16 reviews
It's no surprise that FOX broadcasting has somewhat lowered the bar for the standards of television. Face it; this channel has somewhat thrived upon "trash TV" and has built a reputation on it. However, when it comes to Primetime animation, FOX currently holds several juggernauts including Seth MacFarlane's Family Guy, Mike Judge's King of the Hill and of course, the classic, The Simpsons. So when a new animated series called Sit Down, Shut Up premieres between two of these audience bringers, expectations are somewhat higher.
Sit Down, Shut Up follows a staff of teachers at a dysfunctional school in an attempt to hold things together during hard economic times. Such teachers include Ennis Hofftard who is an essential meat head teaching English, Larry LittleJunk as the lovable P.E. coach who just can't quite woo the girl of his dreams without insulting her, and Stuart Proszakian, a somewhat drugged out Assistant Principal (or in this case the Ass. Principal) who is constantly happy and constantly unaware of the present situation. This week's episode: the school must find a way to raise money or they must fire one of their staff members.
Since the series was created of Mitch Hurwitz (who also created Arrested Development), a series of subplots concerning the misfit teachers take place. Can the German teacher effectively hide his pornography? Will the plan to subject students to steroids work? Can the Librarian find the missing bottle of '93 champagne work hundreds? Also adhering to Arrested Development's structure, all the subplots wind down to a chaotic, no holds bar conclusion. Unfortunately, that's all Sit Down, Shut Up takes from Arrested Development.
One of the major problems is the format. So much plotting and details are shot at rapid pace, that multiple viewings are required. (Though whether it's worth the effort is questionable). However, without an omniscient voice over (such as the one provided by Ron Howard in Arrested Development) to keep the program coherent and accessible, the show becomes very confusing very quickly. This leads to an altogether other problem: whether the show is actually aware that it's an animated series, or whether it's not.
Several hints were thrown revealing that some characters know more than they're supposed to. For example, Larry Littlejunk makes an obscure reference and when no flashback comes up (somewhat insulting the format of Family Guy), Larry asks "Mitch" if they're going to show it. Likewise, Assistant Principal Proszakian has the catchphrase, "I need a catchphrase" to add to the lampooning. However, if the characters are somewhat omniscient, why do they also seem unaware at times, such as when Larry Littlejunk tries to woo Miracle Grohe when he knows he will fail. The reason the Voice Over was so important was because while the narrator could be omniscient, the characters were free to wallow around in their dysfunction, unaware anyone was watching them. However, without one, confusion follows.
One of the saving graces of the series is the voice cast. While I could go on about Kennen Thompson's role as the acting principal and Will Forte's exquisite role as Stuart Proszakian, real credit goes to Will Arnet. Arnet's role is so perfectly defined as the meat head jock, that he essentially steals the show. There's a scene where he's essentially showing a threesome in a porno to a group of students while confusing it with a cheese magazine. He quickly debunks it with "That's not cheese, that's a three way." A few moment's do work besides Arnet's performance. For example there is a great winking bit where everyone winks to each other and the Assistant principal winks in an attempt to fit in. Of course, he never realizes the joke's on him since they are plotting about him, so he continues to wink.
The animation is somewhat lackluster. While it is interesting to see real life backgrounds spliced together with animation, the end result is more a study of effective animation rather than entertainment.
The real problem is that Sit Down Shut Up doesn't reach as high (or perhaps in FOX's standard) or as low enough to warrant it as a classic. After first impressions, it comes off as sort of bland and forgettable. It's not unwatchable, but there's no reason for a second viewing to buy the DVD's. Perhaps Sit Down Shut Up will step up its game after a mediocre pilot and make a home run for its scheduled run, or be rescheduled to a less popular time block. That being said, the end result shows more missed opportunities than classic examples.
