36 reviews
I am all about having the first gay Xmas rom-com. I first watched Lifetime's The Christmas Setup and it was lovely so I had high expectations for this one but turns out Dashing in December isn't all that. The plot actually isn't half bad and the Colorado ranch really adds a different setting to the other Christmas films. But, for me the main lead Wyatt Burwall (Peter Porte) is really annoying and not charming. at. all. The good ole' Andie MacDowell also acts... strange? Like her heart isn't in here. The only saving grace is the handsome rancher Heath (Juan Pablo) who actually captivates me till the end. The film could do better with better lead and cast - it's a little forced for me.
- MeshTheMovieFreak
- Dec 26, 2020
- Permalink
I really expect to like this film. However, for me the character Wyat is so mean and cruel that it would take a lot of storyline to bring us his redemption. Instead, it happens in about 90 seconds and everyone forgets how cruel he was. Sure, there a poorly laid out back story to his feelings. Yet, they are barely explored. It goes from there
- stephen-130-82645
- Dec 19, 2020
- Permalink
A good old-fashioned feel-good Christmas movie with an obvious twist. It is nice, easy to watch, not a second overlong or overdramatic, and just... perfect for a lazy afternoon or evening that you wanna spend indoors either alone or with company.
Yes, it is not 'It's A Wonderful Life' or 'The Christmas Story', but watching it it would make your heart warm. Maybe, in the same way that when you were little you were enjoying the festive season for more than the days off school, the sweets and the gifts: for that special type of magic that almost disappears once you reach puberty.
In any case, if you want to enjoy an evening without over-analyzing. Overthinking and over...something, this is your find. Enjoy!
Yes, it is not 'It's A Wonderful Life' or 'The Christmas Story', but watching it it would make your heart warm. Maybe, in the same way that when you were little you were enjoying the festive season for more than the days off school, the sweets and the gifts: for that special type of magic that almost disappears once you reach puberty.
In any case, if you want to enjoy an evening without over-analyzing. Overthinking and over...something, this is your find. Enjoy!
It is a romantic comedy with a welcomed difference. It is sweet and touching at the same time. I like it.
Watching this seems like watching all the old all American gay films. Why is the door scene when Wyatt went to see Heath is so cliché lol. If not for the hot guys i will not enjoy this movie. Also im more hook about Wyatt Mom and Carlos love story tbh.. I think I like Make Yuletide Gay more.. They're holding back too during the kissing scene and the dance could've been longer.. This is another typical American Gay movie..
- hellostrangerxavmi
- Apr 16, 2021
- Permalink
Although all of Hallmark's movies are the stuff that fills teenage girls' heads with a fantasy, binary version of relationships, it was a premiere of portraying a gay romance. While that is a good development as at least 1-3% of people are gay, and prior exclusion or unfoundedly pessimistic portrayals of gay relationships should be amended, I think that simply replacing one of the couple with a male - but keeping all other elements unchanged - is ultimately counter-productive.
Unlike the fantasy world where parents are intelligent, warm and enlightened, and small town America has become enlightened so that "gay" is not a defining indication of character, the reality is that gay relationships are fundamentally different from straight ones.
The difference is that straight relationships are encouraged by society, familial expectations, professional, religious, legal and even fiscal elements to make them work; while, gay ones have been discouraged since the age of sentience (6 years?) in all those aspects.
The typical gay child is told by his entourage that his very nature is "wrong" well before s/he has developed the ability to think independently. So, many have fundamentally stressful childhoods, especially if their parents are not "enlightened" and they are not intellectually precocious.
The closest mainstream parallel is that of the daughter of the sleeper Soviet spies in The Americans. Born in the US, she is confronted by a society that views Soviets as "bad", but she has loving parents who live a "lie"; it encourages subterfuge, and also, sharpens the ability to think outside the box at a young age. Even that stress is less than that faced by gay children as the fictional daughter already had some intellectual maturity when she found out.
Gay relationships don't have a rule book, and there is no established societal expectations of their configurations. Each relationship must be negotiated in everyday life or they would fall apart if there is no life project as society or family does not facilitate persistence.
In some ways, straight relationships may suffer from the opposite problem: unrealistic expectations by society, family, and naive couples, when the dynamics and economics of family has undergone a seminal shift in the 20th Century. The obsolescence of the monogamous, straight marriage shows up in the very frequent divorce rate among couples under 30, and makes a mockery of the marriage vows "till death do us part". They should change that vow as it is said with no indication if it would be upheld.
Gay relationships that last are some of the healthiest I've encountered when each partner has no preconceived expectations, and so communicate on a level that few straight couples reach. Too often, young straight couples don't think through the fit of their individual makeups, have children, and end up "obliged" to remain as a couple due to child-rearing and financial responsibilities.
The movement to have "gay marriage" simply overlaid onto the increasingly obsolete straight marriage framework may be useful for mainstream acceptability - but doesn't address the fundamental obsolescence of marriage conventions.
However, this is only the first run of mainstreaming gay romance, so, the valid criticism of implausible plot, lack of chemistry, and indubitably happy ending would, hopefully, lead to more honest portrayals of gay romances in future.
Unlike the fantasy world where parents are intelligent, warm and enlightened, and small town America has become enlightened so that "gay" is not a defining indication of character, the reality is that gay relationships are fundamentally different from straight ones.
The difference is that straight relationships are encouraged by society, familial expectations, professional, religious, legal and even fiscal elements to make them work; while, gay ones have been discouraged since the age of sentience (6 years?) in all those aspects.
The typical gay child is told by his entourage that his very nature is "wrong" well before s/he has developed the ability to think independently. So, many have fundamentally stressful childhoods, especially if their parents are not "enlightened" and they are not intellectually precocious.
The closest mainstream parallel is that of the daughter of the sleeper Soviet spies in The Americans. Born in the US, she is confronted by a society that views Soviets as "bad", but she has loving parents who live a "lie"; it encourages subterfuge, and also, sharpens the ability to think outside the box at a young age. Even that stress is less than that faced by gay children as the fictional daughter already had some intellectual maturity when she found out.
Gay relationships don't have a rule book, and there is no established societal expectations of their configurations. Each relationship must be negotiated in everyday life or they would fall apart if there is no life project as society or family does not facilitate persistence.
In some ways, straight relationships may suffer from the opposite problem: unrealistic expectations by society, family, and naive couples, when the dynamics and economics of family has undergone a seminal shift in the 20th Century. The obsolescence of the monogamous, straight marriage shows up in the very frequent divorce rate among couples under 30, and makes a mockery of the marriage vows "till death do us part". They should change that vow as it is said with no indication if it would be upheld.
Gay relationships that last are some of the healthiest I've encountered when each partner has no preconceived expectations, and so communicate on a level that few straight couples reach. Too often, young straight couples don't think through the fit of their individual makeups, have children, and end up "obliged" to remain as a couple due to child-rearing and financial responsibilities.
The movement to have "gay marriage" simply overlaid onto the increasingly obsolete straight marriage framework may be useful for mainstream acceptability - but doesn't address the fundamental obsolescence of marriage conventions.
However, this is only the first run of mainstreaming gay romance, so, the valid criticism of implausible plot, lack of chemistry, and indubitably happy ending would, hopefully, lead to more honest portrayals of gay romances in future.
I was expecting to enjoy this, but sadly nothing really clicks, it never quite gets off the ground. The editing is really annoying; just when a scene starts to build up some energy, the screen abruptly goes blank for a moment, and then it's off to a new unrelated scene. The lead actors are both gay in real life (Porte is married to a guy) but they don't really set off many sparks here. 41-year-old Actor Juan Pablo Di Pace is actually quite good-looking when he's groomed and styled, but here his looks seem kinda smothered and wasted. The whole thing just feels like its going through the motions, pushing for something that isn't quite happening.
I really enjoyed 'Dashing in December'. It is a warm, heartfelt, and engaging Christmas movie, one of the better movies this season. It also gives same-sex male relationships some representation in this genre of film, which is a plus. At the heart of the story is Wyatt Burwall (played by Peter Porte), who works for a Manhattan investment firm. After many years, he has decided to go home for Christmas to the family ranch in Colorado, where he hopes to convince his mother Deb (played by Andie MacDowell) to sell the ranch to one of his investors. While home he meets Heath (our other protagonist in this story played by Juan Pablo Di Pace), the ranch hand who has been helping his mother run the place for the past several years. An unexpected relationship between Wyatt and Heath emerges. From friction to romance, we watch their relationship blossom thru some warm and intimate dialogue on this beautiful and picturesque ranch in Harmony Springs, Colorado. Indeed, one of the strengths of the story/script is the dialogue and exchanges between Heath and Wyatt, discussing their past, their hopes, and their love for the ranch (and the friction at the beginning, of course). There were some weak elements to the story; for example, the fight between the two (that takes place at the dinner table) late in the film seemed forced. That said, the story pulled me in from the start. Moreover, I thought the writer did a pretty good job developing the characters, as I found myself connecting with Wyatt, Heath, and Deb. This is also a reflection of the quality of acting in the film, which was, overall, brilliant. Porte had an impressive, convincing performance on screen. You could see his character develop as the film progressed from a 'Mr. Know It All' at the beginning to a warmer and more caring person towards the end. Di Pace too had a strong performance. It felt authentic, very real on screen. The chemistry between the two was great (believable). Again, the dialogue and exchanges between the two in several scenes made this chemistry work, I thought. The supporting cast was excellent. MacDowell had a very good performance as Deb (the mother). The movie also had quite a festive side as well with some dancing and great country music (some good songs in this film). There were also some beautiful landscapes of the ranch, of the mountains in winter, which added to the Christmas vibe of the film. All in all, it is a refreshing Christmas romance movie, with some very strong acting, a nice new edition to the 2020 season lineup.
- toddsgraham
- Dec 22, 2020
- Permalink
The first time I checked this out, I wasn't overly impressed. I watched it again to see if I liked it any better the second time. I didn't. This is definitely standard Christmas fare--you can predict the entire story simply from the trailer: Hardened city guy returns home to the country, rediscovers his small-town roots, finds love. That being said, the story and dialogue are pretty weak. I did not find Wyatt to be particularly unlikeable: Porte is handsome and plays the role of Wyatt with a quiet restraint, sensitivity, and vulnerability, which is somewhat endearing. Di Pace has a bad habit of overacting and he does so in several scenes here; Heath sometimes came across as an annoying, ungrateful, whiny brat. Moreover, Di Pace seemed a bit miscast: He didn't achieve or exude that special combination of toughness and vulnerability, or possess the rugged handsomeness I thought the role/character required. The characters' back sob stories weren't overly melodramatic, which was a refreshing change of pace. Harris (Blake) was cute, but was underutilized; MacDowell (Deb) was a typical sweet mom character, but even she seemed to be struggling with the weak dialogue. You might enjoy this if you approach it with very low expectations. Otherwise, I'd skip it. On a totally random note: Is bison chili really considered romantic fare in Colorado? That was a laugh-out-loud moment for me and an example of the strange dialogue in this weak entry.
While the movie was predictable, I simply watched. Very entertaining movie. Andie was great. Thanks for giving us a new view of love and family. The whole cast was warm.
- clwelcomb-59025
- Dec 14, 2020
- Permalink
Dashing In December
It was necessary to accept this movie on the bizarre premise and weird script, the whole thing was an ordeal.
