2 Tutorial Handouts 300
2 Tutorial Handouts 300
2 Tutorial Handouts 300
com
Prof. P.K. Sen, PhD, PE, Fellow IEEE Professor, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401 Senior Consultant NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc. Denver, Colorado 80033 [email protected] 303.339.6750
January, 2012
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 1 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc. [2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
3)
4)
5) 6) 7)
3) 4)
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 3 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
Prof. Pankaj K. (PK) Sen, PhD, PE, Fellow IEEE Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado 80401
Dr. P.K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE has over 45 years of combined teaching, administrative, research, and consulting engineering experience. Prior to joining Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado in 2000, Dr. Sen taught for 21 years at the University of Colorado, Colorado. His industrial experience includes power plants and substation engineering design, system & feasibility studies, protection and relaying, training technical personnel at all level and solving various aspects of power systems engineering application problems. He has published over 140 technical papers on a variety of subjects related to Power Systems, Protection / and Relaying, Electric Machines, Renewable Energy and Energy Policy, Power Quality, Engineering Education and Arc Flash and Safety. Dr. Sen has supervised and mentored over 150 graduate students (including non-traditional students, and practicing engineers from the Utility Industries, Rural Electric Companys, Consulting Engineers, and others). He is an IEEE Fellow and a Registered Professional Engineer (Electrical) in the State of Colorado. Currently Dr. Sen is a Professor of Electrical Engineering and the Site Director for the (Originally NSF funded) Industry University Cooperative Research Center (IUCRC) Power Systems Engineering Research Center (www.pserc.org) at Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado. His current research interests include application problems (safety, protection, equipment life, energy economics, asset management and policy issues, etc.) in power systems engineering, renewable energy applications and distributed generation, and engineering education. Dr. Sen is a very active member of a number of Professional Societies including IEEE PES & IAS, Rocky Mountain Electrical League (RMEL) and has been instrumental in providing seminars, short courses, conduct workshops, and provide training for technical personnel in the Rocky Mountain Region and nationwide (USA) and internationally for the past 34 years. Dr. Sen is known in the industry, locally, nationally and internationally for providing educational opportunities for practicing engineers at all level, and for both undergraduate and graduate students. He is an inspiring and prolific teacher with passion. He has authored numerous prize winning papers at the IEEE Conferences and IAS Magazine.
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 4 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
Characteristics of Power Distribution Systems: Utility and Industrial/Commercial Users Perspective Power System Fundamentals & Design Tools: o (Review) 1-Phase and 3-Phase Power o (Review) Power, Reactive Power, Power Factor o Power Triangle o Losses and Efficiency Selection of Voltage Power Factor Correction Percentage Impedance, Voltage Regulation and % Voltage Drop Understanding Electricity Bill Transformer o Procurement and Specification Writing o Losses and Efficiency o Bid Evaluation o Application Guidelines o Protection Basics Quick Cost Estimate Design Problems: Transformer Sizing, Power Factor Correction, Voltage Drop and Voltage Regulation
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 5 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc. [2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 6 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
3) 4)
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 7 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
Fault Contribution
Rotating Machines
Synchronous Machine
Direct-Axis Quantities: Sub-Transient (xd, Td): ~ 3 Cycles** Transient (xd, Td): ~ 0.6-1.0 Sec Steady-State (xd) ** Normally Used in Fault Calculations
Typical Values 0.1 - 0.2 per-unit (Machine Base)
Induction Motor Fault Contributions last usually 2-3 Cycles Sub-transient Reactance varies typically between 0.17 0.25 per-unit (Machine Base) If the starting current is 6.0 times the fullload current, then the sub-transient reactance is 1/6 = 0.167 pu.
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 8 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
Ib =
0 A
5,000 kVA
Assume: 1 HP 1 kVA
5,000 kVA
5,000 Ib = = 209.2 A 3 13.8
Ib =
Total Fault Current @ x = 11,954 + 4,184 + 1,046 + 2,092 A = 19,276 A (= 3 13.8 19,276 = 460.7 MVA) Assume: Finite Bus with 3-Ph Fault Level = 1,500 MVA @ 115 kV Bus Source Reactance (Xs) = 20 / 1,500 = 0.0133 pu Fault Contribution by the Source = 1.0 / (0.0133 + 0.07) pu = 12.00 pu = 12.0 x 836.8 A = 10,045 A Total Fault Current @ X = 10,045 + 4,184 + 1,046 + 2,092 A = 17,367 A (Compared to 19,276 A)
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 9 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc. [2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
= 1/0.06 = 16.7 pu
Important!! Assume Zero Source Reactance or Infinite Bus always yields Conservative Results in Fault Calculations.
