User reviews

It's basically watching a soap opera with a start and end to one entire "dramatic" story.

The overbearing and constant score was very annoying. Zero music was needed in more than half of the entire scores runtime.

The acting for the most part was sub par - unconvincing and/or over exaggerated, but I'm sure that's mostly well-seasoned TV writer and director Fred Olen Ray's failure to direct his scenes and cast properly.

His directing in this one felt very amateurish, that the entire film seemed like an independent low budget amateur filmmaker's production. It felt very phony and unconvincing. The story has been done many times before, and much better, so not sure why we needed a "soap opera" version, that was predictable start to end.

Pacing and runtime were decent. If you have nothing better to watch, I guess this one is OK. It's a generous 6/10 from me

Refreshing change to see star Brittany Underwood playing the baddie. Unfortunately, even her acting chops can't rescue this movie from terrible acting and a bad script. The best part was the ending scene and even that was overacted. Keep on trying, Lifetime! One of these days, you'll get it right!

Eye candy movie.

November 11th after the 11th hour in year 2023rd.

Genre:

Family drama, mental illness, feminist.

What was this tv movie about?:

It was about a syco femmy. Supposedly wanting to be back in her daughter's life. So she Loki's her way into the house.

The story and the production overview:

The mother looked like the Shehulk actress.

They story was interesting. The execution of the film was fine.

The acting wasn't bad in most parts in my opinion.

From my perspective the mother was foolish for not doing reference check and leaving her dot alone right away with a stranger.

The fed lady was a tool. She potential almost got the mother killed because she couldn't just go to the cafe.

Overall a good film nevertheless for its tier level.

Highlight:

Nothing really... Eye candy was alright I guess.

Moral:

Do reference checks and unlock your vast intuition.

Rating:

It was fine.

Final words:

The ending could have been better.

Everything was just bad. The writing, the directing and the acting. I just can't believe someone paid money to have this movie made and be put on TV. I don't understand why all this money keeps getting wasted.

Simply the worst. Horrible acting start to finish if I wasn't so Covid trapped and bored would never have bothered to finish watching.

So I quite like Underwood, but she is just terrible at playing psycho villians, her facial expressions are just God aweful! Also there were many scenes where smimey Tom deserved a scillet to the upside of his head! If I had been Sam I would have thrown him out a long time ago!

On a mountain road in the dead of night mother Samantha (Melanie Nelson) and her 10-year-old daughter Cassie (Scarlett Roselynn) are involved in a car accident. It runs off the road and Sam is relatively unscathed but Cassie is badly injured and ends up needing a wheelchair. While at a hospital undergoing a large blood transfusion, the hospital staff learn that Cassie was adopted, which causes a nurse named Margaret Smith (Brittany Underwood) to get the job of live-in nurse to take care of Cassie after she's released from the hospital. She does this by impersonating Rachel, another nurse from her agency, and of course she's up to no good.

What occurs after this is typical Hallmark thriller. A psycho nurse nurses someone's child, plans to take over, become the mother and get the husband. It's a well worn idea/plot which efficiently acted, however what lifts this up from average is Brittany Underwood's performance. She's beautiful, yet deadly and conveys this so well.

Karina Segura was great! Her acting was believable. Hope to see more of her in thriller movies!

I surfed onto this in progress. The first thing that struck me was how the blonde wasn't using that annoying voice fry I'd expected from her. That took me aback, so I paused to watch a scene then surfed out, only to come right back after a few min. I must say the prettier Shakira look-alike gave a strong performance.

Now, I read the other reviews. People don't seem to have watched Lifetime movies. You don't rate it like a real movie but you rate it compared to the rest of crap this channel puts out. And this was not bad. I found the platinum woman compelling to watch. (Brittany Underwood... is she supposed to be famous? The name rings a bell but I couldn't place her, even after going down her filmography and PS: this isn't listed there!)

I liked when she killed the woman in the car, she barely exerted herself. (I am guessing that was direction?) Sometimes she looked younger than her (32?) age and sometimes she looked 42, like when she went berserk killing the welfare check woman.

What else can I say? It's a Lifetime movie, you don't take them serious. It was well lit. Oh and the mother was so annoying, from the get-go you had to root for the bad girl. Or am I the only 1? Why can't dumb movie channels like Lifetime give us what we want already? Imagine the precedent this could have set: she gets away with all the murders at the end! Come on, we all wanted that! i mean come on: the Hays Code is long over, so act like it! I mean what is this, the ABC Family channel resurrected and crossed with Hallmark? Have some guts, Lifetime and help us murder-and-get-away-with it via proxy. None of us gonna murder anyone, all of us have a couple dozen peeps on our hit list. (Particularly now!) Give us what we want or else: we change channels. Lifetime totally lost an opportunity to make headlines the next day with the social media being all like "WTF?" and other channels going copycat for the (diluted) same effect. Oh, well!

For the bad part: we aren't told at the end if she's really the girl's mother. I say yes. Also worse: the casting of the girl. Nothing against the girl, per se, but against the terrible casting director and choice: this girl was too old and too precocious. It would have made for a more interesting story if the girl had the (sorely needed) "angelical" quality. Think "Gracie" from The Nanny. The kid didn't need to be a 6 year old, but she definitely needed more vulnerability factor, to put the viewer a bit more on edge (for those that know how to "get into a movie" and pretend it's real). Also she wasn't that experienced an actress for the part, such as at the Byrd Cafe when she says "really?" after Blondie told her the story of what happened to her baby daughter. There was nothing behind that word, substance-wise, and the Gracie actress had her character down pat and acting chops in droves.

All in all, it's probably a 7/10 for LifeTime level of non-movies, this is pretty good so I'm bumping it to an 8/10, for Blondie's performance only. Does she moonlight as Shakira's double in her spare time? She's so much prettier, and her platinum-ish hair gave her creepy vibes to perfection for her character. Hope to see her in something else soon.