VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,3/10
9636
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
William Holden interpreta uno sceneggiatore che deve finire una sceneggiatura in tre giorni. Quando chiede alla sua segretaria, Audrey Hepburn, di aiutarlo a mettere insieme le idee, lei fa ... Leggi tuttoWilliam Holden interpreta uno sceneggiatore che deve finire una sceneggiatura in tre giorni. Quando chiede alla sua segretaria, Audrey Hepburn, di aiutarlo a mettere insieme le idee, lei fa un pot-pourri di trame insensate.William Holden interpreta uno sceneggiatore che deve finire una sceneggiatura in tre giorni. Quando chiede alla sua segretaria, Audrey Hepburn, di aiutarlo a mettere insieme le idee, lei fa un pot-pourri di trame insensate.
Raymond Bussières
- François
- (as Raymond Bussieres)
Christian Duvaleix
- Maitre d'Hotel
- (as Christian Duvallex)
Michel Thomass
- Second Gangster
- (as Thomas Michel)
Noël Coward
- Alexander Meyerheim
- (as Noel Coward)
Tony Curtis
- Imagined Actor Portraying Maurice or Philippe
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Marlene Dietrich
- Marlene Dietrich
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Mel Ferrer
- Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Orestis Ganakis
- Philippe
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Henri Garcin
- Third Policeman
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Frank Sinatra
- Frank Sinatra
- (voce (canto))
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Dominique Zardi
- Sailor in Café
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizFilming ended in November 1962, only two days before production began on Audrey Hepburn's next film, Sciarada (1963), which also was set in Paris.
- BlooperDuring the chase, Gaby's hat and veil are both through the sunroof of her car in the long shots, but only her hat is out for the in car shots.
- Curiosità sui creditiThe opening credits include: "Miss Hepburn's perfume: Hubert de Givenchy"
- ConnessioniFeatured in The 79th Annual Academy Awards (2007)
- Colonne sonoreThat Face
Music by Lew Spence
Lyrics by Alan Bergman
Performed by Fred Astaire (Courtesy of Ava Records)
[Played on the photograph as Gabrielle is going through her morning routine]
Recensione in evidenza
This movie isn't everyone's cup of tea. Hepburn called it her least favorite film. Audiences shunned it. At the time of writing, IMDb gives it a measly 6.0 rating. Nevertheless, it is one of my all-time favorite movies.
The problem with this film is that it isn't what everyone seems to be expecting it to be: a mindless romantic comedy. Quite on the contrary: this is a work that I can only compare with "Adaptation". It is a story about how stories actually get written: non-linearly, spasmodically, through much self-doubt and simultaneously excessive (narcissistic, really) introspection. (Although, to be fair, in Hollywood the practice has mostly been to call in a whole bunch of writers to fix up the messes left by writers of earlier drafts, so this is least true of how Hollywood movie scripts get written, but it is true just about everywhere else.) Like "Adaptation", this is a movie that takes the plunge into the mind of the writer as he creates a miniature, constantly shifting and bubbling world for us to visit, only to find a second world inside that first, and probably more where that came from. I don't think that you can appreciate it without having written something yourself, but if you have, then you know the feeling: life mimicking art, mimicking life, mimicking art. Personally, for me, the greatest cameo in this movie isn't the appearance of Tony Curtis or Frank Sinatra, but the fact that in mid-shooting William Holden had to be checked into a rehab clinic. How's that for life and art? Again, like in "Adaptation", the story makes no sense, and, in fact, cannot make any sense. Its what the movie is about. To let us watch and keep our sanity, humor is used abundantly. It is well written wit and quite funny, but it isn't what this movie is about, and taking it to be what the movie is about is perhaps what led to its being so underrated.
"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" says the Wizard of Oz, and as far as box office success goes, he's right. Audiences don't like it when the magician shows how the trick is performed. This movie is a prime example. Another is Schwarzenegger's "Last Action Hero". If you like romantic comedies, you should probably avoid this movie. If you want to see a smart film about the madness of writing, this is a soft introduction to the topic.
The problem with this film is that it isn't what everyone seems to be expecting it to be: a mindless romantic comedy. Quite on the contrary: this is a work that I can only compare with "Adaptation". It is a story about how stories actually get written: non-linearly, spasmodically, through much self-doubt and simultaneously excessive (narcissistic, really) introspection. (Although, to be fair, in Hollywood the practice has mostly been to call in a whole bunch of writers to fix up the messes left by writers of earlier drafts, so this is least true of how Hollywood movie scripts get written, but it is true just about everywhere else.) Like "Adaptation", this is a movie that takes the plunge into the mind of the writer as he creates a miniature, constantly shifting and bubbling world for us to visit, only to find a second world inside that first, and probably more where that came from. I don't think that you can appreciate it without having written something yourself, but if you have, then you know the feeling: life mimicking art, mimicking life, mimicking art. Personally, for me, the greatest cameo in this movie isn't the appearance of Tony Curtis or Frank Sinatra, but the fact that in mid-shooting William Holden had to be checked into a rehab clinic. How's that for life and art? Again, like in "Adaptation", the story makes no sense, and, in fact, cannot make any sense. Its what the movie is about. To let us watch and keep our sanity, humor is used abundantly. It is well written wit and quite funny, but it isn't what this movie is about, and taking it to be what the movie is about is perhaps what led to its being so underrated.
"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" says the Wizard of Oz, and as far as box office success goes, he's right. Audiences don't like it when the magician shows how the trick is performed. This movie is a prime example. Another is Schwarzenegger's "Last Action Hero". If you like romantic comedies, you should probably avoid this movie. If you want to see a smart film about the madness of writing, this is a soft introduction to the topic.
- imdb2-556-923983
- 11 dic 2011
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Paris When It Sizzles
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Hôtel du Cap, Antibes, Alpes-Maritimes, Francia(opening scene)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 4.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 10.721 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 50 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Insieme a Parigi (1964) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi