42 reviews
The Amazing Mr. Blunden is directed by Lionel Jeffries who also adapts the screenplay from Antonia Barber's novel The Ghosts. It stars Lynne Frederick, Garry Miller, Rosalyn Landor, Marc Granger, Laurence Naismith, Diana Dors, Madeline Smith and James Villiers. Music is scored by Elmer Bernstein and cinematography by Gerry Fisher.
1918, London, England, and Mrs. Allen and her three children are visited on Christmas Eve by mysterious old solicitor Mr. Blunden. He offers them a way out of their impoverished surroundings in Camden Town. There's a housekeeping opportunity at a derelict country mansion called Langley Park, the place having been gutted by a major fire previously. There's a reason for the two eldest Allen children, Lucy and Jamie, being there, their help is needed....by child ghosts from 1818!
It has one of the worst posters ever made for a movie, a poster that hints at some guy called Blunden being some superman type magician! Which when coupled with the title of the film really sets up a bum steer for new viewers. To those in the know, the nostalgic Brits like myself, it's a lovely ghost/fantasy story about cross time redemption, resplendent in period flavours whilst operating from an intelligent script. The complex story is delicately crafted by director Jeffries (The Railway Children), this is never about scares, it's a Dickensian type drama that features ghosts of children clutching in the future for help in the past. Relationships are well formed, villains (Dors unrecognisable and immensely vile like) are afforded time to not be of the pantomime kind, and it all builds to a dramatic last quarter where sitting on the edge of your seat is a requisite. And then comes a moment to put warmth into the coldest of hearts.
A beautiful movie, directed and acted with appropriate skill from all involved. If you're looking for a family friendly period ghost story, this is for you. 8/10
1918, London, England, and Mrs. Allen and her three children are visited on Christmas Eve by mysterious old solicitor Mr. Blunden. He offers them a way out of their impoverished surroundings in Camden Town. There's a housekeeping opportunity at a derelict country mansion called Langley Park, the place having been gutted by a major fire previously. There's a reason for the two eldest Allen children, Lucy and Jamie, being there, their help is needed....by child ghosts from 1818!
It has one of the worst posters ever made for a movie, a poster that hints at some guy called Blunden being some superman type magician! Which when coupled with the title of the film really sets up a bum steer for new viewers. To those in the know, the nostalgic Brits like myself, it's a lovely ghost/fantasy story about cross time redemption, resplendent in period flavours whilst operating from an intelligent script. The complex story is delicately crafted by director Jeffries (The Railway Children), this is never about scares, it's a Dickensian type drama that features ghosts of children clutching in the future for help in the past. Relationships are well formed, villains (Dors unrecognisable and immensely vile like) are afforded time to not be of the pantomime kind, and it all builds to a dramatic last quarter where sitting on the edge of your seat is a requisite. And then comes a moment to put warmth into the coldest of hearts.
A beautiful movie, directed and acted with appropriate skill from all involved. If you're looking for a family friendly period ghost story, this is for you. 8/10
- hitchcockthelegend
- May 30, 2012
- Permalink
- Bunuel1976
- Oct 18, 2008
- Permalink
- BA_Harrison
- Oct 10, 2018
- Permalink
The very first time I saw The Others my mind rushed immediately back to this gem...very much a similar premise, people from different periods of time appear to each other as ghosts. It's a nice little film. It's long been my wife's favourite, and its available on DVD from Feb 24, 2003 in the UK which is ooh so cool :)
- Paul Sands
- Feb 13, 2003
- Permalink
Like many films made by the British film industry at it's nadir in the 1970s, the Amazing Mr Blunden could be overlooked, but those willing to make the effort will find a gem. There's the wonderfully English setting of the film, mixing the nostalgia of a Georgian England of Mr Blunden and Langley Park, with the Edwardianism of Jamie and Lucy's world. Mixed with good background music and wonderful setting amongst a stately home and a traditional village and the film is playing to all the traditional strengths of British film and drama. Adults will perhaps prefer these aspects to the plot, but children will enjoy the 'good vs. evil' aspect of the children's fight to save the lives of Georgie and Sara against Mrs Wickens (played excellently by Diana Dors who steals the film). Sadly, the film misses much 'fun' that could be made out of the stark characters of Mr and Mrs Wickens and the rest of the cast (particularly the dandy-ish uncle played by James Villiers). There's also one cringe-worthy moment too - when all the actors and actress wave goodbye at the end. They don't make things that this anymore....
