What do you think?
Rate this book
The Praise Singer
In the story of the great lyric poet Simonides, Mary Renault brings alive a time in Greece when tyrants kept an unsteady rule and poetry, music, and royal patronage combined to produce a flowering of the arts.
Born into a stern farming family on the island of Keos, Simonides escapes his harsh childhood through a lucky apprenticeship with a renowned Ionian singer. As they travel through 5th century B.C. Greece, Simonides learns not only how to play the kithara and compose poetry, but also how to navigate the shifting alliances surrounding his rich patrons. He is witness to the Persian invasion of Ionia, to the decadent reign of the Samian pirate king Polykrates, and to the fall of the Pisistratids in the Athenian court. Along the way, he encounters artists, statesmen, athletes, thinkers, and lovers, including the likes of Pythagoras and Aischylos. Using the singer's unique perspective, Renault combines her vibrant imagination and her formidable knowledge of history to establish a sweeping, resilient vision of a golden century.
Born into a stern farming family on the island of Keos, Simonides escapes his harsh childhood through a lucky apprenticeship with a renowned Ionian singer. As they travel through 5th century B.C. Greece, Simonides learns not only how to play the kithara and compose poetry, but also how to navigate the shifting alliances surrounding his rich patrons. He is witness to the Persian invasion of Ionia, to the decadent reign of the Samian pirate king Polykrates, and to the fall of the Pisistratids in the Athenian court. Along the way, he encounters artists, statesmen, athletes, thinkers, and lovers, including the likes of Pythagoras and Aischylos. Using the singer's unique perspective, Renault combines her vibrant imagination and her formidable knowledge of history to establish a sweeping, resilient vision of a golden century.
256 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1978
89 people are currently reading
2,174 people want to read
About the author
Mary Renault
25 books1,585 followersMary Renault was an English writer best known for her historical novels set in Ancient Greece. In addition to vivid fictional portrayals of Theseus, Socrates, Plato and Alexander the Great, she wrote a non-fiction biography of Alexander.
Her historical novels are all set in ancient Greece. They include a pair of novels about the mythological hero Theseus and a trilogy about the career of Alexander the Great. In a sense, The Charioteer (1953), the story of two young gay servicemen in the 1940s who try to model their relationship on the ideals expressed in Plato's Phaedrus and Symposium, is a warm-up for Renault's historical novels. By turning away from the 20th century and focusing on stories about male lovers in the warrior societies of ancient Greece, Renault no longer had to deal with homosexuality and anti-gay prejudice as social "problems". Instead she was free to focus on larger ethical and philosophical concerns, while examining the nature of love and leadership. The Charioteer could not be published in the U.S. until 1959, after the success of The Last of the Wine proved that American readers and critics would accept a serious gay love story.
Her historical novels are all set in ancient Greece. They include a pair of novels about the mythological hero Theseus and a trilogy about the career of Alexander the Great. In a sense, The Charioteer (1953), the story of two young gay servicemen in the 1940s who try to model their relationship on the ideals expressed in Plato's Phaedrus and Symposium, is a warm-up for Renault's historical novels. By turning away from the 20th century and focusing on stories about male lovers in the warrior societies of ancient Greece, Renault no longer had to deal with homosexuality and anti-gay prejudice as social "problems". Instead she was free to focus on larger ethical and philosophical concerns, while examining the nature of love and leadership. The Charioteer could not be published in the U.S. until 1959, after the success of The Last of the Wine proved that American readers and critics would accept a serious gay love story.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 126 reviews
February 5, 2022
Rating: 4* of five
The Publisher Says: In the story of the great lyric poet Simonides, Mary Renault brings alive a time in Greece when tyrants kept an unsteady rule and poetry, music, and royal patronage combined to produce a flowering of the arts.
Born into a stern farming family on the island of Keos, Simonides escapes his harsh childhood through a lucky apprenticeship with a renowned Ionian singer. As they travel through 5th century B.C. Greece, Simonides learns not only how to play the kithara and compose poetry, but also how to navigate the shifting alliances surrounding his rich patrons. He is witness to the Persian invasion of Ionia, to the decadent reign of the Samian pirate king Polykrates, and to the fall of the Pisistratids in the Athenian court. Along the way, he encounters artists, statesmen, athletes, thinkers, and lovers, including the likes of Pythagoras and Aischylos. Using the singer's unique perspective, Renault combines her vibrant imagination and her formidable knowledge of history to establish a sweeping, resilient vision of a golden century.
My Review: This book was a re-read, I feel sure, since I was hooked on her stuff in the Seventies...yet I felt curiously unfamiliar with the book. I recalled some scenes, such as Simonides returning from home to rejoin his master Kleobis in their Samian exile; I found a lot of the book to be less clear in my mind than most I've read before and choose to re-read.
