Change Your Image
Goosegirl14
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Reviews
The Wild Robot (2024)
A lovely watch, with great messages
I'm not that into animation (sorry, very unpopular opinion, i know), but was quite drawn to see this because it sounded a bit different, and was an opportunity to spent time with my nephew!
The story was great, the animation excellent, and it had a lot of really valuable messages and themes that could have been sickly and sentimal in lazy hands.
However, the film was really careful to not be preachy, and to deliver an engaging plot, with a fabulous array of characters, with lessons subtly interwoven.
My nephew really enjoyed it, and he is neurodiverse, and often finds it hard to sit in a cinema/anywhere for very long. So the fact he was engaged throughout is testament to it's strengths.
I can't really find anything much to criticise, but the reason I'm scoring 7 is because i didn't think it was 'wow'! Nor was the plot that original (think ET, short circuit, etc). I think most kids would have a good time watching it, although my niece who is a little older (10yrs) was not that enthusiastic about it.
Juror #2 (2024)
Flawed, but a good concept & very watchable
I was really intrigued by the advertised description, which didn't give much away (as often can be the case!), but gave enough information to make me very motivated to see Juror #2.
Good points: I was engaged throughout, the casting was excellent, the performances were convincing, and it was thought provoking and an interesting/unique concept for a plot. I love a courtroom drama, and insights into different justice systems. It highlighted the different attitudes members of the jury can come to the trial with, and how these, and their past experiences can influence their perspective.
It did a good job at creating main characters who, despite the awful tragedy, and facts, were empathetic, and my alliances were torn throughout.
Not so good: I did feel a little frustrated because there were so many, in my very inexperienced opinion, of aspects to the case that meant the case to prosecute the accused wasn't strong enough. (I accept i may be totally wrong here, though).
I was surprised how 2D some of the characters on the jury were, and pretty simplistic and dated stereotypes.
I also felt that the jury turning 'detective' and coming up with the exact version of what did potentially happen, as an alternative to the prosecution 's, a bit unbelievable. Would a jury REALLY be able to surmise this with the limited time and information and expertise?
Finally, the final verdict was never explained. One scene it's an evenly split jury if guilty/not guilty, next scene, after one conversation between 2 of the 12 jurors, it's a unanimous vote!? How did those 5 other jurors suddenly get persuaded to completed change their minds?
All the above said, i thought it was a very watchable film, and definitely an enjoyable, satisfying enough Saturday night stream at home one. The cast is excellent, and visuals are quality.
The Apprentice (2024)
A relief because this film wasn't......
First thing to say is that i was relieved this film didn't do what the trailer hinted it may do.....i. E. portray Roy Cohn as a Rasputin figure, who 'made' Trump the utter horror show he is.
While, yes, Cohn was certainly (according to this depiction), an extremely morally bankrupt and vile man who helped stoke the fires of hell that burn so brutally brightly in Trump now, he wasn't a used as a scapegoat. Trump was, thank goodness, shown to be fully responsible for being the absolute narcissist and arrogant nightmare he is!. He wasn't let off the hook, nor made to look like a lamb that was flogged into becoming a wolf.
Secondly, The Apprentice was definitely engaging, well done, interesting, and worth watching. I thought the casting was good and performances, excellent. Far from 'impressions ' or impersonations- Jeremy strong and Sebastian Stan embodied their roles and had clearly studied them well, perceiving way beyond the surface appearance of Trump and Cohn. The film captured the era and place, vibes and political landscape at the time brilliantly. It was authentic and no caricatures of people or settings/times were present.
However, despite so many praiseworthy aspects, The Apprentice failed to have a big emotional impact on me......I feel that It lacked something......I'm not quite sure what though.....maybe it is simply because the people portrayed (apart from Ivana), we're so dislikable? I'm not sure. Then again, i know some films are meant to be interesting, and more of a study, and/or give the audience insights previously absent. Not all movies or stories are told with the intension of stirring deep emotions or leaving us imprinted /changed. I've just seen some incredibly moving and 'wow' films recently so I've been a bit spoilt!
I'm sure there are a lot of people (most!) who could give a far more intelligent and correctly critical review of The Apprentice, than I can/have here. So forgive me if I've missed many important points and observations. I am glad I saw it and would recommend to anyone who enjoys biopics or films /books that are character studies. I wouldn't be surprised if after some time, I feel slightly more or differently about the film. I have a feeling it may be one of those that ones needs to 'sit with' for a while.
Hell or High Water (2016)
A great, entertaining watch!
