Naqaab
- 2007
- 1h 55m
IMDb RATING
5.4/10
1.6K
YOUR RATING
Sophia is engaged to millionaire Karan, who is completely in love with her. She, however, finds true love in Vicky and gets into a relationship that causes problems between her and Karan.Sophia is engaged to millionaire Karan, who is completely in love with her. She, however, finds true love in Vicky and gets into a relationship that causes problems between her and Karan.Sophia is engaged to millionaire Karan, who is completely in love with her. She, however, finds true love in Vicky and gets into a relationship that causes problems between her and Karan.
- Awards
- 1 nomination
Vikas Kalantri
- Siddharth
- (as Vikaas Kalantri)
Raj Zutshi
- Detective Sam
- (as Rajendranath Zutshi)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaBobby and Akshaye returned together after Humraaz. However, this time, Bobby played a negative role and Akshaye played a protagonist role, which are opposite roles from their previous film, Humraaz, which was also directed by Abbas-Mustan.
- GoofsIn the start of the movie, when Sofia leaves Karan's home for work at Burger King, she takes her scooter but in the evening, Karan picks her from work and takes her to dinner in his car. The next morning, Sofia again leaves home on her scooter.
- ConnectionsRemake of Dot the I (2003)
- SoundtracksEh Dil Tujko Pata Hai
Written by Sameer
Composed by Pritam Chakraborty
Performed by Sunidhi Chauhan
Courtesy of Tips Cassettes & Records Co.
Featured review
Abbas-Mustan, who have introduced bold concepts of wife-swapping, surrogate mother and sexual harassment to Indian cinema, true to their unique style of storytelling, try something different yet again. Naqaab certainly isn't your ordinary run-off-the-mill Bollywood love triangle. And true to the directors' trademark, the film is filled with twists and turns. Saying anymore would be giving the plot away.
While the film is a far cry from Khiladi or Baazigar, it is far better than their recent "36 China town" and "Tarzan the wonder car" Casting is where the directors probably lost it: Akshaye Khanna, an old mascot in the A-M camp, seems not only out of shape to play a struggling actor, he seems 10 years too old for the part. Bobby Deol, another old favorite of A-M's still manages to look the part of the flamboyant rich man, but can't pull it off with finesse. Urvashi Sharma is a major let down in the acting department. her emotions seem concocted and superficial. While she looks decent enough in places, there are parts where she is either made to look bad, or achieves it naturally. The supporting cast is feeble. Vikas Kalantri and Vishal seem to be playing buffoons stuck with a serous job. who knows why Raj Zutshi is even there in the film? While the locations and camera work merge seamlessly into the film and the plot is complex and well conceived, the film loses out in its execution: at times focusing on the obvious and at times playing a tangent to the storyline. while it scores points for originality and keeping the audience curious, it loses points for performances, or lack thereof and one twist too many.
The first half sets the plot in motion with haphazard character introductions and development, and the second half has a twist every few minutes, intentionally put to keep the audience in their seats. character motivations seem strong enough but somehow the film lacks flow.
the good: plot has interesting concept, interesting twists the bad: the acting, the execution of the plot the ugly: the supporting cast final verdict: Could have been better, but worth one watch
While the film is a far cry from Khiladi or Baazigar, it is far better than their recent "36 China town" and "Tarzan the wonder car" Casting is where the directors probably lost it: Akshaye Khanna, an old mascot in the A-M camp, seems not only out of shape to play a struggling actor, he seems 10 years too old for the part. Bobby Deol, another old favorite of A-M's still manages to look the part of the flamboyant rich man, but can't pull it off with finesse. Urvashi Sharma is a major let down in the acting department. her emotions seem concocted and superficial. While she looks decent enough in places, there are parts where she is either made to look bad, or achieves it naturally. The supporting cast is feeble. Vikas Kalantri and Vishal seem to be playing buffoons stuck with a serous job. who knows why Raj Zutshi is even there in the film? While the locations and camera work merge seamlessly into the film and the plot is complex and well conceived, the film loses out in its execution: at times focusing on the obvious and at times playing a tangent to the storyline. while it scores points for originality and keeping the audience curious, it loses points for performances, or lack thereof and one twist too many.
The first half sets the plot in motion with haphazard character introductions and development, and the second half has a twist every few minutes, intentionally put to keep the audience in their seats. character motivations seem strong enough but somehow the film lacks flow.
the good: plot has interesting concept, interesting twists the bad: the acting, the execution of the plot the ugly: the supporting cast final verdict: Could have been better, but worth one watch
- nadeem_ali
- Jul 12, 2007
- Permalink
- How long is Naqaab?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $4,966,337
- Runtime1 hour 55 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content