- nicklawton-1
- Oct 5, 2006
- Permalink
- Leofwine_draca
- Dec 24, 2013
- Permalink
This movie worried me at first with a bit of a slow start, but it quickly changed into a wonderfully imaginative fairy tale. The characters are very good and the acting feels the period. Grahm Crowden from the British Sitcom "Waiting for God" does a very good job as well.
Everyone should give this one a try.
The concept is very intriguing and holds your interest well. I really loved the idea surrounding the ghosts and how they got where they were. The story is really one that I would love to share with my whole family.
This one feels like a Dickens Narrative due to the time period it is set in, which adds to the overall feel and believability.
Everyone should give this one a try.
The concept is very intriguing and holds your interest well. I really loved the idea surrounding the ghosts and how they got where they were. The story is really one that I would love to share with my whole family.
This one feels like a Dickens Narrative due to the time period it is set in, which adds to the overall feel and believability.
- brickmeyer
- Aug 19, 2005
- Permalink
Once you get past the ridiculously improbable plot, there is a lot to like about The Amazing Mr Blunden. It displays a wicked sense of humor at times and features some delicious acting by some icons of British cinema including a star turn by Diana Dors as the vile Mrs Wickens. Just listening to some of these people speaking their lines is a treat. Discerning adults will get a lot of enjoyment from this movie. Their children will too, but on a different level. They will be on the edge of their seats as our heroes, Jamie and Lucy, travel backwards in time - yes, I kid you not - to try and rescue two orphans (what else?) from the machinations of their hissably evil housekeeper and the indifference of the adults who should be looking out for them. There are a few holes in the plot and the acting of the younger cast members is adequate at best. Also, the character of Lucy seems to exist primarily to act helpless, panicky and get in the way of other characters. These minor flaws are easily ignored though and once you do so you will find yourself enjoying this movie immensely.
- CabbageCustard
- Dec 29, 2019
- Permalink
Saw this film when I was a child, and it still gives me the same lil shudders and I STILL giggle in the right places... its a good old story with the sweetest ending EVER.
It really encapsulates the film genre of the 1970's and the old way of telling ghost stories which seems to have been lost in modern films.
This film is good for the whole family and actually deals with death and the afterlife in a manner that makes you talk about it afterwards
It really encapsulates the film genre of the 1970's and the old way of telling ghost stories which seems to have been lost in modern films.
This film is good for the whole family and actually deals with death and the afterlife in a manner that makes you talk about it afterwards
- darwiniantheory
- Feb 3, 2002
- Permalink
Movie night with Gertie.
Much loved and delivers. You can see the cast are really enjoying themselves. But it's not The Railway Children.
Much loved and delivers. You can see the cast are really enjoying themselves. But it's not The Railway Children.
Two children go back in time a century to save a couple of orphans that are targeted for assassinations by their stupid uncle's evil parents who want their inheritence. They come across as ghosts in the future, but are in fact invisible projections that only children can see. Can they change the future....?
Despite some generally good performances from the younger actors (it's harder than it looks to be a genuinely endearing child star) coupled with truly loathsome adult villains (if it was the writer's mission was for the audience to detest them, then they succeeded admirably) I did not much care for this misshapen hodge-podge of sci-fi and family film.
It seems the makers threw everything at the screen to make it a classic, but for all their unique ideas and original notions, it's all a bit of a mess. I would prepare a list of everything here that didn't make any sense, but let's be honest... who would even read it?
My only impression is that those who really love the film either have very different standards in which to judge a 'classic' movie, or are blinded by nostalgia into propogating The Amazing Mr Blunden with some of the happier times in their life.
I, on the other hand, am not, and rank it as the average also-ran mostly forgotten 70's British flick it is. So there. 5/10.
Despite some generally good performances from the younger actors (it's harder than it looks to be a genuinely endearing child star) coupled with truly loathsome adult villains (if it was the writer's mission was for the audience to detest them, then they succeeded admirably) I did not much care for this misshapen hodge-podge of sci-fi and family film.
It seems the makers threw everything at the screen to make it a classic, but for all their unique ideas and original notions, it's all a bit of a mess. I would prepare a list of everything here that didn't make any sense, but let's be honest... who would even read it?
My only impression is that those who really love the film either have very different standards in which to judge a 'classic' movie, or are blinded by nostalgia into propogating The Amazing Mr Blunden with some of the happier times in their life.