This is not the kind of film I'm drawn to. I feared clichés, tired/unoriginal tropes, and 2D characters.
I was pleasantly surprised by how much I enjoyed it. There was such a great cast, who seemed to have genuine chemistry and I can honestly say there were no week links.
The four main actors were particularly good.
While the plot is one that has been repeated (or versions of it) plenty of times before, this had a fresh energy and kept my attention fully throughout. It has dark humour, and the Jeff bridges character is a problematic curmudgeon who deep down has a heart and genuine love of his partner who is just one of many he casually abuses and offends.
The relationships that are portrayed between the brothers and the cops is a pleasure to watch and I felt such an array of emotions thanks to the clever tone and script. I can understand some may find it problematic due to the racism of Jeff bridges' character, but I think it is done tk reflect truth of many of the characters that do serve in such positions and in that older generation. Plus. It was fantastic to watch his first nations colleague come back at him with the best put downs and bat away his comments with the wittiest retorts!
The Critic (2023)
The consequences of spite and narcissism
I wasn't convinced I actually wanted to see this. I had heard bits about it and not great reviews overall. The praise when it did come tended to focus on the performances, which I do agree with.
This may sound a weird thing to say/obvious but it is definitely a film in which everyone is 'acting'. It's not naturalistic or raw in the way films by Ken loach or Andrea Arnold for example. It is put together in the traditional idea of a British movie. It is polished, the cast are all excellent at doing exactly what they're meant to. The story was far more engaging and compelling than I expected.
While I completely appreciate It is not anything that's not been done before, nor will it particularly stand out in my mind- it was a perfectly entertaining, and I am glad I saw it. I would recommend to certain friends and family who I suspect will like it. I felt that sometimes it was perhaps a little 'confused' in what it was trying to 'be'/do. I think IMHO it's best consumed as a light, entertaining film that repeats back to us the well known warnings and truths.....no one likes a narcist apart from the narcist. Spite and greed, selfishness and self grandiose only result in pain and suffering. Hurt people, hurt people.
There are some important acknowledgements of the not so long ago horrendous treatment of anyone loving someone of the same sex received. The homophobia within law, and throughout society is sickening.
However, the fact that's and realities it does 'walkabout are not done so as obvious 'themes'. It doesn't feel like it has an agenda/aim os to moralise or judge. It simply reflects the worst parts of human nature in a very aesthetically beautiful, light handed way, I'm not a big Ian McKellen fan (I do though, definitely appreciate him and can see why he is acclaimed), but I heard some criticise him as making this a vanity project. I disagree. For that kind of thing I'd refer you to The Mule (Clint Eastwood lost his way up him own bottom!?!) Or Blackbird (Lord of the dance acts out his 007 fantasy)!
The critic is satisfying if you are happy to be entertained by a story well told by an excellent cast and crew, but then forget you'd even done so a day later!
ElemenTory (2024)
A mix of terrible and watchable
I sometimes love a bit of a trashy/Hallmark/straight to TV kind of film. Usually 'based on real events'. They have their place and, in my view, can be entertaining despite the often mediocre acting and VERY sensationalised presentation. Among the many so bad they're good, there is occasionally a hidden gem, or within these films, a really stand out performance. An actor who is phenomenal and you hope get the roles and backing their talent deserves.
I skimmed the reviews for this film and they were mostly extremely negative. However, I was intrigued enough by the synopsis and, to be honest, the fact that for a few viewers this was a 9 or 10/10, and for the majority a 3/10 at best. Anyways, I decided to put it on in the background and see if I got sulked in.
Well, I watched the entire thing! So I guess that I was undeniably hooked in. The plot follows the parents of 3 young children who go missing within the same town and a small time frame. The police are frankly negligent and, probably due to the socio-economic status and overall profile of the families, not given the attention, resources or effort they desire. In this respect, although it's not an original statement/message, I valued that it was highlighting this awful truth: only certain victims of crime and members of society are given the support and level of investigation they should be. It speaks of how the media, the authorities and much of society want or need a victim to fit a specific profile, and those who fall short are often blamed, or seen as less deserving of sympathy and justice. In the cases of these three children, it seems they are almost discarded and their disappearances go barely acknowledged. Again, important messages.
However, this film increasingly descends into an almost caricature? (I'm not sure if that best describes what I mean?). Some of there performances and acting is actually really good, andni think those that state the acting is terrible aren't being fair to some of the cast, who are excellent. In fragments of this film i feel it showed potential. Gradually, though, it feels very amateurish. The storyline is unsophisticated in uts development, and by the final quarter is, if it weren't for the subject matter, laughable. Camp?!? It has no subtlety. The characters become cartoonish and are simplistic and the writers display immaturity.
I'd say, if you want something trashy, entertaining and in some ways, interesting (in terms of seeing how a film maker is developing/clearly displays their strengths and weaknesses fully in their work), give it a watch. As I said, it does also make important points, but sadly cannot be taken seriously due to the overall presentation and lack of sophistication.
Mr Inbetween (2018)
I'm one of few, but not for me
This show has been raved about. People seem to love it. Those critics I often have such similar opinions with have expressed how damn good Mr Inbetween is. Plus, I'm usually very in tune with/enjoy Australian drama, humour, film , novels etc.
However, after numerous tries, I have accepted that I just am not the right audience for Mr Inbetween. I love dark humour, complex characters and find it hard to strongly reject or see anyone as all bad. But despite the many adoring fans of this show, I loathe it. I don't find it entertaining to watch people beg for their lives, or someone so coldly kill. The main character 'Mr inbetween ', may have a kid and be forming a relationship with a seemingly lovely, great woman, but the things that could be said to be positive in his life don't detract from the fact he's a callous murderer who has no regard for life.
I'm probably missing something huge, or have completely not given this series a enough of a chance, but life's too short and there are too many incredible dramas like Succession, Line of Duty, Severance and Slow horses to be trying to make myself watch any more of this one. I guess it's just not to my taste. In many ways (acting, script etc) it's probably very good.
The Dead Don't Hurt (2023)
A lot to admire, in a slightly undercut film
This is said to be a Feminist Western. I can see in some ways how it earns that description. Vicky Kiep is outstanding and plays a young, stridently independent, intelligent, and mesmerising woman, Vivienne, who captures the attention of Viggo Mortensen's Olsen. She is clearly attracted to him and finds him a hugely improved contrast to the overly-mannered, pretentious and shallow man whose company she is having to suffer.
Vivienne and Olsen quickly develop a delightfully playful, unsaccharin and equal partnership with/love for one another. The beautiful, determined and aspirational Vivienne is, I'm sure greatly to do with Kriepp's acting and interpretation, but it is impossible to ignore that Mortensen is proving again that he is a skilled, insightful and perceptive creator/director aswell as actor.
The film then follows the couple as they navigate their life together in a typical Western town during the American civil war, in which corrupt, power-hungry, characters dominate, and reap violence and distress amoung the folk living there. Fear is used to maintain positions of authority and to ensure those in them not only receive the majority of wealth, but also decide what counts as 'law'/'justice'.
I cannot fault the performances, the cinematography, the script or even what is a familiar tale.
However, i know if I wasn't viewing this in the cinema I'd have given up on it after the first 45mins. In my amateur opinion, it could have been better if less fleshy and tightened up through cutting. I feel better editing could deliver a punchier, more engaging first half. I'm glad I did watch it at the cinema though, because after the initial drag, it really took off and I became very invested and involved.
Where feminism shines is the character of Vivienne herself and her refusal to be cowered by the horrendous violence and violation inflicted upon her. What enraged me and actually made me tearful was the way in which her supposedly relatively egalitarian/non-misogynistic 'husband'/love/partner, Olsen, made the traumatic, brutal and soul destroying attack on Vivienne about him. I am sure it is reflective of the time and a sadly accurate portrayal of how men would have (& many still do) react to discovering such a devastating violation has occurred, rather than Mortensen himself. The film definitely captures the female perspective, so I don't want to ignore this. In a way , I hope the film's focus on how Olsen makes what happened to Vivienne about HIM rather than her, highlights the need to remove male ego when it comes to sexual violence. Other audience members will feel, as I did, that the impact is has upon the victim (mostly women) is often diluted or given too little consideration due to the consideration and attention given not only to the perpetrator but also the male allies of the victim.
Hit Man (2023)
A very strong 6.5/7?!?!?!?
This is one of those films that if I stumbled across it I'd probably talk a lot about it and recommend to many. It is entertaining, well cast, engaging and a perfect length. Plus it is based loosely on a true story, which I usually find elevates my interest.
That said, it isn't going to blow you away, doesn't do anything new and isn't particularly memorable. I can't fault the performances, and it is a fun enjoyable watch, which is worth viewing at home. I did get a bit of an insight into a whole 'world' of detective work that is legal and I was shocked by how scarily common it is for a spouse, or disgruntled friend/relation/colleague/rival to attempt to set up a hitman to kill.
