IPS e Max Clinical Guide
IPS e Max Clinical Guide
IPS e Max Clinical Guide
CLINICAL GUIDE
Table of Contents
Introduction | Indication
10
12
Cementation options
14
18
Clinical cases
29
33
Literature
35
The demand for all-ceramic restorations has dramatically increased in recent years and aesthetic dentistry would be unthinkable without them. In addition, all-ceramic materials are increasingly used as an alternative to metal-ceramics. Because of its unrivalled aesthetic properties, the IPS Empress all-ceramic system rapidly established itself as a recognized standard among the all-ceramic restoration systems. Thanks to IPS Empress, the press technique has evolved into a state-of-the-art procedure within the past 15 years. Cost-effective CAD/CAM procedures and high-strength zirconium oxide ceramics for dental applications are currently experiencing a considerable upswing in popularity. IPS e.max is the rst system to combine the benets of both, the PRESS and CAD/CAM technique, offering highly aesthetic and high-strength materials for both technologies. IPS e.max allows you to provide your patients with highly personalized restorations that offer outstanding aesthetics and the mechanical stability that the individual situation demands.
PRESS technology
Framework materials
CAD/CAM technology
Layering material
Introduction | Indication
Indication
Veneers Partial crowns Anterior and posterior crowns Three-unit anterior bridges Three-unit premolar bridges Three-unit posterior bridges 4- to 6-unit anterior bridges 4- to 6-unit posterior bridges Inlay-retained bridges
Cementation
adhesive self-adhesive / conventional
1) 1) 1) 1) 1) 1) 1) 1)
2) 2) 2) 2) 2) 2) 2) 2)
Variolink II, Variolink Veneer Variolink II, Multilink Automix Variolink II, Multilink Automix Variolink II, Multilink Automix Variolink II, Multilink Automix Multilink Automix Multilink Automix Multilink Automix Multilink Automix
Vivaglass CEM Vivaglass CEM Vivaglass CEM Vivaglass CEM Vivaglass CEM Vivaglass CEM
1) in combination with IPS e.max ZirCAD 2) one layering ceramic for all the IPS e.max materials
Contraindications Very deep, subgingival preparations (adhesive cementation) Patients with severely reduced residual dentitions Bruxism
The highlights Highly aesthetic and high-strength materials can be combined One layering ceramic for the IPS e.max system Predictable shade results and similar clinical behaviour even in different restorations veneered with IPS e.max Ceram Adhesive, self-adhesive and conventional cementation
Most all-ceramic systems are composed of framework and veneering materials. To date, no system has proven suitable for various indications, so that different framework materials with the matching veneering ceramics had to be used in the past. This problem has been overcome with the new IPS e.max Ceram nano-uorapatite glass ceramic. Due to its optimally coordinated ring temperature and coefficient of thermal expansion, this ceramic can be used to veneer both zirconium oxide and glass-ceramic frameworks.
8.5 8
CTE (coefficient of thermal expansion) of IPS e.max products Source: Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, 2005 IPS e.max Ceram features the lowest CTE value of all IPS e.max products
IPS e.max Press copings veneered with IPS e.max Ceram IPS e.max Ceram veneer
IPS e.max ZirPress pressed on IPS e.max ZirCAD framework IPS e.max ZirPress pressed on IPS e.max ZirCAD framework
zirconium oxide
One layering ceramic for all indications The challenging task of having to adjust the shade of restorations is a thing of the past. Depending on the indication and strength required, you choose either glass-ceramic or zirconium oxide as the framework material. Thanks to the one, common layering scheme, all the IPS e.max restorations exhibit the same wear properties and surface gloss.
IPS e.max Ceram on four different framework materials (from left to right): IPS e.max Press, IPS e.max ZirPress, IPS e.max ZirCAD, IPS e.max CAD MDT Thorsten Michel, Germany
The new generation of materials features a crystal structure similar to that of vital teeth.
The highlights One layering ceramic for glass-ceramic and zirconium oxide frameworks Predictable shade results and the same clinical behaviour as regards wear and surface gloss, independent of the framework material Nano-uorapatite for highly aesthetic properties
Glass-ceramics
All you need for highly aesthetic restorations
Glass ceramic materials have been successfully employed in the fabrication of all-ceramic restorations for many years. They cannot only be used for the press technique, but also allow processing with cutting-edge CAD/CAM technology.
300
114
129
139
140
150
Indications: Anterior and posterior crowns Partial crowns Three-unit anterior bridges Three-unit premolar bridges Veneers
*No registered trade-marks of Ivoclar Vivadent AG Source: R&D, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan
Both glass ceramics allow natural shade effects to be reproduced and they enhance light transmission. The highlights Highly aesthetic lithium disilicate glass ceramic Lifelike aesthetics independent of the shade of the prepared tooth Adhesive and conventional cementation thanks to high strength of 360 to 400 MPa
8
Even in cases where patients have non-vital teeth, it is possible to produce pressed all-ceramic restorations, as the IPS e.max Press range also includes high opacity ingots.
250
Authentic *
GC Initial PC *
Cergo Press *
IPS e.max Press, the highly aesthetic lithium disilicate glass-ceramic ingots in 3 levels of translucency, offer optimized homogeneity and heightened strength and enable you to create accurately tting restorations. Because of the high strength of 400 MPa, which is unmatched by any other glassceramic, self-adhesive or conventional cementation methods can be used.
Zirconium oxide
All you need for high-strength restorations
Inlay-retained bridges Primary telescope crowns Implant superstructures (single tooth and bridge frameworks)
For pressing onto implant superstructures made of IPS e.max ZirCAD (single tooth copings and bridge frameworks) For pressing onto frameworks, implant abutments and implant superstructures made of sintered zirconium oxide and HIP zirconium oxide, which have a CTE in the range of 10.5-11.0 x 10-6 K-1 (100-500 C)
The highlights High-performance all-ceramic also for the posterior region thanks to the unrivalled strength and high fracture toughness Outstanding biocompatibility and low thermal conductivity Minimally invasive all-ceramic inlay bridges in conjunction with IPS e.max ZirPress
9
Glass-ceramics
Preparation
Basic rules
Circular shoulder preparation with rounded inner edges or chamfer with a width of approx. 1 mm No feather edges Avoid sharp edges and angles Adhesive cementation protocols allow conservative cavity preparation Make sure to observe minimum layer thicknesses (stability of the restoration)
Bridges (IPS e.max Press) The maximum acceptable pontic width depends on the position, size and state of the teeth, as well as the position of the abutment within the tooth arch. The measurements to determine the bridge pontic width should be taken on the unprepared tooth. In the anterior region (up to the canine), the bridge pontic width should not exceed 11 mm. In the premolar region (from the canine up to the 2nd premolar), the bridge pontic width should not exceed 9 mm.
Anterior and posterior crowns (IPS e.max Press | IPS e.max CAD) Evenly reduce the anatomical shape and observe the stipulated minimum thicknesses. Prepare a circular shoulder with rounded inner edges or chamfer with an angle of approx. 1030. The width of the circular shoulder/chamfer is approx. 1 mm. 1.0 Reduction of the crown third incisal or occlusal areas by approx. 2 mm. For anterior crowns, the labial and palatal/ lingual part of the tooth should be reduced by approx. 1.5 mm.
1.2
1.5
1.5 1.5
1.0
1.5 1.0
1.5 1.0
6
1.2
IPS e.max CAD The incisal edge of the preparation should be at least 1 mm (milling tool geometry) in order to permit optimum milling of the incisal edge during CAD/CAM processing.
1.5
A retentive tooth preparation design cannot be used if an adhesive luting technique is chosen.
1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.5
Partial crowns Provide at least 1.5 mm of space in the cusp areas. Partial crowns are indicated if the preparation margin is less than approx. 0.5 mm away from the cusp tip, or if the enamel is severly undermined. Prepare a circular shoulder with rounded inner edges or chamfer with an angle of approx. 2030. The width of the shoulder/chamfer is approx. 1.0 mm.
Veneers If possible, the preparation should be entirely located in the enamel. The incisal preparation margins should not be located in the area of the abrasion surfaces or dynamic occlusal surfaces. By preparing orientation grooves using a depth marker, controlled enamel reduction can be achieved. Opening of the proximal contacts is not required. Preparation without involving of the incisal edges (only labial reduction): The preparation depth in the labial area should be at least 0.6 mm. 0.6 Preparation reduction of the incisal edge (labial/incisal reduction): The preparation depth in the cervical and labial area should be at least 0.6 mm. The incisal edge must be reduced by 0.7 mm. The more transparent the incisal edge of the intended veneer, the more pronounced the reduction should be.
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
10
Preparation
Zirconium oxide
Preparation
Single crowns and up to 6-unit bridges Evenly reduce the anatomical shape and observe the stipulated minimum thicknesses. Prepare a circular shoulder with rounded inner edges or chamfer. The width of the circular shoulder/ chamfer is approx. 1 mm. Reduce the crown third incisal or occlusal areas by approx. 1.2 mm. Reduce the incisal and occlusal areas by approx. 1.5 mm. The incisal edge of the preparation should be at least 1 mm (milling tool geometry) in order to permit optimum milling of the incisal edge during CAD/CAM processing.
1.5
1.5 1.2
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.2 1.0
6
1.2
1.0 1.5
1.2
Multi-unit bridges
2.0
2.0 1.5
1.0 1.0
1.5
1.0
1.5 1.0
6
1.5
1.0 2.0
1.5
11
Practical procedure
Shade determination
Selection of the correct shade based on the shade of the prepared tooth is an important prerequisite for restorative success. You should communicate both the shade of the preparation and the desired shade of the completed restoration to the dental technician. In this way, subsequent adjustments of the shade during cementation are avoided. As the shade of the prepared tooth is dened, the dental technician is in a position to control the shade and brightness of the restoration during the individual working steps. The nal shade is a combination of the shade of the prepared tooth the shade of the framework material the shade of the layering ceramic the shade of the luting material The light curing IPS Natural Die Material encompasses 9 shades to imitate the shade of the prepared teeth. Among them are three new shades for bleached, intensively shaded and discoloured/devitalised teeth.
Impression taking
Overall restorative success and the accuracy of t of a restoration are essentially inuenced by shade selection and impression taking/model casting procedures. The impression is taken as usual with either a silicone (e.g. Virtual), polyether or any other suitable impression material using the impression technique preferred. Bite record, e.g. with Virtual CADbite Registration, to incorporate antagonist data directly in the design of tooth restorations with CAD/CAM technology.
12
Practical procedure
Shade determination | Temporary restoration
Temporary restoration
Provisional composite restorations made of eg Systemp.c&b are the best solution if full crowns and bridges are fabricated. The provisional restoration is cemented with a temporary, eugenol-free cement such as the dual-curing Systemp.link. Important: Do not use cements that contain eugenol, as these may detrimentally affect the curing process of the subsequently used luting composite!
Provisional restoration (Systemp.c&b) with cement excess (Systemp.link) after incorporation. The provisional restoration can easily be removed.
OptraDam | OptraGate
Modern dentistry would be unthinkable without the possibility of creating a completely dry eld using rubber dam isolation. Due to its anatomical shape and the three-dimensional exibility, OptraDam is very comfortable to wear for patients even during long treatment sessions. OptraGate provides effective perioral retraction of the lips and cheeks and thus considerably enlarges the operating eld. As a result, visibility and accessibility are signicantly increased. The material of the successor version OptraGate ExtraSoft has been optimized to further enhance patient comfort to provide a snug but gentle t.
Complete isolation of the treatment eld using OptraDam is recommended when restorations are adhesively cemented.
13
Cementation options
The use of aesthetic luting cements is crucial to ensuring harmonious shading of metal-free restorations. IPS e.max all-ceramic restorations can also be self-adhesively or conventionally cemented, depending on the indication. For the conventional cementation of IPS e.max restorations, we recommend using Vivaglass CEM glass ionomer cement. Powder-liquid systems are used for self-adhesive cementation. Variolink II, Variolink Veneer or Multilink Automix are the ideal composites when the adhesive luting technique is chosen.
