Bridgerton (TV Series 2020– ) Poster

(2020– )

User Reviews

Review this title
1,999 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
If you've read the books, lower your expectations for S3
caeevans15 June 2024
Warning: Spoilers
It's strange, Netflix marketed S3 as the friends to lovers story of Colin & Pen, but this story seems to have got lost in the myriad of story lines that were introduced this season.

Instead of seeing a supportive and intuitive Colin that helps to build Penelope's confidence, we get a patched together story with a Colin that insults her instead. And instead of a reveal that praises what Penelope, as Lady Whistledown, has accomplished, we get an apologetic Penelope who promises to do better. What a let down.

We didn't need more Benedict sex scenes (you won't miss anything by fast forwarding through them) and although I appreciated a focus on the various platonic friendships, it was overdone. And then of course there is the change of a character from Michael to Michaela, which we assume is to set up a same-sex relationship with Francesca. I'm just hoping that this means that the writers will leave Eloise alone, as I would prefer that the non-stereotypical female just be left as that, rather than made into another stereotype i.e. Must be lesbian if not like the others.

Overall, it was disappointing.
83 out of 95 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A fun, dramatic, fantasty gulity pleasure.
BoydudeReviews1 January 2021
As a 23 year old black dude, I actually liked this show. I honestly thought it was going to be a full on comedy, but it actually had a lot of dramatic themes. I won't lie when i watched the first two episodes, I was very, very confused as to why there were alot of black royals. I thought for a second that this was true, but if memories served me right, it wasn't. But then I began to understand that this is all fiction and a made-up fantasy on what if life was like this.

And I have to admit, I kinda liked it. Some people don't like the film because of it being politically incorrect. But there are HUNDREDS and HUNDREDS of period dramas that are more accurate than this. So why don't those people just go and watch those? I think people just want to complain about something because human beings are never satisfied. Even some of the greatest period dramas that are pretty historically accurate has it's fair share of haters. I didn't take it seriously. I just turned my brain off and enjoyed the fantasy.
447 out of 653 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pretty, fun and thin
Thasinceart18 May 2024
Fun for those who enjoy the frothy visual thrust, light story and modern casual take on costume drama. It's a trashy soap opera in a dream version of Regency. I do like the diversity in casting and experimentation in costume. Casting is strong. However I can't seem to appreciate this production as much as I wanted. I find the direction and delivery of lines tends to self conscious, loud, stagey and over the top. Also the soundtrack is the same thing again and again, pizzicato strings, not creative, boring that flattens depth of emotion or drama. Otherwise a heady trip with lots of short scenes whipping from one character to another. It's good, just not totally my cuppa. A pleasant pretty distraction.
31 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Mainstream Wattpad Historical Romance
hazard11125 December 2020
Let me just start that I am a fan of the books so I am watching this as I did when I watched all the live actions of Pride and Prejudice, with eyes finally getting my wish of seeing my fave books come to life, and I was not disappointed. Is it a masterpiece? NOT AT ALL. Is it accurate to the books? Not so much but they did get the heart of it. There's a lot of issue I find with it but somehow I still find myself watching it because I love the genre.

To note: If you are into the ACCURATE retelling of history then I'm telling you right now SKIP THIS. This isn't about the accurate retelling of history. So if the "diversity" and "wokeness", the designs of their costumes, the way they acted takes you away from the story because of inaccuracy then you will have a bad time. This isn't a documentary. This isn't a biography. This isn't a true story.

Now first of, the books star different siblings so each season will focus on different Bridgerton with splice inserts of side stories. S1 is more steamy and shoves a more lustful play on their romance it's a fake love turned real love trope. S2 is a slow burn and might be boring for some as it is less steamy, it's an enemies to lovers trope.

Now. If you're into the book series do give this a try! Of course it wouldn't be 100% accurate but I did feel that it was very true in how romance book genre goes. It's like a whimsical romance. Glazed over. Or whatever term. Something like those Hallmark Christmas romance movies but with more mature scenes. Modern music made classical. They really brought to life the family dynamic of the Bridgertons. I love how they interact with one another as a family.

