User reviews

Another project to spill some mess over the Great Soviet Victory by Anti-Soviet, rusophobic Russian community including Russian government as the Ministry of Culture and local oligarch family. Not a surprise as this is not the first modern Russian movie in WW2 setting that's been filmed supported by pro oligarchy government to paint Soviet history with black colors. Not a surprise that there is a massive resonance among the Russian people and people from ex-USSR republics as there are WW2 veterans still alive and they are different people compare to characters shown in the modern Russian films. It is common thing that many people say those directors and scriptwriters are filming movies mostly about themselves and those people that pay money for that dirty propaganda films as their characters speak and act like these days modern people. And mostly they show their characters as a drunk, uneducated gangsters instead of Soviet people of culture, honor and respect who they mostly were. It is sad to realize, that these days anti-Soviet propaganda films are coming from inside the country as often as from outside it from Western filmmakers.

Another rubbish film from sawflies of the Russian budget. The plot is maximally optimized for future drunken degradants. The plot has nothing to do with reality that occurred during the second world war. The film is a mockery and spit in the face of veterans..

"To Paris" attracted Govorukhin with a big name. It was a last name written by mistake.

In principle, the presence of Litvinova and Efremova in the picture was immediately alarming, but what the hell was not joking. The description is interesting. Unfortunately, he could not surprise or believe that he simply got terribly boring and faceless. The only thing that impressed me was an old and well-known song.

Efremov played a drunken officer. As always, actually. Only professions are changing, the game remains stably template. Litvinova is already from the city of Paris. Next will be the role of the princess of the sea, probably. She played herself (like Efremov): with a claim to elitism and mystery. Nothing in general. Makovetsky did not leave the image of Grozny. Karkal, cursed, frowned. Did not impress. The rest of the actors are exactly. Neither good nor bad.

But to hell with this, be the plot interesting. But no. The genre of paintings remained familiar, and this is not drama, and not melodrama. And when there is nothing to show, I start to show the topics of brothels and other similar things. Indeed, part of the audience will be immediately interested in this. It's just not entirely clear how this relates to the Great Patriotic War. Nothing more to show about her? Or is there nothing more to do in Paris? There's nothing to look at? They will be waiting for a fun adventure, easy action with unobtrusive humor. But this was not. Not at all.

The film left no impression. The characters are not disclosed, the plot is fresh, there are no events, in fact. The only word that can describe this film is: "no."

2 out of 10