I, on the other hand, am not, and rank it as the average also-ran mostly forgotten 70's British flick it is. So there. 5/10.
- Mr_Sophistication_Uk
- Apr 2, 2024
- Permalink
A very good family film; its only flaw is that it's a bit too long. The film takes place in England, in approximately 1916. A widow and her three children are left destitute on the husband's death. The mysterious Mr. Blunden shows up and offers the mother a caretaker's position at an old country mansion which was partially destroyed by a great fire decades ago. The family goes to live in a small cottage on the estate. The two oldest children, Lucy and Jamie, are drawn into the unsolved mystery that surrounds the old fire. They find out that the two heirs to the estate, a boy and girl, were killed in the fire, but it might have been murder and not an accident. The film takes a fanciful twist at this juncture, sending Lucy and Jamie back in time to save the two orphaned kids. Will they succeed? And what will it mean to their own lives if they do? What does Mr. Blunden have to do with all this and why does he need Lucy and Jamie's help? I can only say, rent the movie and find out. It has a nice late Victorian air to it, and is steeped in atmosphere. Older kids and adults will enjoy it; my entire family loves this movie.
Laurence Naismith is a solicitor who visits a family with an offer for them to help manage a ramshackle country house. Once they arrive, the children start to see the ghostly apparitions of two other children and soon we discover that they were the children of the house before a fire reduced it to it's present state. Aided by a magic potion - together, the four of them piece together what actually happened on that fateful night, and to try and rewrite history. This is a superb, gentle, family drama; the 4 children deliver strong and engaging performances and there are some lovely touches from Graham Crowden as "Mr. Clutterbuck" and Diana Dors as the evil "Mrs. Wickens". Written and directed by Lionel Jeffries, this is the kind of family drama we just don't make nowadays.
- CinemaSerf
- May 27, 2023
- Permalink
I was vastly underwhelmed by "The Amazing Mr. Blunden," which I purchased for a hefty price after reading several positive reviews here. The film started off poorly and got progressively worse as the 95-minute ordeal dragged by. The script was shallow with characters we don't care about, special effects were amateurish, and even the editing was choppy (with many noticeable splices). Worst of all, the acting was painfully unconvincing, particularly by Diana Dors as Mrs. Wickens, the sadistic housekeeper. Exceptions would be Laurence Naismith, who was quite effective in the title role, and all four of the children, who were acceptable for their ages. The only reason I can see for purchasing this ill-conceived product is the sweet loveliness of teenager Lynne Frederick. She never fails to light up the screen.
The early-'70s were pioneering years and this UK children's film adapted by Lionel Jeffries in 1972 from Antonia Barber's novel, The Ghosts records the pneuma and 'feel' of the period so well. It refers to trauma, redemption,, time travel and the spirit world. Diana Dors as a money-grubbing, bonnet-wearing Regency-Era pub landlady with facial moles, Mrs Wickens is remarkably good as is David Lodge who plays her punch-drunk husband, while the shadowy scenes in Camden Town are evocative. 1972 was also the year, The Nightcomers an adult-themed ghost story was released which was directed by Michael Winner.
- mark-rojinsky
- Jun 1, 2022
- Permalink
It's no word of a lie to say that I'd never heard of "The Amazing Mr. Blunden" before now but then again it did hit the silver screen when I was in nappies. As it happens I probably would have enjoyed its simple sentimentality just a few years later but that was long before VCRs became a consumer must-have.
Still the film is available to stream and delivers on its many positive attributes if you're in the right mood. For a start the story may be naive but it is also straightforward and the central child actors carry the dialogue well enough. They don't have to do a great deal mind.
In contrast the adult actors generally take to their characters with some gusto. Diana Dors is remarkably effective as the evil, bullying mother-in-law and quite unrecognisable under her makeup. Her demented husband David Lodge is also genuinely scary and together they add a real darkness to the tale.
That said the story doesn't have much heft and apart from the central twist (which is inventive) it mostly trundles along in a quite predictable arc. Still there's nothing wrong with seeing the baddies get their comeuppance while goodness is rewarded. A solid watch if you have young, but not too young, children.
Still the film is available to stream and delivers on its many positive attributes if you're in the right mood. For a start the story may be naive but it is also straightforward and the central child actors carry the dialogue well enough. They don't have to do a great deal mind.
