User reviews

I've never seen anything like this before: Andrew Scott plays every role in an adaptation of Chekhov's Uncle Vanya and delivers an astonishing performance. One quickly becomes accustomed to the conceit of one actor utilising a multiplicity of gestures, inflections, body language and mannerisms to depict different characters; Scott's exceptional skills in carrying this off have to be seen to be fully appreciated.

The adaptation of Chekhov's material is expertly devised and although there are many, many laughs in this production, what really strikes home is the deep emotional intensity of the performance. Scott is in tears at several points and it is both heartbreaking and exhilarating to witness.

Anyone who has the slightest interest in the theatre should make it a point to catch this film. Wonderfully filmed, with expressive and thoughtful camera work, it is an undiluted triumph for all concerned.

Wow. An amazing night in Liverpool. After seeing Vanya on stage I was not sure it would transfer to the big screen. How wrong I was. Andrew Scott's performance is as beautiful and heartfelt on screen as it was in the theatre. Watching it again transported me back to the theatre performance and the camera work brought the excellence of Scott's acting into sharp focus, I cannot remember what I paid for the theatre tickets but with train fares and other expenses it was in the hundreds. Full marks for the National Theatre for making this master class in acting and direction available to all, everywhere and at an affordable price. A must see. I am going again!

It's always rewarding when talented actors and skilled direction come together to bring a concept to life.

Andrew Scott's ability to embody various emotions and inject humour into his performance while keeping the audience engaged is truly commendable.

The captivating emotions Andrew Scott brings to each character make it easy to see his portrayal as the norm. His ability to breathe life into multiple roles is truly impressive, creating a seamless and engaging experience that draws viewers into the rich tapestry of emotions woven throughout the performance.

Translating the theatrical experience to the screen successfully adds another layer of appreciation. It's a testament to both the actor's skill and the team's efforts in capturing the essence of live theatre.

Thank you to all involved who brought this production to the screen.

To enjoy this version of Uncle Vanya, two conditions are essential:

• to be familiar with Anton Chekhov play;
• to be familiar with Andrew Scott manner to build his characters - his Hamlet can be useful prepair -.

Because , at first sight, it is a provocative version- one actor plays all the characters . The manner to do that is not real surprising - the accent on humor sides of each character was present in other adaptations. And Mr. Scott knows to use each nuance in fair - precise manner, fair reminding the play itself and its versions.

But, obvious, it is only an experiment, perfect for Andrew Scott who use, in brilliant way, entire liberty offered by lines , meanings of words and context.

Iloved the final of play, maybe little strident in this case but beautiful crafted.

So, no doubts, Andrew Scott deserves his Vanya and this play is the precious pledge for it.

I believe it would be correct to say that this is far away from a regular play and if you want a classical Chekhov play and the story then this might not be it. As I've seen it now I realise how much it is about Andrew Scott and what an actor can do. This is the real reason everyone should go watch it, in case if you want to be a part of the experiment and see how Andrew gives a brilliant performance.

Especially since he is playing like 3 female characters and 3-4 male characters? I must admit that as I'm not a native English speaker and I'm not very familiar with the original material then I really needed to pay attention and even though Andrew made it quite simple to understand the character change sometimes I could have drifted away as at one point one of the character states as well.

"Vanya" is all show and no depth; a specious spectator sport. The fact that is has been so well received says much about the present climate of our culture.

The hallmarks of great acting are subtlety and nuance, when a mere glance, a small gesture or a slight vocal inflection can tell us volumes about a character. Subtlety and nuance have never been Andrew Scott's strong suit. A vanity project such as this egotistical one-man show which allows him free reign to flaunt his undoubted talents, was for me an experience that bordered on excruciating.

Perhaps his status as one of the most prominent actors of his generation is something that prevents directors from curbing his outlandish bag of tricks. His overacting is at times jaw dropping. I don't doubt his talent, but he is in dire need of an authoritative director to harness his irritating mannerisms and guide him towards an intelligent and meaningful performance. Every minute of "Vanya" screams "look what a smart boy I am". Letting him loose in this poorly written adaptation, under the helm of an admiring director, spells disaster.

The very idea of turning Uncle Vanya into a one-man show is pointless, and worse, ludicrous. If you are genuinely interested in "Uncle Vanya" search out the filmed versions with Michael Redgrave, widely considered the greatest of all Vanyas or David Warner in the BBC version. The performances in these versions, both with outstanding casts, exemplify the meaning of subtlety and nuance.

If you've never seen Uncle Vanya, this is not the adaptation you want to know the play by Anton Checkov: it won't give you any idea of what the original is about.

Andrew Scott plays all the characters. A bold move, but that's not the problem. He is an actor good enough to try it. His farcical adaptation is the problem. All the characters are defaced by an endless sequence of childish, pointless jokes and mannerisms, like a 5th grader mocking his teachers and aunties, making them caricatures of the originals.

He tries to catch up with tragic ethos of the play in the end, with the final monologue by Sonia, but then it's too late: all empathy one could have for her, her uncle, or anyone else in the play was already destroyed before.

What is more enraging is that this failure is not due to acting incompetence. It would be understandable if it was. But no, I really believe Andrew would be capable of pulling this off, with a different, I'd say even opposite, approach. What a great opportunity was lost here!

If you never saw Uncle Vanya and wants to be introduced to Checkov's classic by a movie, try 'August'. It's an adaptation by Anthony Hopkins set in his native Wales, which he stars, directs, and also wrote the soundtrack for.

I'm a very visual person, have 2 cinema memberships,1 unlimited, and a contributor to our local theatres. I love National Theatre & NTL. I usually like quirky and different things? I probably see 100 things a year. This one really didn't work for me. The concept of 1 person playing 8 characters was crazy? Probably a good story but in the end had no idea what was going and left after an hour, and wanted to go after 20 minutes. Time moved tremendously slow. I've never been more disappointed in a NTL production. Amazing amazing acting but why? Appreciate we're all different and just wanted to add a perspective. The closest thing to a person sitting and narrating a book or an audio book I've ever seen as an experience.