18 reviews
The great French innovator finally seems to be running out of imagination here. Having invented cinema as we understand it today, he eventually had to exhaust his fount of inspiration.
This film could best be described as a remake of his "Voyage to the Moon" from 1902. Unfortunately much of the old vim is missing. Sequences run on for too long. At times the film seems more primitive than many of his earlier films.
Still, there was life in the old boy yet. The « géant des neiges » (giant of the snows) episode is quite good with a monster who swallows intrepid Arctic explorers whole. The ice giant is about as good an effect as Fafner the dragon in Fritz Lang's "Siegfried", and that film was made in 1924. There is a funny moment when the explorers reach the Earth's Magnetic Pole. They are attracted right onto the needle they find and get stuck there.
The long (too long) scene where the explorers in their airship fly past the signs of the zodiac reminded me strangely of what Dorothy sees from her window as she is caught in the tornado in "The Wizard of Oz". That would make Méliès nearly 30 years ahead of his time.
Nevertheless, I got the same impression I get with a lot of modern special effects films. Méliès was spending more money without necessarily expending more ingenuity. Perhaps he was only trying to imitate the lesser but more successful mortals who came after him.
This film could best be described as a remake of his "Voyage to the Moon" from 1902. Unfortunately much of the old vim is missing. Sequences run on for too long. At times the film seems more primitive than many of his earlier films.
Still, there was life in the old boy yet. The « géant des neiges » (giant of the snows) episode is quite good with a monster who swallows intrepid Arctic explorers whole. The ice giant is about as good an effect as Fafner the dragon in Fritz Lang's "Siegfried", and that film was made in 1924. There is a funny moment when the explorers reach the Earth's Magnetic Pole. They are attracted right onto the needle they find and get stuck there.
The long (too long) scene where the explorers in their airship fly past the signs of the zodiac reminded me strangely of what Dorothy sees from her window as she is caught in the tornado in "The Wizard of Oz". That would make Méliès nearly 30 years ahead of his time.
Nevertheless, I got the same impression I get with a lot of modern special effects films. Méliès was spending more money without necessarily expending more ingenuity. Perhaps he was only trying to imitate the lesser but more successful mortals who came after him.
In many, many ways, this film is like Georges Méliès' triumph from almost a decade earlier--"Voyage Dans le Lune". In fact, if you didn't know they were made 9 year apart, you would have sworn that they were made at the same time. While I enjoyed the film a lot, the similarity in style is an indicator why this wonderful filmmaker soon fell out of favor--he was using techniques that had just become passé. Crowds were looking for something new. But the only really new aspect of "The Conquest of the Pole" is that it is very, very lengthy for a Méliès product--at 33 minutes (which was pretty long for 1912).
The movie begins with a bizarre scientific meeting. The leading minds from all over the world are meeting to discuss how to go to the pole. Some want to take cars, some want balloons and others want flying contraptions. It's funny because they folks mostly just argue (like they did in "Voyage Dans le Lune"), some of the folks there seem way out of place (such as the Mexican banditos) and it only gets worse when the comic relief arrives in the form of obnoxious suffragettes. The director was obviously making a statement about women's rights here and portrays their leader as a total jerk.
Soon the various expeditions begin and soon most of them result in killing these people. However, although they'd only talked about building the one flying machine, the sky is filled with hundreds or more! Now you'd think this would be a pretty straight-forward flight but it looks like his moon movie once again--and the flying machine is whizzing past stars, planets and comets--all being held in the air by beautiful women.
The arrival gets weird, as they soon see a giant--and the giant is a very funny piece of equipment. You really have to see it and the ending to believe them.
The bottom line is that this film, quality-wise, is little improvement over Méliès' early films BUT it does have a certain quaint charm. You can't help laugh at many of the situations (especially when the giant eats a member of the expedition) and it's a cute window into a bygone era. Amazing to look at and a bit silly as well. This is among the filmmaker's last films--and is a nice window into what he was doing before he stopped making films entirely the following year.
The movie begins with a bizarre scientific meeting. The leading minds from all over the world are meeting to discuss how to go to the pole. Some want to take cars, some want balloons and others want flying contraptions. It's funny because they folks mostly just argue (like they did in "Voyage Dans le Lune"), some of the folks there seem way out of place (such as the Mexican banditos) and it only gets worse when the comic relief arrives in the form of obnoxious suffragettes. The director was obviously making a statement about women's rights here and portrays their leader as a total jerk.