499 A 93 A
Assume: Infinite Bus Source Reactance (Xs) = 0 1/0.06 = 16.67 pu = 16.67x41.9 A = 698 A
Ib = 1,000 = 1,202 A 3 0.480
35 A
71 A
= 16.7 x 1,202 A = 20,047 A (= 3 0.480 20.047 = 16.67 MVA) Assuming Fault at X Source Reactance (Xs) Fault Current at Y = 460.7 MVA (or 11,954 A) = 1.0 MVA (Transf. Rating) / 460.7 MVA = 0.0022 pu = 1.0 / (0.0022 + 0.06) = 16.085 pu = 16.085 x 1,202 A = 19,347 A ( = 16.08 MVA)
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 10 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
Fault Calculations
Assumptions! !
F1
17,811 17,412 16,288 16,602 31,379 38,596 ?? 5,395 ?? 5,910 26,162 28,375
F2
F3 F4
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 11 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
Important!! Assume Zero Source Reactance or Infinite Bus always yields Optimistic Results in Voltage Drop Calculations. Source Reactance (for minimum fault current or highest value of Xs) must be considered, in doing the real calculations.
Assume: Full-load Efficiency = 0.92 and Full-load Power Factor = 0.93 (lag) Approximate Full-load Current = 363 A Assume Full Voltage (Direct-on-Line) Starting Current (Ist) = 6.0 x IFL = 2,178 A @ 0.0 lagging power factor (conservative assumption) % Voltage Drop = [ % r Cos % x Sin ] Ipu (Loading) (+) Lagging Power Factor
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 12 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
(1) Assume: 1 HP 1 kVA, Constant Current Model and 0.0 lag power factor, % Voltage (Momentary) Drop = 28.8% (2) Using Actual Efficiency and Power Factor in calculating the full-load current, Constant Current Model and 0.0 lag power factor, % Voltage Drop = 25.12% (3) Same as (2), but assuming a power factor (more realistic) 0.25 lag, % Voltage Drop = 24.4% (4) Assume, 1 HP = 1 kVA and a Constant Impedance Model and 0.0 lag power factor, % Voltage (Momentary) Drop = 22.4%
All of the above simplified quick calculations (with various assumptions) produce most likely an unacceptable voltage drop (more than 20%) at the motor terminals. Since the motor torque is proportional to the squared of the voltage ( Tm V2 ), the starting torque will be drastically reduced (e.g., for case (4) (V = 1.0 0.224 = 0.776), the torque will be 0.7762 = 0.60 or 60% of the full-voltage starting torque).
(1)
Increase the transformer size Doubling the transformer size to 10 MVA will reduce the voltage drop (approximately) by a factor of 2 (to 12-13%). (2) Buy an induction motor (Code Letter D) with starting current less than 6.0 times (say 4.0 4.5). This will reduce the % voltage drop proportionately (to about 14-16%). (3) Use reduced voltage starter (Autotransformer) or soft start. This will reduce the % voltage drop to a real value (much less than 10%, depending on the design). However, care must be taken to ensure that adequate motor torque is produced during starting. (4) Reduction of the % reactance of transformer may be utilized to enhance the problem. However, this will increase the fault current values, and may increase the cost of switchgear, and other associated equipment. . (5) Redesign the process requirements, when appropriate and possible, to reduce the motor output. (6) Using higher plant distribution voltage. Ultimately, application requirements and cost will probably dictate the solution.
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 14 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
(4)
(5)
Phase Quantities
Sequence
Quantities
a b c
a1 b1 c1
Positive
a2 b2 c2
Negative
a0 b0 c0
Zero
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 15 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
Mathematically, say, for a set of three phase (phasor) currents (Ia, Ib and Ic) and the three sequence components of (phasor) currents (I(a,b,c)1, I(a,b,c)2 and I(a,b,c)0): Ia = Ia1 + Ia2 + Ia0 Ib = Ib1 + Ib2 + Ib0 Ic = Ic1 + Ic2 + Ic0
Conversely, it can be shown by simple mathematical manipulation that the three sequence components of currents (Ia1, Ia2, and Ia0) for phase-a can be calculated: Ia1 = 1/3 [ Ia + a Ib + a2 Ic ] Ia2 = 1/3 [ Ia + a2 Ib + a Ic ] Ia0 = 1/3 [ Ia + Ib + Ic ] where, a is a unit vector defined by, a = 1.0 120o.
(2)
(3)
(4)
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 16 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
Understanding the Physical Significance of (and other Basic Facts about) the Sequence (components) Currents: (1) (2) (3) (4) Vector summation of the positive sequence currents = 0. (Three vectors, equal in magnitude and 120o out-of-phase, and phase sequence, abc). Statement (1) is equally true for the negative sequence of currents. (except the phase sequence is, acb). Vector summation of the three zero sequence currents (I0, same in magnitude and phase) = 3I0 Any 3-phase power system under normal operating conditions is considered to be the positive sequence network conditions, even though we do not explicitly say so. Negative sequence network (or power system) conditions could be dealt with in the same fashion as the positive sequence network, except for a major difference: the voltage sources have a phase sequence opposite to the positive sequence. Synchronous generators (or alternators) connected to the normal 3-phase power network produces only positive sequence voltage (in an ideal condition). Static devices connected in a 3-phase power network (like transformers, transmission and distribution lines, capacitors, etc.) do not see any difference between positive and a negative sequence quantities. However, they behave completely differently for zero sequence quantities. For a balanced 3-phase conditions (like positive and negative sequence conditions), neutral connections for Y-connections (transformer neutral, loads, generator neutrals, etc.) is immaterial. The system doesnt see the difference between grounded (any form) and ungrounded system, since vector summation of three vectors 120o is zero. In case of currents, no current flow through the neutral conductor or ground (Kirchoffs Current Law). However, in case of zero sequence current, as an example, the current flowing through the neutral (and/or ground) equals the 3 times the zero sequence current (Kirchoffs Current Law). This can be seen from the fundamental definition of zero sequence quantities. The sequence quantities are always line-to-neutral or line-to-ground (or phase quantities).
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(8)
(9)
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 17 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 18 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
Sequence Connections for Typical Two-Winding Transformer Banks Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 19 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc. [2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
Reduced Sequence Networks where Z1, Z2 and Z0 are the Equivalent Impedances of the Network to the Fault Point Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 20 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc. [2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
39
ZT I OS
System Grounding and Ground Fault Protection
40
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 21 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
ZT I OS
44
I OP
I OS
46
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 22 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
Reduced Sequence Networks where Z1 , Z2 and Z0 are the Equivalent Impedances of the Network to the Fault Point
Positive
Negative
Zero
Single-Line-toGround Fault
Line-to-LineFault
System Grounding and Ground Fault Protection
Line-to-Line-toGround Fault
37
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 23 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
(a) 3 x 100 HP Induction Motors (b) 2 x 50 HP Induction Motors, and (c) 300 kW of lighting, heating and other small plant loads Estimate the total plant load, typical running power factor, and size (specify) a transformer. Discuss the protection philosophy for such a plant.
(2) A 3-phase transformer is rated at 5/7.5 MVA, 13.8 kV (Delta) 4.16 kV (Grounded-Wye). Calculate (estimate) the full-load phase and line currents on both high-side and low-side of the transformer at maximum loading. What will be a typical % reactance and X/R ratio values? Also calculate the maximum available fault current on the low-side of the transformer. Discuss the protection philosophy for this transformer.
a) b) c) d) e)
Device No. 27 ___________________________ Device No. 51 ___________________________ Device No. 81 ___________________________ Device No. 87 ___________________________ Device No. 38 ___________________________
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 24 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
(4) Put a check (x) in front of each factor affecting transformer protection: ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ Magnetizing Inrush Current Load Tap Changer No-Load Tap Changer Transformer Voltage Level Current Transformer (CT) Ratios Transformer Winding Connections
(5) Draw a (typical) simple motor thermal load capability. How would you protect
a 200HP induction motor? Discuss the key information you must identify in protecting the motor.
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 25 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
Brain Tinker No. 2 1) Draw a typical symmetrical short-circuit current supplied by a synchronous generator. Identify and briefly discuss the key points in the drawing. Also show the rms value of the current.
3) What is the worst possible (theoretical maximum) dc offset one can expect in a synchronous machine?
4) What is the difference between the interrupting (short-circuit capability) current and closing and latching current in a circuit breaker?
5) Draw a typical symmetrical short circuit current supplied by an induction motor. Discuss briefly why this is distinctly different from the synchronous machine? What are typical sub-transient reactance values?