Cementation
adhesive Thin veneers, veneers Partial crowns self-adhesive* / conventional
Variolink II Variolink Veneer Multilink Automix
Vivaglass CEM
Anterior and posterior crowns, 3-unit bridges up to the second premolar Veneers Inlay-retained bridges Crowns and bridges Veneers
IPS e.max ZirPress IPS e.max ZirCAD + IPS e.max ZirPress IPS e.max ZirCAD
Veneers
14
Cementation options
Multilink Automix
... is a self-curing (chemically curing), selfetching luting composite system. It is suitable for universal applications and is offered in the practical double syringe. Multilink offers all the advantages of adhesive cements and shows superior adhesive strength. The application of several components (primer, bonding agent) required by other self-etching products, is eliminated.
MPa 40 36 30
20 12 10 4 0 Ceramic MaxCEM* 6 2 13
18
18
11 7 1 3
15
Glass-ceramics
Which restorations should be etched, blasted with aluminium oxide or silanated prior to insertion? This depends on the material!
adhesive
Cementation method
self-adhesive*/ conventional
adhesive
20 sec with IPS Ceramic Etching Gel 60 sec with Monobond-S Variolink Veneer Variolink II Multilink Automix
20 sec with IPS Ceramic Etching Gel 60 sec with Monobond-S Variolink Veneer Variolink II Multilink Automix
1)
1)
Cementation system
Vivaglass CEM
Vivaglass CEM
Variolink II
For self-adhesive cementation, silanization is necessary. 2) Partial crowns and veneers must be adhesively cemented * self-adhesive powder-liquid systems
1)
If an adhesive cementation protocol is applied, glass-ceramic materials are normally etched with the hydrouoric acid IPS Ceramic Etching Gel and subsequently silanated using the silane Monobond-S. Important: Glass-ceramic material must not be sandblasted!
High-strength glass-ceramics (IPS e.max Press, IPS e.max CAD) can also be conventionally cemented using glass ionomer cements. Silanization is not required for conventional cementation with glass ionomer cements.
16
Cementation options
Preparing the restorations for cementation
Zirconium oxide
Glass-ceramics
Veneers 2)
Cementation method
adhesive
adhesive
adhesive
adhesive
Etching
180 sec with Metal/Zirconia Primer Multilink Automix Vivaglass CEM
20 sec with IPS Ceramic Etching Gel 180 sec with Metal/Zirconia Primer Multilink Automix Vivaglass CEM
Multilink Automix
Zirconium oxide-based restorations are neither etched nor silanated. The inner aspect of the restoration can be cleaned by sandblasting it with 110 m aluminium oxide at 1 bar pressure. To establish an adhesive bond, we recommend to use the Metal/Zirconia Primer. Zirconium oxide restorations can also be conventionally cemented using glass ionomer cements.
17
Depending on the dentin adhesive used, system-specic procedures are applied. Syntac is a time-tested multi-component adhesive system. An adhesive bond to dentin and enamel is established by consecutively applying Syntac Primer, Syntac Adhesive and Heliobond. Excite DSC is a dual-curing single-component adhesive with an innovative applicator.
18
Step-by-step procedure
Glass-ceramic restoration case
Tooth preparation for a glass-ceramic crown. The tooth is prepared for adhesive cementation.
Dimensions in mm
Adhesive cementation of the crown involves the following steps: Conditioning of the restoration: Rinse the restoration with water and blow dry with an air syringe. Important: Glass-ceramic materials must not be sandblasted! Etch the inner aspects of the restoration with the hydrouoric acid IPS Ceramic Etching Gel for 20 seconds, thoroughly rinse with water and blow dry with the air syringe.
Apply the silane Monobond-S to the inner aspects of the restoration for 60 seconds and air-dry. Subsequently, apply a thin coat of Heliobond and protect from light until the restoration is seated.