Soon the various expeditions begin and soon most of them result in killing these people. However, although they'd only talked about building the one flying machine, the sky is filled with hundreds or more! Now you'd think this would be a pretty straight-forward flight but it looks like his moon movie once again--and the flying machine is whizzing past stars, planets and comets--all being held in the air by beautiful women.
The arrival gets weird, as they soon see a giant--and the giant is a very funny piece of equipment. You really have to see it and the ending to believe them.
The bottom line is that this film, quality-wise, is little improvement over Méliès' early films BUT it does have a certain quaint charm. You can't help laugh at many of the situations (especially when the giant eats a member of the expedition) and it's a cute window into a bygone era. Amazing to look at and a bit silly as well. This is among the filmmaker's last films--and is a nice window into what he was doing before he stopped making films entirely the following year.
- planktonrules
- Feb 14, 2014
- Permalink
Despite producing over 500 movies by 1912, Georges Melies, the early film pioneer credited as being the father of cinematic special effects, was under the dominance of Paris' Pathe Studios because of a contract he signed earlier. In what turned out to be his last movie he had total control over, May 1912's "The Conquest of the Pole" is ironically been labeled as his career masterpiece. The 30-minute film, Melies longest movie ever, describes the race to be the first to reach the North Pole.
Many cite "Conquest" as a remake of his 1902 classic "Trip to the Moon." Melies never quite departed from his stationary camera capturing his elaborate stage presentations. Because cinema had advanced greatly from his cutting-edge 1902 production, "Conquest" became a financial failure upon release. Audiences by that time were growing more accustomed to the Italian epics and outdoor dramas.
Melies' three remaining movies after "Conquest" under Pathe supervision were heavily edited. Soon after the contract expired, he was in debt and faced World War One, which proved disastrous for him. His family's beloved theater was taken away, bunches of his original films were confiscated by the French Army to be used for its silver content, and his wife died.
Bitter at his poverty years later, he burned crates of his films. He ended up working at a small toy and candy story in a Paris train station. In the late 1920's, Melies' films were rediscovered and his rightful position as a preeminent pioneer in early film was established. Martin Scorsese's 2011 "Hugo" placed Melies in today's spotlight for a younger generation to enjoy his films.
His legacy survives despite all the destruction of his films because of piracy, which had caused him so much distress at the lack of strict copyright laws overseas and had cost him so many unrealized francs. Two hundred of his films, out of over 560 that he produced, exist today and can be viewed. The amount is huge in silent movie cinema since so many early films have been destroyed and considered "lost."
Many cite "Conquest" as a remake of his 1902 classic "Trip to the Moon." Melies never quite departed from his stationary camera capturing his elaborate stage presentations. Because cinema had advanced greatly from his cutting-edge 1902 production, "Conquest" became a financial failure upon release. Audiences by that time were growing more accustomed to the Italian epics and outdoor dramas.
Melies' three remaining movies after "Conquest" under Pathe supervision were heavily edited. Soon after the contract expired, he was in debt and faced World War One, which proved disastrous for him. His family's beloved theater was taken away, bunches of his original films were confiscated by the French Army to be used for its silver content, and his wife died.
Bitter at his poverty years later, he burned crates of his films. He ended up working at a small toy and candy story in a Paris train station. In the late 1920's, Melies' films were rediscovered and his rightful position as a preeminent pioneer in early film was established. Martin Scorsese's 2011 "Hugo" placed Melies in today's spotlight for a younger generation to enjoy his films.
His legacy survives despite all the destruction of his films because of piracy, which had caused him so much distress at the lack of strict copyright laws overseas and had cost him so many unrealized francs. Two hundred of his films, out of over 560 that he produced, exist today and can be viewed. The amount is huge in silent movie cinema since so many early films have been destroyed and considered "lost."
- springfieldrental
- Apr 7, 2021
- Permalink
Méliès made some pretty weird features, and this is one of the strangest. It's certainly entertaining to watch, and at times it reminds you of "Trip to the Moon", although it is not as good. The main difference is that "Conquest of the Pole" has more padding, material that doesn't go anywhere other than to set up some camera tricks. Yet it's still worth seeing, and it is filled with interesting visual effects.