I put this down to the fact that as I was reading it in 1978 or 1979, I was disappointed that the main character wasn't gay and wasn't even very excitingly drawn. (Can you tell I was a youth who loved the Alexander novels, The Bull from the Sea, The King Must Die, The Persian Boy? Especially The Persian Boy, quite salacious!)
But, in the end, as a fifty-year-old who's tastes have matured (ha), I liked this book quite a lot. It was a lovely tale of how the world has always judged others by their looks and not their deeds or talents. It presents itself as a harmless historical novel, and examines human nature minutely, unsparingly, and with what can only be called a jaundiced eye. Renault was clearly irritated at the follies of mankind. It shows in such lines as this, spoken by Simonides in his old age: "I have never desired young maids, preferrinig ripe fruit to green; maybe it is because I feared their laughter when I was a boy." (p262, Pantheon hardcover edition 1978)
Still scared of the masses. Still subject to the fears and foibles of youth. Wiser? Renault is too good a writer to make you take her view. She tells her story, and leaves you to take her meanings.
Sheer pleasure, friends, and all too seldom met, when a storyteller trusts you to read, and read again, and reach your own conclusions. Read it and conclude, and you won't be sorry.
The Publisher Says: In the story of the great lyric poet Simonides, Mary Renault brings alive a time in Greece when tyrants kept an unsteady rule and poetry, music, and royal patronage combined to produce a flowering of the arts.
Born into a stern farming family on the island of Keos, Simonides escapes his harsh childhood through a lucky apprenticeship with a renowned Ionian singer. As they travel through 5th century B.C. Greece, Simonides learns not only how to play the kithara and compose poetry, but also how to navigate the shifting alliances surrounding his rich patrons. He is witness to the Persian invasion of Ionia, to the decadent reign of the Samian pirate king Polykrates, and to the fall of the Pisistratids in the Athenian court. Along the way, he encounters artists, statesmen, athletes, thinkers, and lovers, including the likes of Pythagoras and Aischylos. Using the singer's unique perspective, Renault combines her vibrant imagination and her formidable knowledge of history to establish a sweeping, resilient vision of a golden century.
My Review: This book was a re-read, I feel sure, since I was hooked on her stuff in the Seventies...yet I felt curiously unfamiliar with the book. I recalled some scenes, such as Simonides returning from home to rejoin his master Kleobis in their Samian exile; I found a lot of the book to be less clear in my mind than most I've read before and choose to re-read.
I put this down to the fact that as I was reading it in 1978 or 1979, I was disappointed that the main character wasn't gay and wasn't even very excitingly drawn. (Can you tell I was a youth who loved the Alexander novels, The Bull from the Sea, The King Must Die, The Persian Boy? Especially The Persian Boy, quite salacious!)
But, in the end, as a fifty-year-old who's tastes have matured (ha), I liked this book quite a lot. It was a lovely tale of how the world has always judged others by their looks and not their deeds or talents. It presents itself as a harmless historical novel, and examines human nature minutely, unsparingly, and with what can only be called a jaundiced eye. Renault was clearly irritated at the follies of mankind. It shows in such lines as this, spoken by Simonides in his old age: "I have never desired young maids, preferrinig ripe fruit to green; maybe it is because I feared their laughter when I was a boy." (p262, Pantheon hardcover edition 1978)
Still scared of the masses. Still subject to the fears and foibles of youth. Wiser? Renault is too good a writer to make you take her view. She tells her story, and leaves you to take her meanings.
Sheer pleasure, friends, and all too seldom met, when a storyteller trusts you to read, and read again, and reach your own conclusions. Read it and conclude, and you won't be sorry.
November 3, 2024
I said, “We shall come back again. All that I know of Athens tells me so. A city is not as great as its rulers only. It is as great as its gods. I have served them most; and I think the city knows it.”
“And its heroes,” said the boy. “You have sung them too. Perhaps it was because of you that he died so bravely.” He was feeling better now, and wanted to give some comfort back to me, in return for mine to him. “You sang it, and he did it. Have you thought of that?”
Another great trip to Ancient Greece, this time in the age of Peisistratids' tyrant rule of Athens.
This is a quiet and restrained story, especially compared to other Renault's epics, told by the great poet Simonides of Keos. He is an observer of history more than a participant. Because of that it can potentially be boring and that is why I won't recommend to start your acquaintance with Mary Renault with this one. But if you're already her fan and Ancient Greek history fascinates you, there's nobody like Renault.
September 27, 2015
If you want to visit ancient Greece, Mary Renault is the perfect tour guide. She can take known facts, make logical conclusions based on them, and weave both into a magic carpet that transports you to a living era, not a long lost one.
In The Praise Singer, we enter the world of Simonides the poet, 83 years old and reflecting about his life. He is a bit cranky at first, complaining that no one can remember songs anymore without writing them down, the way his young (40 years or so) nephew does. Of course in his day and earlier, a poet's memory was his meal ticket, so it was easy to understand his complaint here. Technology makes people nervous no matter the era.
