Ethics (2007) , pp .307-321
1.

Christina Chiang and Margaret Light body , " Financial auditors and
environmental auditing in New Zealand " , Managerial Auditing Journal , ( Vol
19 , No.2 , 2004 ) , pp . 224-234

2.

Environmental Audit , Water Environmental . Federation , 1992 ,


Available from : www.wef.org/Government.Affairs

3.

Joseph F. Brazel , " A Field Investigation of Auditors Use of


Brainstorming in the Consideration of Fraud " Electronic copy of this paper is
available at : http://ssrn.com/abstract .

4.

McNamee, David , " The fourth 'E': An interview with L. Denis


Desautels " , The Internal Auditor , (Springs: Apr 1993. Vol. 50, Iss. 2) pp. 4246

5.

Mehmet zbirecikli , " A Review on How CPAs Should Be Involved in


Environmental Auditing and Reporting for the Core Aim of It ",2007. Vol. 5,
Iss. 2; pg. 113, 14 pgs Available from : www.proquest.com

6.

Peter Letmathe and Roger K. Doost , " Environmental cost accounting and
auditing " , Managerial Auditing Journal. Bradford , (Vol. 15, Iss.8 ,
2000 ) , pp.424

7.

Quirke, Brendan , " Environmental Auditing: What's It All About? " ,


Management Accounting. London , 0(: Mar 1992. Vol. 70, Iss. 3) ; pp 34-35

8.

SYLVIA VAN LEEUWEN , "Auditing International Environmental

Agreements : The Role of Supreme Audit Institutions " , (2005) . Available


from : /www.proquest.com.
9.

Venkataraman et al , " Litigation Risk , Audit Quality and Audit Fees :


Evidence from Initial Public Offering " The Accounting Review , (Sep 2008 ,
Vol , 83 , No 05) , pp 1315-1345

10.

Water Environment Federation, www.wef.org/GovesnmentAffairs

15

You might also like