19 reviews
Expensively mounted Biblical production with mostly Italian star-cast and spectacularly filmed in Italy , but overlong , in fact the length of this TV movie runs 4 hours and 25 minutes . Two men changed the world forever : Jesus Christ and his main disciple : St Peter . A colorful version of Peter's life with a true epic treatment and following the Catholic canon and being marvellously shot . Peter was considered along with James the Just and John the Apostle as pillars of the Church .The leadership of Peter forms the basis of the Apostolic succession and the institutional power of orthodoxy, and is described as "the rock" on which the church will be built. Catholics refer to him as chief of the Apostles . As Peter is always listed first among the Twelve Apostles in the gospels and in the Book of Acts . Peter is often depicted in the gospels as spokesman of all the Apostles . He is also frequently mentioned in the gospels as forming with James the Elder and John a special group within the Twelve Apostles, present at incidents at which the others were not present, such as at the Transfiguration of Jesus, at the raising of Jairus' daughter and at the agony in the Garden of Gethsemane , Death and Resurrection . As Paul's First Epistle to the Corinthians contains a list of resurrection appearances of Jesus, the first of which is an appearance to Peter . In John's Gospel, Peter is the first person to enter the empty tomb, although the women and the beloved disciple see it before him . And of course , all four canonical gospels recount that, during the Last Supper, Jesus foretold that Peter would deny him three times before the following cockcrow ("before the cock crows twice" in Mark's account). According to Christian tradition, Peter was crucified in Rome under Emperor Nero.He is traditionally counted as the first Bishop of Rome-or pope-and also by Eastern Christian tradition as the first Patriarch of Antioch. The ancient Christian churches all venerate Peter as a major saint and as the founder of the Church of Antioch and the Roman Church. This highly regarded epic deals with a dramatic recreation of the life of St. Peter from his meeting with Jesus . Through miracles , Jesus succeeds in allaying the doubts of Simon the Fisher called Peter (Omar Shariff) and even those of Thomas, the skeptic , and shortly after , Matthew the tax collector who becomes a follower of Jesus, despite the other disciples' mistrust . Jesus Christ's (Johannes Brandrup) journey from Galilee to Golgotha is portrayed here in thought-provoking as well as original treatment by using some flashbacks . Including Christ evangelization , Crucifixion , Resurrection , through the Ascention and the renewal of Pentecost. Concerning about the wonderful life, work and death of Peter , a reluctant but passionate leader , as we know it from the Bible , adding his relation to St. Paulus (Daniele Pecci) Virgen Maria , Christ's Mother (Lina Sastri) , Maria Magdalena (Milena Miconi) and other Apostles : Mattias (Lionello) , Barnabe (Mariani) , Filippo (Abenayake) ... The film includes all of the major events referred to in the New Testament with descriptive Biblical passages from the crucifixion of Jesus to his own, his life in Jerusalem , Antioch , and Rome where Peter knows he has a destiny to fulfill. The film's first half dramatizes the New Testament's "Acts": early fear, as his followers disciples are already slowly beginning to gather around him , Saul's conversion, the decision to baptize pagans, and his relationship to other apostles and so on and finally the Apostles' dispersal. Peter went to Antioch where Paul rebuked him for following the conservative line regarding the conversion of Gentiles, having meals separate from Gentiles . Subsequent tradition held that Peter had been the first Patriarch of Antioch. Later on , Peter and Paul founded the Church of Rome and the Church of Corinth, and they have lived in Corinth for some time, and definitively in Italy where they found death and there Paul wrote his Epistle to the Romans about AD 57 . In the second half, an elderly Peter goes to Rome to join Paul, bringing to the Eternal City the Christian teachings and arriving on the day of Paul's arrest. Paul's death brings a crisis to Rome's Christians and to Peter ; lessons from Jesus's teachings guide his decision to stay. The apocryphal Acts of Peter is the source for the tradition about the Latin famous phrase "Quo vadis, Domine?" which means "Where are you going, Lord?". According to the story, Peter, fleeing Rome to avoid execution meets the risen Jesus. In the Latin translation, Peter asks Jesus, "Quo vadis?" He replies "I am going to Rome to be crucified again". Peter then gains the courage to continue his ministry and returns to the city, where he is martyred . Early Church Tradition says that Peter probably died by crucifixion (with arms outstretched) at the time of the Great Fire of Rome in the year 64. This took place three months after the disastrous fire that destroyed Rome for which the emperor (Nero) wished to blame the Christians. This "dies imperii" (regnal day anniversary) was an important one, exactly ten years after Nero ascended to the throne, and it was 'as usual' accompanied by much bloodshed. Traditionally, Roman authorities sentenced him to death by crucifixion. In accordance with the apocryphal Acts of Peter, he was crucified head down.Tradition also locates his burial place where the Basilica of Saint Peter was later built, directly beneath the Basilica's high altar .