The story itself, based on another Jules Verne story, starts off in a fashion similar to some other Méliès adaptations of Verne, this time with a scientist detailing his plans to go to the North Pole. It gets bizarre pretty fast, and many of the conceptions seem unnecessarily wacky. Yet there is always plenty to see on the screen, and Méliès's imagination is displayed in numerous ways. It's an interesting feature that is worth seeing for anyone who finds the great visual effects pioneer's movies interesting or enjoyable.
The story itself, based on another Jules Verne story, starts off in a fashion similar to some other Méliès adaptations of Verne, this time with a scientist detailing his plans to go to the North Pole. It gets bizarre pretty fast, and many of the conceptions seem unnecessarily wacky. Yet there is always plenty to see on the screen, and Méliès's imagination is displayed in numerous ways. It's an interesting feature that is worth seeing for anyone who finds the great visual effects pioneer's movies interesting or enjoyable.
- Snow Leopard
- Oct 21, 2004
- Permalink
Why one has to go into outer space to get to the North Pole is a question to ponder. Apparently, there were numerous expeditions going and the airship appears to be the one that succeeds. After forming diverse crew from several countries and throwing out the women, the air bus embarks on its journey. It goes past several constellations, including Scorpio and Pisces as well as Gemini. When the explorers finally get to the North Pole, there is really nothing to do. They run around and meet up with a monster and one of them gets eaten. Since they were from all countries, the monster got to choose between German, French, Chinese, Spanish, etc. This could have been played for laughs but wasn't. Anyway, it is all visual and the whole process of exploring is wasted. These guys really don't have a clue. As for Melies, he is still doing the same stuff.
- CitizenCaine
- Nov 23, 2012
- Permalink
Welcome to one of the most incredible and fascinating trips in the history of cinema!... Come on board the Aero-bus made by the engineer Maboul and, with the permission of its multinational crew, you will join an extraordinary expedition to the North Pole where many threats will be facing us.
Forget other rudimentary expeditions in the conquest of the North Pole!... in "A La Conquête Du Pôle" (1912) you will enjoy travelling on an exclusive flying machine with the most advanced technical equipment of the time!. But beware!!... Herr Maboul is not alone in his particular trip to the North Pole!... There are also rival expeditionary groups who want to reach that cold land by other means of transport such as balloon or automobile. And if that isn't challenging enough, there is also the threat of a group of suffragettes who want to compete on equal terms with men ( Can you believe that?! ) but of course they fail.
During the trip Herr Maboul's Aero-bus will fly through comets, beautiful woman stars ( now you finally know the meaning of being a cinema star thanks to Herr Méliès ) and tricky constellations until finally it will land- or better said, crash -in the North Pole where more perils await, particularly the Giant of the Ice!!.
In this silent delicatessen, one of the last works by the pioneer French director, Herr Georges Méliès, the director displays in its full grandeur his wonderful artifacts, special effects ( including his daring explosions ), décors and fascinating imagination. The gap of 100 years since engineer Maboul's trip matter not at all when such incredible sets and cinematic mastery are on display to make a unique, enjoyable and unrepeatable experience.
A masterpiece, a wonderful dream.
And now, if you'll allow me, I must temporarily take my leave because this German Count must join Herr Maboul's crew.
Herr Graf Ferdinand Von Galitzien http://ferdinandvongalitzien.blogspot.com
Forget other rudimentary expeditions in the conquest of the North Pole!... in "A La Conquête Du Pôle" (1912) you will enjoy travelling on an exclusive flying machine with the most advanced technical equipment of the time!. But beware!!... Herr Maboul is not alone in his particular trip to the North Pole!... There are also rival expeditionary groups who want to reach that cold land by other means of transport such as balloon or automobile. And if that isn't challenging enough, there is also the threat of a group of suffragettes who want to compete on equal terms with men ( Can you believe that?! ) but of course they fail.
During the trip Herr Maboul's Aero-bus will fly through comets, beautiful woman stars ( now you finally know the meaning of being a cinema star thanks to Herr Méliès ) and tricky constellations until finally it will land- or better said, crash -in the North Pole where more perils await, particularly the Giant of the Ice!!.
In this silent delicatessen, one of the last works by the pioneer French director, Herr Georges Méliès, the director displays in its full grandeur his wonderful artifacts, special effects ( including his daring explosions ), décors and fascinating imagination. The gap of 100 years since engineer Maboul's trip matter not at all when such incredible sets and cinematic mastery are on display to make a unique, enjoyable and unrepeatable experience.