Simonides was from the island of Ceos (now written as Keos) and he says the island was "stern": there were strict laws about behavior, dress and all sorts of things, but it is a lie that a man must take hemlock at age sixty. That was only in the old seige when the warriors had to be kept alive. Nowadays, it is just considered good manners. He spent his final years in Sicily and although he had other reasons for that choice, I would have to agree with him that Ceos was 'stern'!
We follow Simonides from youngster on the stern island to renowned poet in Athens, and are caught up in a swirl of history, watching intrigues and learning what may well have been the true back stories to many events that since those days have become legendary. I visited wiki a lot while reading this book, because as the story went along I became curious about nearly everything that was mentioned. The people were nearly all historical people, not merely created to fill out the tale (although there were of necessity a few such, they felt as real as the others and who's to say they did not actually exist?). Here is the wiki link for Simonides https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simonid...
Besides the story of one man's life, this is a story of the development of a country. We see ancient Greece on its way to the Classical Greece most of us think about when we hear the name. I like to read about people becoming who they are meant to be, and to see a bit of the same type of development in an entire country was fascinating. This book may not be as well known as others Renault wrote about ancient Greece, but it definitely deserves our attention.
In The Praise Singer, we enter the world of Simonides the poet, 83 years old and reflecting about his life. He is a bit cranky at first, complaining that no one can remember songs anymore without writing them down, the way his young (40 years or so) nephew does. Of course in his day and earlier, a poet's memory was his meal ticket, so it was easy to understand his complaint here. Technology makes people nervous no matter the era.
Simonides was from the island of Ceos (now written as Keos) and he says the island was "stern": there were strict laws about behavior, dress and all sorts of things, but it is a lie that a man must take hemlock at age sixty. That was only in the old seige when the warriors had to be kept alive. Nowadays, it is just considered good manners. He spent his final years in Sicily and although he had other reasons for that choice, I would have to agree with him that Ceos was 'stern'!
We follow Simonides from youngster on the stern island to renowned poet in Athens, and are caught up in a swirl of history, watching intrigues and learning what may well have been the true back stories to many events that since those days have become legendary. I visited wiki a lot while reading this book, because as the story went along I became curious about nearly everything that was mentioned. The people were nearly all historical people, not merely created to fill out the tale (although there were of necessity a few such, they felt as real as the others and who's to say they did not actually exist?). Here is the wiki link for Simonides https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simonid...
Besides the story of one man's life, this is a story of the development of a country. We see ancient Greece on its way to the Classical Greece most of us think about when we hear the name. I like to read about people becoming who they are meant to be, and to see a bit of the same type of development in an entire country was fascinating. This book may not be as well known as others Renault wrote about ancient Greece, but it definitely deserves our attention.
February 1, 2013
3.5 – 4 stars
Mary Renault’s _The Praise Singer_ is another highly enjoyable visit to the world of ancient Greece. This time we have left the heroic age of her consummate Theseus series (The King Must Die and The Bull from the Sea) and entered the early classical period of Athens during the reigns of the tyrant Pisistratos and his heirs as seen through the eyes of the poet Simonides. This turns out to be something of a golden age for Athens and the arts, at least according to Simonides, which lies precariously on the edge of political upheaval and, ultimately, the coming storm of the Graeco-Persian war.
Simonides, the ugly but gifted child of a wealthy landowner on the small and severe island of Keos, tells us the story of his life as he grows from a provincial outcast into a shining star in the cultural centre of the Ionian world. He is an amiable narrator, seemingly unafraid to tell the truth as he sees it, and embodies almost equal parts perceptive insight and naïve simplicity. Given that this is a first-person narrative we obviously see the events of Simonides’ world through his eyes and thus the events that make up his life are central to the story, and yet I also had the sense that however much his life may be the focus of the tale and even be a not insignificant part of the cultural centre of his world, he is still much more of an observer than a participant in what we see. What I mean by that is that while Simonides was in no way a grey or lifeless character I still felt as though it was his world, and not the character himself, that took centre stage in the story. Simonides is also never a mystery to the reader, but I think that is because he is presented as a very straightforward man, a plain-speaking one whose position on any subject is able to be known without needing to ask. This simplicity of character means that there are times that the significance of events, and especially the nuances of personalities, can be overlooked by him until he sees them in a new light after events have fallen out in an unexpected way. The fact that the story is told as a memoir by Simonides as he looks back from old age on the various events of his life lends itself nicely to this nuance of his personality. As is perhaps likely to be the case with any tale set in ancient Greece the story is something of a tragedy, but it is not so much a personal tragedy for an individual brought on by hubris (though that does certainly play a part in things, as it must) as it is a tragedy for a people and a way of life subject to the vicissitudes of time and fortune.