Having since read a bit about the guy upon whom this film's main character is based, his 'success' is undeniable. The parallel lives he led is impressive and fascinating. The statistics we are given on screen are accurate. But, it does become rather a farfetched plot and in some cases of 'based on true events' films I've really felt 'truth can be stranger/more wild than fiction '.
However, in the case of Hitman, the twists and turns the story takes are fictional, and discovering this was slightly disappointing but I guess it also makes me feel they did a good job at using a true character and expanding/fleshing out an entertaining yarn!
I'd love to see a documentary on this guy, and/or a different director/filmmakers create a more serious, exploration of him or other people who work undercover, and the impact this has upon their psyche, relationships, and the type of person who can actually live a life like this.
Bad Behaviour (2023)
So.much excellence but a bit of a mess
An intriguing, challenging, at times brilliant, sometimes veering off track exploration of mental health, mother/daughter relationships, finding direction and so much more. I won't pretend to have completely made my mind up about this film, or claim to have fully delved into trying to understand every aspect. It is one of those films that is due discussion, and raises questions and self reflection.
I totally understand this is definitely not a film for the majority/masses who like big blockbusters. But I think if you appreciate indie films, and those that look at personal experiences and the impact these have upon one's reactions and perception, relationships and sense of self ,then youll find there is a lot to appreciate.
Jennifer connelly is outstanding, of course. But so too are Ben Whishaw, and in particular, the actress who plays her daughter. There is much to admire and credit this film for. There are scenes that I think are incredible and it is (sorry to use this term but it is the best descriptor) brave. The characters are flawed and we constantly observe them unflinchingly. It can be uncomfortable and frustrating.
With all the above said, the 'star rating' feels inadequate, but I just feel it was a very cold watch, which at times lost its flow and almost tried too hard, too it's detriment. Saying that, it's packed with talent and despite a lot of darkness/the cold I felt, it is streaked with black humour and I'd definitely call it a 'dark comedy'.
Challengers (2024)
A thrilling, sexy, delicious film!
I wasn't expecting to like this as much as I did. I love Josh O'connor so that was a real draw for me. Plus I'd heard a great deal of praise for Challengers. But, in the past the 'talk' around a film will rarely reflect one's own reaction.
I definitely feel I git the best experience of the film by watching at the cinema. My attention span is poor, but in the cinema I'm better able to engage, must give the film a chance, and get to fully immerse myself. So recommendation 1. If you can, see it at the movie theatre, or be disciplined and put your phone away, and let yourself be swept up in the thrill of the ride!
This is a film about tennis that's not about tennis. It's about friendship, loyalty, commitment, power dynamics, competition, rivalry, love/hate, ambition and connection.
The three leads are fantastic- zendaya is possibly the most perfect, beautiful creature! I liked how my feelings towards the characters kept changing, as did my alliances. For such a long film, it went quickly and was totally engaging, entertaining and, the final scene is the absolute edge of your seat buzz that makes one totally satiated! It is a slick, visually pleasing, solid film. I love gritty realism- Ken loach, Andrea Arnold, etc. But, if I'm going to watch a big hitter/more Hollywood type film, then this is exactly what I want!
I must add, that despite the dark humour that is interlaced throughout, and the lightness/aesthetic perfection, I feel it did a great job of exploring very complex relationship issues, fluctuating dynamics, morals, ethics and sacrifices/choices that inevitably come up in our lives.
De rouille et d'os (2012)
Utter perfection
It has taken me 12 years to watch this, despite knowing I wanted to when hearing about it 2012. I have no idea why, but I am so so glad that I have made time for this incredible film. It is truly beautiful, raw, highly emotive in all ways, and, in my personal view, flawless film making.
The cast are all unbelievable. I've been a huge Marion Cotillard fan for a while now- she never fails to give anything but a convincing, captivating and awe inspiring performance. Matthias is lesser know to me, but he matches cotillard on screen presence, and is clearly as talented an actor as she.
This film evokes all the emotions and never feels manipulative. It is a gripping story with complex and believable characters. Despite how excellent it is in all ways (one loses oneself completely and becomes deeply invested in the characters), it seems effortless. Natural. Fluent.
I loathe violence, and even though there are some heavy fight scenes,they are integral to the plot and character development. The sensitivity and tenderness balance the aggression out, and so I could handle it.
I'll definitely be watching more films by this director and seek out other works which involve the writers, and cast.
Civil War (2024)
Still processing.....