A masterpiece, a wonderful dream.
And now, if you'll allow me, I must temporarily take my leave because this German Count must join Herr Maboul's crew.
Herr Graf Ferdinand Von Galitzien http://ferdinandvongalitzien.blogspot.com
- FerdinandVonGalitzien
- Feb 23, 2012
- Permalink
Explorers in a variety of fantastic vehicles race to the North Pole where the winners encounter the pipe-smoking Giant of the Snows. Despite some imaginative imagery and a topical subject (both Poles having been reached for the first time within three years of the film's release), Méliès ambitious techno-fantasy (one of his last) is neither particularly interesting nor entertaining. The story is very similar to the auteur's 'biggest hit', the seminal sci-fi film 'A Trip to the Moon' (1902) but despite some 'updating' (e.g. The suffragette movement is lampooned), by 1912 audiences seemed to be tiring of Méliès' fanciful theatrical style. From my perspective a century hence, the film is historically interesting but otherwise stagy, slow-moving and repetitive. The climactic battle with the giant is an impressive display of puppeteering but the various driving and flying contraptions (and their fates) are mostly silly (considering that by 1912 automobiles and aircraft were becoming relatively common place (the Paris Air Show began in 1909 and the international French Grand Prix was first run in 1906)). The film, which was a failure commercially, marked the beginning of Méliès decline as a filmmaker - of his over 500 films, only three were made after "Conquest of the Pole' and by 1914 the pioneering French auteur was bankrupt.
- jamesrupert2014
- Oct 15, 2021
- Permalink
It's been 16 years since director Georges Melies started making his illusionary, "trick" films. Over that time, he was able to fine-tune his craft, involving his special effects techniques, that he originally pioneered back in 1896. As we approach the twilight of his career, he was still using just a stationary camera. With his dazzling set pieces, he took audiences to fantastic worlds. In this film, Melies out-does himself with the spectacle of a Polar Giant, that terrorizes our Arctic explorers during an exciting climax. In what is a repeat of Melies many other films, crafted with a template that dazzled his audiences, explorers gather together to figure out their plans for a trip to the North Pole. Once all the members are happy, the race to the Pole begins.
This film suffers from being a little bit too long. It is Melies longest film he ever did. It also is a little top-heavy, with a dragged out, build-up, in the beginning and middle of the film, which does, eventually, culminate with a great ending. Once they arrive, the men run into all kinds of magical happenings, found in a wondrous world and built with a fantastic design. Melies design. It is 1912 and Melies builds a giant creature with a head bigger than five people. It's the amount of work done by Melies, that really endeared him to movie fans. The Arctic Giant is some of his best work. His pioneering spirit is what made him great. I just wish some of the scenes were a little bit tighter and not dragged out. Still, this film is a sight to see.
7.9 (B- MyGrade) = 8 IMDB.
This film suffers from being a little bit too long. It is Melies longest film he ever did. It also is a little top-heavy, with a dragged out, build-up, in the beginning and middle of the film, which does, eventually, culminate with a great ending. Once they arrive, the men run into all kinds of magical happenings, found in a wondrous world and built with a fantastic design. Melies design. It is 1912 and Melies builds a giant creature with a head bigger than five people. It's the amount of work done by Melies, that really endeared him to movie fans. The Arctic Giant is some of his best work. His pioneering spirit is what made him great. I just wish some of the scenes were a little bit tighter and not dragged out. Still, this film is a sight to see.
7.9 (B- MyGrade) = 8 IMDB.
Scholars from all over the world assemble in Paris, to discuss making a trip to the North Pole. Suffragettes want to be included, but the men throw them out of the room. An aeroplane is determined to be the mode of transportation. In a factory, workers build the airship. Along the way, professor Georges Melies and his crew see the signs of the zodiac. Arriving at the North Pole, the men are startled to find it inhabited - but not by the jolly man you may be expecting. This film is very much like Mr. Melies' "A Trip to the Moon" (1902), but more than twice as long and less than half as entertaining.
***** A la conquete du pole (1912) Georges Melies ~ Georges Melies, Fernande Albany
***** A la conquete du pole (1912) Georges Melies ~ Georges Melies, Fernande Albany
- wes-connors
- Jul 18, 2012
- Permalink
- ludovicthomas55
- Jul 14, 2020
- Permalink
I found this one long and drawn out for nothing. It took 20 minutes for them to get into the air, 5 minutes of watching them "sail though the stars" (where the constellation of Scorpio knocks the ship with it's tail) just to get to the last 5 minutes of the adventure to see a huge Howdy Doody looking creature coming out of the water and for the group to jump on a cone that turns them in a circle. WTF did I just watch?