Finally. If you're just looking for a Pride and Prejudice or historical setting romance show then do give this a try! You might just like it.
682 out of 1,084 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well that went over like a turd in the punchbowl.
crystalkniss18 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
WARNING, SPOILERS!

I love the show. I do, but this was a bit of a letdown.

They led us in a direction they didn't follow through with.

I don't think I was the only one under the impression Lord Debling would be head over heeels for Pen. It was disappointing to not see her get that adoration. I just don't understand the thinking there.

Our girls glow-up deserved more. This too was a letdown. At least one Lord should have been giving Colin a run for his money.

I did not like at all whorey boy Colin.

We should have watched them innocently fumble through the blossom of young love. Colin is not a rake. It was kind of gross.

I did enjoy the introduction of Francesca and the sweet nature they gave her. It will pay dividends in the future is they don't screw it up like the fake rake.

I thought the Fetherington girls were hilarious these first 4. They had some great lines and Mrs F. Never disappoints.

I was really hoping either she or Mrs. B. would be given a true blue love interest that would tease to knock our socks off. They are both amazing actresses. There are so many possibilities there.

One more thing. Why on earth was Colin celebrated the hero when Debling literally saved Pens life? She's not a worthy enough treasure to leave the ton swooning at her rescue?

Some of the little side stories they are building just took up what could have been more Colin and Pen time.

It was sorely lacking. We had no big build up like the last two couples.

We all know the importance of forplay before the big scene and they stole that from us. That's what I'm most dissatisfied about.

I will continue to watch of course like everyone else and hope for more meet and potatoes but I'm afraid it will be more along the lines of kippers and mash.
32 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An excellent cumulative of YEARS of waiting for this.
anwaaribrahim-3485125 December 2020
Here are my thoughts

#1. I have to note that I had reservations about this when I first saw the casting of Simon and other POC actors. As a black women I didn't know if it was pandering to my ethnic group or if it was for genuine inclusivity. And after seeing Simon on screen I must say that he is PERFECT!! I literally can't picture him otherwise (and I've been picturing him for over a decade. (I also have to say the same for lady D))

#2. I was surprisingly pleased with the Marina character (btw she's not new to the series. Just early). She will fit in like a puzzle.

#3. I'm enjoying how flushed out Anthony is. I admit he was a little 1D for the first book since he wasn't a main character so I appreciate that tv allows him more dimension and build up.

#4. The rest of the siblings are excellent too. The seeds of their characters are coming through.

5. The visuals, directing, and music reminds me of a TRUE historical romance book. This doesn't feel like a made for tv show. I love how they managed to make the colors so beautiful and vibrant unlike other historical romance movies/shows that have everything "accurately" bleak.

This series was my very first introduction to the romance genre of books when I was a little girl and I could not have asked for a better pilot episode. The characters, the chemistry, the intrigue, the intensity (this list goes on and on) is exactly how I pictured it and how I felt when I first read this series years ago.