Sit Down, Shut Up follows a staff of teachers at a dysfunctional school in an attempt to hold things together during hard economic times. Such teachers include Ennis Hofftard who is an essential meat head teaching English, Larry LittleJunk as the lovable P.E. coach who just can't quite woo the girl of his dreams without insulting her, and Stuart Proszakian, a somewhat drugged out Assistant Principal (or in this case the Ass. Principal) who is constantly happy and constantly unaware of the present situation. This week's episode: the school must find a way to raise money or they must fire one of their staff members.
Since the series was created of Mitch Hurwitz (who also created Arrested Development), a series of subplots concerning the misfit teachers take place. Can the German teacher effectively hide his pornography? Will the plan to subject students to steroids work? Can the Librarian find the missing bottle of '93 champagne work hundreds? Also adhering to Arrested Development's structure, all the subplots wind down to a chaotic, no holds bar conclusion. Unfortunately, that's all Sit Down, Shut Up takes from Arrested Development.
One of the major problems is the format. So much plotting and details are shot at rapid pace, that multiple viewings are required. (Though whether it's worth the effort is questionable). However, without an omniscient voice over (such as the one provided by Ron Howard in Arrested Development) to keep the program coherent and accessible, the show becomes very confusing very quickly. This leads to an altogether other problem: whether the show is actually aware that it's an animated series, or whether it's not.
Several hints were thrown revealing that some characters know more than they're supposed to. For example, Larry Littlejunk makes an obscure reference and when no flashback comes up (somewhat insulting the format of Family Guy), Larry asks "Mitch" if they're going to show it. Likewise, Assistant Principal Proszakian has the catchphrase, "I need a catchphrase" to add to the lampooning. However, if the characters are somewhat omniscient, why do they also seem unaware at times, such as when Larry Littlejunk tries to woo Miracle Grohe when he knows he will fail. The reason the Voice Over was so important was because while the narrator could be omniscient, the characters were free to wallow around in their dysfunction, unaware anyone was watching them. However, without one, confusion follows.
One of the saving graces of the series is the voice cast. While I could go on about Kennen Thompson's role as the acting principal and Will Forte's exquisite role as Stuart Proszakian, real credit goes to Will Arnet. Arnet's role is so perfectly defined as the meat head jock, that he essentially steals the show. There's a scene where he's essentially showing a threesome in a porno to a group of students while confusing it with a cheese magazine. He quickly debunks it with "That's not cheese, that's a three way." A few moment's do work besides Arnet's performance. For example there is a great winking bit where everyone winks to each other and the Assistant principal winks in an attempt to fit in. Of course, he never realizes the joke's on him since they are plotting about him, so he continues to wink.
The animation is somewhat lackluster. While it is interesting to see real life backgrounds spliced together with animation, the end result is more a study of effective animation rather than entertainment.
The real problem is that Sit Down Shut Up doesn't reach as high (or perhaps in FOX's standard) or as low enough to warrant it as a classic. After first impressions, it comes off as sort of bland and forgettable. It's not unwatchable, but there's no reason for a second viewing to buy the DVD's. Perhaps Sit Down Shut Up will step up its game after a mediocre pilot and make a home run for its scheduled run, or be rescheduled to a less popular time block. That being said, the end result shows more missed opportunities than classic examples.
- Burnoutsss
- Apr 19, 2009
- Permalink
An animated comedy about incompetent teachers at a flailing school that really has very little to do about teaching at all. It's made by the Arrested Development guy and stars such big names as Will Arnett, Jason Bateman, Kristen Chenowith, Keenan Thompson, Will Forte, Cheri Oteri, Henry Winkler and Nick Kroll. The expectations were high to live up to and that brought a lot of disappointment and I can see both sides of it. The show got a little bit too meta too early in its run. In the 4th episode and last before leaving the remaining 9 episodes of the season (and most likely the series) in limbo, there were no less than three or four self-referential gags going on: characters kept trying to consciously match themselves to 80's archetypes, characters alluded to how they had few adventures before episode one, and Miracle was self-conscious about being nothing more than a plot device fueling the rivalry between Ennis and Larry.
