IMDb RATING
6.3/10
8.4K
YOUR RATING
When Countess Marya Zaleska appears in London, mysterious events occur that lead Dr. Von Helsing to believe that the Countess must be a vampire.When Countess Marya Zaleska appears in London, mysterious events occur that lead Dr. Von Helsing to believe that the Countess must be a vampire.When Countess Marya Zaleska appears in London, mysterious events occur that lead Dr. Von Helsing to believe that the Countess must be a vampire.
- Awards
- 1 win & 1 nomination
Halliwell Hobbes
- Hawkins
- (as Halliwell Hobbs)
Claud Allister
- Sir Aubrey
- (as Claude Allister)
Agnes Anderson
- Elena
- (uncredited)
John Blood
- Bobby
- (uncredited)
David Dunbar
- Motor Bobby
- (uncredited)
Douglas Gordon
- Attendant
- (uncredited)
Owen Gorin
- Groom's Friend
- (uncredited)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaCompleted for $278,000 it was one of Universal's most expensive productions of the 1930s.
- GoofsWhen the police came upon the mayhem at Carfax Abbey (caused in Dracula (1931)) in the first scene, where were the primary witnesses, Mr. and Mrs. Harker? Their names would certainly have come up at some point while Dr. Von/Van Helsing was being booked and the crime scene was being examined. Furthermore, their suspicious departure from the scene should cause them to be regarded as fugitives and suspects. Yet they are never mentioned in this movie.
- Quotes
Lady Esme Hammond: Sherry, Marya?
Countess Marya Zaleska: Thank you, I never drink... wine.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Shock!: Dracula's Daughter (1958)
Featured review
This movie literally starts off were "Dracula" finished. Since it is a sequel you would expect only more of the same old routine but "Dracula's Daughter" is surprising original and good on its own. This ain't your average bloodsucking vampire movie.
Thing that was best about this movie is that they came up with a quite original and solid story that goes deep enough and features some strong and interesting characters. It's not like they wanted to surpass the original "Dracula" movie or became too dependent on the events that occurred in that movie. Instead they just tried to be original and create a new and different kind of vampire movie.
Only returning character is professor Von Helsing (why did they ever changed his name?) played by yet again Edward Van Sloan. Van Sloan truly was a fantastic actor, I already loved him in "Dracula" and in this movie he reprises his role with just as much flair. Another actor that impressed me was Irving Pichel as the creepy looking Sandor.
It's definitely a movie worth watching. It never becomes scary, mysterious or tense really but the story and acting are what makes this movie a very solid one.
8/10
http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
Thing that was best about this movie is that they came up with a quite original and solid story that goes deep enough and features some strong and interesting characters. It's not like they wanted to surpass the original "Dracula" movie or became too dependent on the events that occurred in that movie. Instead they just tried to be original and create a new and different kind of vampire movie.
Only returning character is professor Von Helsing (why did they ever changed his name?) played by yet again Edward Van Sloan. Van Sloan truly was a fantastic actor, I already loved him in "Dracula" and in this movie he reprises his role with just as much flair. Another actor that impressed me was Irving Pichel as the creepy looking Sandor.
It's definitely a movie worth watching. It never becomes scary, mysterious or tense really but the story and acting are what makes this movie a very solid one.
8/10
http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
- Boba_Fett1138
- Jun 12, 2005
- Permalink
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Languages
- Also known as
- Daughter of Dracula
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 11 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content