Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1K views

    ABS-CBN V PMSI

    Uploaded by

    Kirk Alwyn Gonzales RN
    1. ABS-CBN sued PMSI, a signal provider with cable and satellite services, for allegedly infringing on its copyrights by transmitting ABS-CBN channels to provinces where they are not usually shown. 2. The Supreme Court ruled that PMSI did not violate property rights because it was merely carrying ABS-CBN's signals and not originating the content. 3. The Court also ruled that the National Telecommunications Commission had valid authority to issue the "Must-Carry Rule" requiring signal providers to transmit certain local channels, as radio frequencies are subject to regulation in the public interest.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    ABS-CBN V PMSI

    Uploaded by

    Kirk Alwyn Gonzales RN
    1K views1 page
    1. ABS-CBN sued PMSI, a signal provider with cable and satellite services, for allegedly infringing on its copyrights by transmitting ABS-CBN channels to provinces where they are not usually shown. 2. The Supreme Court ruled that PMSI did not violate property rights because it was merely carrying ABS-CBN's signals and not originating the content. 3. The Court also ruled that the National Telecommunications Commission had valid authority to issue the "Must-Carry Rule" requiring signal providers to transmit certain local channels, as radio frequencies are subject to regulation in the public interest.

    Original Title

    ABS-CBN v PMSI

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. ABS-CBN sued PMSI, a signal provider with cable and satellite services, for allegedly infringing on its copyrights by transmitting ABS-CBN channels to provinces where they are not usually shown. 2. The Supreme Court ruled that PMSI did not violate property rights because it was merely carrying ABS-CBN's signals and not originating the content. 3. The Court also ruled that the National Telecommunications Commission had valid authority to issue the "Must-Carry Rule" requiring signal providers to transmit certain local channels, as radio frequencies are subject to regulation in the public interest.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    1K views1 page

    ABS-CBN V PMSI

    Uploaded by

    Kirk Alwyn Gonzales RN
    1. ABS-CBN sued PMSI, a signal provider with cable and satellite services, for allegedly infringing on its copyrights by transmitting ABS-CBN channels to provinces where they are not usually shown. 2. The Supreme Court ruled that PMSI did not violate property rights because it was merely carrying ABS-CBN's signals and not originating the content. 3. The Court also ruled that the National Telecommunications Commission had valid authority to issue the "Must-Carry Rule" requiring signal providers to transmit certain local channels, as radio frequencies are subject to regulation in the public interest.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation vs. Philippine Multi-Media System, Inc. G.R. Nos.

    175769-70, January 19, 2009 Facts: Philippine Multi-Media System Inc (PMSI) is a signal provider which has cable and satellite services. It is providing its satellite services through Dream Broadcasting System. PMSI has its Free TV and Premium Channels. The Free TV includes ABS-CBN, GMA-7 and other local networks. The premium channels include AXN, Jack TV, etc which are paid by subscribers before such channels can be transmitted as feeds to a subscribers TV set which has been installed with a Dream satellite. ABS-CBN is a television and broadcasting corporation. It broadcasts television programs by wireless means to Metro Manila and nearby provinces, and by satellite to provincial stations through Channel 2 and Channel 23. The programs aired over Channels 2 and 23 are either produced by ABS-CBN or purchased from or licensed by other producers. ABS-CBN also owns regional television stations which pattern their programming in accordance with perceived demands of the region. Thus, television programs shown in Metro Manila and nearby provinces are not necessarily shown in other provinces. In May 2002, ABS-CBN sued PMSI for allegedly engaging in rebroadcasting and thereby infringing on ABS-CBNs copyrights; that the transmission of Channels 2 and 23 to the provinces where these two channels are not usually shown altered ABS-CBNs programming for the said provinces. PMSI argued that it is not infringing upon ABS-CBNs copyrights because it is operating under the Must-Carry Rule outlined in NTC (National Telecommunications Commission) Circular No. 4-0888. Issue: 1. Whether or not PMSI violated the Laws on Property Rights. 2. Whether or not the issuance MC 4-08-88 by the NTC is a valid exercise of the police power of the State. Ruling: 1. NO. PMSI did not violate the Laws on Property Rights because it is not engaged in rebroadcasting Channels 2 and 23. Rebroadcasting has been defined as the simultaneous broadcasting by one broadcasting organization of the broadcast of another broadcasting organization. It is also the transmission by wireless means for the public reception of sounds or of images or of representations thereof; such transmission by satellite is also broadcasting where the means for decrypting are provided to the public by the broadcasting organization or with its consent. PMSI is only engaged in the carrying of signals of ABS-CBN coming from ABSCBN and transmitting signals. PMSI is not the origin nor does it claim to be the origin of the programs broadcasted by the ABS-CBN. PMSI did not make and transmit on its own but merely carried the existing signals of the ABS-CBN. When PMSI subscribers view ABS-CBNs programs in Channels 2 and 23, they know that the origin thereof was the ABS-CBN. Therefore, the retransmission of ABS-CBNs signals by PMSI which functions essentially as a cable television does not constitute rebroadcasting in violation of the formers intellectual property rights under the IP Code. 2. YES. The law on copyright is not absolute. The carriage of ABS-CBNs signals by virtue of the must-carry rule in Memorandum Circular No. 04-08-88 is under the direction and control of the government though the NTC which is vested with exclusive jurisdiction to supervise, regulate and control telecommunications and broadcast services/facilities in the Philippines. The imposition of the must-carry rule is within the NTCs power to promulgate rules and regulations, as public safety and interest may require, to encourage a larger and more effective use of communications, radio and television broadcasting facilities, and to maintain effective competition among private entities in these activities whenever the Commission finds it reasonably feasible. Moreover, radio and television waves are mere franchised which may be reasonably burdened with some form of public service. It is a privilege subject, among other things, to amendment by Congress in accordance with the constitutional provision that any such franchise or right granted shall be subject to amendment, alteration or repeal by the Congress when the common good so requires.

    You might also like