Conditioning of the preparation: Rinse the preparation with water and blow dry with the air syringe. Etch the enamel with phosphoric acid gel (eg Total Etch) for 30 seconds. If required, etch the dentin surfaces for 1015 seconds. Thoroughly rinse off phosphoric acid using water spray and blow dry with the air syringe. Apply a dentin bonding agent, eg Syntac dentin/enamel bonding system Let Syntac Primer react on the dentin for 15 seconds. Then thoroughly dry with the air syringe. Let Syntac Adhesive react on the dentin for 10 seconds and dry with the air syringe. Coat enamel and dentin surfaces with Heliobond using a brush and remove excess with water spray/blow off with the air syringe. Important: Do not polymerize Heliobond, as this could detrimentally affect the t of the restoration.
19
Seating of the restoration: Apply ready-mixed Variolink II luting composite to the inner surfaces of the restoration and/or to the prepared tooth if required (to avoid air entrapments). Seat the restoration. Remove gross excess using foam pellets and dental oss. Cover margins with glycerine gel (Liquid Strip) to prevent oxygen inhibition. Polymerize the seated crown from all aspects using a curing light (eg bluephase HIP mode).
Finishing and polishing: Occlusal adjustments are performed using ne diamonds (30 micron). Polishing is carried out with ceramic polishing sets (eg diamond-coated ceramic polishers from Brasseler) After removing all excess, uoridize the tooth with eg Fluor Protector.
20
Step-by-step procedure
Clinical case: Courtesy of Dr. Dr. Andreas Rathke | Achim Kuster, Liechtenstein
Preoperative situation: Fractured tooth After a sports accident, tooth 11 had been restored with a metal-ceramic crown, while the incisal edge of tooth 21 had been reconstructed with a composite build-up.
Preparation of tooth 11 for an IPS e.max CAD crown and of tooth 21 for an IPS e.max Ceram veneer. A considerable difference is observable as regards the amount of tooth structure that had been removed. While the margins of the crown preparation had to be located in dentin, those of the veneer preparation could be located in enamel.
Dimensions in mm
21
After milling the IPS e.max CAD MO blocks (in eg the inLab system from Sirona or Everest system from KaVo), the crystallization process is conducted in a ceramic furnace. The framework obtains its natural shade through the crystallization process. The tooth-coloured framework is subsequently veneered with IPS e.max Ceram layering ceramic.
inLab is a registered trade mark of Sirona Dental Systems GmbH Everest is a registered trademark of KaVo Dental GmbH
The adhesive cementation of the crowns involves the following steps: Conditioning of the preparation: Remove the provisional restoration and clean the cavity. Mix Multilink Primer A+B in a 1:1 ratio and apply it to the dentin and enamel surfaces, scrubbing with slight pressure for 15 seconds. A reaction time of 30 seconds is recommended on the enamel, and 15 seconds on dentin. The applied primer is subsequently dried with water- and oil-free air. As the Primer is solely self-curing, no light curing is necessary!
Conditioning of the restoration: Rinse restoration with water and blow dry with the air syringe. Important: Glass-ceramic materials must not be sandblasted! Pre-treatment of the crown: Etch inner surfaces with the hydrouoric acid IPS Ceramic Etching Gel for 20 seconds, thoroughly rinse with water and blow dry with the air syringe.
Apply the silane Monobond-S to all inner surfaces for 60 seconds and air-dry.
22
Step-by-step procedure
Glass-ceramic restoration case
Seating of the restoration: Apply the desired amount of Multilink Automix from the automix syringe directly on the inner aspects of the restoration. Seat the restoration.
Seating of the restoration - solely self-curing: Remove excess material immediately with a microbrush/ brush/foam pellet/dental oss or scaler. Make sure to remove excess in time in difficult-to-reach areas. Due to the reaction between Multilink Automix and Multilink Primer A/B, a high bond strength and degree of cure is achieved quickly after the placement of the restoration. Seating of the restoration - self-curing with optional light curing: Cure excess material briey with light (12 seconds) which enables a smooth removal by using a scaler. Make sure to remove excess in time in difficult-to-reach areas. Subsequently, light cure all cement margins for 20 seconds. Coat the margins with glycerine gel (Liquid Strip) to prevent oxygen inhibition. Rinse off the gel after complete polymerization.