To all those that worked on this series , everyone from the actors to the crew, your artistic talent has not just made beautiful period piece show. No, your artistic talent has magically translated all the beautiful things I love about historical romance books and the writing of arguably the most famous HR author of modern times perfectly to the screen and to that I thank you from the bottom of my heart.
503 out of 853 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It is entertainment
taisun2424 February 2021
This is not a quality Jennifer Ehle/Colin Firth Pride and Prejudice type series, or downton abbey. This show is an exaggeration of those kinds of tales and it is pure fantasy, using the back drop of victorian english high society. Do not take it seriously and enjoy it for what it is. It really highlights the absurdity of that time period as well. I love the pride and prejudice series I mentioned above and to me this movie was like a guilty pleasure version of that kind of genre. Costumes are beautiful and they threw in some modern music played classically, so really, this show is not taking itself seriously as a period piece, and is clearly just having fun. Have fun with it and enjoy the eye candy.
92 out of 136 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Thoroughly Enjoyed it!!
refinerychick28 December 2020
Knowing nothing about the books or what to expect from the show, I gotta admit that the diversity threw me in the beginning. By the second episode, I became colorblind and grew completely enchanted by it all that I didn't want it to end. Although I loved it, to be quite frank, in a way it made me sad. All the diversity.. well, it made me see how the world COULD have been and needs to be. I eagerly await the second season!
255 out of 423 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Best Actress "Claudia Jessie".
bhfred111 January 2021
Claudia Jessie played Eloise with extreme class. Hope she continues to "stun the stage" in her future acting career!
61 out of 91 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Dashing
esabettie25 December 2020
Eloise and Lady Danbury are by far my favorites but I liked it all overall, quite different than the book but keeping essential plots and the essence. I do love the diverse casting.
415 out of 701 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Season Two was a Letdown
bethcrim-032601 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I really enjoyed Season One despite some repetitive sex scenes but Season Two was a slog. Eventually I started to ask myself how many more episodes to go? There was much to like except for the boring love story that dragged on and on, only to end up in a few minutes at the very end when rather suddenly all was well and good in the world. Whatever. I won't watch this again, and I've watched Season One several times.
28 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Am I watching a different series?
barrypchantler18 June 2024
After 2 excellent seasons of a well written, well produced series, I waited with anticipation for series 3 to drop on Netflix.

And boy, what a disappointment it was. Where to start. For some unknown reason the showrunner had decided to suck out the any of the whimsical joy of Seasons one and two and instead dished up an incoherent mess of a script which tries to be more camp dramatics than anything else.

It seemed that characters such as Queen Charlotte had had a personality change. Yes, previously she was cranky over Lady Whistledown and wanted to unmask her, but also relished the challenge. It was a game! This series we get a vindictive Queen full of malice, who I didn't like at all.

Can't understand the high scores for this series.
42 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Are there an decent American screenwriters left
juliekrol24 June 2021
Can't understand the entertainment value Americans get out of bad scriptwriting for shows that take place in Europe. This is on par with Emily in Paris, complete crap and forgettable.
72 out of 104 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not as bad as many reviews say
lisamazzone5 February 2021
I read a lot of negative reviews. Especially about the characters that do not correspond to the era. To be honest, I think you shouldn't be too heavy on that. It's fiction and it just looks good. It is a shame that the first episode is the least fun. This would almost make you stop watching. Fortunately, I looked further, which I certainly do not regret. It seems nice and I am looking forward to season 2.
157 out of 255 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A long time fan of the books, and a fan of the show
lornaheatley25 December 2020
I first read the books years ago and this adaption has done it justice. Perfectly cast. The people obsessed with the "diversity" should know that this isn't a factual historical show, but a version of Georgian history that lives in the minds of all of us who love this type of thing and really need to get over it. They also didnt play string quartet versions of "bad guys" or "thank u next" back in the early 1800s. Basically, it's what I've dreamed of and waited for!

Adore that they've kept the main storylines but complement them with lines that add, rather than subtract to the main line.

Thank you Shondaland!
280 out of 472 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Season 2: A dull remake of Season 1
jennifer62627 March 2022
The costumes, settings, music are all beautiful, but we've seen them before. This season lacks the substance and intrigue that led so many to bingewatch the first. A gaping hole is left with the resolution of Simon and Daphne's romance. The love triangle between Anthony, Kate and Edwina feels forced, with none of the actors particularly charismatic. The heightened focus on Eloise is detrimental, with the actress' eyerolls, overreaction, and unrealistic conduct reminiscent of Anna Chlumsky as Vivian in Inventing Anna. The other subplots are so redundant that they could have been crafted from film left on the editing floor in Season 1 and weren't enthralling on the first go-round (e.g., Penelope's unrequited infatuation with Colin).