In contrast the adult actors generally take to their characters with some gusto. Diana Dors is remarkably effective as the evil, bullying mother-in-law and quite unrecognisable under her makeup. Her demented husband David Lodge is also genuinely scary and together they add a real darkness to the tale.
That said the story doesn't have much heft and apart from the central twist (which is inventive) it mostly trundles along in a quite predictable arc. Still there's nothing wrong with seeing the baddies get their comeuppance while goodness is rewarded. A solid watch if you have young, but not too young, children.
- movie-reviews-uk
- Nov 15, 2023
- Permalink
I first saw this film at the cinema in 1972, and thought at the time it was the best film I'd ever seen - in fact I watched it twice that day! Now, all these years later it's still one of my all-time favorites.
Directed by Lionel Jeffries as a follow-up to his very successful 'Railway Children' movie 2 years' before, it's also a charming period piece set in the Edwardian era, but this time with very a clever plot concerning time travel and ghosts.
His direction is first-class, despite obvious budget restrictions, and it seems a pity this movie wasn't so well-received at the box-office as his previous film, as I think it's even better. Once again the casting and performances are perfect too.
There is excellent brooding atmosphere about the derelict mansion the family are mysteriously hired to caretake by the Amazing Mr Blunden... he has placed them there in order to right a terrible wrong of 100 years' past. The suspense builds up to an exciting climax with the terrible fire of 100 years before played out again - and we are left to wonder if history really has been changed this time.
The music score is fantastic too - one of the best ever in my view, and one of the film's many highlights is the unforgettable performance of Diana Dors as the awful and scary hag-like housekeeper Mrs Wickens.
This is simply an excellent family film that leaves a lasting impression. I showed it to my son when he was 7, and he was absolutely captivated by it - just as I had been in the cinema all those years ago. He actually calls it 'The Ghost Children' - a title that I feel would have served the film better, and perhaps would have maybe drawn attention more to its supernatural elements.
Directed by Lionel Jeffries as a follow-up to his very successful 'Railway Children' movie 2 years' before, it's also a charming period piece set in the Edwardian era, but this time with very a clever plot concerning time travel and ghosts.
His direction is first-class, despite obvious budget restrictions, and it seems a pity this movie wasn't so well-received at the box-office as his previous film, as I think it's even better. Once again the casting and performances are perfect too.
There is excellent brooding atmosphere about the derelict mansion the family are mysteriously hired to caretake by the Amazing Mr Blunden... he has placed them there in order to right a terrible wrong of 100 years' past. The suspense builds up to an exciting climax with the terrible fire of 100 years before played out again - and we are left to wonder if history really has been changed this time.
The music score is fantastic too - one of the best ever in my view, and one of the film's many highlights is the unforgettable performance of Diana Dors as the awful and scary hag-like housekeeper Mrs Wickens.
This is simply an excellent family film that leaves a lasting impression. I showed it to my son when he was 7, and he was absolutely captivated by it - just as I had been in the cinema all those years ago. He actually calls it 'The Ghost Children' - a title that I feel would have served the film better, and perhaps would have maybe drawn attention more to its supernatural elements.
(55%) A better than most period set family horror that gets by because it well made, watchable, and above all else: simple entertainment. The plot may be messy and a bit clumsy, but the charm that runs through makes for a worthwhile sit. Anyone who is familiar with modern Hammer hit "The woman in black" will notice a slight similar feel and look to the mansion house, though this wouldn't scare a baby. The premise is a decent stab at an old spooky house ghost story; although things do get a little too silly at times (the time travelling ghost potion). It's best to think of this as a holiday, wet and windy afternoon type of film, and in that regards this is a good little watch.
- adamscastlevania2
- Apr 9, 2015
- Permalink
This movie is a classic fantasy film about two children who travel back in time to save the lives of two children who died in a fire 100 years ago. Two siblings, Lucy and Jamie, get the shock of their lives when they encounter the ghosts of two children in the garden of the home there mother is overseeing. Sara and Georgie are two young ghosts that died in a fire at the house nearly 100 years ago. They desperately need help and cannot find it in their own time so they find a recipe that enables them to travel back in time. They ask Lucy and Jamie to make the potion in order to travel to their time to help save their lives. This movie is also nice because it has an interesting plot twist at the end and it is also one of the few movies in which you get to see Diana Dors act instead of just look nice. It is a thrilling movie but out of print and hard to find. I highly recommend it.
