I like this show and I like Brett Waterman, but the show does have a few things that could be improved for me. But first, the good things: Brett is a wealth of knowledge and skill, and obviously has great love for the types of houses he chooses to work on. The people he works with all seem to be wonderful craftspeople, suppliers and artisans, and the results he achieves are always very well done. Some of the turnarounds shown are simply remarkable transformations. And sometimes you get a real winner, such as his recent resto of the 1960s California bungalow that was simply outstanding. Shout out to Sara Zofko, his usual designer, for her fine work on this.
What I don't like quite so much are some of the changes that seem imposed upon the homeowners for the sake of originality and design integrity. We aren't living in the 1900s and with some of these restorations I find myself wondering how long the result shown lasts after the cameras leave and the owners need to live in it day to day. The budgets are usually large, yet the results sometimes don't seem to reflect that level of investment because of the costs of finding the right vintage tile for a fireplace, dull linoleum for the kitchen floor, or reproduction (and to my eye, not always attractive) period light fixtures. Spending $150K on restoration to end up with a house with 2 small bedrooms and no place to watch TV doesn't always seem the wisest investment to me, but I guess that is what the owners asked for. I also find the repetition of scenes before and after commercial breaks, especially the predictable one near the end before revealing the kitchen, pretty tiresome. But a good show overall.