Breathtaking story set in Christ times with emphasis in religious motives , lavish costumes and crowds . This is an impressive story of the life of St. Peter filmed on a relatively grand scale , being efficiently directed by Giulio Base . However , not completely reverential at some Biblical characters . Life of Peter is intelligently told , including glowing cinematography by Giovanni Galasso , an attractive visual style , memorable soundtrack by Marco Frisina and decent cast giving larger-than-life interpretation . Sensitive though aged Omar Shariff in exactly the right role , he gives a dedicated effort at the character , his acting has power , nobility, subtlety and sensibility . However , some scenarios and outdoors lack of authenticity and unrealistic , being extremely green and lush .
Breathtaking story set in Christ times with emphasis in religious motives , lavish costumes and crowds . This is an impressive story of the life of St. Peter filmed on a relatively grand scale , being efficiently directed by Giulio Base . However , not completely reverential at some Biblical characters . Life of Peter is intelligently told , including glowing cinematography by Giovanni Galasso , an attractive visual style , memorable soundtrack by Marco Frisina and decent cast giving larger-than-life interpretation . Sensitive though aged Omar Shariff in exactly the right role , he gives a dedicated effort at the character , his acting has power , nobility, subtlety and sensibility . However , some scenarios and outdoors lack of authenticity and unrealistic , being extremely green and lush .
THE PROS OF THIS MOVIE: All-star cast line-up: Omar Shariff, Flavio Insinna, Lina Sastri, Milena Miconi. The legendary Omar Shariff gives a magnificent performance as Saint Peter, and this is the FIRST film that I ever saw him act. His final scene in the film is extremely touching. Flavio Insinna shines as David, the Roman slave Gladiator fighting for his family's freedom. It's always a joy to see him act in a fatherly role. His interaction with the children is extremely heartwarming, and his scenes with his wife, Anna, are beautiful. Omar and Flavio's scenes together is wonderful. Their interaction has such chemistry which really brings out the best in this film. Lina Sastri and Milena Miconi, who also worked with Flavio respectively in Don Bosco and Don Matteo, played their parts superbly. Lina's performance as the Virgin Mary was impeccable, and Milena Miconi, who I almost didn't recognize, because of her red hair dyed black, beautifully portrayed Mary Magdalene.
THE CONS OF THIS MOVIE: First, the movie's 197 minutes long, and usually I don't have an attention span past 2 hours. Second, Flavio doesn't appear until the second half of the film, and he's like the third person listed in the credits, which is the only reason why I even bothered to watch this film. Third, Flavio, Lina and Milena's voices were all DUBBED!!!!! The whole point of me watching this film was to hear Flavio's NATURAL voice!!!!! They hired some macho voice-over to dub Flavio's voice.
Overall, the movie is wonderful to watch, but some scenes they could've done without. The actor who portrayed Jesus was fantastic. This was an excellent production done by Rai and Lux Vide.
THE CONS OF THIS MOVIE: First, the movie's 197 minutes long, and usually I don't have an attention span past 2 hours. Second, Flavio doesn't appear until the second half of the film, and he's like the third person listed in the credits, which is the only reason why I even bothered to watch this film. Third, Flavio, Lina and Milena's voices were all DUBBED!!!!! The whole point of me watching this film was to hear Flavio's NATURAL voice!!!!! They hired some macho voice-over to dub Flavio's voice.
Overall, the movie is wonderful to watch, but some scenes they could've done without. The actor who portrayed Jesus was fantastic. This was an excellent production done by Rai and Lux Vide.
- mistymountain
- Sep 4, 2007
- Permalink
Omar Sharif is excellent in this biblical epic as Saint Peter. He is shown from the beginning as an early follower of Jesus of Nazareth. The script is faithful to the New Testament description of Peter's life as the orignal founder of Christianity. It runs a bit too long at over three and a half hours but EWTN ran it over the span of two Saturdays. The scenery is breathtaking and the acting good throughout. Sharif is perfectly suited for the role. I recommend this film for even lapsed Catholics such as myself.
at first sigh- a biblical movie as many others. at the second - a touching story who gives to Omar Sharif the opportunity to build a special character, exploring its nuances, proposing a different Peter, using sensitivity for create not only the image of the Apostle but, more important, powerful silence's slices. a film who not convince but reminds. a film about mission, duty, choice and sacrifice. the delicacy of Peter's portrait is the great virtue of a film who propose a different manner to discover Jesus. a film about purpose of life, it is almost a kind of poem. for its music, for landscapes and for the role of nuances. interesting. and useful. powerful. and seductive. a film who reminds the old art of Omar Sharif in inspired manner.
- watrousjames
- Mar 16, 2021
- Permalink
I really enjoyed San Pieter. Omar Shariff is excellent and for me it's one of his best performances! Although not the best of movies technically, however this movie does portray the important aspects of St Peter and who this man was. Omar, although playing a Peter much older than the Peter in the Gospels, shows the passion and love he had for Jesus. And his desire to evangelize to the world. I saw the 2 hour version of Santa Pietro versus the 4 1/2 version but it covers the high pets of Peters journey from denier to evangelize. The other actors do a great job also. I think you will enjoy this movie.
- tmcgrath26
- Oct 25, 2022
- Permalink
"One heart, one soul"
These words that appear many times in the magnificent latest movie by Giulio Base are not just the words that relate to early Christian attitude but they are clearly reflected throughout the film made with honest effort and great faith both from the crew and the cast. I have seen many religious historical epics. Nevertheless, I have to admit that seldom have I seen such a purely faithful movie where almost each moment is an experience. Let me discuss some of the aspects of the film that make it a brilliant piece of film art.
CONTENT: Giulio Base's film can be divided into two parts concerning the content. The first part discusses purely historical events from the New Testament, beginning with the death and resurrection of Christ and going on to Apostles' meetings, conversions to the new faith, quarrels who actually has the right to be baptized, persecutions from Jews, the miraculous story of Saul/Paul, and ending with Peter's journey to the heart of the empire, Rome. The events showed in the second part take place primarily in Rome, with some fictitious characters that are contextualized in the whole life stories of Peter and Paul. We see two families whose lives are connected by love and faith. Claudius Maximus (Ettore Basi), the son of a wealthy Roman, Persius (Ennio Caltorti), falls in love with a Christian girl Silvia (Bianca Guaccero). He does not see any benefit in the new faith at first but slowly starts to believe in the Son of God. Will this help him retain good relations with his family? Moreover, a mystery from his family's past is revealed at the moment of the death of Claudius' Grandma... In the other family, David (Flavio Insinna), the masked gladiator called Trachus, fights on arena as a gladiator. However, he hides this truth from his Christian wife, Anna (Claudia Koll). Yet, his life in two worlds cannot last forever and he once has to stand before the choice... earthly or spiritual freedom?... Among these vivid stories, the director shows Peter-Paul relations. Sometimes, they are exaggerated because these two have not met so many times and probably died on the same day not having met in prison before. Yet, it must be treated rather in the symbolic way. The primary fact about them is that they were the two greatest Apostles of Christ's Church. In the end, we see the persecutions of Christians and Peter who leaves Rome and meets the Lord on his way who is going to be crucified again...
BEAUTIFUL MOMENTS: The film is filled with a number of magnificent scenes that I deeply experienced to tears. If you decide to see the movie, pay attention to little aspects that are perhaps not so clear at once but noticed after a longer inspection. These aspects, which I noticed at the second viewing, are the real pearls of the film. These are, among many others, the visit at Cornelius' in Caesarea, the Eucharist in prison, the symbolic moment of joy at Christ's resurrection, the conversation with a prostitute ("Is there really such a God who will forgive?") or Paul's miraculous way for Damascus. Except for the above, I will never forget Sylvia-Claudius conversation in his beautiful gardens. "What do you lack? What more is there that can make you happy? asks Claudius. Immediately, the question is answered by a voice coming from the streets of Rome "Jesus is true happiness!" I also loved the moment of retrospection in time. Peter decides to put up his mission in Rome but unintentionally comes back in memory to the words of Christ: "You are the rock and on this rock I shall build my Church". The end is also unbelievably beautiful and touching, which refers to one historical and spiritual fact: Rome has changed forever and the whole world will never be the same since the Redeemer makes all things new...
CAST: Among the films about Peter's elderly years in Rome, Omar Sharif portrays the fishermen of people in the most memorable way I have seen so far: better than Dennis Quiley in A.D (1985), more authentic than Franciszek Pieczka in QUO VADIS? (2000), even more appealing than Finlay Currie in Hollywood's monumental production QUO VADIS? (1951) by Mervyn LeRoy. He is great with that blink in his eyes that probably real saint Peter had and at showing love for all men that real saint Peter learned from his Lord. Omar Sharif is magnificent and even if you are not religious, you will love this film thanks to his performance. Other cast are not that famous but they give fine performances, too. I particularly liked Bianca Guaccero in the role of gentle young girl Silvia, so in love with Claudius. Among others, these are Italian cast who very well fit to the roles of the Romans.
LOCATIONS: There is one more reason why I like the movie. The landscapes that the film shows are very much like the ones in Palestine. After my journey to the Holy Land, I deeply feel this sense of authenticity. Therefore, some biblical films seemed so unnatural because they were made in wrong locations. Giulio Base's film does a great job throughout, including the Sea of Galilee, Capernaum, the reconstruction of the Jerusalem and the Rome of the 1st century. So far, such an authentic film concerning locations was Franco Zeffirelli's production with Robert Powell.
I would recommend everyone to see this film, no matter if old or young, Christian, Jew or Muslim, believer or atheist. It is a splendid film which is not a "Christian propaganda" as some cynical people unjustly call such films. It is the film which primarily focuses on the dignity, freedom and love of every human being. 10/10 Excellent movie that I dream to see for the third time!
These words that appear many times in the magnificent latest movie by Giulio Base are not just the words that relate to early Christian attitude but they are clearly reflected throughout the film made with honest effort and great faith both from the crew and the cast. I have seen many religious historical epics. Nevertheless, I have to admit that seldom have I seen such a purely faithful movie where almost each moment is an experience. Let me discuss some of the aspects of the film that make it a brilliant piece of film art.
CONTENT: Giulio Base's film can be divided into two parts concerning the content. The first part discusses purely historical events from the New Testament, beginning with the death and resurrection of Christ and going on to Apostles' meetings, conversions to the new faith, quarrels who actually has the right to be baptized, persecutions from Jews, the miraculous story of Saul/Paul, and ending with Peter's journey to the heart of the empire, Rome. The events showed in the second part take place primarily in Rome, with some fictitious characters that are contextualized in the whole life stories of Peter and Paul. We see two families whose lives are connected by love and faith. Claudius Maximus (Ettore Basi), the son of a wealthy Roman, Persius (Ennio Caltorti), falls in love with a Christian girl Silvia (Bianca Guaccero). He does not see any benefit in the new faith at first but slowly starts to believe in the Son of God. Will this help him retain good relations with his family? Moreover, a mystery from his family's past is revealed at the moment of the death of Claudius' Grandma... In the other family, David (Flavio Insinna), the masked gladiator called Trachus, fights on arena as a gladiator. However, he hides this truth from his Christian wife, Anna (Claudia Koll). Yet, his life in two worlds cannot last forever and he once has to stand before the choice... earthly or spiritual freedom?... Among these vivid stories, the director shows Peter-Paul relations. Sometimes, they are exaggerated because these two have not met so many times and probably died on the same day not having met in prison before. Yet, it must be treated rather in the symbolic way. The primary fact about them is that they were the two greatest Apostles of Christ's Church. In the end, we see the persecutions of Christians and Peter who leaves Rome and meets the Lord on his way who is going to be crucified again...
BEAUTIFUL MOMENTS: The film is filled with a number of magnificent scenes that I deeply experienced to tears. If you decide to see the movie, pay attention to little aspects that are perhaps not so clear at once but noticed after a longer inspection. These aspects, which I noticed at the second viewing, are the real pearls of the film. These are, among many others, the visit at Cornelius' in Caesarea, the Eucharist in prison, the symbolic moment of joy at Christ's resurrection, the conversation with a prostitute ("Is there really such a God who will forgive?") or Paul's miraculous way for Damascus. Except for the above, I will never forget Sylvia-Claudius conversation in his beautiful gardens. "What do you lack? What more is there that can make you happy? asks Claudius. Immediately, the question is answered by a voice coming from the streets of Rome "Jesus is true happiness!" I also loved the moment of retrospection in time. Peter decides to put up his mission in Rome but unintentionally comes back in memory to the words of Christ: "You are the rock and on this rock I shall build my Church". The end is also unbelievably beautiful and touching, which refers to one historical and spiritual fact: Rome has changed forever and the whole world will never be the same since the Redeemer makes all things new...
CAST: Among the films about Peter's elderly years in Rome, Omar Sharif portrays the fishermen of people in the most memorable way I have seen so far: better than Dennis Quiley in A.D (1985), more authentic than Franciszek Pieczka in QUO VADIS? (2000), even more appealing than Finlay Currie in Hollywood's monumental production QUO VADIS? (1951) by Mervyn LeRoy. He is great with that blink in his eyes that probably real saint Peter had and at showing love for all men that real saint Peter learned from his Lord. Omar Sharif is magnificent and even if you are not religious, you will love this film thanks to his performance. Other cast are not that famous but they give fine performances, too. I particularly liked Bianca Guaccero in the role of gentle young girl Silvia, so in love with Claudius. Among others, these are Italian cast who very well fit to the roles of the Romans.
LOCATIONS: There is one more reason why I like the movie. The landscapes that the film shows are very much like the ones in Palestine. After my journey to the Holy Land, I deeply feel this sense of authenticity. Therefore, some biblical films seemed so unnatural because they were made in wrong locations. Giulio Base's film does a great job throughout, including the Sea of Galilee, Capernaum, the reconstruction of the Jerusalem and the Rome of the 1st century. So far, such an authentic film concerning locations was Franco Zeffirelli's production with Robert Powell.
I would recommend everyone to see this film, no matter if old or young, Christian, Jew or Muslim, believer or atheist. It is a splendid film which is not a "Christian propaganda" as some cynical people unjustly call such films. It is the film which primarily focuses on the dignity, freedom and love of every human being. 10/10 Excellent movie that I dream to see for the third time!
- marcin_kukuczka
- May 24, 2006
- Permalink
A remarkable realistic portrayal of the life of St. Peter by the brilliant actor Omar Sharif. Also follows the conversion and ministry of St. Paul. Recounting well the struggles and trials of early Christians in the Roman Empire. The film takes one from the crucifixion of Jesus Christ to the execution of St. Paul and eventual crucifixion of St. Peter. Exceptionally well directed and acted by all characters. Sharif is convert to Islam from having been raised a Coptic Christian. One may only speculate how this deeply moving Christian role has affected him personally. Sadly, some intolerant Muslims are calling for his death for appearing in this religious role. Highly recommended film for people of all faiths and persuasions.
- markdunlop
- Sep 13, 2013
- Permalink
- subfour1600
- Apr 3, 2007
- Permalink
After seeing the 1981 made for TV film PETER AND PAUL, I wondered if any one could match or remake the story of early Christianity as adequately as SAINT PETER. Omar Sharif wasn't as bad as Peter like in the other biblical films he was been in in recent years. Johannes Brandhupp's Christ was OK after a fine performance in the resurrection scenes.The background and music was great.They should of shown a little bit more about Peter's relationship with Jesus much before his crucifixion.If you liked this film, you should watch PAUL THE APOSTLE and also THE APOCALPYSIS(Richard Harris). RAI LUX-VIDE really knows how to do biblicals.
The acting is awful. Poor makeup and costumes. Background and props are terrible. This seemed like a very bad high school play.
- archive-82325
- Apr 1, 2020
- Permalink
This movie was really great, especially the man who played Peter, and the woman who played Silvia. The sets I never much noticed which overall is good, because like good CGI, if it's good you shouldn't really "notice" ...really I loved everything about this, except for two things...well 3..
1) the audio sync was off enough to notice it pretty easily, I was glad to know it wasn't my Xbox messing up at least..?
2) the man who played Paul was...ill just say he was a cheesey goofball.
3) the man who played Jesus looked like a TOTAL creep, I just don't get why everyone looks right...and then Jesus is always a hippy from San Diego, California. I half except him to have crocs on his feet. I get that Jesus was a small role in this but man he looked like a creeper!!
Besides those 3 things? Which all were fairly minor...I really loved this. I loved EVERY MOMENT that Peter was on screen...even with Paul being my favorite of the Ways early followers!!
I don't think I'd advise NEW Christians or Non-Belivers to watch it, as one group will find it a bit too removed from Christ, while the other group will find it boring.
1) the audio sync was off enough to notice it pretty easily, I was glad to know it wasn't my Xbox messing up at least..?
2) the man who played Paul was...ill just say he was a cheesey goofball.
3) the man who played Jesus looked like a TOTAL creep, I just don't get why everyone looks right...and then Jesus is always a hippy from San Diego, California. I half except him to have crocs on his feet. I get that Jesus was a small role in this but man he looked like a creeper!!
Besides those 3 things? Which all were fairly minor...I really loved this. I loved EVERY MOMENT that Peter was on screen...even with Paul being my favorite of the Ways early followers!!
I don't think I'd advise NEW Christians or Non-Belivers to watch it, as one group will find it a bit too removed from Christ, while the other group will find it boring.
Omar Shariff does a good job. that is the first verdict after the end of film. a film who propose , in 197 minutes, not a religious lesson but a circle of stories. and who propose a different Saint Peter, more humble, kind and, maybe, wise. it is touching and convincing. it is beautiful and credible. and propose an inspired manner to discover the Christianity in its essence. that is the rare gift who impose this film as a trip in the manner to assume the faith. Saint Peter of Omar Shariff is vulnerable and looking the right answer to his brothers and sisters in faith. he becomes a guide for community as result of his fear, doubts, need to be the disciple of the Lord who is not only the model but the only real solution to assume the challenges.and that does Peter not the first Pope, the saint or the first apostle but a kind of country priest from the novel of Bernanos. his success is different by the character of the French writer. the purpose is the same. and that detail does the film beautiful. the dialog, the patience, the atmosphere, not real different by the atmosphere of many Christian films but more subtle and warm for send the message in right manner. a film about the build of faith. and the birth of Church.
- Kirpianuscus
- May 25, 2016
- Permalink
Love this movie it is just like a gospel. So much to learn . The life of apostles after the death of Jesus. This movie help me restore my faith. ONE HEART ONE SOUL... what a line by st peter in this movie. I wish this movie is released again with another promotion trust me it can be as big as passion of Christ.
I have seen so many biblical movies but none can be compared to the effect it leaves on your heart and mind. The role played by st peter and st paul was too good. St peter and st paul are truely our Iron man . I respect them so much more after watching this movie. Reading bible first and watching this film just makes it better.
I have seen so many biblical movies but none can be compared to the effect it leaves on your heart and mind. The role played by st peter and st paul was too good. St peter and st paul are truely our Iron man . I respect them so much more after watching this movie. Reading bible first and watching this film just makes it better.
- idemonkilla
- Jan 15, 2024
- Permalink
I gave this 1 star...and the real Apostle Peter would have no doubt given it none. It was rarely faithful to the Book of Acts in any specifics, more than not going of on wild tangents.
My wife rented this from netflix. The description said it was made for Italian TV, but I didn't do the math...this would appear to be a Roman Catholic based film. Portraying Peter as the "rock" that the Church was built on, mechanical repetition of the Lord's Prayer, the constant recital of the Sermon on the Mount and not the Gospel (which is what was done in Acts).
The lip syncing bothered me as did some of the acting and editing, but the content is what really bothers me. As has been mentioned before, this really went wacko when they got to Rome.
If this were a BIBLICALLY ACCURATE movie, I could easily sit for three hours, but this was a waste of time.
If you want an accurate portrayal of the Apostles, get the Acts series from "The Visual Bible".
This was basically a ride through fantasyland.
My wife rented this from netflix. The description said it was made for Italian TV, but I didn't do the math...this would appear to be a Roman Catholic based film. Portraying Peter as the "rock" that the Church was built on, mechanical repetition of the Lord's Prayer, the constant recital of the Sermon on the Mount and not the Gospel (which is what was done in Acts).
The lip syncing bothered me as did some of the acting and editing, but the content is what really bothers me. As has been mentioned before, this really went wacko when they got to Rome.
If this were a BIBLICALLY ACCURATE movie, I could easily sit for three hours, but this was a waste of time.
If you want an accurate portrayal of the Apostles, get the Acts series from "The Visual Bible".
This was basically a ride through fantasyland.
- tjbrown527
- Dec 8, 2007
- Permalink
As a fan of Omar Sheriff, I was delighted to find this 2005 film in which he portrays a confused, penitent and endearing Peter. Yes, the film is long. But the length enables us to get to know the early followers of Jesus that are named in the Gospels/Acts. And we meet other imagined followers with whom we can identify in experiencing their fears and frustrations. The vast array of characters can become somewhat confusing since they are intermixed with events depicted in biblical stories through flashbacks into differing time periods. But the whole film succeeds in drawing us into the personal challenges of the earliest Christians.
- jdianahall
- Mar 26, 2021
- Permalink
This movie was not a good adaptation but it was the effort that counted. Why don't they get actual Jews to these movies? There were a lot of important pieces that should have been here. I know that time was an issue, but some events should have been included. The actions or events that Peter witnessed should have been included. The exact portrayal of how Cornelius and his family was saved was inaccurate in this movie. John the Baptist and the Apostles did full submersions according to the Jewish ritual for cleanliness, but this movie did what some Roman do which is baptize by sprinkling. Any movie that is made to honor the Lord should be close to scripture so that if non-believers see it, they can get a sense of what the Bible speaks.
Does anybody know who played Cornelius and soldier Lucius?
I can't find them mentioned anywhere, not even under "full cast" view... :(
good things about this movie...Peter's acting is really amazing and believable (most of the time) and scenery, camera action and music are better than mediocre...
bad things: ACTING....OMG it is terrible!!! I have never seen a movie with that horrible acting...from Paul, Silvia, Fulvia, Jesus (who looks like a Dracula)...all the extras sucked ...along with the fakest crying and screaming I have ever seen!! Audio-Video Synch....WOW!!! soooo annoying enough said... Acting Voices...some of the actors' voices don't match the way the look, react or behave...or even the way they express their emotions... Direction of movie....it's like the Acts that you never read! really who wrote this script!!! and a love story that I could never find in any documented Christian book or history!!!
BOTTOM LINE: ITALIANS SHOULD NOT DIRECT English MOVIES!!!!
bad things: ACTING....OMG it is terrible!!! I have never seen a movie with that horrible acting...from Paul, Silvia, Fulvia, Jesus (who looks like a Dracula)...all the extras sucked ...along with the fakest crying and screaming I have ever seen!! Audio-Video Synch....WOW!!! soooo annoying enough said... Acting Voices...some of the actors' voices don't match the way the look, react or behave...or even the way they express their emotions... Direction of movie....it's like the Acts that you never read! really who wrote this script!!! and a love story that I could never find in any documented Christian book or history!!!
BOTTOM LINE: ITALIANS SHOULD NOT DIRECT English MOVIES!!!!