4/10
4/10
- Rainey-Dawn
- Jul 11, 2019
- Permalink
I really enjoyed this movie. Some of the other users have complained that there are scenes that don't advance the plot. I can't say this really bothers me in a movie that's less than ten minutes long.
I was most impressed by the production design. The sets and backdrops were lovely, and the whole film has a coherent look. The makers of this film obviously put a lot of effort into creating their fantasy world. Even if the journey through the zodiac didn't move the story forward, it held my attention because it was so imaginative and so beautiful.
While the effects are primitive by today's standards, they work because they're consistent with the design as a whole. Modern special effects are much more sophisticated, but that means nothing if they aren't smoothly integrated into the rest of the film. Melies and his collaborators created a world that I wanted to believe in.
I was most impressed by the production design. The sets and backdrops were lovely, and the whole film has a coherent look. The makers of this film obviously put a lot of effort into creating their fantasy world. Even if the journey through the zodiac didn't move the story forward, it held my attention because it was so imaginative and so beautiful.
While the effects are primitive by today's standards, they work because they're consistent with the design as a whole. Modern special effects are much more sophisticated, but that means nothing if they aren't smoothly integrated into the rest of the film. Melies and his collaborators created a world that I wanted to believe in.
In spite of having some special effects a little bad compared to other films of Geroge Méliès and having a story a little queer and unconquered, I found the film quite good and I think it is one of those classics that everyone should see at least once in life. Highly recommend.
- afonsobritofalves
- Dec 10, 2018
- Permalink
- Horst_In_Translation
- Dec 12, 2018
- Permalink
- Cineanalyst
- Feb 6, 2008
- Permalink
Conquest of the North Pole (1912)
aka Conquete du pole, La
*** (out of 4)
Georges Melies film that tries to rival his legendary A Trip to the Moon but doesn't come that close. A group of scientists try to determine a way to reach the North Pole. Once there they must do battle with a large ice monster. The stuff dealing with the ice monster was terrific and this creature is one of the best of Melies career.
In early 2008 there will be a box set released and will feature over 170 Melies' shorts.
aka Conquete du pole, La
*** (out of 4)
Georges Melies film that tries to rival his legendary A Trip to the Moon but doesn't come that close. A group of scientists try to determine a way to reach the North Pole. Once there they must do battle with a large ice monster. The stuff dealing with the ice monster was terrific and this creature is one of the best of Melies career.
In early 2008 there will be a box set released and will feature over 170 Melies' shorts.
- Michael_Elliott
- Feb 26, 2008
- Permalink
Indeed, I'm currently going through a pile of films (on a 16mm projector no less) that are being discarded. I came across this one today and sat there the entire time riveted to the screen.
It has to be one of the most bizarre films I've ever seen. It seems to be trying very hard to be funny and for the most part it succeeds quite well. The images and the sheer craziness of it all can't help but make a person laugh.
I do have to admit though, that the overly long journey past the zodiac could have been done without. It slowed the frantic pace of the rest of the film, and was out of place in a film which was otherwise trying to be funny.
If you're a film buff, or you have a chance to see it, I'd say go for it. Otherwise, don't go out of your way.
There is one thing I'd like to point out, and I'm not sure if I'm right, but the version of this film that I saw had an English title screen and (not sure what they're called) - English dialog screens. The company that produced this version was "Star Films." I assume it's not the original one because it wasn't in French.
It has to be one of the most bizarre films I've ever seen. It seems to be trying very hard to be funny and for the most part it succeeds quite well. The images and the sheer craziness of it all can't help but make a person laugh.
I do have to admit though, that the overly long journey past the zodiac could have been done without. It slowed the frantic pace of the rest of the film, and was out of place in a film which was otherwise trying to be funny.
If you're a film buff, or you have a chance to see it, I'd say go for it. Otherwise, don't go out of your way.
There is one thing I'd like to point out, and I'm not sure if I'm right, but the version of this film that I saw had an English title screen and (not sure what they're called) - English dialog screens. The company that produced this version was "Star Films." I assume it's not the original one because it wasn't in French.