On the other hand, I really like most of the characters (the sexually confused Andrew is definitely an exception) and there is a sense that the writing is witty and sharp and will be even better once a coherent tone is found. Most of the running gags the show has works: I think there is a good amount of running gags they have: The assistant principal is really really incompetent and was a prison clown before he was a principal, Happy's ethnic mumblings superimposed with proper-soundng British, Willard always having a different way to get to school, the fact that no one cares the least bit about actually teaching and we know very little of the students, etc..
On the other hand, I really like most of the characters (the sexually confused Andrew is definitely an exception) and there is a sense that the writing is witty and sharp and will be even better once a coherent tone is found. Most of the running gags the show has works: I think there is a good amount of running gags they have: The assistant principal is really really incompetent and was a prison clown before he was a principal, Happy's ethnic mumblings superimposed with proper-soundng British, Willard always having a different way to get to school, the fact that no one cares the least bit about actually teaching and we know very little of the students, etc..
After hearing about this new TV sitcom cartoon, I was having high hopes that it would be the most unique one to air on Fox. The series takes place in Florida with the main characters being staff members of a least convenient high school to attend. Each of the teachers, including the acting principal and custodian all have a personality of their own. During each episode they try to make their school as highly recognizable as a first rate school. However there's always something or someone messing up that goal towards the end.
Even though it only had four episodes air on TV. I think the idea for it was unique. It wasn't trying to become another knock off of the Simpsons or Family Guy. Cause it would be boring for their to be another family sitcom on TV when there's already so many of them. Despite it being different from those shows, I think the writers were trying their best to make this cartoon as non-Simpsons as possible. Without a theme song and large usage of live action backgrounds, that's one of the fewest elements that made this cartoon stand out more.
I was surprised that it became a failure so fast. After reading so many negative reviews from various viewers who say that it wasn't that funny.
I think the reason why not many people expect this to be a great comedy is probably because the writers didn't work out most of the jokes presented in the show. I admit that there were moments where a joke could been more funny than it was presented. Also a couple of the characters could need some working on too. Cause if you want a cartoon to be successful you need appealing characters.
Could this show have been a bigger success, I think so. Part of the problem with it is the writers failed to come up with something that would appeal to all viewers. If the writers took the time to gather surveys on what people want to see in this cartoon then it would of lasted for at least 2-3 seasons the most.
Even though it only had four episodes air on TV. I think the idea for it was unique. It wasn't trying to become another knock off of the Simpsons or Family Guy. Cause it would be boring for their to be another family sitcom on TV when there's already so many of them. Despite it being different from those shows, I think the writers were trying their best to make this cartoon as non-Simpsons as possible. Without a theme song and large usage of live action backgrounds, that's one of the fewest elements that made this cartoon stand out more.
I was surprised that it became a failure so fast. After reading so many negative reviews from various viewers who say that it wasn't that funny.
I think the reason why not many people expect this to be a great comedy is probably because the writers didn't work out most of the jokes presented in the show. I admit that there were moments where a joke could been more funny than it was presented. Also a couple of the characters could need some working on too. Cause if you want a cartoon to be successful you need appealing characters.
Could this show have been a bigger success, I think so. Part of the problem with it is the writers failed to come up with something that would appeal to all viewers. If the writers took the time to gather surveys on what people want to see in this cartoon then it would of lasted for at least 2-3 seasons the most.
- emasterslake
- May 22, 2009
- Permalink
- eriktherandom
- Apr 19, 2009
- Permalink
Sit Down Shut Up had a rocky first couple of episodes but heck if they haven't hit their stride. Fortunately, my DVR is smart enough to record the show even though FOX moved its time slot without notice. Seriously, what's FOX's problem with good shows? They did the same thing with Futurama and look how that turned out - canceled because of low ratings...maybe because no one knew when to find it! It most certainly wasn't a quality issue because they won several awards and have a huge following.
