7 reviews
I never thought I'd say that about a Republican. And Nicole has, I believe, the best panel & guests in cable news. They actually seem to really enjoy being on her show. I rate her up there with Jake Tapper, Brian Williams & Chris Wallace. She has the best laugh in television & she makes me smile while I'm learning stuff. That's never happened before :-)
- droberts-67892
- Apr 15, 2018
- Permalink
Ever thought I would say this but N Wallace is smart & witty
Excellent cast of
Commenters
- wwsmith-41013
- Jun 7, 2018
- Permalink
Nicolle Wallace spends a good part of the show reading to her audience. She must think either that her viewers are too dumb to read for themselves or that it's impressive to demonstrate her own ability to read. Today she read a good portion of Jeffrey Goldberg's Atlantic article on General Mark Milley, occasionally asking her guests, (including a U. S. General) to comment on what she's read.
It wouldn't be so bad if she were able to read with expression. As Dorothy Parker famously said, "Her emotions ran the gamut from A to B." Which pretty much characterizes Wallace's reading of the teleprompter as well. Instead of reading long excerpts of newspaper and magazine articles, Wallace might try trusting her viewers to read for themselves and concentating more on preparing better to have more spontaneous discussions with her guests.
It wouldn't be so bad if she were able to read with expression. As Dorothy Parker famously said, "Her emotions ran the gamut from A to B." Which pretty much characterizes Wallace's reading of the teleprompter as well. Instead of reading long excerpts of newspaper and magazine articles, Wallace might try trusting her viewers to read for themselves and concentating more on preparing better to have more spontaneous discussions with her guests.
- jztherapist
- Sep 21, 2023
- Permalink
Nicole Wallace is a joke. All she does is read the newspaper to her audience and rambles about what she just read. When she finally asks a question, she interrupts and rambles more. If it was not for the Washington post, New York times, and such, she would have nothing to take up time in her 2 hour time slot. MSNBC should nor allow such fake representation as news reporting. It is good for anyone interested in getting the newspaper read to them every single weekday. It's also hard to believe anything she rambles about due to the fake smile she always has whenever trying to attempt to ask questions. Definitely needs to be moved to late night!!!!
- rogergriffin-23053
- May 24, 2023
- Permalink
Gateway Pundit posted a montage of things Nicole Wallace has said that are false. Wallace demonstrates how moderates are incapable of keeping radical leftists in check. They end up siding with the leftists. Her heroes are the Bushes who have backed candidates of the Marxist Democrat Party the last two Presidential Elections. Avoid this shrill political hack at all costs.
- nlathy-839-300677
- May 24, 2022
- Permalink
The show on MSNBC is one of a few Consevative based news politics show on this network. Unless she is confidant about her shows content, Wallace becomes too excitable and shrill when faced with breaking news or a show where she loses control of the subject or her political pundits views. John Heileman seems to be a particular thorn in Wallace' side. Last week of August were hosted by other journalists who made this show far more enjoyable, especially when the host was John Heileman
Steve Kornacky, who was in the 4 pm slot was soon sidelined although he was to be her co-host. Wallace seemed to argue with Kornacky comments or views from the beginning. He has been absent the past couple of months filling in for Chris Matthews Hardball vacation.
Steve Kornacky, who was in the 4 pm slot was soon sidelined although he was to be her co-host. Wallace seemed to argue with Kornacky comments or views from the beginning. He has been absent the past couple of months filling in for Chris Matthews Hardball vacation.
- Maryjnberry
- Sep 3, 2017
- Permalink
"Um". Just count how many times Nicole uses "um" when she is addressing someone on her show while not reading off the teleprompter. She is a terrible speaker who should be replaced by a true journalist and better speaker. She does not deserve two hours of prime time news when MSNBC already employs much better hosts. She always has her favorite reporters and friends to answer questions posed to them by her to take up time on her show. She looks comfortable with them, but has an uneasy constipated look when dealing with a new guest. Besides using a whole lot of "ums", she stutters quite often too when not reading an article or off the teleprompter. Her guests are great, but she isn't, so isn't it time for her to go?
- darokohara
- Aug 19, 2024
- Permalink