I have two main gripes with this movie, firstly it states that all relationships are based on the heterosexual model which is palpably absurd. Second it shouts out that unless you are in a relationship it is not possible to be complete or happy, which is just naive and insulting.
The music ramped up the sentimental elements but mostly it grated.
The acting was good they were just given rubbish to say!
At best it's a 3 outta 10 for the nice horses, it could have been really good but alas it was not!
It was necessary to accept this movie on the bizarre premise and weird script, the whole thing was an ordeal.
I have two main gripes with this movie, firstly it states that all relationships are based on the heterosexual model which is palpably absurd. Second it shouts out that unless you are in a relationship it is not possible to be complete or happy, which is just naive and insulting.
The music ramped up the sentimental elements but mostly it grated.
The acting was good they were just given rubbish to say!
At best it's a 3 outta 10 for the nice horses, it could have been really good but alas it was not!
- martimusross
- Dec 20, 2022
- Permalink
1. Pro - it brings to the forefront that 'love' or 'attraction' between two people of the same gender is perfectly and absolutely normal !! And worthy of a family type story.
2. Con - the production values are unacceptable ! Using spring or summer for winter just does not work. The directors can spray tons of - whatever that white stuff is suppose to look like snow - on everything but you can't hide summer green.
Outside of the above this is a typical Xmas story.
2. Con - the production values are unacceptable ! Using spring or summer for winter just does not work. The directors can spray tons of - whatever that white stuff is suppose to look like snow - on everything but you can't hide summer green.
Outside of the above this is a typical Xmas story.
Thanks Paramount for making a movie with real people and showing that all relationships don't all look the same👍🏽
After some Halmark Christmas who I saw, I admitt, I expected little more - becoming, scene by scene, too much- about this film. Honestly, it is not bad and works just well. But the recipe remains the same, the gay story is not very different by a heterosexual one and the end reminds than the kick to see it was the presence in cast of Andie MacDowell and so familiar from Hallmark universe Peter Porte.
The only reproch is about the heavy cliches - the son returning home to sell the farm, the young , hard working and handsome worker and his mom opposition, the steps of romance, the conflict and the expected final .
Sure, some suggestions about homophobia, beautiful cinematography and the admirable contribution of Andie MacDowell.
But , without dessapointing, I suppose it could be better , having a nice potential of story.
The only reproch is about the heavy cliches - the son returning home to sell the farm, the young , hard working and handsome worker and his mom opposition, the steps of romance, the conflict and the expected final .
Sure, some suggestions about homophobia, beautiful cinematography and the admirable contribution of Andie MacDowell.
But , without dessapointing, I suppose it could be better , having a nice potential of story.
- Kirpianuscus
- Dec 25, 2023
- Permalink
It was all bad. Formula Christmas story. Characters were not like able. Story was incredibly weak and poorly conceived. Acting wasn't good. Reminds me of the family friend who went away for a wine country weekend and wrote a Hallmark Christmas movie in their free time. The only emotional response I had during this movie was when I realized my partner intended to watch it until the end, simply because we had started it.
- jeffreyroper
- Dec 19, 2020
- Permalink
This is a holiday romance story from the Paramount Network that has some common plot elements with Hallmark and Lifetime holiday movies, so there is crossover appeal for viewers of those networks. Hallmark and Lifetime are focused on women, so a young female is always the main character in their formulaic films and a young man is her love interest. In this film there is a male who is the main character and another male is his love interest.
The script for Dashing in December is above average and the characters talk about real things. In this movie the leads are two males Peter Porte and Juan Pablo Di Pace, they both graduated from drama schools so they know how to act and there is chemistry between them. It has all the usual Hallmark elements such as being very Christmasy, gingerbread, hot cider, hot cocoa and holiday traditions and maintains the cardinal rule that lead characters kiss, but are never seen in bed together. The supporting actors Andie MacDowell and Caroline Harris are excellent. And the music throughout is wonderful.