So here we go again...FOX is going to let another great show die because they only know how to promote their damn reality shows. That and anything with Seth MacFarlane's name on it - no offense to Seth especially since he's a friggin' genius. The point is that Sit Down Shut Up is cleverly written and the voice talent is top notch but it's on the verge of being canceled because its own network doesn't support it.
What's it like to be under appreciated by FOX? Ask the people from Futurama. C'mon FOX...wake up!
So here we go again...FOX is going to let another great show die because they only know how to promote their damn reality shows. That and anything with Seth MacFarlane's name on it - no offense to Seth especially since he's a friggin' genius. The point is that Sit Down Shut Up is cleverly written and the voice talent is top notch but it's on the verge of being canceled because its own network doesn't support it.
What's it like to be under appreciated by FOX? Ask the people from Futurama. C'mon FOX...wake up!
Oddly enough, the animation reminds me of the old "Critic" carton with Jon Lovitz...
but whereas the Critic was funny, this is just horrible...
It seems the use of still photos for backdrops shows a shortcutting approach to the animation process, and the use of trite stereotypes and clichés shows a shortcutting approach to the writing...
Does the TV-14 rating mean that this is only liable to funny to those 14 and under..? A waste of good vocal talent...
With the current trend in television, I guess this will run for 4 or 5 seasons... While good shows will continue to whither and die within 2.
but whereas the Critic was funny, this is just horrible...
It seems the use of still photos for backdrops shows a shortcutting approach to the animation process, and the use of trite stereotypes and clichés shows a shortcutting approach to the writing...
Does the TV-14 rating mean that this is only liable to funny to those 14 and under..? A waste of good vocal talent...
With the current trend in television, I guess this will run for 4 or 5 seasons... While good shows will continue to whither and die within 2.
First of all the title is just great, it feels like that is the way it is in school for real. It's a good concept, since there aren't very many shows about the teachers at school. I found this show to be pretty good, well at least the first episode was good. The jokes were funny and the storyline worked. I enjoyed watching and surprisingly the animation was rather good, which is hard to find good animation lately. It was a little weird that pretty much the whole Saturday Night Live cast is starring, but they play their parts well.I hope that this series lasts more than a few episodes and doesn't just go downhill like King of the Hill did after a while.
I was so bored, I'd rather watch 5 consecutive repeat episodes of Family Guy. I hope this show discontinues and fills in the space with another Family Guy or American Dad episode.
It seems like such a waste of famous people that you should know, but aren't exactly surprised that it's not that funny.
I don't understand where it's going. It's hard to realize who you're supposed to care about. The animation has taken quite a few steps back and uses photography/video which does't add to the style of the show, but just makes you feel cheated instead. The show seems like it's trying too hard to be shocking or into the cut-scene routine, but it just feels awkward.
It seems like such a waste of famous people that you should know, but aren't exactly surprised that it's not that funny.
I don't understand where it's going. It's hard to realize who you're supposed to care about. The animation has taken quite a few steps back and uses photography/video which does't add to the style of the show, but just makes you feel cheated instead. The show seems like it's trying too hard to be shocking or into the cut-scene routine, but it just feels awkward.
- oysterflowers
- Apr 25, 2009
- Permalink
that it has a lot of potential to be an addicting show within a season or two. A good cast, with quirky writing becomes a fresh new approach to the adult animated world. I like how this differs a lot from the norm(Simpson's,family guy,American dad)with it's live-action backdrop and it's mission hill influenced drawing, I welcome it with open arms.
I hope to see a lot more from this show, it's already setting in nicely.
I give the PILOT 7/10 and keep my general vote/rating for the show until it's had a complete season (or half lol)
Also note that I did like KOTH. haha
I hope to see a lot more from this show, it's already setting in nicely.
I give the PILOT 7/10 and keep my general vote/rating for the show until it's had a complete season (or half lol)
Also note that I did like KOTH. haha
- Corpus_Ribcage
- Apr 19, 2009
- Permalink
Wow. It was like watching an animated version a really bad SNL skit. One that should have been retired years before. There was no energy, none. I think they were going for shock humor but they must have hired priests for their writers. Every joke, EVERY JOKE missed the mark, failed to shock or simply lay there and twitched feebly.
Dull, disjointed, dumb and destined, surely, for a very long run. If it fails on Fox, I'm sure NBC can pick it up to fill the spot where 'Life' use to be.
In all honesty, I'm not sure how this thing even got past the first meeting with the network. There is nothing of even the slightest redeeming value here. Perfect execution (which wasn't apparent here) could not have saved this thing. From the concept up it is just bad, bad, bad.
Hurrah, Fox.... whoever picked this up was probably the same person who axed 'Dollhouse'..... and 'Firefly'.... and 'Family Guy' TWICE!... Futurama.... and on and on and on........
Dull, disjointed, dumb and destined, surely, for a very long run. If it fails on Fox, I'm sure NBC can pick it up to fill the spot where 'Life' use to be.
In all honesty, I'm not sure how this thing even got past the first meeting with the network. There is nothing of even the slightest redeeming value here. Perfect execution (which wasn't apparent here) could not have saved this thing. From the concept up it is just bad, bad, bad.
Hurrah, Fox.... whoever picked this up was probably the same person who axed 'Dollhouse'..... and 'Firefly'.... and 'Family Guy' TWICE!... Futurama.... and on and on and on........
- CommonSns1
- Apr 19, 2009
- Permalink
I didn't have much hope for it from the previews, but I watched it anyways as I am often wrong on how well a show is by it's previews. But this show was just show incredibly boring and unfunny. I had to fight with myself to watch to whole show and not go scrub the grout in my shower as scrubbing the grout would've been more entertaining.
It's a waste of some good voice talents and I think they are trying way to hard to be as good as the other "Sunday Night Cartoon Shows".
I think next Sunday I'll find something else to do after watching The Simpsons and Family Guy, you can bet I won't watch Sit Down Shut Up again.
It's a waste of some good voice talents and I think they are trying way to hard to be as good as the other "Sunday Night Cartoon Shows".
I think next Sunday I'll find something else to do after watching The Simpsons and Family Guy, you can bet I won't watch Sit Down Shut Up again.
- Sullivan_Rookwood
- May 4, 2009
- Permalink
My friend told me to look up this show, told me about the cast and that's all I needed. Even if I didn't recognize the talent in the voices, I knew I had a new favorite cartoon on my list. I have mixed feelings about FOX and this show though; I don't expect the same people who watch Fox News to understand anything in this show (or anything about life for that matter) I think this show would find a better home on The Comedy Network, but unfortunately they don't pay with large sums of blood soaked money. A quick note to all the haters commenting on IMDb; just because you can't follow the jokes due to your lack of, well processing speed or, um, intellect, doesn't make this show bad.
From a visual point of view, they do a great job implementing real photographed backdrops with added details. The animation is nothing spectacular but works well with the overall look of the show. The dialogue does move fairly fast as mentioned above which requires you to give it the attention it deserves. That's the thing isn't it, what else would you expect from a show named "Sit Down, Shut Up".
From a visual point of view, they do a great job implementing real photographed backdrops with added details. The animation is nothing spectacular but works well with the overall look of the show. The dialogue does move fairly fast as mentioned above which requires you to give it the attention it deserves. That's the thing isn't it, what else would you expect from a show named "Sit Down, Shut Up".
- seb-hebert
- Apr 29, 2009
- Permalink
- frequentflicks
- Apr 19, 2009
- Permalink
I have only seen two episodes of this show, but am looking furiously for more. I had not heard of the Sit Down Shut Up before I did a little research into Mitch Hurwitz, as I am a huge fan of Arrested Development, and was terribly upset when it was canceled by those lifeless drones at the box network (Futurama joke). As you can see I am also an avid Futurama fan, which has been renewed for another season after being showed by fox at irregular and varying times and ultimately canceled as well.
