Change Your Image
saadanathan
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Reviews
The Offer (2022)
Paramount made me an offer I couldn't refuse
The Offer is a wild biography about the making of Mario Puzo's The Godfather and the crisis production that it went through behind the scenes. The series is based on the experience of producer Albert S. Ruddy (Miles Teller).
As a big fan of the franchise myself, I was excited to watch this series and discover what went behind the scenes. It isn't unknown that many movies throughout history have been through A crisis production: Apocalypse Now (1979), the Star Wars trilogy (1977 - 1983) and any movie that suffered from the COVID 19 pandemic.
But for a movie based on a novel to be met with so much controversy that it involved the Italian mafia and political figures is just wild and quite amusing. So, after watching the show I have to admit it was indeed amusing and intriguing.
The series does not slow its pace at any moment, which could be a positive note and a negative at the same time. I had a hard time following through the first episode because the whole timeline felt scrambled everywhere: between Al Ruddy (Teller) pitching the series Hogan's Heroes (1965 - 1971) to Mario Puzo writing the novel The Godfather and up until Paramount decides to pick up the project there is at least a 5-6-year time gap that goes to fast and there is barely time to adjust.
Within the fast pacing of the series, there are a few inaccuracies in history that are later revealed regarding the involvement of Joe Colombo and the Mob in the production of the film. So unfortunately, some scenes are dramatized for audience reaction.
The acting on the other hand is beyond recognition, every actor in this show does a suburb performance and has true devotion to the real characters they are portraying.
Matthew Goode for me steals the show, his portrayal of senior vice president of Paramount Robert Evans is just so captivating and impressive, he's a real pleasure to watch and the real star of the show.
Juno Temple is a true gem; her wide range of acting allows her to perform so well in every role so far. Between Vinyl and Ted Lasso, to her role in The Offer. She is really amazing.
Colin Hanks does a great job of portraying the typical Hollywood producer, the one that interferes with the creators' choices and decisions. The type of producer that thinks he knows what's best to make the movie successful and marketable. As much as I disliked his character, there was some sense in what he was saying. I could've understood why he was making going against the other characters, Paramount had a lot on their plate and were facing many risks.
I enjoyed the dynamic between Lapidus (Hanks) and Evans (Goode). Their relationship knew its ups and downs. In general, all dynamics between characters were great; Ruddy and McCartt (Temple), Puzo (Patrick Gallo) and Coppola (Dan Fogler). Ruddy and Colombo (Giovanni Ribisi).
In conclusion, I believe fans of The Godfather will enjoy this series and all it's references. Paramount did an excellent job paying homage to it's greatest movie of all time.
Masters of the Air (2024)
Spielberg and Hanks have done it again
Masters of the Air is a brilliant and astonishing miniseries centering around the U. S. Air Force during World War 2.
Produced by Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks, the same creators of Band of Brothers & The Pacific. This epic miniseries chronicles the lives of the brave men who fought in the air against the German air force during World War 2 and up until the end. Flying B17 bombers also known as "Flying Fortresses".
Aside of the stunning visuals of the air combats, the real element that makes this show special and heartful is the brotherhood and companionship between the pilots, the bond they share on and off the air.
As a big fan of the previous shows mentioned, I knew I would enjoy Masters of the Air at the same scale. The show follows the same format of having a main character recall his tales and narrate the story, same way Ricard Winters (Damian Lewis) did in Band of Brothers. In that case we have Lt. Harry Crosby (Anthony Boyle) who narrates his exploits and experience in the war, the friends he lost and the missions he's been to.
The cast is impressive and very talented. All actors are emotionally intact with their characters, in particular Anthony Boyle and Nate Mann who both do a great job of evoking emotion and empathy.
The score of the series is beautiful and well made. Composed by Blake Neely who also composed the score for The Pacific.
In conclusion, I'm happy to watch another series centering around one of the most important wars and turning points in human history. After watching the two other shows mentioned earlier, I was happy to encounter another tale of brotherhood and courage and experience a brave story of good vs evil.
Rome (2005)
Before Game of Thrones, there was Rome
Rome is a historical epic depicting the final days of the Roman Republic with the use of both fictional and real characters from around that period.
The key feature of this series lies within its two main protagonists, the dynamic duo Lucius Vorenus and Titus Pullo. Portrayed by Kevin McKidd (Soap MacTavish from Call of Duty: modern warfare) and the late Ray Stevenson (The Ahsoka Tano series) respectively.
The dynamic duo concept is a rather common feature used in shows and movies, it is a feature meant to portray two characters that work perfectly well together, or the opposant, are very different from one another and yet still complete each other. Likewise, Chandler and Joey, or Kramer and Newman.
Vorenus (McKidd) and Pullo (Stevenson) are no strangers to this concept, they both work very well together and yet always at each other's throats. Vorenus is more of a square type of figure, very strict and man that goes by the book. Pullo on the other hand is a freelancer, does whatever he wants and doesn't plan ahead.
Put these two together in a show that centers around the Roman Empire and you get a somewhat of comedy (at least from I've been viewing the two). But Rome is not a comedy, it is an early version of what is to be seen in the late Game of Thrones a decade later.
A show about wars, betrayals and political games that grow bigger as the seasons progress, A show that depicts how family can be the biggest enemy of a man, how if little mercy is shown than the lions will eat anything alive.
In just two seasons, Rome manages to capture the same excitement and passion that Game of Thrones has delivered later on. Even though some of the plot points have been dramatized for the show to be interesting, most of what's told is true to history and quite interesting.
I would point out that season two falls a bit short from season one, the whole arc they've built around Vorenus and the tension with his family hasn't interested me, even in terms of political games it became less interesting after Caesar is killed.
Another thing that bothered me a bit while watching was the accent of some of the actors, most of the cast are from Great Britain and thus have a heavy British accent, it kind of affected the whole atmosphere of the show having these actors portray Italian/Roman ancient figures from a few centuries ago. Aside of that issue, it doesn't bother the overall viewing of the series.
In Conclusion, Rome is an epic period drama that predates other classic shows such as Game of Thrones, Vikings and even Succession by laying down the essential features that should be presented in a political mind game show.
Arrival (2016)
Memory is a strange thing, or is it even a memory?
The most intriguing thing about Denis Villeneuve's Arrival is not the presence of the aliens nor their enormous ships floating midair. But rather the human's interaction with them. And with each other.
If there is a lesson to be learned upon watching this film, is that interaction amongst each other is the key to understanding one another. How by not sharing knowledge can things escalate for the worst.
The main two questions that come to mind when speaking of an alien presence are "why are they here?" and "what is their purpose?". We as humans automatically assume their purpose on earth is war and to conquer worlds (such as in Independence Day & War of the Worlds). Yet in Arrival their purpose is to teach humans their language to communicate and be of service.
The plot and final reveal are an interesting take on the arrival of aliens and suggest an alternative than the usual cry out for war. I enjoyed the reveal and thought it to be original and delivers a great message.
An interesting detail I've picked up half way through the film was when the characters discovered the Chinese have been communicating with their aliens using Mahjong, A game of competition and rivalry. A game that like chess could be translated into signs of opposition, victory, defeat. Meaning someone could get the wrong impression that these are signs of war.
I found this moment to be very interesting because it shows how using the "wrong" tools of communication could deliver a false message that needs to be clarified.
Finally, I want to point out the ending of the movie (or should I say the beginning?). The flashbacks of Louise Banks (Amy Adams) were in fact Flash-forwards into her future, and since she explains how for the aliens time works different, that for them it is nonlinear. She figures out how her future will look like. So just like time in this film, also the plot is linear.
This has been the second time that Villeneuve has managed to blow up my mind (first time with Incendies). The amount of talent this man has, along with the partnership with every screenwriter he works with is beyond amazing to me. (shout out to writer Eric Heisserer and original story by Ted Chiang).
Overall, I enjoyed the pure idea and story. It was definitely an interesting take to put not the aliens but rather the humans at the center of the conflict and verge of a global war. The exploration of linear time is a subject I'm familiar with from Nolan's films. And Villeneuve has executed it perfectly.
Sunset Blvd. (1950)
I guess the price for a pool was a bit too high
Sunset Boulevard is a story of false belief and deception, how greed can drag a man to big lows and eventually seal his fate in a brutal way.
The one thing I find clever about Sunset Boulevard is how any person with aspirations can relate to it and find themselves in the shoes of Joe Gillis (William Holden). Many times, during the movie I found myself relating to Joe and thinking to myself if the film industry is for me, if I'm up to it and if I'm capable of writing movies for the big/small screen.
I'm not saying I'm going to get shot by a faded and delusional actress, but the movie did put me in an unease position about my future.
In general, the film has an unease tone to it, from the moment Joe Gillis enters the mansion of the infamous Norma Desmond (Gloria Swanson) up until the climax and his death. The film is accompanied by a tone of Claustrophobia, as if Gillis can't escape the mansion or the relationship with Desmond. He is trapped no matter in which sense.
The film also does a great job of demonstrating how both the main women in Gillis's life have an influence on him. Norma Desmond gives Gillis what he needs which is Money, a mansion, and a pool. All awhile Betty Schaefer (Nancy Olson) gives Gillis what he wants which is a sense of happiness in writing movies.
The idea of having both women have an influence and importance in Gillis's life is similar to how both women have an importance in the life of Travis Bickle in Taxi Driver (1976).
While watching the film, the whole setting of the story reminded me a lot of the film Misery (1990). If examined closely: both films focus on a writer struggling with a writer's block, both of the writers end up in a mansion/cabin and are being flattered by a woman who's delusional. Although both movies end differently and have major differences from one another, I still found the similarity to be amusing.
In conclusion, I found this movie to be very influential in the film noir genre and the way it demonstrates how a person's desire can backfire at them.
Rush (2013)
Like the title suggests, everyone is driven by something
Rush is an impressive movie about Rivalry, and how it drives people to push themselves to the extreme.
With the superb acting of both Daniel Bruhl and Chris Hemsworth, along with a killer soundtrack by Hans Zimmer. This sports film is perfect for anyone who's in for some thrill.
When examining the two main characters; Niki Lauda (Bruhl) and James Hunt (Hemsworth). It is clear how each one is different from the other: Lauda is determined, wise and straight to the point. Hunt is more of a playboy, he's a skilled driver but not a serious man.
These characteristics are what help set the relationship between both rivals, and generically the plot of the movie.
I guess the best way to examine this rivalry is from the sentence Lauda says to Hunt at the end of the movie: "A wise man can learn more from his enemies than a fool from his friends." It is the way both characters have been competing against each other
Aside of the rivalry, another element that comes into play is the P. O. V of the characters on the sport they take part in: Lauda is driven by the victory and works by statistics, he's wise enough to not risk his life and even says that willing to risk your life for a competition is losing.
On the other hand, there is Hunt who is driven by the thrill of the sports, living each day as if it is his last. Cheating death and facing it during the race. Hunt even says at the end of the film "what is the point of all this if you don't have fun."
