72 metra
- 2004
- 1h 55min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,5/10
1808
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaEvery second is precious for a Russian submarine crew, as they are stranded 72 meters below the ocean's surface.Every second is precious for a Russian submarine crew, as they are stranded 72 meters below the ocean's surface.Every second is precious for a Russian submarine crew, as they are stranded 72 meters below the ocean's surface.
- Premi
- 2 vittorie e 6 candidature
Foto
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizFinal film of Svetlana Konovalova.
- ConnessioniReferences U-571 (2000)
- Colonne sonorePis'mo
Performed by Kirill Tolmatskiy (as Detsl)
Music by Gleb Matveyev
Lyrics by Gleb Matveyev, Kirill Tolmatskiy (as Kirill Tolmatsky)
(p) Dand D Music
Recensione in evidenza
This movie seems to be alright. And it desperately tries to feel alright. And for a large part of the population it might be alright, but it isn't.
This movie may have become the greatest drama of recent Russian movie history. However, it's attempt to describe too much at once greatly undermines its quality.
One one hand we have a typical disaster movie - an explosion on a submarine, with all necessary genre "features" - survivors, random acts of heroism etc.
On the other hand we have a standoff between main characters, which could have (only could have) been very intense. Unfotunately, Russia seems to have lost all of its acting talents. These actors simply cannot deliver.
On the third hand (oh, yeah, there's more) we have personal drama of one of the main characters, delivered through a series of flashbacks. Again, it doesn't touch on any emotional level.
On the fourth hand we have a feeble attempt to describe the dire state of Russia'a fleet after the collapse of the Soviet Union. These attempts are not only feeble, but overly nationalistic as well (things like "Hey, Slavs, anybody here" followed by "You are not Ukrainian, are you").
Et cetera, et cetera.
This movie could have been great. It isn't. It may have been Ernst, who didn't let the movie blossom, but you can't blame Ernst for everything, can you? 5/10, not more
This movie may have become the greatest drama of recent Russian movie history. However, it's attempt to describe too much at once greatly undermines its quality.
One one hand we have a typical disaster movie - an explosion on a submarine, with all necessary genre "features" - survivors, random acts of heroism etc.
On the other hand we have a standoff between main characters, which could have (only could have) been very intense. Unfotunately, Russia seems to have lost all of its acting talents. These actors simply cannot deliver.
On the third hand (oh, yeah, there's more) we have personal drama of one of the main characters, delivered through a series of flashbacks. Again, it doesn't touch on any emotional level.
On the fourth hand we have a feeble attempt to describe the dire state of Russia'a fleet after the collapse of the Soviet Union. These attempts are not only feeble, but overly nationalistic as well (things like "Hey, Slavs, anybody here" followed by "You are not Ukrainian, are you").
Et cetera, et cetera.
This movie could have been great. It isn't. It may have been Ernst, who didn't let the movie blossom, but you can't blame Ernst for everything, can you? 5/10, not more
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is 72 Meters?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 1.600.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 2.392.932 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 55 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti