IMDb RATING
5.2/10
3.9K
YOUR RATING
An escaped murderer is in pursuit of his ex-girlfriend, who has fled to start a new life in a small town.An escaped murderer is in pursuit of his ex-girlfriend, who has fled to start a new life in a small town.An escaped murderer is in pursuit of his ex-girlfriend, who has fled to start a new life in a small town.
- Awards
- 3 wins
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaMultiple members of the cast, namely AJ Bowen, Amy Seimetz, Joe Swanberg, and Lane Hughes, went on to play characters in You're Next (2011) a year later.
- Quotes
[first lines]
Garrick Turrell: I must have... I must have dozed off or something. I apologize.
- ConnectionsFeatures Cat-Women of the Moon (1953)
- SoundtracksBloodguilt
Written and Performed by Yeti
Courtesy of Connor Garritty and Yeti
Featured review
Billing itself as a realistic portrayal of insanity in the mind of a serial killer, I was left bitterly disappointed.
Expecting something like "Tony : London Serial Killer" what I got was a very disappointing and shallow look at a movie that wants to be more than it is.
There are many problems. One of them being the irritating way that the film has been shot. Being a very shaky cam, at first I liked it and appreciated it for being different and gave it realism, but after a while it began to become a distraction. Deliberate out of focus shots were also contributing to the irritating value that the movie was rapidly growing.
The fact is, you never feel like you are getting into the mind of this killer. You simply feel as though you are following him. Neither investing time in anything he is doing. You know he is a bad guy because he kills people, but any depth to this killer as a person, is non existent.
The acting was fine and there were some genuine decent moments, but the film wants realism, and the biggest killer to the realism is in the ending. I am not going to spoil it, but I thought "no way, this is basic horror movie stuff". I thought that it was a cheap way to end what was a film that was lacking the positives that made films like "Henry" and "Tony" the films that they are in the Serial Killer sub genre.
If you want a good serial killer movie, check out the films I just mentioned. You could probably give this one a miss!
Expecting something like "Tony : London Serial Killer" what I got was a very disappointing and shallow look at a movie that wants to be more than it is.
There are many problems. One of them being the irritating way that the film has been shot. Being a very shaky cam, at first I liked it and appreciated it for being different and gave it realism, but after a while it began to become a distraction. Deliberate out of focus shots were also contributing to the irritating value that the movie was rapidly growing.
The fact is, you never feel like you are getting into the mind of this killer. You simply feel as though you are following him. Neither investing time in anything he is doing. You know he is a bad guy because he kills people, but any depth to this killer as a person, is non existent.
The acting was fine and there were some genuine decent moments, but the film wants realism, and the biggest killer to the realism is in the ending. I am not going to spoil it, but I thought "no way, this is basic horror movie stuff". I thought that it was a cheap way to end what was a film that was lacking the positives that made films like "Henry" and "Tony" the films that they are in the Serial Killer sub genre.
If you want a good serial killer movie, check out the films I just mentioned. You could probably give this one a miss!
- SpannersGerm669
- Sep 16, 2014
- Permalink
- How long is A Horrible Way to Die?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime1 hour 27 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content