So, in conclusion, the movie is not meant to prove which P. O. V of the character is the correct one to live by. It is simply meant to discuss how both rivals viewed themselves and the sports they took part in. Either way of living is acceptable, the one of Lauda and the one of Hunt.
Moonrise Kingdom (2012)
A coming-of-age and escape from reality tale
Moonrise Kingdom is an honest and personal examination on a coming-of-age story. How two young children try to navigate themselves in a challenging period of their lives.
Upon watching the film and later examining it, I've come to the conclusion that the escape plan of Sam and Suzy is in fact not to escape from their parents and child services, but an escape from reality.
Sam is an orphan and a misfit everywhere he goes; Suzy discovers her mother (Frances McDormand) is having an affair with Captain Sharp (Bruce Willis). Each of them is feeling trapped in their reality and find common ground when they're together. Hence why they decide to run away and start a new life on the spot they call Moonrise Kingdom.
Filled with Anderson's unique technique of filming consisting of Pan, Dolly and Tilt movements. This artistic style film is depicting the challenges of adulthood with the best possible way, in the form of children. Jared Gilman and Kara Hayward as Sam and Suzy respectively do the best job possible of portraying kids running from their reality, with each presenting moral subjects.
The entire tone of the movie is built on odd and quirky humor that is present in all of Wes Anderson movies. The tone in which the characters are very direct in their conversation. All wrapped in a romantic story between to kids trying to deal with the challenges of their adult lives.
The ending to me is perfect; not because of the "everything is back to normal" type of end, but the way Sam and Suzy manage to move on with their lives together. The final shot of Sam's drawing of the Island spot they lived in is a reminder of the memories to treasure. That bit of childhood that will stay with them forever.
The Monuments Men (2014)
Ocean 11 during War World 2
The main reason I enjoyed The Monuments Men is because it is a perfect combination between a true story and a humorous one. Creating an enjoyable movie experience.
Centering around a group of artists, historians, and architects; Tasked with retrieving stolen arts and sculptures from Nazi Germany during World War 2. From the very beginning; the writers put a lot of emphasis on the important task to retrieve the stolen arts and return them to their owners.
While the task seems impossible and at the time quite ridiculous, Leader of the platoon Frank Stokes (George Clooney) is determined to save the pieces of history of human kind. While also reminding everyone that no amount of human life is worth sacrificing for a piece of art. A moral question that comes into play throughout the story.
What attracted me to the film were the dynamics between the platoon members, how they are all different from one another and yet share the same passion for art.
As I mentioned earlier, this film is a great combination between a true story and a humorous one, nowadays; it seems all movies based on a true story have to be dramatic, filled with depth, show a darker tone and image of the person the audience would have chosen not to see. Take for instance the movies of Elvis (2022) and Blonde (2022).
In the case of The Monuments Men; it is based on a true story. And even if not all the characters are real; they are amusing and all play a significant role. The story in itself is interesting, Combined with a bit of drama and humor and an uplifting soundtrack by Alexandre Desplat. With both elements combined - the movie becomes an enjoyable experience.
I guess the best advise I could give for film creators who struggle to make a movie based on a true story. Aside of staying true to the source material, is to enjoy the experience, have the movie filled with simple moments between characters and dynamics that reveal more about the characters we as audience are supposed to empathize with.
Chung Hing sam lam (1994)
Why you should study Kar Wai Wong
Kar Wai Wong is an exceptional director; his movies are odd yet poetic at the same time. Upon watching Chungking Express I have found a similar pattern among all his films. They all examine the subject of loneliness.
At first watch it may not pop out immediately, but if rewatching those movies it becomes brighter how each character is "trapped" in their own world, longing for a close person to relate with.
In the mood for Love, two neighbors share a platonic relationship after discovering their spouses are cheating on them. They do not have a relationship beyond their status from the fear of being betrayed again. Hence both are a bit cold and restrained.
In Fallen Angles, every main character has their own thing going on, no one is trying to create a relationship with the other for one reason or another. Hence all the characters are lonely - they like being in their own world.
Same pattern is followed in Chungking Express, the characters are "stuck" in their own world, while some are more active in the story and try to initiate a conversation with the other. For instance, in Story 1; Cop 223 (Takeshi Kaneshiro) is interested in the woman in Blonde Wig (Brigitte Lin) while the other is passive and disinterested.
In story 2; Faye (Faye Wong) is more interested in a relationship with Cop 663 (Tony Leung) and goes lengths to make his house cleaner. Yet she doesn't ask him out nor initiates contact with him. Another example of how Kar Wai Wong's world is filled with characters who are trapped in their own worlds and lonely.
I highly recommend to all cinephiles out there to watch Kar Wai Wong movies and be exposed to different kind of cinema. The one that isn't well known or taught in film class. Try to be exposed to the odd kind of movies in his making and learn from them something new.
Kramer vs. Kramer (1979)
Does a great job of depicting a child stuck in the middle
Kramer vs. Kramer is a touching movie about a father and son relationship, and their struggle to deal with the mother's absence. A movie about love that has three sides.
Upon watching the film, I remembered my first-time watching Marriage Story (2019). And how heartfelt it was. Of course, Marriage Story probably took some inspiration from Kramer vs. Kramer, since both films focus on elements such as divorce and child custody.
Yet out of the two, Marriage Story was my favorite mostly because it does a better job of demonstrating how a couple argues over marriage and divorce: at first both parties try to seal the deal quietly and without drama, then when child custody comes into play, the couple argues and show their true colors, all while the children find themselves in the middle torn apart.
The Scene where Charlie (Adam Driver) and Nicole (Scarlett Johansson) argue at the apartment is not only the best scene of the entire movie, but it is the one scene that was missing for the entirety of Kramer vs. Kramer.
With all that being said, Kramer vs. Kramer does a better job at demonstrating the relationship between parent and child. Ted (Dustin Hoffman) and Billy (Justin Henry) have a bond that grows throughout the whole movie. Ted being a work-obsessed person learns how to pay attention to his son and take care of him.
The comparison between the first time Ted and Billy try to make French toast for breakfast and the last time is emotionally touching. Especially after you see how much they've been through. I think this movie does a better job in making the child be more of an active character than in Marriage Story; in which the child Henry (Azhy Roberton) is not active nor aware of his surroundings.
Overall I find much pleasure and heart in both films, in one element where something lacks, there is something else to offer.
Dune: Part Two (2024)
An Epic installment portrayed on the big screen
Dune: Part Two is a spectacular movie that comes in times where there are nearly no more great movies in Hollywood; While the industry is busy with random, dry content such as Marvel, DC and even Star Wars. Some creators manage to salvage a bit of honor left in the film and TV industry and create some epic movies and shows.
Either it be Nolan with Oppenheimer, Spielberg with Masters of the Air or even now, Villeneuve with Dune Part 2. It's good to know that some creators still have a certain passion and drive to make epic movies.
In my last review of Dune from 2021, I expressed my disappointment over the need of turning Dune into a new franchise. I still stand by that thought, A trilogy would have been good enough because with six books to cover it really bears the question - how long can this be going? How long till this franchise will be completely worn out?
I feel at this point that complementing the Visual Affects is an obvious statement, for such a grandiose movie the VFX will most certainly be at a high level.
Greig Fraser is the one to thank for the crazy photography, there is nothing to compare between this and a Disney or Marvel movie.
In terms of casting, among all the characters Paul was my favorite. Paul Atreides (Timothee Chalamet) to me kind of redefines the title "the chosen one." He is powerful and a born leader, with plenty of followers by his side. I haven't been this invested in a "chosen one" character since the prequal trilogy with Anakin Skywalker.
Which is why I believe we could see in the third film a major downfall to his character, a tragedy to come. It's like the old saying: "you either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain."
Chani (Zendaya) is not much of a interesting character, sure I might be missing something that others can point out to me. But story and plot speaking she doesn't deliver much. Which is why it felt weird for me to end the movie with her fleeing the scene.
Feyd-Rautha (Austin Butler) felt like an interesting villain, not the most worthy opponent to Paul. But still had some potential. If the movie had done more to dive into his character, I believe he could have been great for the rest of the franchise.
To summarize, as much as I want to be invested in the story world of Dune. I don't understand the need to turn it into an entire new franchise. Sure, there are many reasons such as money and marketing. And yet still I don't know what to make out of it. I rather enjoy the movies as they are.
La La Land (2016)
Why Damien Chazelle is an Author
The best thing about Damien Chazelle's 'La La Land' is that it's a movie anyone can relate to. Any person with aspirations of becoming something can watch Mia (Emma Stone) and Sebastian (Ryan Gosling) on screen and say "I feel just like them!"
I've been trying to look for something specific that attracted me to this film; for those who don't know, I'm not a fan of musicals. It's my least favorite genre and every time I watch one, I wish to enter the screen and hold the characters at gun point so they shut up and stop singing.
With all that being said; I did enjoy the overall tone of the movie, everything that surrounds it: from costume designs and set decoration, to lighting and visual colors, to the soundtrack and dance sequences. I think the dance scene between Mia and Sebastian in the middle night was one of my favorite scenes.
But what really fascinated me upon watching this film is that I found out how well of an Author Damien Chazelle is (A director that has the same motives and patterns in all his movies).
One of Chazelle's repeating patterns is his ambitious characters:
Whiplash (2014) is about a young drummer who pushes himself to the limit because of his ambitions of becoming the best drummer ever.
First Man (2018) is about the life of Neil Armstrong and his journey to the moon.
Babylon (2022) (I mean heck, who isn't ambitious in that film? There is Nelly La Roy who wants to be an actress and Manny Torres who wants to make movies).
Now there's La La Land, where the two main characters are ambitious and want to succeed in what they love the most, Mia as an actress and Sebastian as a Musician. It's their ambitions that eventually drive them apart.
The story is wonderful and as I said earlier, it's a story that anyone can relate to. The one negative thing I have to say about the story is it's ending, it's predictable.
The whole story goes like this: two people try to succeed in their passions, they meet and fall in love, they break up, both end up succeeding in their goals but separately. And to end it all with a sad note, there is an entire sequence that shows a scenario of what could have been, a fantasy just like in the movies.
The ending where both characters end up successful yet separately seems predictable. I could have figured out the ending myself by not watching the movie, but I wished for something different, although having Mia and Sebastian together as a couple like in the fantasy sequence would also have been predictable, too good to be true.
So really I don't know myself how I would have ended the film, sure it is a fascinating story and one people can empathize with. But giving the realistic ending I feel a bit empty and not moved.
Aside of that, I enjoyed the movie and believe it deserved the academy award for best picture (giving the circumstances of the mix-up back in 2016)
I highly recommend to watch this movie for those who want to study Damien Chazelle, and the way he writes ambitious characters. For those who want to relate and empathize with these kind of characters, you're going to have a wonderful experience.
Avatar: The Last Airbender (2024)
Fair adaptation but does not exceed the childhood magic
Avatar: The Last Airbender Netflix version is a bit of a mixed bag; on one hand it fails to capture the magic of the original series, on the other hand it seems to stay very loyal to the source material from first watch. The best way to look at this show is from an open mind, there is no other way.
Let's dive into the world of Avatar by examining pros and cons, we'll focus on the pros first:
The visual effects are stunning and look most impressive, same for the entire world and locations created from story board to screen. In general everything that has to do with the surroundings is at a most high level and I appreciate the care for detail.
In terms of story, it seems the creators decided to go with a 'Game of Thrones' approach: political games, schemes and backstabbing, wars and careful planning. I for once am in favor of this approach and believe it fits well the world of Avatar (after all, there is war in the show, people die).
Zuko's arc is very well crafted, mostly because it is the most interesting of the show (both original and Netflix). From being a banished prince to a man and leader of his own destiny. Dallas Liu portrays him very well and overall it seems he's the only character amongst the others who wasn't harmed by the script.
There are other good things to say about the show but for now we'll move to the cons:
The biggest problem the show suffers from is that the creators focus mainly on the story and not the characters. In the original series, you had many filler episodes that focused on the dynamics: the episode Tales of Ba Sing Se, when the Gaang get lost in the caves with the group of hippies; Zuko and Azula going on a summer vacation with their friends.
You have many examples of character dynamics; Katara and Toph arguing, Zuko and uncle Iroh on the run throughout Book 2. There are Also moments when the characters are just acting silly. I feel all those little dynamics were absent throughout the show it could have added much more depth.
Because there were no filler episodes, there was no real chance at diving into the characters, after all Aang, Katara and Sokka are basically kids, so why not show them as kids having fun? ATLA is a show about kids on a journey, about friendship. Imagine the movie 'Stand by me' only at war times.
Another big problem the show suffers from is the pacing, this season alone is only 8 episodes, for a show like Avatar it is way too rushed. In one episode alone we were introduced to King Bumi, Jet and The Mechanist. I know Netflix couldn't make a full season of 20 episodes of live action ATLA. It's like demanding a live action version of One Piece with 100 episodes each season - in terms of budget and production it is impossible. Even a 10- or 12- part season would have been fine. I really don't see the reason to rush the story and cut corners.
In conclusion, I feel this show overall is a fair adaptation and possibly the best version of ATLA we could have got in live action. If Netflix wants this show to really succeed, they are going to have to put more effort in the script and characters, as of now this series is far from reaching the same level of magic the original show possessed.
Ted (2024)
Our favorite Teddy Bear after Winnie the Poo is back
Ted is funny show full of nonsense nonstop. The type of 'feel good' shows that you want to watch during the weekends and relax to.
For those who were wishing for a third movie of Ted, this show is by far the most we will get. Until Seth MacFarlane finally puts an end to Family Guy, we'll just have to get used to a series which is as good as the movies.
Hopefully the success of the series will lead to a second season and a third film, because as of now Ted has been quite a hit; surprisingly good and funny which I'm glad for. In times when comedy is hard to acquire and you can't find a lot of comedy shows or movies, Ted gives a pathway for a good laugh.
Seth MacFarlane is funny as always, adding much attitude to each character he voices. His dialogues with co star Max Burkholder are the main source of comedy in the series, all their dialogues together are amusing and fun to laugh at. Burkholder is great and holds some resemblance to Mark Wahlberg which is pretty impressive.
Overall I really enjoyed watching this show, Me and my brother spent most of the weekends watching it and laughing hard which was great and I hope season 2 will come soon enough to enjoy those weekends once again.
Dreamgirls (2006)
Dream BIG
Dreamgirls is a great movie, with a killer soundtrack, an ensemble cast of talented actors and an impressive production design that makes you dive into the vibe the movie gives.
As much as I don't like Musicals (again, except for The Blues Brothers. West Side Story is also great but has it's own downs). I gotta give praises to Dreamgirls for all the sayings above. The only complaint I have is that just like any other musical, the characters don't know when to shut up and stop singing. Every 5 to 10 minutes there must be someone to sing or dance.
Based on the Broadway musical and the musical group 'Diana Ross and The Supremes.' The film follows the tale of A trio of Black female soul singers rising to fame and facing personal struggles. I do love stories that tell 'The Rise and Fall of ...' yet this film actually ends on a happy note which I'm also glad for.
The whole production design and sets as I mentioned are fantastic, really colorful and impressive. The transition between scenes from a simple practice of the trio to a live performance is so clean and superb. The Hairstyling for Deena Jones (Beyonce) is great and fits her well with every outfit design.
The cast of actors is amazing and each one gives 100% of a performance, Jamie Foxx portrays a villain unlike any other could have. Beyonce and Jennifer Hudson are Top Tier, both their performances are filled with emotion and enthusiasm. Hudson deserved her academy award and Beyonce's performance of the song 'Listen' is powerful. In Addition, her resemblance in the film to Diana Ross is shockingly good.
To me, the real surprise was Eddie Murphy. His performance as James 'Thunder' Early is hilarious and surprisingly touching. Sure, his character cheats on everyone and uses drugs, yet something about him is vulnerable and I enjoyed watching Murphy take on a serious role. He should have won the academy award for Best Supporting Actor in 2006 if it wasn't for Alan Arkin in 'Little Miss Sunshine'.
Although, Being a Scorsese fanatic, I probably would have given my vote to Mark Wahlberg in 'The Departed'.
Overall I enjoyed this film and loved it's great soundtrack, the whole vibe and music from the 60s and 70s must have persuaded me but I mostly enjoyed the story and characters.
