User reviews

Not great, not terrible, just avoid the trailer before watching the movie, since it delivers all the plot twists beforehand and it partially ruins the experience!

Solid acting by the three main characters, excellent cinematography and locations, definetely worth watching.

JUST AVOID THE TRAILER!

Lost momentum once the truth was revealed. Good enough to watch to the end. Not good enough to watch again. The acting was great. The plot missed its mark.

It started off good with premise of wars and hiding in the woods, but quickly become highly predictable, then it just became stupid and aggravating *pretty much when silverstone (or character) came into the movie.

Anyways avoid this movie I was fooled by fake reviews you don't have to be.

3/10 for steady camera work and the scenery.

Fake advertising...as for the rest, seen a thousand times, nothing new.

Everything is predictable.

PS. No thriller either, but could at least be put in that category.

It's difficult to talk about the film without spoiling its premise, so beware, even if the premise is old, tired and badly implemented, not to mention telegraphed way before the reveal. The problem, though, is that after the reveal, the movie is just plain bad and totally predictable. Alicia Silverstone acts like her character is mentally deficient, which may just as well have been in the script, but I doubt it, Stephen Moyer kind of phones his performance in, while the plot holes are large enough to drop dead deer into. It could have been enjoyable if about a third of the scenes in it would have been deleted and people seemed to care about the production.

Bottom line: just wanted to watch the film because of Moyer and because I've not seen Silverstone in anything relevant in a long time. But it was a mistake.

I thought it was a good movie. Yes in the middle it was predictable but still a good story. Wish they answered more questions about everyone's past. But I enjoyed the 90 minutes. Kept me entertained and thats all I can ask for in a movie. So it was good. Watch it for what it is.

The movie was a de ja vu to a hundred different movies that you can't help but skip to the end just to confirm that you're not wrong. They could have chosen a different title too. This should have been a 3 if it weren't for the actor's exquisite behind.

It is a well crafted effort for a thriller which is burning slow, but eventually gets there.

The acting is very good on part of the three leads (not much to say about the few others who are barely in the picture), the camerawork is fairly good, and the score is lovely. No home-video style shaky camera here, thanks for God. The script develops well if sometimes slowly, it is easy (not too hard) to follow, and the emotions depicted by the leads are more than fine. Drew Van Acker is really there.

Just for the record, I am a neutral watcher of this movie from Hungary with no connection to any of the crew whatsoever, so I'm not making this up just get a higher score for it.

In my opinion, this is a decent thriller / drama for an evening watch. I give it 6.5 out of 10.

Filmmakers (the writer and director) that only have short-film experience need to start becoming more mindful of what they put on a film's running time. Of the long and dragged out 98 min runtime, the entire first half should've been condensed to at most 20 mins. Ya we get it, father and son are survivalists, get on with the story. Typical rookie filmmakers mistakes.

And whoever decided to genre-label this a "sci-fi" needs to give their heads a shake. There's zero sci-fi in this film. For that matter, there's very little thrills even calling this a "thriller". Maybe 10 mins tops near the end where your heart rate may go up a few bpm. This is more of a mystery/drama film, that drags out a lot of filler, and underutilized any good substance there was in the story. Conceptually, the story is smart, but the execution was clumsy, drab, and muddled.

The performances were good and convincing, especially Silverstone. The cinematography was decent, as was the soundtrack - especially the last song by Baker Grace, but the score was your typical B film nonsense; loud, overbearing, constant and annoying. If you're patient, and maybe fast-forward most of the first half of the film, it does get better by the ending, and it'd be a good one-time watch if you have nothing better to see. It's a generous 6/10 from me for this non-thrilling non-sci-fi film.

Seriously, the 8-10 star ratings??? So fake and scripted.

It started off ok, but quickly became predictable before the first quarter of the movie. I feel like I have seen another version of this same movie before. The cast was decent especially when Drew Van Acker gets indecent. "sizzle"

It's watchable, but the predictability of it all, made it a boring made for TV or some latenight lifetime channel flick. There was plenty of opportune moments to create some cool twists and intensity - but it felt quite lazy, lets get it over and done with kind of feel.

Okay storyline but the ending was terrible and the plot holes are deep. Also, how is this listed under Sci-fi? I was hoping the wars talked about would turn out to be an alien invasion and we'd get a kind of body-snatchers plot. Oh, and it's very predictable.

Some great ideas (survivalists / loyalty / desertion) but also faint whiffs of gun control and anti-masculine ideas that seem silly. Silverstone is good - but the last third of the movie falters in making any good points.

No idea why the sci fix reference, but I'm guessing the bad reviews are mostly coming from those expecting an alien invasion, bombs, battles, blood and guts.. Basically teenagers with short attention spans.. Yes, it was fairly predictable, but I thought it wasn't bad for a what if scenario.. Nothing unbelievable, tho depending on how many trespassers went missing over the years I think it would have raised enough suspicion that they'd have been caught long before.. That said, the rest was relatively believable and tight enough to maintain a sense of reality.. I do not doubt this has and will continue to happen in the real world, so then this simple movie offers a what if perspective.. The cinematography was good, scenery great, acting surprising adequate and the directing solid.. For what it is I'm not sure there's a lot needing to change.. I did wonder where the canned peaches came from, but generally it's a fine little film.. The bad reviews are mostly coming from those whose expectations of grand murder and mayhem from aliens were not fulfilled.. I think 6 is fair for this type of movie and I'd like to hear honest justification for less..

This film is one of the few films that achieves what the director have in mind . Natural background, reality, drama, crime and suspense. The lighting of the design does its work and finally a repetitive story that doesn't seem repetitive.

There's little about this film that is going to make it stand out. Boring, predicatable and poorly written. When I looked on Friday all the reviews for this were 10 stars. It was obvious that they were fake, but still I thought I'd give it a watch as I like Alicia Silverstone.

I thought it might muster a 6, but it didnt. A straight to TV movie you might avoid on a bad TV station on a Wednesday afternoon when everyone is at work. I watched this movie to give it a 3* rating so that you can avoid wasting your time or your bandwidth.

This movie is a 3 or 4, but I'm giving it a 1 to help balance out the early, obviously fake 9s and 10s.

Plot is a mishmash of a dozen movies you've seen before, and although it was nice to see Silverstone again and her acting was serviceable, the rest was below average to bad.

Also, am I the only one wondering how this movie warrants a "sci-fi" category?

If you literally have nothing else to watch, this could be ok to have on in the background while you browse your phone or something.