My rating of 6 is the average of a 7 for Season 1 and a 5 for Season 2.
49 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
2nd Season
teja-4937230 March 2022
Usually I find myself disappointed by second seasons of shows, especially when the first is so good, and as such did not have the highest of hopes heading into season 2. Having recently completed it I can confidently say that it's better than season one. What about it made it better I cannot say, though I am a sucker for forbidden romance and the removal of those awful sideburns made Anthony 10x hotter. The second season is a must watch with a thrilling slow burn and an incising story. I cannot wait to see how this show plays out and stand witness to each Bridgerton siblings season and the pages of gossip it will bring.
78 out of 123 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Season 2 - Watered down colors, story, music
thejdrage28 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Last season was fun fun fun, with Episode 6 all sex, but that's another story.

This season, it's full of older men vying to marry girls who have barely turned 18.

Also this season, (I'm on Episode 4) it's all watery colors, music and weak story. Nothing is really fun, except for Queen Charlotte, of course. And Penelope. She's still a pip.

Where's the vibrance and verb and fun? It's gone.

Another Season 2 where it seems that all the good writers have been dumped and replaced by ersatz staff.
43 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Season 2 puts content over nudity
poulomihari28 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I am writing this review after having watched the series, followed by reading the book "The Viscount who loved me". This season has offended many ardent book fans and I can see why. The Kate Sheffield of the book and the Kate Sharma of the series are two entirely different people. The book was written primarily for female audience. Therefore Kate Sheffield appears to be similar to reader-favourite Elizabeth Bennet- a witty girl next door with some severe insecurities. And she has her feet swept away by the deveilish playboy of the 'ton' i.e. Anthony Bridgerton. Even though he is shown to have physically attracted to her, he always remains in control of the situation- in a way guiding Kate to a whirlwind of challenges and then confusing her feelings.

The series however was clear about its narrative character, i.e. Bridgerton. Hence Kate Sharma was written for the male audience. It takes a lot more than intelligence to impress a man. Men adore bravery, independence, free spirit and a great deal of selflessness. The charismatic Kate Sharma hence knows how to ride a horse, goes on hunting, remains undeterred by Anthony's or any man's advances, acts completely selfless to the point that she is willing to walk away after leaving her family with Sheffield money. She therefore makes Anthony crazy, as he finds absolutely no control over her. She pushes him to his extremes. When they speak its not just a witty banter, its a display of their strong character arcs. Kate Sharma is far more of a "tough cookie" than in the books. This is why its Anthony who feels swept away by the woman. He tries his best to get rid of his desire for her but she continues to make it harder, by doing , well, nothing. Yeah, its weird. While Anthony takes pride in confusing a woman in order to seduce her, he is maddened that he is unable to do that to Kate Sharma. He is unable to break her to the point until he finally breaks and admits that he loves her. He is forced to do so by his own feelings, as he grows into acknowledging that what he feels for Kate is far more than desire.

The 2 stars that I have deducted is for the almost dragging subplots of Eloise and Penelope. Even if I forgive Penelope storyline, Eloise perhaps became way more one-dimensional in the 2nd season. That is my opinion.

Nudity in this season was toned down to almost PG13 level because the content was stronger. Afterall its about a man growing out of his fear for true love and settling down with his muse. The target male audience perhaps appreciates less such scenes and more of the actual adrenaline rush.
48 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Season 2 - not as good as season 1
sbdjones27 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
As much as I enjoyed season 2, there wasn't enough of Anthony and Kate's story. I get that the stories of the other characters need to be fleshed out some, but there's a whole part of the story in the book that relates to the time after they're married that is juicy and got completely ignored. The actors have great chemistry, it would have been nice to see more of it.
21 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Readers are missing some points
laurasalander-3006625 December 2020
I am well aware of Quinn's Bridgerton series, but people are not focusing enough on things such as directing, plot, acting, etc. Who cares if there weren't black aristocrats? This point keeps dragging and it's honestly quite pointless. Quinn herself expected a very inclusive cast and a re-interpretation of the series. Stop wasting your energy in worrying about "pc culture." Have some imagination.