Finishing and polishing: Occlusal adjustments are performed using ne diamonds (30 micron). Polishing is carried out with ceramic polishing sets (e.g. diamond-coated ceramic polishers from Brasseler). After removing all excess, uoridize the tooth with e.g. Fluor Protector.
Left: IPS e.max CAD/Ceram crown; Right: IPS e.max veneer As the same veneering ceramic was used for both restorations, a consistent optical appearance is achieved.
Pictures courtesy of Dr Dr Andreas Rathke / Achim Kuster, Liechtenstein
23
Preoperative situation
IPS e.max ZirCAD crown preparation, performed with the help of a silicone matrix
Dimensions in mm
The IPS e.max ZirCAD blocks are processed in the inLab system from Sirona in a partially sintered, "chalk-like state. The milled framework is subsequently sintered in the Sintramat high temperature furnace. Following this, either IPS e.max ZirPress is pressed onto the crown coping and/or the crown coping is veneered using IPS e.max Ceram layering ceramic.
Conditioning of the preparation: Clean preparation with prophy paste, eg Proxyt, rinse with water and blow dry with the air syringe. Avoid overdrying of the dentin surfaces!
24
Step-by-step procedure
Zirconium oxide restoration case
Conditioning of the restoration: The inner surfaces of the zirconium oxide restoration can be blasted with 110 m aluminium oxide at 1 bar pressure prior to insertion.
Seating of the restoration: Mix one drop of liquid and one scoop of powder on the mixing pad. Subsequently, load the blasted crown with translucent Vivaglass CEM glass ionomer cement and seat it exerting slight pressure. Remove excess cement immediately afterwards.
Finishing and polishing: Occlusal adjustments are performed using ne diamonds (30 micron) Polishing is carried out with ceramic polishing sets (eg diamond-coated ceramic polishers from Brasseler) After removing all excess, uoridize the tooth with eg Fluor Protector.
25
Clinical case: Courtesy of Prof. Dr. Daniel Edelhoff | Oliver Brix, Germany
Preoperative situation
26
Step-by-step procedure
Zirconium oxide restoration case
Conditioning of the preparation: Remove the provisional restoration and clean the cavity. Mix Multilink Primer A+B in a 1:1 ratio and apply to the dentin and enamel surfaces, scrubbing with slight pressure for 15 seconds. A reaction time of 30 seconds is recommended on the enamel, and 15 seconds on dentin. The applied primer is subsequently dried with water- and oil-free air. As the Primer is solely self-curing, no light curing is necessary!
Conditioning of the restoration: Rinse restoration with water and blow dry with the air syringe. Important: The IPS e.max ZirCAD/ZirPress inlay bridge must not be sandblasted!
Etch inner surfaces with the hydrouoric acid IPS Ceramic Etching Gel for 20 seconds, thoroughly rinse with water and blow dry with the air syringe.
Apply the silane Monobond-S to all inner surfaces for 60 seconds and air-dry.
27
Seating of the restoration: Apply the desired amount of Multilink Automix from the automix syringe directly on the inner aspects of the restoration. Seat the restoration. Seating of the restoration - solely self-curing: Remove excess material immediately with a microbrush/ brush/foam pellet/dental oss or scaler. Make sure to remove excess in time in difficult-to-reach areas. Due to the reaction between Multilink Automix and Multilink Primer A/B, a high bond strength and degree of cure is achieved quickly after the placement of the restoration. Seating of the restoration - self-curing with optional light curing: Cure excess material briey with light (12 seconds) which enables a smooth removal by using a scaler. Make sure to remove excess in time in difficult-to-reach areas. Subsequently, light cure all cement margins for 20 seconds. Coat the margins with glycerine gel (Liquid Strip) to prevent oxygen inhibition. Rinse off the gel after complete polymerization.
Finishing and polishing: Occlusal adjustments are performed using ne diamonds (30 micron). Polishing is carried out with ceramic polishing sets (e.g. diamond-coated ceramic polishers from Brasseler). After removing all excess, uoridize the tooth with e.g. Fluor Protector.
28
Clinical cases
Complete restoration of both dental arches with IPS e.max Adhesive cementation in the anterior region using Variolink Veneer, and Multilink Automix in the posterior region.
IPS e.max ZirCAD/IPS e.max Ceram The zirconium oxide copings were veneered with IPS e.max Ceram and conventionally cemented.
IPS e.max CAD/IPS e.max Ceram The copings milled from IPS e.max CAD lithium disilicate glass-ceramic blocks were veneered with IPS e.max Ceram and cemented with Multilink Automix.
29
IPS e.max Press/CAD/ZirCAD/ZirPress and IPS e.max Ceram Copings and bridge frameworks made of IPS e.max CAD/Press/ZirCAD and ZirPress characterized and veneered with IPS e.max Ceram. The glass-ceramic restorations made of IPS e.max CAD and Press were cemented with Variolink II, while for the IPS e.max ZirCAD bridges Multilink Automix was used.
IPS e.max Press and IPS e.max Ceram Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic copings made of IPS e.max Press were veneered with IPS e.max Ceram and conventionally cemented.
IPS e.max CAD and IPS e.max Ceram Adhesively cemented restorations made of IPS e.max CAD lithium disilicate glass-ceramic and veneered with IPS e.max Ceram.
30
Clinical cases
IPS e.max CAD and IPS e.max Ceram The restorations milled from IPS e.max CAD were layered with IPS e.max Ceram in the incisal area using the cut-back technique and subsequently self-adhesively cemented.
IPS e.max Press and IPS e.max Ceram The lithium disilicate glass-ceramic veneers made of IPS e.max Press were layered in the incisal area with IPS e.max Ceram and adhesively cemented using Variolink Veneer.
IPS e.max Press and IPS e.max Ceram IPS e.max Press crowns veneered with IPS e.max Ceram and adhesively cemented
31
IPS e.max Press and IPS e.max Ceram IPS e.max Press veneers and crowns were veneered with IPS e.max Ceram and adhesively cemented using Variolink Veneer.
IPS e.max Press and IPS e.max Ceram IPS e.max Press crowns veneered with IPS e.max Ceram and adhesively cemented
IPS e.max CAD and IPS e.max Ceram The crowns milled from IPS e.max CAD were layered with IPS e.max Ceram in the incisal area and subsequently self-adhesively cemented.
32
Objective:
Experimental:
Start: Results:
Start: Results:
5. Head of study: Prof Stanford, Dental Clinical Research Center, University of Iowa, USA
Title: Objective: Experimental: Start: Clinical long-term performance of IPS e.max Ceram on IPS e.max ZirCAD To evaluate the clinical long-term performance of IPS e.max Ceram on restorations made of ZirCAD. Incorporation of 40 crowns and 10 bridges made of IPS e.max ZirCAD veneered with IPS e.max Ceram September 2004 Neither framework fractures nor chipping of veneering material was observed after all the restorations had been incorporated.
Results:
Start: Results:
33
Objective: Experimental:
Start: Results:
8. Head of study: Dr. Beuer (Prof. Gernet), University Clinic, Munich, Germany
Title: Objective: Experimental: Clinical study on all-ceramic restorations made of zirconium oxide ceramic veneered with a new veneering ceramic To examine the clinical performance of IPS e.max ZirCAD as a framework material for crowns and bridges Incorporation of 20 crowns and 20 bridges (3 to 4 units) made of zirconium oxide (Y-TZP), veneered with IPS e.max Ceram. May 2004 After the restorations had been observed up to one year, chipping of veneering material was recorded in one case.