I hope the Paramount Network gives us more films with gay couples in the near future.
The script for Dashing in December is above average and the characters talk about real things. In this movie the leads are two males Peter Porte and Juan Pablo Di Pace, they both graduated from drama schools so they know how to act and there is chemistry between them. It has all the usual Hallmark elements such as being very Christmasy, gingerbread, hot cider, hot cocoa and holiday traditions and maintains the cardinal rule that lead characters kiss, but are never seen in bed together. The supporting actors Andie MacDowell and Caroline Harris are excellent. And the music throughout is wonderful.
I hope the Paramount Network gives us more films with gay couples in the near future.
- Avidviewer-02847
- Dec 21, 2020
- Permalink
The awkwardness in this film really stems from the fact that it almost seems like the characters should have been played by younger actors. For example, asking a 30- or 40-something year old guy things like, "Have you ever had a boyfriend?" or "Have you ever danced with a boy?" comes across as juvenile and laughable, when this was likely not the intention. Dialogue like that would have made more sense and been less silly if the characters were teenagers or maybe in their early 20s. Wyatt obviously likes Heath and he stares at Heath in doe-eyed wonder, as though he's never been in love or in like before, yet the story mentions that Wyatt has had several previous relationships. Also, unlike other reviewers, I didn't find Wyatt's character to be overly mean or unlikeable. In fact, when you realize that he is financially carrying everyone else, you realize that his position is not unreasonable. Thus, I didn't feel like his character needed this deep redemption--I actually found Heath to be very catty and unlikeable (or maybe Porte is simply a better actor than Di Pace). Finally, the falling in love aspect felt way too rushed--there was no slow burn, no real tension. This was clearly a rushed, slapped-together project, and it comes across as overly formulaic and silly.
- SpeciousgURL
- Dec 22, 2020
- Permalink
Andie went from being one of the biggest stars in the world to... this? She deserves better. Couldn't handle ten minutes of his movie.
- ashrxdgrave
- Dec 21, 2020
- Permalink
This is a sweet romance with some fine moments. Sure, the storyline is predictable and the HEA is never in doubt... but that's what I want from this type of entertainment. The two leads have good chemistry and are sincere. The supporting cast does well and the scenery is gorgeous. It was good to see Andi McDowell. Thank you for making this film.
- tpatchen-77031
- Dec 13, 2020
- Permalink
Watched it boring predictable and the editing is awful it just cuts and jumps from one to the next without any transitioning acting leaves much to be desired the plot is simply too obvious
- amirezamoghdm
- Dec 20, 2020
- Permalink
Wyatt and Heath were charming to watch as their budding romance blossomed. Love a good Christmas romance, this movie had my heart fluttering wishing for a new romance for my Christmas. Helps both men are handsome and country boys!
- amyrobin-50549
- Dec 14, 2020
- Permalink
Everything feels forced and what's with every character noting how many years ago something happened?
A frustrating film to finish. The lead is so unlikable, I'm baffled who the demographic is. Is this how straight people view gays?
Anyways, it's not great. Watch Happiest Season or Christmas Setup instead.
- sstidham-4
- Dec 25, 2020
- Permalink
The chemistry between two main characters is so weak . The script is pretty bad actually, it's so common, not thing special, you can guest the whole movie. The transition between the scenes are weird and bad editing. And I was waiting three words 'I love you' to show up but no, I feel so disappointed.
I watched this movie tonight, and have say it is pretty darn wonderful. Predictable, yes, as we know these Christmas movies to be. But following grouchy Wyatt, and seeing him change after meeting ranch man Heath is Christmas cheer! Their sparring that turns to mutual respect and love is fun to watch.
Both leads do a fine job, especially the actor playing Heath.
Andie MacDowell is a delight as Wyatt's mother and matchmaker between Wyatt and Heath.
I am so happy this movie was made and hope to see more!
- ronterry55
- Dec 14, 2020
- Permalink