West Side Story (2021)
A wonderful remake to the original love tale
As I've said before in my previous review of the original West Side Story (1961). I'm not a fan of musicals, it is my least favorite genre and yet I do love two movies in this genre: The Blues Brothers and West Side Story. For some reason I love this movie for all it's nuances and touching moments, even though I find myself sometimes joking and making fun of it.
I've already stated that Spielberg is very much the Picasso of cinema, he has no specific genre, he's not a author, he can make any film from any genre and it would be touching, full of heart and amazing. For a musical, I believe there was no better choice than West Side Story.
The plot is the same as the 1961 version, same setting, time and characters. Maria and Tony's relationship is the center of the story. Surrounding it is the ongoing fight between the Sharks and Jets.
There are a few slight changes to the story that differ from the original: such as Tony serving time in prison, Tony and Maria visiting the museum/church, etc. Little changes like these I find suiting and add more depth to the characters.
The entire cast is fantastic: Ansel Elgort is great and plays so well, Ariana DeBose is powerful and her academy award win is well deserved. The real surprise of the movie though is Rachel Zegler, she is just gorgeous and adorable, For her first movie role she completely nailed it and gave such an emotional performance.
The entire set design of the film is shockingly impressive, Combined with the dances and all the flashing colors. Spielberg and director of photography Janusz Kaminski have done a wonderful job with the lighting. The sequence where Tony and Maria are walking in the museum/church is shown with so many beautiful lights, my favorite moment of the whole movie.
Evan though all the songs are reintroduced in the movie, some of them are in a different order, the song 'Cool' sang by the Jets is placed before the rumble between the gangs. And the song 'I feel Pretty' sang by Maria is placed after the rumble. I don't understand why they did it, but the song seemed unfitting to be placed after a rumble and tragic death of two characters.
In conclusion, I've really enjoyed this movie, I've been waiting a long time to watch it ever since I heard of the film; I'm happy to say it was worth the wait and is such a wonderful remake to a overall really lovable classic.
The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford (2007)
Never meet your heroes
The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford is study case on admiration turned into obsession. A close examination of how a young man is driven by jealousy towards a person he once admired.
Upon viewing the film, I've noticed how the bitter relationship between James (Pitt) and Ford (Affleck) is the main element, the main focus. The two characters have an off-putting relationship that's not even considered "Mentor - Trainee". Ford is simply portrayed as a kid who wanted his hero to take notice of him. Only once James did take notice and joked over his admirer. Ford's admiration turned into obsession, which finally turned into resentment.
Speaking of acting, Pitt is wonderful and really captivating, from body movements to sowing fear into the other characters. All his nuances are implanted in the script in a delicate way which makes it fascinating and frighting sometimes.
I can't say the same dough about Affleck, something about his acting was really annoying and felt insecure. Though it is clear his character is supposed to resemble a fan, an admirer. I wasn't moved by his emotions. Hence why the ending didn't surprise me.
As for the cinematography by Roger Deakins, I was completely astounded. Every image and shot was so beautiful and captivating. The dark shots of the train in the opening sequence, the single shot of Robert Ford fading in from the mirror, the amount of heavily detailed shots in a single film is the type of work I trust only Deakins to make.
Overall I'm really impressed by this movie, the soundtrack that accompanies the film by Nick Cave and Warren Ellis is authentic and fits the tone so well. Along with the bitter relationship between James and Ford which is filled with emotion and hostile behavior make this movie a must watch among cinephiles.
John Wick: Chapter 4 (2023)
The Final Chapter of Baba Yega
I simply love the John Wick franchise, it is amongst the best movie franchises in recent years. I know some people may consider those movies to just be all about guns and action. But there's a lot more to it.
With cinematic expression; which centers around elements such as: camera movements, frame angles, the perfect synchronization between music and image, lighting that creates shadows and other sorts of shapes. The creators of John Wick and the franchise have turned these "Action movies" into something more artistic, more serious. And I gladly appreciate it.
Focusing on the events of the previous 2 films, John Wick is on the run for his life, searching for a pattern to earn back his freedom from the underworld.
The movie does a great job with closure, cause this is the last we'll ever see of John Wick. As I mentioned, everything that has do to with cinematography and cinematic expression is perfect. Although the story falls a bit short.
1) First of all, Wick's desire is to be free from the High Table's debt. But it seems that throughout the film what Wick really desires is to reunite with his wife Helen who passed away prior to the events of the first film (2014).
For those who forgot, Helen was portrayed by Bridget Moynahan in the first film and her death had a huge impact on John. In the final film I've failed to see the impact of her death on John this time.
Maybe if there were dream sequences or scenes of the two characters together I may have been able to empathize with John's grief and desire to be with her.
2) Second problem I felt the movie suffered from was the lack of a main antagonist. As much as Bill Skarsgård was impressive, his character mostly pulled the strings like a puppet master, he was pretty passive for a villain.
I don't consider Donnie Yen's character to be a villain cause he's really drawn by the desire to reunite with his daughter. He and John share mutual respect and their fight scenes are carried with a lot of emotion.
To be honest I don't recall any John Wick film to feature a villain who was a big threat or menace towards John. Even the so called High Table are never to be seen on screen.
Overall when it comes to story I feel John Wick, both character and films just lack something to make them really shine. For a movie that ends a franchise I was expecting for something sharper in terms of story.
Before I end the review I must point out that the Bird Angle sequence in the house in Paris was just top tier cinematic expression. So well done and I'm so glad to witness such a sequence.
All in all, I really enjoyed the John Wick franchise, it is really a pleasure to watch and enjoy so much action on screen. With the amount of dedication given to every scene and every fight. It's really the type of movies you want to re-watch again and again.
Serpico (1973)
How honesty can sometimes stab you in the back
Serpico is a sad tale about a man trying to do some justice only for him to be betrayed by the very same institute he swore to serve.
When dived deep into the details, whenever the story progresses, Serpico (Al Pacino) gets more angrier and more paranoid over his life. His beard and hair get longer (which may just be an appearance) but holds so much meaning to it. Serpico begins his story clean shaved and determined to fulfill his duty. As the story moves forward Serpico grows more beard and more hair, resembling an ageing man who's tired of the system, unstable and worn out.
The end of the third act when Serpico is in the hospital after being shot and breaks down in tears is a sad and heartfelt moment that summarizes his path ending at a deadlock.
Two things I have to say about the film that I feel were lacking or not empowering enough: There is a lack of music throughout the film, either there is music at the start and end or there is not at all. Except for a few brief moments. The lack of music makes the atmosphere of the film a bit empty and lackluster.
The second thing is the lack of any other interesting characters, Serpico is the main titular character and is present in every scene and place. Only because he's the only character that matters, he's also the only character that has any influence on the story. Normally in movies, there are other characters who either steal the show or have a certain impact. Serpico not only suffers from the lack of significant characters, it lacks characters in general, leaving Serpico to carry the whole movie on his back.
As much as I appreciate the heartfelt story of one man against an entire system, and as much as I love Pacino's acting. This movie fails to have any other key factors that make it shine amongst others.
True Romance (1993)
Sweet Romance film - with some bits of violence
True Romance is a fun, entertaining and full of ride movie. Quite a Tarantino film you can say. If anyone would have told me this film was directed by him, I would have probably believed them.
Starring the lovely couple duo Christian Slater and Patricia Arquette, along with an assemble of other great actors. This odd romance film is a pleasant surprise for anyone who whishes to watch a romance story with some bits of action and violence that only Tarantino can deliver.
I would even extend and say this movie reminded me of Baby Driver (2017), one of my all-time favorite movies. Maybe Baby was inspired by True Romance.
The script manages to swift the audience throughout the whole story: starting with what seems as a simple love tale, leading to a crime and murder, following a chase around the country and a journey for freedom.
Another element implanted into the story are the characters being film buffs and pop culture nerds, whenever there is a movie reference or a conversation about movies you can feel that it's Tarantino's writing style, a style that I love so much and wish to make myself one day.
Overall I really enjoyed this film and think it's a nice mixture between love and violence, the kind of mixture I didn't know Quentin can write but glad he did.
Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992)
An Interesting and tragic take on the Bloody Count
Bram Stoker's Dracula is an interesting take on the infamous Count from Romania. Dracula has always been perceived as this mysterious, monsteras, blood sucking evil creature. What Stoker and Coppola did in this case was give the character emotion and a tragic love story - a bit similar to Romeo and Juliet if you ask me.
I'll start this review with the positive aspects in my opinion: The costume designs, makeup and set decorations are amongst the most impressive I have seen in a nineties film. No wonder the movie won Best costume design and Best makeup at the Academy Awards. These aspects are captivating and feel true to the story's setting and timeline.
In terms of what was negative, I had to point out towards two things: the acting and editing:
The Editing of the film felt a bit rough to me, for example, When Professor Van Helsing (Anthony Hopkins) comes to the conclusion that the characters are facing a menace. Suddenly there is a cut to Dracula (Gary Oldman) in his grave, having a somewhat stroke. It is these kinds of small moments where the editing is not at its best.
The Acting wasn't my favorite part and I felt quite annoyed by it at some times. Don't get me wrong, Gary Oldman is a fantastic actor and his portrayal is suburb. But his acting is the only muscle that carries the movie's weight. The acting in general in really theatrical (which would make sense due to the period the story is placed). But I'm not a fan of theatrical acting (which is why I'm not a fan of Musicals). I should also point out that Keanu Reeves in this movie looks like he just came out from the set of Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure.
Overall I did enjoy the take on Dracula's story and his tragic love affair with Mina (Winona Ryder). This movie is a good example of how it's possible to humanize a villain, A writing technique that I really appreciate in movies. The more the villain is humanized and shares emotion, the better the viewers will empathize with him.
The Killer (2023)
Intelligent, aggressive and visually suburb. but feels a bit empty
The Killer starring Michael Fassbender is a stunning and good movie. Although lacks a bit of excitement. Something throughout the whole movie felt off to me.
Based on the graphic novel by Alexis Nolent and Luc Jacamon. The Killer is a good movie with a dark tone to it. I love the green colors that are present throughout the whole film. The type of green and pastel colors that have become a key feature in Fincher's movies.
The visuals and cinematography are also beautiful, I know some of the shots during the film are mostly taken by drones so it isn't much of a cinematography but the visuals are still very well made.
Although the other aspects are well done, the main issue with the film is its story: it just feels a little empty. An assassin battles a bunch of other assassins and employers on an international killing spree. Which was all caused in the first place because he messed up at his job.
Michael Fassbender is a great actor, that goes without saying. It's just his character that's full of flaws. The Killer is supposed to be a professional assassin: really clean, precise and cautious (and he definitely is, the short montage of the first chapter shows how careful and direct he is as a killer). The problem going forward is the way he executes his missions: he makes mistakes, false calculations, gets ambushed in some cases. The Killer isn't your typical 007 agent but rather a more calculating type who's misfortune in some cases.
I would say this isn't Fincher's brightest film, sure it may be visually impressive and edited in a suburb way. But just the story and turn of events feels off to me.