6) Identify some of the key parameters one should specify and check while procuring a medium voltage power circuit breaker.
7) How do you define the total asymmetrical fault current? Draw and explain.
8) What are the typical sub-transient reactance values? a. Large Alternators Steam or Gas Turbine (2-pole or 4-pole) _________ b. Large Alternators Hydro (Salient Pole, slow speed) _________ c. Large (MV) Induction Motors (say, 1000 HP and above) _________ d. Smaller (LV) Induction Motors (say, 50-200 HP) _________ e. Smaller (LV) Induction Motor (say, below, 50 HP) _________
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 26 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc. [2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
9) Answer the following questions: (a) What are the typical reactance and X/R values? o 12.47 kV Overhead Distribution Lines o Small Distribution Transformers (Say, 500 kVA or less, 4.16 kV 480 V) o Large Power Transformers (Say, 30/40/50 MVA, 230 kV-12.47 kV) o 115 kV Overhead Transmission Line o 500 kV Overhead Transmission Line
(b) What are the typical values (@ Rated Load Condition)? o Efficiency of a 500 MVA Generator o Efficiency of a 100 MVA Transformer o Efficiency of a 5,000 HP Induction Motor o Efficiency of a 5 HP Motor o Operating Range of Power Factor for a Large Generator o Voltage of a 3,000 HP Induction Motor o HP Limit of Induction Motor for 480 V System
10) In a large distribution power system, 3-phase fault current reported by the utility at the incoming 69 kV point is 24.5 kA rms symmetrical. Calculate the source impedance in . Also calculate the source impedance in per-unit, assume a base of 10 MVA.
11) Estimate the full-load current of a 50 HP induction motor. 12) What limits the output of a power transformer? Explain briefly.
14) Calculate the line and phase currents (both magnitude and phase angle) in a 2 MVA, 12.47 kV (Delta) 480 V (Wye) transformer. Assume the load is purely resistive and the transformer is fully loaded. Use the load voltage as the reference.
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 27 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc. [2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
More Brain Tinker Identify True (T), False (F) or Unclear, Unknown or Subjected to Conditions and Add Brief Comments, as Appropriate. 1) Protective relaying is utilized to protect major power equipment against the maximum fault current (short-circuit) only.
2)
3)
Protective relays always use both the current and voltage signals for its operation.
4)
Protective relaying costs about 30% of the major power equipment it is protecting.
5)
In order to do proper relay settings calculations in a large scale (utility oriented) power system, it is essential that you should have both 3-phase and single-line-to-ground faults (bolted) information available at appropriate locations including the current distribution. Some form of polarizing (current and/or voltage) is needed for all directional relays.
6)
7)
In a three-phase power system (under normal operation), at any point in the system, both positive- and zero-sequence voltages are zero.
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 28 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
8)
To measure a 10,000A current in a normal power system application, we need to use a CT. However, if the current is 100 A only, there is no need for a CT.
9)
To design a protective relaying scheme (during the conceptual design stage), the three-line diagram and the AC, DC schematics, are absolutely essential.
10)
In modern microprocessor based relaying scheme, auxiliary relays are not used extensively to perform a variety of control functions and logic.
11)
Modern day microprocessor relays perform more than relaying like event recording, fault location detection, other control and monitoring functions.
12)
In microprocessor based relays, for each function (defined by ANSI Numbers), you need a separate relay.
13)
Knowledge of polarity and phase-sequence is essential for proper relay applications (selection).
14)
In an ungrounded wye connected system, if one phase goes to ground, the voltages of the other two phases goes up to the line voltages (with respect to ground) of the system.
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 29 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012
15)
16)
In a delta-wye connected two-winding transformer, there is a phase-shift of 30o (for positive sequence) between the primary and secondary line quantities (voltage and currents), and the standard ANSI connection recommends the low-voltage quantities to lead the high-voltage quantities.
17)
In a 3-phase power system, zero-sequence currents for all three phases are same.
18)
In a three-phase power system with a delta-wye (grounded) transformer, zero-sequence current flows (confined) within the delta windings (in the loop).
19)
For all faults involving ground, there will always be (in general) some zerosequence current in line.
20)
Dr. P. K. Sen, PE, Fellow IEEE 30 Professor, Colorado School of Mines Senior Consultant, NEI Electric Power Engineering, Inc.
[2012] IEEE IAS Distinguished Lecture Series Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Delhi: India January, 2012