Sit Down Shut Up really appealed to me because of it's intelligent humour, much like Arrested Development which made the show so great. After two episodes I already think I know the characters well, and cant wait to see how they develop throughout the season, which unfortunately has been stopped four episodes in apparently, and the other episodes will be aired later at a terrible time. I can't help but think of Futurama, but this show has had much less of a chance to prove itself. First Arrested Development and Futurama, and now this. I am pretty sure the Fox network hates me. I really hope Sit Down Shut Up is able to survive for at least another season, so Fox has more to play as reruns like Futurama and Arrested Development in Australia. They've made the mistake twice before but hopefully this Third time we will be lucky :)
Sit Down Shut Up really appealed to me because of it's intelligent humour, much like Arrested Development which made the show so great. After two episodes I already think I know the characters well, and cant wait to see how they develop throughout the season, which unfortunately has been stopped four episodes in apparently, and the other episodes will be aired later at a terrible time. I can't help but think of Futurama, but this show has had much less of a chance to prove itself. First Arrested Development and Futurama, and now this. I am pretty sure the Fox network hates me. I really hope Sit Down Shut Up is able to survive for at least another season, so Fox has more to play as reruns like Futurama and Arrested Development in Australia. They've made the mistake twice before but hopefully this Third time we will be lucky :)
It's like this show were written by a mildly retarded Jacky the Joke Man.
The "jokes" are hackneyed and stolen or so old your grandmother will ask you why you're watching the Jack Bennie show.
It's just terrible writing no one with any self respect would even try to foster this garbage off on the public.
In addition forcing 10 lines is idiotic.
So you don't care about the quality of the post.
You just care about the number of lines.
This site must be run by the same idiots that wrote this stupid show. Morons.
The "jokes" are hackneyed and stolen or so old your grandmother will ask you why you're watching the Jack Bennie show.
It's just terrible writing no one with any self respect would even try to foster this garbage off on the public.
In addition forcing 10 lines is idiotic.
So you don't care about the quality of the post.
You just care about the number of lines.
This site must be run by the same idiots that wrote this stupid show. Morons.
- MiturBinesderti
- Sep 19, 2009
- Permalink
I watched Sit Down, Shut Up.
Adult Swim aired it around 2013 or 2014.
and....I liked it and here is why.
A group of silly teachers work at a high school where they are...well you know, silly. These teachers are pretty fun to look at and I see a bit of a character development in them, I'm just saying. One of my favorite characters of the show is of course...Miracle. I like Miracle because... #1: She's kinda cute, sweet, and nice. #2: She's funny and she carries a baby. and.. #3: I like listening to her voice and she is a pacifist.
Like freaking seriously, Miracle is the best character in the show in my opinion. I was honestly kinda bummed that Adult Swim doesn't air it anymore, but whatever, stuff happens. So in conclusion, Sit Down, Shut Up was a good show, the teachers are fun, the writing is decent, and also Miracle. (She is literally the best)Too bad FOX canceled it after one season. Give this one a 8.3/10.
A group of silly teachers work at a high school where they are...well you know, silly. These teachers are pretty fun to look at and I see a bit of a character development in them, I'm just saying. One of my favorite characters of the show is of course...Miracle. I like Miracle because... #1: She's kinda cute, sweet, and nice. #2: She's funny and she carries a baby. and.. #3: I like listening to her voice and she is a pacifist.
Like freaking seriously, Miracle is the best character in the show in my opinion. I was honestly kinda bummed that Adult Swim doesn't air it anymore, but whatever, stuff happens. So in conclusion, Sit Down, Shut Up was a good show, the teachers are fun, the writing is decent, and also Miracle. (She is literally the best)Too bad FOX canceled it after one season. Give this one a 8.3/10.
- nasdagoodshepherd
- Jun 1, 2019
- Permalink