Start: Results:
Objective: Experimental:
Start: Results:
34
Literature
Schweiger M (2004). Zirkoniumdioxid Hochfeste und bruchzhe Strukturkeramik. sthetische Zahnmedizin 5:248-257 Cramer von Clausbruch S (2003); Zirkon und Zirkonium. Dental Labor 1137-1142 Helbig J, Schnholzer U (2001) Grundzge der Keramik; Skript zur Vorlesung Ingenieurkeramik I. Professur fr nichtmetallische Werkstoffe ETH Zrich, 37-43 Kriegesmann J, Burger W; Technische Keramische Werkstoffe; Deutscher Wirtschaftsdienst Kln, April 1996; Kapitel 8.7.2.0. "Zirkonoxid in der Medizintechnik"; S. 1-45 Anusavice KJ; Degradability of Dental Ceramics. Adv Dent Res 6 (1992) 82-89 Kracek, F; The binary system Li2O-SiO2. J. Phys. Chem. 1930. 34: p. 2641-2650 Anusavice (2001); interner Bericht an Ivoclar Vivadent AG Berge HX, Sorensen JA, Edelhoff D (2001); Split energy factor theory in fracture analysis of dental ceramics. JDR 80:57 Sorensen JA, Berge HX, Edelhoff D (2000); Effect of storage media and fatigue loading on ceramic strength. JDR 79:217
16 Fischer H, Marx R (2002); Fracture toughness of dental ceramics: comparison of bending and indentation method. Dental Materials 18:12-19 17 Edelhoff D, Sorensen J (2002); Light transmission through all-ceramic framework and cement combinations. Journal of Dental Research (Spec Iss A) 81. 18 Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA (2001); Light transmission through all-ceramic framework materials and bovine dentin. JDR 80:600. 19 Stappert CFJ, Dai M, Chitmongkolsuk S, Gerds T, Strub JR (2004); Marginal adaptation of three-unit xed partial dentures constructed from pressed ceramic systems. British Dental Journal 196:766-770 20 Stappert et al (2002); berlebensrate und Bruchfestigkeit von vollkeramischen Teilkronen unterschiedlicher Prparation nach thermozyklischer Kausimulation. Eine in-vitro Studie. Abstracts, 51. Jahrestagung der DGZPW Dresden 21 Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, Kern M (2003); Clinical Evaluation of marginal t of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 16:587-592 22 Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Anusavice KJ, Young H, Jones J, Gibbs C (2004); Clinical performance of a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic for three-unit posterior FPDs. International Journal of Prosthodontics 17:469-475 23 Etman MK, Watson TF, Woolford MJ (2002); Clinical performance of Experimental Glass-Ceramic Posterior Crowns: 3D Measurement of Clinical Wear. IADR San Diego, abstract #1697 24 Etman MK, Woolford MJ, and Watson TF (2004); 3-year Clinical Evaluation of Experimental GlassCeramic Crowns: In-vivo Elemental Analysis. IADR Hawaii, abstract #0197 25 Etman MK, Woolford MJ, Dunne SM, Wilson N (2005); 54 Months Clinical Performance and Crack Propagation in All-Ceramic Restorations. IADR Baltimore, abstract #0423 26 Roulet JF, Herder S; Seitenzahnversorgung mit adhsiv befestigten Keramikinlays. Quintessenz VerlagsGmbH, Berlin, 1985 27 McLean JW; Wissenschaft und Kunst der Dentalkeramik. Verlag "Die Quintessenz", Berlin, 1978
10 Anusavice KJ, Della B, A., Mecholsky JJ (2001); Fracture behavior of Leucite- and Lithia-Disilicatebased hot-pressed ceramics. JDR 80:544 11 Ludwig et al (2000); Glastech. Ber. Glass Sci. Technol. 73 C1, 293-301 12 Marx R, Fischer H, Weber M, Jungwirth F (2001). Rissparameter und Weibullmodule: unterkritisches Risswachstum und Langzeitfestigkeit vollkeramischer Materialien. DZZ 56:89-98 13 Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV (2003); Biaxial exural strength, elastic moduli, and x-ray diffraction characterization of three pressable all-ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 89:374-380 14 Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV (2004); Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part I. Pressable and alumina glass-inltrated ceramics. Dental Materials 20:441-448 15 Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV (2003); Fracture toughness and hardness evaluation of three pressable all-ceramic dental materials. J Dent 31:181-188
35
601978/0408/e/W