Chronicles rare and fascinating details of how "Star Trek" began, where it's been, and how it's going where no television series has gone before.Chronicles rare and fascinating details of how "Star Trek" began, where it's been, and how it's going where no television series has gone before.Chronicles rare and fascinating details of how "Star Trek" began, where it's been, and how it's going where no television series has gone before.
Browse episodes
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaDuring the history of Star Trek V, there was no mention about Lawrence Luckinbill (Sybok) for one reason. There was a mention of Lucille Ball who gave Star Trek TOS life on TV; Kirstie Alley (Saavik on Star Trek II) who met and played with Lucille Ball on a game show; and when it came to Lawrence Luckinbill, the only mention was Sean Connery was considered the role of Sybok. Not mentioned was Lawrence Luckinbill (married to Lucie Arnaz) was the son-in-law of Lucille Ball who gave Star Trek TOS life on TV.
- ConnectionsReferenced in Treksperts Briefing Room: The Center Seat w/ Peter Holmstrom (2023)
Featured review
When watching this series, take a moment to listen. Almost the entire thing is scored like a Tom & Jerry cartoon. It's distracting and insulting. It sounds as if they didn't think we were capable to paying attention otherwise. Someone says something like "I was told they might not renew my contract", and the music makes a big dun-dun-DUHNNNN. Or "So, again, we went back to Gene for his advice" - cue cartoon whipping sound and quick zoom to shot of Gene Roddenberry. Crap like that. What are we, six years old? As I said, insulting.
The shows jump around from one trivial detail to the next, with no sense of narrative or point. It seems like they told their interviewees to just start talking about anything Star Trek related and whatever came out they'd use. So, for example, in the segment about The Wrath of Khan, they covered the mechanism of the slug crawling into Chekov's ear for several minutes (spoiler: they pulled it with a STRING! Ooh, fascinating...) and yet topics like introducing KIRK HAVING A SON in the same movie was never mentioned. Presumably because none of the subjects happened to talk about it.
Seeing shows like this makes me want to call up the filmmakers and yell at them. The most frustrating thing is that we just have to sit still and take it. Thus this review.
The shows jump around from one trivial detail to the next, with no sense of narrative or point. It seems like they told their interviewees to just start talking about anything Star Trek related and whatever came out they'd use. So, for example, in the segment about The Wrath of Khan, they covered the mechanism of the slug crawling into Chekov's ear for several minutes (spoiler: they pulled it with a STRING! Ooh, fascinating...) and yet topics like introducing KIRK HAVING A SON in the same movie was never mentioned. Presumably because none of the subjects happened to talk about it.
Seeing shows like this makes me want to call up the filmmakers and yell at them. The most frustrating thing is that we just have to sit still and take it. Thus this review.
- jkoseattle
- Jan 24, 2024
- Permalink
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Inside Star Trek: Hinter den Kulissen des Enterprise-Universums
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime46 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was The Center Seat: 55 Years of Star Trek (2021) officially released in India in English?
Answer