Lionel Jeffries (The Railway Children) directs this enjoyable supernatural fantasy movie. It's a nostalgic family classic in which the mysterious but kindly solicitor Mr Blunden visits Mrs Allen and her young children, offering her the position of caretaker at a derelict country mansion. More surprises are in store when the children encounter the ghosts of two former young residents and find themselves transported back in time to help their new friends right a 100-year-old wrong. film. Spike Milligan, Gert Fröbe, Gene Wilder, David Niven, Michael Gough, David Tomlinson, Peter Cushing, Christopher Lee, Donald Pleasence and Robert Helpmann were all considered for the role of Mr. Blunden before the role went to Laurence Naismith. Diana Dors plays the wicked housekeeper Mrs. Wickens, who along with her disturbed husband is plotting to kill the children to get her hands on an inheritance. Pretty much unrecognisable from her normal blonde bombshell image she's gross, warty and every young child's nightmare. The film was shot at Pinewood Studios in 1971 with location filming around the village and church at Hedgerley. The fire-ravaged derelict stately home was in fact Heatherden Hall, on the estate of which the studios are located and which at that time served as administration offices for the production facilities. It's based on a 1969 novel by Antonia Barber entitled The Ghosts, which was shortlisted for the Carnegie Medal.
- mwilson1976
- Dec 25, 2019
- Permalink
This movie takes me back to my childhood, remembering how I used to sit in front of the tv and watch it.
I recently watched it in dvd and I live it just as much as I did then.
It's a child's ghost story, and all ages will love this movie. Shame they don't make movies like this now.
I recently watched it in dvd and I live it just as much as I did then.
It's a child's ghost story, and all ages will love this movie. Shame they don't make movies like this now.
- margy-06701
- Jan 21, 2019
- Permalink
- mark.waltz
- Sep 12, 2017
- Permalink
Is, and always will be, my favourite movie of all time. I can't tell you why, it just is. Worth a watch, time and time again.
A fondly remembered film from my youth and one I've re-visited more than once since, it still charms me today. A delightful and thrilling fantasy, it plays almost as well to adults as to its no doubt target audience of children.
The Dickensian-styled story is well-wrought with a nice blend of mystery, enchantment and adventure throughout. Sympathetically and winningly directed by British character actor Lionel Jeffries who gives himself a brief expository scene too, it's a perfect example of family entertainment.
All the principal characters are well-played, especially Laurence Naismith as the twinkle eyed title character, out to right wrongs from a hundred years before and Diana Dors as an over-the-top scheming harridan figure whose plans the amazing Mr B thwarts with the help of two young children from the future. All the child-actors act very well and for the most part avoid the usual wooden-ness in similar portrayals.
I won't give away any of the ingenious plot but it all resolves and revolves around a race to save a young heir and his sister from being murdered in a deliberately-set house fire in a plot devised by Dors and acted upon by her simpleton husband. In fact the film just tails off a little after its fiery climax, although it redeems itself with a happy ending and an unusual but warm-hearted end-credit sequence wholly in keeping with what has gone before. There's a fine understated score by Elmer Berstein too.
It probably helps that this film evokes my happy child-hood but watching it again forty years on, I'm pleased to say I enjoyed it just as much as I did in a Glasgow flea-pit in 1973.
The Dickensian-styled story is well-wrought with a nice blend of mystery, enchantment and adventure throughout. Sympathetically and winningly directed by British character actor Lionel Jeffries who gives himself a brief expository scene too, it's a perfect example of family entertainment.
All the principal characters are well-played, especially Laurence Naismith as the twinkle eyed title character, out to right wrongs from a hundred years before and Diana Dors as an over-the-top scheming harridan figure whose plans the amazing Mr B thwarts with the help of two young children from the future. All the child-actors act very well and for the most part avoid the usual wooden-ness in similar portrayals.
I won't give away any of the ingenious plot but it all resolves and revolves around a race to save a young heir and his sister from being murdered in a deliberately-set house fire in a plot devised by Dors and acted upon by her simpleton husband. In fact the film just tails off a little after its fiery climax, although it redeems itself with a happy ending and an unusual but warm-hearted end-credit sequence wholly in keeping with what has gone before. There's a fine understated score by Elmer Berstein too.
It probably helps that this film evokes my happy child-hood but watching it again forty years on, I'm pleased to say I enjoyed it just as much as I did in a Glasgow flea-pit in 1973.