I am finding it really hard to work out how I feel about this film, because it evoked so much emotion and sent my mind into rapid fire questions, commentary and reflection. The things I can say I feel sure about: the performances were excellent. All the actors were pretty well cast, and their skill level ensured that this film was far from a 'just another bang bang/war/apocalyptic (?)' film. Kirsten Dunst was brilliant and captured the character's experience extremely well, which i felt most informed my perspective running through each scene.
Having said that, i do think the other characters were fairly generic (not a criticism because i don't think character is at all the central point or intended focus of Garland), so many great actors of similar ilk could have portrayed them as well. The cinematography was incredible. The soundscape/track and way it was shot created devastation and shattering of beauty. Horror and chaos, became almost artistic and this is where my conflict begins. I may be swayed in my perspective, but I did feel that early on in the film that the music selected to partner certain footage/scenes did maybe glorify the killing? To highlight the disregard for human life felt, and thrill certain soldiers were getting from the act of killing didn't require the backing track chosen. I felt the director was almost complete wanting us as an audience to get a buzz from their barbarity?
Having said that, the films does clearly want to show the audience a true nightmare that feels horribly close to our lives atm. I definitely couldn't stop thinking 'this must be what people in ..... are currently experiencing' and it is a chilling and vital reminder of what is happening right now in so many places and that we could so easily and quickly descend into this state.
I know it was intentional but I did find the lack of explanation for who was fighting who and their agendas or motives made if difficult to follow in a way. I can see the strength in this-it shows the mindlessness and lost meaning of it all. At some points characters say they don't know whose 'side' the people they're shooting at are on. This isn't what matters to them. Only killing them before they get killed. It illustrates the way people are dehumanised, particularly in masses. The press crew we're following throughout are constantly struggling to numb themselves by shrugging off the deaths they witness, while their humanity and regard for life simultaneously fights to overwhelm them. Because i didn't have a clue what the war was about and both sides seemed simply set upon killing, it was at times me watching people shooting and bombing other people, and although this lack of explanation or clear narrative may be the point, this type of film is not for me. I see war and the devastation on the news every day. Watching it with a musical score and artistically shot scenes of it all felt like gorging on poison.
If there is a need for audiences to be told war is terrifying and extremism and non communication is only going to lead to division and utter destruction and death then of course it is important people see this film and those similar to it. If anything can reach individuals and encourage peace and respect and compassion then I'm all for it. But, despite the incredible performances and quality of this film visually, I am unable to say it is neccesary. I know I don't feel portraying such depravity is the best way to create empathy and communicate a message. But I AM open to correction and know i'm far from qualified to critique films. I'll be interested to hear interviews with Alex Garland, and the thoughts and reactions of critics and people who's opinion I respect.
God's Creatures (2022)
Compromise in the name of love
This film is what I suppose the term 'quiet' is intended. It makes no effort to introduce the audience to place, circumstances, or time. We are presented with a young man (played by current favourite, Paul Mescal) who is seemingly returning to his small Irish home community after a substantial time of absence.
It is clear that his return raises varying emotions in family members and others in the community. We get a sense that there is a lot of tension under the surface, and relationships with particular people are strained but never explained.
Alongside Brian's arrival, the film portrays a hardworking, financially vulnerable community, dependant on the fishing/oyster gathering industry (? If apologies if this is incorrect terminology/surmisation?). It is a bleak watch, and I would understand if many abandoned it. Had I been in a different mood I may have done so.
However, there was enough intrigue created, for me to stick with it and see what was going to unfold. I was pleased that , unlike some films of this ilk, it was actually building to an incident which then forces certain characters to make decisions that compromise their values and question their loyalties.
It is subtle, perhaps too much so for me personally, but it is very authentic, and I believe an accurate depiction of how a victim can become an outcast if the perpetrator is within a community's heart. It raises many important questions, and does offer some satisfying realisations and declarations.
The themes are not new, but they continue, unfortunately to be very relevant and problematic today. So it is great that filmmakers are continuing to address these issues and keep people discussing and reflecting upon the treatment of women, how we deal with sexual assault, especially when the perpetrator is liked, family or /& 'one of our own'.
Femme (2023)
What Oscars should be made for
I'd heard an interview with both George Mackay and Nathan Stuart-Jarrett about their experiences on set and during the filming of Femme, and was intrigued. Previously, Mackay has played pretty easy to like, or ar least average/'ordinary' character. He comes across as a,fairly gentle soul.
His performance in Femme is testament to his acting talent. He embodies a violent, intimidating man, who is almost unrecognisable from the actor as I'd had previously perceived him. When an actor can truly transform in the way he does, it is incredible to watch.
The film focuses on two main characters, one openly queer and immersed in the sphere of free expression of identity and gender and sexuality. The other, is caught up in a very toxic, aggressive, and closed minded circle, who are hostile to any 'non-traditional'/-patriarchal gender and sexual stereotypes. When these two characters collide, we witness devastating, moving and captivating consequences. Each is thrown into the other's completely foreign 'world', and the film explores how they navigate this- the impact it has upon their perceptions and relationships with themselves and those around them.
Nathan Stuart-Jarrett is lesser known than Mackay, but totally matches his skills at portraying a hugely complex character who is respond to life changing experiences. It is believable, tragic, beautiful, crushing and so so worthy of attention and praise.
Past Lives (2023)
My rating keeps changing!
Obviously there's been a huge amount of praise thrown at this film, and so I came to it with hopeful, fairly high expectations. Which maybe why I didn't feel 'blown away' by it. It is excellent in many ways- the performances, the naturalism, the characterisation, etc.
The relationship the film explores is one that is very relatable, and the emotions and questions raised can I'm sure be recognised and are frequently experienced by most audience members. The high authenticity and realism is what I imagine makes it receive so many plaudits.
I value films that are contemplative and through acting and script alone, Past Lives certainly made its impact. I can appreciate why it is recognised as very well done and cannot criticise it, BUT, on a personal level, I wasn't as impressed as the majority seem to be. My expectations may have something to do with why I can't get as enthusiastic as the critics.
However, although I remain prepared to rewatch and change my mind, for now it is definitely not one of my films of the year. 'Emperor's new clothes ' even sprang to mind which probably is more a reflection on me being a philistine than the objective view. It is beautiful visually, melancholy, frustrating, truthful, heart wrenching, relatable, but not highly original IMHO.
Bob Marley: One Love (2024)
I feel the love!
It took me a while to get into and fully appreciate this film. I was really keen to see it, but felt a bit concerned that the trailer I'd been forced to watch (at a previous cinema trip) had given away far too much. *
One Love was definitely similar in many ways to what I gathered- a study of Bob Marley's impact on the world and politics via his music and determined effort to communicate and build bridges via lyrics and melody and the messages he injected into them.
However, it was not a linear biopic. In fact it takes a very small segment of Marley's life and has some flashbacks to his childhood and late youth to help give us a greater insight into how he reached the mindset, circumstances and position he was in. I think I may have become a little impatient and abandoned the film if I'd been watching at home. But thank goodness for cinema, because it really got under my skin eventually and I became so enamoured by him, and invested in the relationships being portrayed, and his wellbeing. I'm by no means a huge Marley fan, or I wasn't, but I now have an even deeper respect and a new found interest in him and his values and outlook. I don't know how accurate it was, but for me, the man captured in this film was a beautiful soul who knew so clearly and simply his own heart. He was a man extremely connected to his values and lived by them more than any religious leader I've learnt about.
I recognise this film's is flawed- the trajectory it runs is messy in my opinion. I do understand why some may find it too 'quiet' /subtle, and be frustrated by the pace or lack of 'explosive' moments. But, if like me you allow yourself to be swallowed by the film and go with its flow, I guarantee you'll find it a really worthwhile watch and walk out loving Bob marley with a capital L!!!!!
*Rant: why do so many trailers give away basically the entire film? They should tantalise, give one a few 'drops' of the film's essence so that we get a hint of the vibe and story etc but NOT a complete breakdown of the whole film!!! I deliberately arrive 20mins after thr advertised start time of a screening now just to dodge the trailers and have future cinema trips ruined.
The Zone of Interest (2023)
A horror film
This is such a tough film to rate.* I had such a strong emotional response to it. I have seen many films during and about the holocaust, and it is inevitably an emotive time to reflect upon.
However, what struck me is how totally disgusted I felt. I generally find myself perceiving the smallest of glimmers of 'good' in the darkest of characters. Circumstances and experiences don't excuse actions but they can explain them and I rarely feel such visceral loathing towards anyone. The family and most of the other characters we see in this film don't immediately present as 'bad' people. But knowing what is going on only meters from their home, and watching them be completely supportive of and/or unaffected by the horrors occurring under their noses, makes them abhorrent.
The more at ease the family seemed to be, and pleasant their lifestyle, the more monstrous they became to me. It truly is a sickening experience to sit through even 20mins of ZOI. This is undoubtedly an extremely important film, and definitely a chapter in history that must be examined, condemned and forewarned by. But i also felt a little like i was watching depravity, despite the lack of violence or explicit cruelty shown. I understood very quickly that the film's approach of observing this family go about their lives in knowing or somewhat ignorant bliss was in a way more powerful than confronting the audience with torture and images of what was unseen. What isn't present in so may ways (the death and inhumane acts and shocking cruelty) is louder and more present that what plays out in front of our eyes.
Sorry. This isn't really a review or helpful, more a reactionary splurge. This is a horror film, and there is no light at all. I found no characters likeable. It is therefore a very grim watch. A 'slap in the face', reiterating how depraved humans are capable of being. I also feel even more aware of and guilty about how my own circumstances mirror the family I felt such disdain towards. The home could represent the 'West'/any society lucky enough to not be facing war or famine or floods, or living under a dictatorship. The atrocities that are currently occuring in Israel and Palestine, the Ukraine and much of the Middle East to name a few areas, could be said to parallel the suffering experienced and unseen in ZOI. I can't stop thinking about this film, and feeling constantly ill at ease whenever i get caught up in my own petty concerns or distress. Whilst not complicit in nor unaffected by the Wars and pain and fear of those living under awful regimes or in inhospitable environments, I am so so sheltered. I do carry on and indulge at times, even take for granted my privilege. The Zone of Interest highlights this greatly and I it is invaluable for doing so.
*In fact I'm finding rating films increasingly difficult because so much is about taste and does a strong emotional response mean something is 'good'. I can appreciate so many films for their content and intellect, or importance and production value, but they can leave me unmoved/satiated,
or simply I found them a tedious or disappointing watch.
Anatomie d'une chute (2023)
Anatomy of a damaging marriage
I feel ill-equipped to give a proper/intellectual review, because I'm just someone who loves cinema and film, so I apologise for not being more sophisticated or highbrow. What I can share is the impact the film had upon me and my philistine thoughts.
I've been extremely keen to watch this for a long while, partly because of the rave reviews and partly because I generally love a courtroom drama and mystery. This film certainly contains all the best qualities of a drama for me. The characters are complex, the performances are brilliant but natural and subtle. The story/lives we see are believable, and it has a compelling story.
Unlike a film such as 'The Holdovers' or 'The lives of others' I didn't finish feeling overwhelmed and fulfilled in that 'wow' way. But, I totally enjoyed it, was thoroughly engaged and have since watching, found myself thinking about it a lot. I definitely want to talk about it and watch it again. There is so much in it that I do agree that it is a film that could be discussed and deserves multiple viewings. I'm so intrigued to hear other's perspective because I find myself now questionning the conclusion I came to in my head immediately after I finished it. I also need to underline that yes, it is about the understanding what actually happened literally to cause the 'fall'.
However, the complexity of the central relationship; the events that occurred and; the conversations that were had leading up to and following it are the biggest question and aspects that cause me to keep revisiting the narrative and scenes in my mind.
A film that is subtle and unflashy, but, if your kind of thing, will definitely hit hard and repeat on you for a long while afterwards. I hate this phrase but it is fitting in this instance: it is a meaty film!
One Life (2023)
Outstanding performances
Sir Anthony Hopkins is amazing! I know aging isn't an illness, nor is it right to patronise anyone of a certain age, but generally the body and mind get pretty exhausted and naturally, the majority of us find/will find we tire more easily and short term memory, plus processing is perhaps a little more of an effort/slower. I am, and have never not been awed by Hopkins' acting abilities. He is utterly convincing and seems to embody the characters he plays deeply, getting into their mindset and gaining an understanding of whoever he plays perspective. In One Life, despite being 86yrs old, he continues to be nothing less that outstanding.
In fact, all the main cast were excellent and almost noone took me out of the story and into that state of awareness whereby one is watching actors performing, this taking the focus off the action and characters, and out of the world/drama the film is aiming to encapsulate its audience in.
The film reveals a hugely important element of the 2nd world war, and spotlights men and women who were beyond courageous, dedicated, inspiring and incredible examples of the human race! I was utterly humbled by the extraordinary actions they took and the lives they saved and enabled to thrive. It is yet another example of how film can teach not just history, but also remind us of our responsibilities, privilege, and create empathy where it may not have existed previously. I couldn't help drawing parallels with the wars currently happening in Israel and the Ukraine, to name only 2 of many, and the refugees seeking asylum in the UK. History continues to read itself because humans fail to learn from what has gone before, sadly.
As is obvious from my words so far, I found this very affecting and think it deserves to be viewed and admired by as many people as possible. I couldn't score more than an 8 because there were some minor elements that very slightly weakened it. That said, I will highly recommend it to friends and family.
Alone Together (2022)
6 .5 shiny stars
I feel I have been a bit harsh on this film, as I did really enjoy watching I, and found it to be a bit better than reviews had me believe.
It wasn't a wholly original premise, although the Lockdown element added something fresh. I can understand this film isn't for those who like high action or a steady flow of punchy one liners.
However, despite the gentle pace, no huge peaks or troughs, and a pretty tame/simple concept, I was fully engaged throughout the film and thought it was very watchable. Yes, big things are ignored, or/& wrapped up/over before they're really ever a 'thing ', but I just liked being in the company of the characters and watching them navigate the pandemic with existing stresses and life situations.
I'd not deter anyone from watching this, and I appreciated most performances. But, its not something I'd rave about either. I think it's best being one of those films you stumped across and decide to give a try, and end up having a pleasant 90mins viewing experience.
The Holdovers (2023)
My kind of film exactly!
I'd heard many positive things about this film and from the little I let myself know of the synopsis (I prefer to go into films/plays, etc as naive as possible), it sounded like one I would also enjoy. That is to say- I went into the cinema with cautious excitement and fairly hopeful that The Holdovers would be a great watch.
It definitely was!
It had all the right ingredients, from; excellent actors, who all gave incredible, convincing performances; witty and smart script; brilliant production, casting and set; &, a plot that could have ended up as a smulchfest in the wrong hands, but instead told a well balanced, heart-warming and, at times, heart-aching story.
I hate feeling manipulated by art- if a am aware of all the 'strings' being pulled to try and force me into having specific emotional responses, for me that's poor film making. The best kind are those that I become completely submerged in and the characters, action and dialogue work beautifully to evoke feelings to arise within in me. The Holdovers definitely did this. This, to me, is a Christmas film and already, it is a top one in my estimation!
No Hard Feelings (2023)
If things were reversed?!?
I am a little confused. Yes, there were some good elements to this film- the performances were all pretty good, and it looked good. There was a bit of charm, perhaps? The odd comment or remark that was slightly funny.
However, can you imagine what would be said if a film was about parents hiring a man in his 30s to take their shy, socially awkward 18 year old daughter's virginity. Then have a large portion of the scenes shaming her for not having sex with him because she wasn't ready? There would, rightly do, be uproar.
So, why is this marketed as funny and acceptable when the 18 year old is a male? Yes, he may be at the age of consent, but if someone says they're not ready nomatter how old they are. It shouldn't be framed as funny or geekish? I felt uncomfortable watching this for these and other reasons.
The other problem I have with it, is that it is a bit of a mess. I love a romcom if it's done very well, but this one was not. It was scatty and there was no real depth. I didn't care about any characters. Basically, I thought it was a bit weird. And it was made in 2000 or the 90s?!
Passages (2023)
AKA: A Study of a Narcissist
I'd heard how good this film was, but read very little about the film's plot or themes prior to watching it. I'm glad I didn't because it needs no explanation and works best, in my view if you go in naive.
This way, the characters and the 'decisions' made have even more of a punch. I guess I'm mainly talking about Tomas. It's hard not to! His utterly selfish and self absorbed behaviour comes, i think from a desperate need for attention. For wanting to always be the centre of it, and so it is galling to find, as an audience member, he is so fascinating and impossible to ignore. I certainly didn't want to give him what he wanted after when watching him repeatedly treat those he pulls into his web so cruelly and carelessly. The strength of feeling I felt whilst viewing the film, is a testament to how excellent it is. I love that despite the horrendous treatment of Tomas' lovers, they are not portrayed as weak or victims.
Passages is full of brilliant performances. Highlights abuse of a non physical, but still extremely destructive nature. Its emotive and a captivating watch.
She Came to Me (2023)
You'll love it of you love this kind of film
I really enjoyed this. It was non formulaic, intriguing. I found it thought provoking and engaging. I can understand it is not going to appeal to those who like fast-paced or action films. But, I imagine those drawn to selecting this are not looking for that.
Even though it isn't a suspenseful storyline, I was always involved with the characters and story. The actors were all excellent. I love Marissa Tomei and Peter Dinklage, and they retained their high estimation in my mind. It is hard to articulate the brilliant vibe streaming through this movie- I'll give it a go.....there is a perfect balance of cynicism, heart, dark humour and surprising. I loved that i cared so much about some of the characters, and I think this enabled me to be invested throughout in the way the events would unfold.
Watchable and thought provoking, honest and a little off beat without trying to hard to be 'quirky'. I will definitely watch more films by this director.