Nightcrawler (2014)
Study of a sympathetic sociopath
Nightcrawler is a dark, tense and fascinating story about a sociopath who tries to make a name for himself at the expense of others.
Upon viewing movies and shows, I try to play a little game and focus on many details as possible throughout the watch. It's a small exercise on focusing on the story, it's characters and world. While I was watching Nightcrawler I was really amazed by the dark lighting and use of dark colors. (shoutout to Robert Elswit for the cinematography).
Same goes for the portrayal of Louis Bloom (Jake Gyllenhaal). When we first meet louis, his first line of the film is "I'm lost." This statement alone shows his current situation and how he feels about himself for the first few minutes of the film.
The scene where he stumbles upon a car accident and witnesses how cameramen shoot the accident is a defining moment for louis, in which he sees what he can achieve by stepping in the business of "Night crawling."
Fron here on out, Louis is on a journey of making a name for himself. All a while doing so at the expense of other people. Crossing the line between observer and participant. And complimenting himself on his great work.
I found it to be odd that it wasn't Louis who committed most crimes (aside of sabotaging his opponent's van and scarifying Rick). Louis's character seemed to be the kind of person to take the gloves off, get his hands dirty and commit bad things so he'll have a story to give the media. Instead of documenting, he could have been a orchestrator of multiple crimes, which would have deepened his character.
Personally I wasn't much of a sympathizer towards louis. Yet I could understand why he did the things he did: moving bodies in crime scenes as if they were props to get a good frame, entering crime scenes before the police does to get a lot of footage, following criminals and calling the cops just to get footage for the news.
All the wrongdoings he's committed was to achieve a certain position, gain himself more attention. Because louis Bloom is portrayed to be the protagonist, the audience feels a certain urge to root for him. Sure he may be a sociopath who cares little to non, but the way he accomplishes success makes you cheer for the protagonist. What seems to be more disturbing is the way he's rewarded for his actions. As if it's a way of telling how society encourages people such as louis Bloom.
Overall I really enjoyed the film and it's dark tone, I loved the story Dan Gilroy created, a vicious sociopath who gains fame, by committing crimes and staging scenes. Yet with all that he's being paid and rewarded by the news channel. A nice demonstration of a sympathetic sociopath.
Ted Lasso (2020)
One of the most heartfelt shows of recent years 7/10
Ted Lasso is a wonderful show, full of joy, laughter, and heart. Whenever I think about TV shows that have emotion put into the script, I come up with a few examples: Breaking Bad, The Sopranos, Better Call Saul, etc. But Ted Lasso took me by surprise.
For starters, I'm a huge Football fan (face it, It's called football, drop the whole soccer nonsense). So I already knew I would enjoy the show and its humor. Second the concept of the show and the screenplay is quite brilliant: a American football coach heads to London to manage a Premier League football team. Even though he doesn't posses any knowledge of the game.
The idea behind the script is funny, the amount of potential and ways the show could have gone is huge, and I believe the show delivered well in its own way - the Lasso way.
Season 1 was a joyful ride, from the introduction of the characters, the small differences of culture, the arc of Ted and his struggle with panic attacks and divorce. Overall the first season centered around failure (with the club being relegated) and how to deal with change (the life chancing experience for Ted).
Season 2 dealt with success as AFC Richmond successfully got promoted back to the Premier League, although I felt most of the time the show went to astray, many different plot points that didn't really matter. The whole Sam and Rebecca romance for example.
Season 3 was all about closure, all characters get a satisfying ending, the club is in good hands and heads towards a better future, and Ted reunites with his son.
Unlike other shows who have a narrative line, Ted Lasso focuses on filler episodes, episodes that do not necessarily connect with each other but reveal more about the characters. Every episode has something to offer in terms of context, subtext, emotion, and relations.
Aside of Ted, I enjoyed other characters such as Sam and Roy Kent. In general I loved most of the characters, their all sweet and funny. Full of rage yet also soft.
In conclusion, I really enjoyed this series. As much as I wished the show would have continued. I'm happy with the way it ended. Better to have a closed ending than to drag a show for eternity. I highly recommend to watch for those who love shows with heart.
Incendies (2010)
Twins discover their past, we cinephiles have discovered Villeneuve
Denis Villeneuve is a magnificent and brilliant director, in his case he either makes good movies or he doesn't make movies at all. Truly one of the only directors nowadays in Hollywood who makes movies with a deep passion and love to the art.
His Keymark film would have to be his first movie titled "Incendies," a horrible and strong tale about broken promises and family secrets. The story centers around twins who travel to the middle east to discover their family history. In order to fulfill their mother's last wish.
The movie is split into two time periods: the past focusing on the mother and her voyages across the war-torn country. And the present focusing on the twins and their effort to discover the past.
God forbid if I dare spoil the ending of this massive movie, you're just going to have to watch and be amazed by yourself.
Aside of the subtle soundtrack by Gregoire Hertzel, the cinematography by Andre Turpin, and the editing by Monique Dartonne. The movie has a really unique tone, it's a simple story about family and dealing with the past as it is, to embrace it.
I have to say though that I had a problem with the characters chemistry throughout the story, I felt like there wasn't much balance between the twins, I was way more intrigued and interested in Jeanne's quest than Simon. Jeanne was more active and determent to find out about her father's identity. Simon was really passive up until it was his turn to discover his brother's identity.
I'm glad I finally watched this film, it was a chilling and frighting experience, not only did I enjoy the story and the journey all characters went through, but I came to respect and adore Villeneuve even more as a filmmaker.