Now, the plot is predictable for a novel series like this. I chose to watch it with my mother and it was enjoyable like an afternoon conversation with friends. Nothing deep really, lack of subtlety. But that doesn't have to be a bad thing. People often forget who are watching series and films, forgetting that some may not understand the undertones of a message. Bridgerton's lack of subtlety is beneficial for them, for my mother who doesn't understand English aristocracy because of our background. She loved the series.

It is a VERY colorful setting. Wonderful clothes and scenery. There is a lot of individuality represented through that. Some characters certainly felt re-interpreted from the original material. For example, I hadn't imagined anyone with particularly loud personalities, mainly in presentation. The series provides this. Admittedly, Daphne was an absolute bore many times. I was not passionate about Thompson. So basically, some characters were louder, some were more tame when compared to the original. At times I welcomed the change, but not every time.

Anyway, I look forward to the progress of this series. I also look forward to people relaxing a bit and trying to understand that media enjoyment is different for others. Literature majors may scurry away from the predictable and superficial, but (for example) someone whose main language isn't English and has always lived in a low-middle class neighborhood may feel welcomed into a different culture and may start a learning opportunity. It's not about absolute accuracy, it's about captivating our attention at first sometimes.

Oh and also, I don't think the subtitles in Spanish are the best. There are words that change tone when translated. I listened as I read the subtitles. I had to re-translate a few times so my mother.
177 out of 302 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Adaptation or new story?
Su_6615 June 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Adaptation allows changes until the backbone of the story remains the same. So many added subplots, especially in the third session, erased even this part of the backbone. I was not sure until the end whether Colin supported Penelope or not.

If this story is new, why use the title and sell it as an adaptation? I can't buy either that this is, in fact, a Regency story. And I was there because I would like to watch one. I have no problem making the show multiracial, even I really liked the characters in the first season. I also didn't mind adding LGBTQ+ issues within the subplots, but repeating the same issue (Benedict's story in the first and the third session), although a little differently, still the same problem, is too much.

I hope Michaela Stirling is only a marketing trick and that Michael will appear somehow.

This season was completely forgettable, and I am not looking forward to the new season. As someone advised on some social media, if you don't like the show, re-read the books; I will stick to the book When He Was Wicked.

At this point, I re-read my review, and it made me wonder: Was the third season really Colin and Penelope's story?
46 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rubbish
galatea-413118 January 2021
Wondering how the overall rating was 7.4 when all the reviews I see are below 3?!! Waisted an hour watching this awful drivel. Enough said.
327 out of 557 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Started strong, writers bungle season 2
afsant29 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I loved season one. Watched it twice in a row I loved it so much. Thought they did a great job and actually improved on the book. Season two, unfortunately, did not. Kate and Anthony's story is by far the best of the novels - the main reason being because it is FUNNY! I was looking forward to season two the most because of this, and while I don't mind the overall massive rewrite and plot changes they added, the writers didn't include any of the funny bits that make this book enjoyable and endearing. (And what a missed opportunity for character growth on the practically non-existent library storm scene!) The show on its own is very well done and the acting is excellent, I just hate when screen writers of book adaptations try to "beef up" the drama and, in so doing, remove all the goodness that made romance readers fall in love with the story in the first place.
29 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brilliant adaptation with a modern twist.
jennjaeger-2297525 December 2020
Ever since hearing this was going to be made into a series I have been anxiously awaiting it. This series has gone beyond my expectations. I love the costumes, the pageantry, and above all the cast. Each character is very well represented by the actor/actress portraying them. I love the addition of a diverse cast. It in no way detracts from the story and makes it a beautiful representation of today's society. I was nervous at first that the move to the big screen would not carry over the beauty of the story but I am happy to say that I am in no way disappointed. This is a great series and I highly recommend it to everyone loved the books or just loved a great romance.
268 out of 469 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed