175 reviews
New to the character, zero expectations, thought Warren created a great character, never lost interest, liked the finale, do not understand the negative reviews.
- A_Different_Drummer
- Feb 9, 2021
- Permalink
I don't know anything about the original, so I'm going only on what I've seen. Good acting, writing, and interesting characters. I look forward to seeing episode 2 and hope it's even better.
- lornagwater
- Sep 13, 2020
- Permalink
This ITV series is centred on Commissaris Piet Van der Valk, a cynical detective in the Amsterdam police. Each two hour episode features a separate murder inquiry in the sort of setting that is typical of the genre; those with an interest in mediaeval erotica and the art world... in other words people not like most viewers.
I vaguely recall seeing episodes of the original version of Van der Valk but not well enough to let memories of that spoil my enjoyment of this new series. I was concerned that having an English speaking cast playing Dutch characters may seem strange in an era when subtitled continental programmes are so common... thankfully I soon forgot all about that. The cases are interesting enough with plenty of suspects and motives and the central characters are pretty good. Marc Warren is solid as our eponymous protagonist and is ably supported by a good supporting cast. For the most part the stories are self-contained but there is character development through the series and one or two questions that remain unanswered at the end of the third episode... presumably the makers are hoping further series will be commissioned. Overall I'd recommend this to fans of the murder mystery genre; it might not be the best example but it is far from the worst.
I vaguely recall seeing episodes of the original version of Van der Valk but not well enough to let memories of that spoil my enjoyment of this new series. I was concerned that having an English speaking cast playing Dutch characters may seem strange in an era when subtitled continental programmes are so common... thankfully I soon forgot all about that. The cases are interesting enough with plenty of suspects and motives and the central characters are pretty good. Marc Warren is solid as our eponymous protagonist and is ably supported by a good supporting cast. For the most part the stories are self-contained but there is character development through the series and one or two questions that remain unanswered at the end of the third episode... presumably the makers are hoping further series will be commissioned. Overall I'd recommend this to fans of the murder mystery genre; it might not be the best example but it is far from the worst.
I don't think there would be any complaints if this series had any other title but van der valk. Never saw the original, but this detective series is just as good as anything out there now. Amsterdam makes for a great backdrop, plus the series has your typical grumpy, main protagonist, good chemistry with the beautiful sidekick, and the secondary characters include the genius, the ladies man, and the oddball coroner. Plus any show that has a dog in it has my vote. So how is this detective show any different from Midsomer Murders? So stop complaining. Plus, my god, the previous version was a billion years ago.
For those here who are wondering why there are so many British actors in a show about Dutch police, could I point out: a) I'd be quite happy to watch a subtitled Van der Valk series made by Dutch TV, but there's no such thing; and b) Nicolas Freeling, who wrote the original books, was a Londoner. By the way, if you're in the UK and want to see the original series, at time of writing they're showing it on the mighty Talking Pictures TV channel.
- johngammon56
- May 5, 2020
- Permalink
I watched all three episodes of this 2020 Van Der Valk and I enjoyed them. I like good police procedurals and it's a treat when I can watch one filmed in one of Europe's beautiful cities or the countryside.
Of the actors on Commissioner Van Der Valk's team, Elliot Barners-Worrell as Lt Cloovers and Luke Allen-Gale as Sgt de Vries were especially good. Warren and McCoy were good but not as strong as the above two actors.
It's a challenge to maintain viewers attention span over 90 minutes, especially so with a who-done-it and a number of characters with foreign names. Please be kinder to viewers - poor sound levels, strong regional British accents and other actors whose first language is not English, makes listening difficult. And lighting could have been better on interiors in dark old buildings and in long boats.
I'm not a big fan of flashbacks, but in this series it would have helped explain Van Der Valk's mercurial personality if we knew about his wife in Episode 1 not in Episode 3. Same with the Chief Commissioner.
I'd watch a series 2, it's good.
________________________________
I'm watching series 2 and enjoying it. The writing, the key to any successful series is very good. I also went back and re-watched series 1 and I scored it higher, the plots are very good.
Van Der Valk the commissioner, Hassell the inspector, de Vries the sergeant, Cloovers the lieutenant, Dahlman the chief commissioner and Davie the pathologist are very different personalities. There is some minor personal things but basically the characters are focused on solving the complicated crimes.
________________________________
Sadly Season 3 isn't that good, Brad de Vries (Luke Allen-Gale) and Job Cloovers (Elliot Bares-Worrell) have been replaced by two less experienced actors. Episode 2 is the best of the 3 episodes. And there is more of Emma Fielding (Julia Dahlman) and Darrell D'Silva (Henrik Davie). Luke Allen-Gale and Elliot Barnes-Worrell brought humor and acting skills their replacements ae stiff. In police dramas the top officers and pathologists come and go, New writers, this was probably farmed out by ITV, cliched episodes.. Chris Murray the creator is off writing his new series "Cannes Confidential". I dropped the rating, Season 1 & 2 were very good, Season 3 is poor.
Of the actors on Commissioner Van Der Valk's team, Elliot Barners-Worrell as Lt Cloovers and Luke Allen-Gale as Sgt de Vries were especially good. Warren and McCoy were good but not as strong as the above two actors.
It's a challenge to maintain viewers attention span over 90 minutes, especially so with a who-done-it and a number of characters with foreign names. Please be kinder to viewers - poor sound levels, strong regional British accents and other actors whose first language is not English, makes listening difficult. And lighting could have been better on interiors in dark old buildings and in long boats.
I'm not a big fan of flashbacks, but in this series it would have helped explain Van Der Valk's mercurial personality if we knew about his wife in Episode 1 not in Episode 3. Same with the Chief Commissioner.
I'd watch a series 2, it's good.
________________________________
I'm watching series 2 and enjoying it. The writing, the key to any successful series is very good. I also went back and re-watched series 1 and I scored it higher, the plots are very good.
Van Der Valk the commissioner, Hassell the inspector, de Vries the sergeant, Cloovers the lieutenant, Dahlman the chief commissioner and Davie the pathologist are very different personalities. There is some minor personal things but basically the characters are focused on solving the complicated crimes.
________________________________
Sadly Season 3 isn't that good, Brad de Vries (Luke Allen-Gale) and Job Cloovers (Elliot Bares-Worrell) have been replaced by two less experienced actors. Episode 2 is the best of the 3 episodes. And there is more of Emma Fielding (Julia Dahlman) and Darrell D'Silva (Henrik Davie). Luke Allen-Gale and Elliot Barnes-Worrell brought humor and acting skills their replacements ae stiff. In police dramas the top officers and pathologists come and go, New writers, this was probably farmed out by ITV, cliched episodes.. Chris Murray the creator is off writing his new series "Cannes Confidential". I dropped the rating, Season 1 & 2 were very good, Season 3 is poor.
- Avidviewer-02847
- May 3, 2020
- Permalink
I quite enjoyed this first episode. It's entertaining, well made and quite funny at times. As an Amsterdam citizen, I was a bit suprised by the english speaking police at first. But in the end it didn't put me off at all. Political plot was interesting as well.
Good acting and definitely a step up compared to recent dutch drama series on television.
Looking forward to coming episodes.
- film_member
- Jan 4, 2020
- Permalink
Unfortunately it started out interesting but by season 3 the writers run out of fresh ideas and it gets very predictable/cliche. Limited character development other than self medicating with alcohol and inability to form relationships. Standard plot lines and devices. More scenes of amsterdam would have added a little something to the series. Or more of a commentary on society. Any kind of education or thoughtful addressing of issues would have held my attention a little better. Even when they go to a museum there is little art showed. Maybe its just me but i am not sure why PBS picked this one to bring across the pond but maybe because its in englsh.
I'm shocked how many people dislike this show. I found it entertaining and well acted with interesting storylines - not to mention beautiful Amsterdam as a backdrop. For me Marc Waerren was perfectly casted as the tough and complex Van der Volk. I'd like to see much more of him in in the future.
- tilokaudaman
- Sep 27, 2020
- Permalink
I watched Season 1 quite a while ago, and I quite enjoyed it, but I found Season 2, which I only watched this week, to be a good deal less enjoyable.
I am not sure how the writers and producers of the show wanted the series to be classified, but I felt it was extremely lightweight, and to be taken with a very small pinch of salt.
It was entertaining enough, and I certainly wasn't bored, although Mark Warren really doesn't bring much to his portrayal of Van Der Valk, and the supporting cast were nothing special either. Whoever designed the outfits worn by Maimie McCoy needs sacking, and Maimie herself needs to decide on an accent to use and stick to it. It comes across as a combination of northern and southern, with a slight Dutch twang, and her clothes and accent provide a distraction.
In my opinion the stories in the three 90 minute episodes had quite a few holes, but as long as you suspend your belief, and don't expect very much from the series, it may be worth a few hours of your time.
I am not sure how the writers and producers of the show wanted the series to be classified, but I felt it was extremely lightweight, and to be taken with a very small pinch of salt.
It was entertaining enough, and I certainly wasn't bored, although Mark Warren really doesn't bring much to his portrayal of Van Der Valk, and the supporting cast were nothing special either. Whoever designed the outfits worn by Maimie McCoy needs sacking, and Maimie herself needs to decide on an accent to use and stick to it. It comes across as a combination of northern and southern, with a slight Dutch twang, and her clothes and accent provide a distraction.
In my opinion the stories in the three 90 minute episodes had quite a few holes, but as long as you suspend your belief, and don't expect very much from the series, it may be worth a few hours of your time.
- robbiscargill
- Jul 5, 2023
- Permalink
- fionakluck
- Dec 31, 2019
- Permalink
I am mystified by the awful reviews of this show. Unlike many reviewers, I watched the original series. This version is very different, but every bit as good. The team of actors playing the crime fighters led by Marc Warren do a fine job, and their various characters are well developed. The scripts are sharp and keep the action moving well, and I thought the plots were intriguing and definitely a cut above the ordinary. The episodes are well-directed, with well staged action. The personal Ives of the characters provided useful background without intruding to much, and the City of Amsterdam is used effectively as a back drop.
I hope they do a third series.
I hope they do a third series.
The biggest problem with episode 1.1, Love in Amsterdam, is that it doesn't do justice to politics in Amsterdam. Only two candidates are presented, while the local government body entirely consists of leftists and the city council sees no less than 12 political parties. The biggest party and the mayor belong to Green Left, while the second party, Democrats 1966, are comparable with the British Liberal Democrats. So no, De Klerk would not be the main rival of Paul Oosterhuis. Also especially the Amsterdam electorate is not very interested in the sex lives of its politicians. This all hardly makes the political aspect of the plot credible.
The final scene, with Van der Valk and Hassell sailing a tjalk on the IJ, quite a busy channel with several harbours, is simply ridiculous. Dutch police officers would have had such a chat in a local pub - like the one Van der Valk uses as his briefing room.
Granted, better than almost all Dutch productions, but that doesn't set the bar high. Like fionacluck already pointed out, there's quite a lot left to desire. At the other hand I was quite entertained, so six stars it will be.
An audience needs to connect with at least one of the main characters. There is neither respect nor cohesion between the investigating team and Van der Valk exudes nothing but arrogance. Plot lines aren't bad and location makes the show more interesting. Nothing like the original though.
- nakedwalker
- May 2, 2020
- Permalink
I loved this show, was never into the original it couldn't hold my attention. this on the other hand did. great cast, well acted.
To address criticism in other reviews, if you listen carefully you will hear parts of the original theme tune in the opening music, as for the accents is that really an issue. i thinks its good that they actors are a mix of British and European. i look forward to a second series
- cj_fenric-95690
- May 11, 2020
- Permalink
First thing to address, the theme tune, that's the biggest disappointment, it was the main thing everyone remembers, a pity they couldn't have used a take on it.
That's the only comparison I'll make to Barry Foster's version.
Good stories, gorgeous location work, Amsterdam looks amazing, and I'd say it's well acted. They made great use of the visuals, the Canal and architecture looked wonderful. Very well acted.
I would say I'm unsure about Marc Warren, I'm a huge fan of his, he's a brilliant actor, time will tell if he's right for the part. I thought he made a good start, his character could lighten up a little. Why on Earth do some have Dutch accents, and some have English ones, it's so irritating.
There is so much material out there, the works of Francis Durbridge for example, I wish commissioners would look at the work of someone like him.
I was expecting to dislike it, I thought it was good, 7/10.
That's the only comparison I'll make to Barry Foster's version.
Good stories, gorgeous location work, Amsterdam looks amazing, and I'd say it's well acted. They made great use of the visuals, the Canal and architecture looked wonderful. Very well acted.
I would say I'm unsure about Marc Warren, I'm a huge fan of his, he's a brilliant actor, time will tell if he's right for the part. I thought he made a good start, his character could lighten up a little. Why on Earth do some have Dutch accents, and some have English ones, it's so irritating.
There is so much material out there, the works of Francis Durbridge for example, I wish commissioners would look at the work of someone like him.
I was expecting to dislike it, I thought it was good, 7/10.
- Sleepin_Dragon
- Apr 26, 2020
- Permalink
I thoroughly enjoyed the show. Marc Warren and Maimie McCoy make a great duo. They are always good anyway . The plots you have to think about which I really like. It's beautifully shot. Amsterdam looking great. Yes it's moody. Yes it's dark. But I don't understand any negativity towards this. Most detective shows are. I'm a huge Inspector Morse and Frost fan and both of them had a temper and never cracked a smile. Maybe there could be a touch more humour. Buts it's got a good pace. And I really am pleased to be watching. So thanks.
- jenwilkinson-05260
- May 6, 2020
- Permalink
- parsifal-17173
- Sep 29, 2020
- Permalink
Really excellent show. I enjoyed the acting, the story, the mood. I'm looking forward to this becoming even better in future episodes
- tonys_aussie
- Apr 4, 2020
- Permalink
I am old enough to have liked the original series.
I think it is pointless to compare both series.
I hope this series get recommissioned and if it does can I suggest it tries to be a bit more Dutch in its plots?
Apart from the backgrounds there is little in this that makes me think the location is adding much to the plots.
I have been to Amsterdam 4 or 5 times,it has been described as the most liberal place in the world.
Given the city's liberal culture I have to laugh at people on here complaining how PC the drama is.
I liked the Rowan Atkinson Maigret,it was very French.
- ib011f9545i
- May 2, 2020
- Permalink
I was really looking forward to the introduction of a crime series set in Amsterdam. There is so much material to play on given the location. I was astonished at how cliched every character was. Also, why cast British actors in a series set in Amsterdam? The writing was laughable, and none of the characters were at all interesting. I am American, so I can watch this drivel any time on U.S. networks. Loved the travelogue, but that is all this series is.
We were happily surprised by the first episode of Van der Valk season 1 (2020) aired on Dutch television as a 'pilot' on New Year's Day. Rest to follow this summer.
The British cast is great and the Dutch actors add the nice local sauce. Amsterdam is obviously a great location for the series. The first episode has some nice plot twists, and is entertaining. Not the best detective ever, but better than most Dutch productions. Looking forward to the full season!
The British cast is great and the Dutch actors add the nice local sauce. Amsterdam is obviously a great location for the series. The first episode has some nice plot twists, and is entertaining. Not the best detective ever, but better than most Dutch productions. Looking forward to the full season!
- jouwert-vangeene
- Dec 31, 2019
- Permalink
As I haven't seen the 1972-1992 series, I can't compare the two, but I am a huge fan of Marc Warren and watch anything he is in. That said, I had difficulty keeping up with all the characters in the current series.
To user billcarr31, who didn't know who Barry Foster was, he played the Van Der Valk character in the 1972-1992 series, which is played by Marc Warren in the 2019 series.
Man alive this is bad... When the show came up in my TV listings I was excited having been a fan of Barry Foster's VdV. Within twenty minutes of the start of Marc Warren's version, my head was swimming with the sheer wretchedness of it all. Awful, clunky dialogue that thinks it's fast paced and witty but falls flat every time, creakingly wooden supporting actors for whom even am-dram would appear to be a bridge too far (especially Luke Allen-Gale and Darrell D'Silva as the boringly inevitable laconic pathologist), and a dullard, wannabe hip plot that spends too much time stating it's social awareness credentials but precious little engaging the viewer on any level whatsoever. Unutterable nonsense.
- sendaiadmacc
- Apr 17, 2020
- Permalink
I don't get the multitude of negative reviews!! I thoroughly enjoyed this series. It had a good plot, as most Masterpiece series do. I'm rather exigent when it comes to series. They have to get my attention from the beginning and this one did as did the following episodes. Give it a try- it is a good one!