Chronicles the fortunes of two actresses in pre-revolutionary China, who are separated by money and politics.Chronicles the fortunes of two actresses in pre-revolutionary China, who are separated by money and politics.Chronicles the fortunes of two actresses in pre-revolutionary China, who are separated by money and politics.
- Awards
- 1 win
Photos
Fang Gao
- Journalist Jiang Bo
- (as Ai-sheng Gao)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaAlthough shown in China, in 1964, it was not seen in the United States until 1991,
- ConnectionsFeatured in Century of Cinema: Naamsaang-neuiseung (1996)
Featured review
I first heard of this film in the late 1970s ... but didn't manage to see it for decades and decades. When I did it was worth the wait.
It has an amazing history: first produced in PRC in 1964 ... but then squashed by the extremist "Gang of Four" (including Mao's wife) who were behind the unbelievably cataclysmic Cultural Revolution of the 1960s. Only long after that "gang" had been replaced did the PRC leaders gingerly accept that it could be re-released in the late 1970s.
The irony (although not a surprise) is that this film is extremely supportive of the Revolution, which starts happening right at the end. It also depicts pretty well the poverty/oppression which was the main lot of most Chinese people before the Revolution.
The objection of the Cultural Revolutionaries was that the film was not the kind of film ardent Communist film-makers should be making: workers proud of fulfilling their monthly quotas in tractor factories, etc. The form of the film also struck them as too Hollywoodian, bourgeois, slavish to the cultural hegemony of the USA, etc. Etc. (this is the kind of language people used back then).
The two "sisters" here are not in fact sisters. And their ideals and aspirations diverge in the course of the film. In fact one of the most revolutionary aspects of this film is that it shows women making choices about their lives, making it more modern and compelling than most 1960s films produced anywhere, including the English-speaking countries.
I also found the depiction of Chinese theatre/opera here, as performed by the touring troupe, absolutely thrilling: Chinese opera is so strange to Western eyes and ears, but so beautiful. I hope it still survives and is popular... but I have some fears.
Over the decades I have developed a strange attitude towards films: the ability of a film to depict sociological or political realities of another time and place can often provide the main interest of a film for me. But also an individual film's genesis or specific history, which is rarely as special as this one's, can influence how much interest I have in watching something.
It has an amazing history: first produced in PRC in 1964 ... but then squashed by the extremist "Gang of Four" (including Mao's wife) who were behind the unbelievably cataclysmic Cultural Revolution of the 1960s. Only long after that "gang" had been replaced did the PRC leaders gingerly accept that it could be re-released in the late 1970s.
The irony (although not a surprise) is that this film is extremely supportive of the Revolution, which starts happening right at the end. It also depicts pretty well the poverty/oppression which was the main lot of most Chinese people before the Revolution.
The objection of the Cultural Revolutionaries was that the film was not the kind of film ardent Communist film-makers should be making: workers proud of fulfilling their monthly quotas in tractor factories, etc. The form of the film also struck them as too Hollywoodian, bourgeois, slavish to the cultural hegemony of the USA, etc. Etc. (this is the kind of language people used back then).
The two "sisters" here are not in fact sisters. And their ideals and aspirations diverge in the course of the film. In fact one of the most revolutionary aspects of this film is that it shows women making choices about their lives, making it more modern and compelling than most 1960s films produced anywhere, including the English-speaking countries.
I also found the depiction of Chinese theatre/opera here, as performed by the touring troupe, absolutely thrilling: Chinese opera is so strange to Western eyes and ears, but so beautiful. I hope it still survives and is popular... but I have some fears.
Over the decades I have developed a strange attitude towards films: the ability of a film to depict sociological or political realities of another time and place can often provide the main interest of a film for me. But also an individual film's genesis or specific history, which is rarely as special as this one's, can influence how much interest I have in watching something.
Details
- Runtime1 hour 52 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content