Renault explores many themes in this novel: the unfairness of a human nature which by default castigates ugliness and praises beauty; meditations on the nature and purpose of art as well as its abuses; the precarious nature of human society and the seemingly small, and even personal, incidents that can lead to the downfall of an entire culture; and the serenity that can be found in remaining true to oneself and one’s principles. Aside from these themes the story is worth reading simply to enjoy Renault’s fluid mastery of her prose and her vivid depiction of a long-gone world. I will admit to having enjoyed the Theseus books more, I think that was at least partially because the shading between the natural and the supernatural was still very ambiguous in those and the mythical was coinciding with the historical in a fascinating way, whereas here we are in a much more ‘modern’ and almost purely historical setting where, if the gods are not exactly disbelieved in, they are certainly treated with much more complacency. I sometimes felt as though Simonides’ point of view was occasionally a little too restrictive, though I can’t really count that as a fault since it was really an expression of effective character building and was also inherent in the format Renault chose for her tale; really this was more a case of my own desires not always coinciding with the author’s purpose.
All in all, though, this was an excellent tale that immerses the reader into a specific era of the Hellenic world with vivid characters and a quick, fluid pace. Definitely recommended to lovers of well-written historical fiction and the world of ancient Greece.
Mary Renault’s _The Praise Singer_ is another highly enjoyable visit to the world of ancient Greece. This time we have left the heroic age of her consummate Theseus series (The King Must Die and The Bull from the Sea) and entered the early classical period of Athens during the reigns of the tyrant Pisistratos and his heirs as seen through the eyes of the poet Simonides. This turns out to be something of a golden age for Athens and the arts, at least according to Simonides, which lies precariously on the edge of political upheaval and, ultimately, the coming storm of the Graeco-Persian war.
Simonides, the ugly but gifted child of a wealthy landowner on the small and severe island of Keos, tells us the story of his life as he grows from a provincial outcast into a shining star in the cultural centre of the Ionian world. He is an amiable narrator, seemingly unafraid to tell the truth as he sees it, and embodies almost equal parts perceptive insight and naïve simplicity. Given that this is a first-person narrative we obviously see the events of Simonides’ world through his eyes and thus the events that make up his life are central to the story, and yet I also had the sense that however much his life may be the focus of the tale and even be a not insignificant part of the cultural centre of his world, he is still much more of an observer than a participant in what we see. What I mean by that is that while Simonides was in no way a grey or lifeless character I still felt as though it was his world, and not the character himself, that took centre stage in the story. Simonides is also never a mystery to the reader, but I think that is because he is presented as a very straightforward man, a plain-speaking one whose position on any subject is able to be known without needing to ask. This simplicity of character means that there are times that the significance of events, and especially the nuances of personalities, can be overlooked by him until he sees them in a new light after events have fallen out in an unexpected way. The fact that the story is told as a memoir by Simonides as he looks back from old age on the various events of his life lends itself nicely to this nuance of his personality. As is perhaps likely to be the case with any tale set in ancient Greece the story is something of a tragedy, but it is not so much a personal tragedy for an individual brought on by hubris (though that does certainly play a part in things, as it must) as it is a tragedy for a people and a way of life subject to the vicissitudes of time and fortune.
Renault explores many themes in this novel: the unfairness of a human nature which by default castigates ugliness and praises beauty; meditations on the nature and purpose of art as well as its abuses; the precarious nature of human society and the seemingly small, and even personal, incidents that can lead to the downfall of an entire culture; and the serenity that can be found in remaining true to oneself and one’s principles. Aside from these themes the story is worth reading simply to enjoy Renault’s fluid mastery of her prose and her vivid depiction of a long-gone world. I will admit to having enjoyed the Theseus books more, I think that was at least partially because the shading between the natural and the supernatural was still very ambiguous in those and the mythical was coinciding with the historical in a fascinating way, whereas here we are in a much more ‘modern’ and almost purely historical setting where, if the gods are not exactly disbelieved in, they are certainly treated with much more complacency. I sometimes felt as though Simonides’ point of view was occasionally a little too restrictive, though I can’t really count that as a fault since it was really an expression of effective character building and was also inherent in the format Renault chose for her tale; really this was more a case of my own desires not always coinciding with the author’s purpose.
All in all, though, this was an excellent tale that immerses the reader into a specific era of the Hellenic world with vivid characters and a quick, fluid pace. Definitely recommended to lovers of well-written historical fiction and the world of ancient Greece.
December 24, 2015
I have no praise to sing for this one. And what a shame. Ancient history is of tremendous interest to me in both fictional and nonfictional form and, until this book, I've never found it trite and uninteresting. It's a fictional account of a real life praise singer's notably long (for the time) life of 88 years and yet the writing was so dull, so...froufrou for lack of a proper word, so distractingly heavily fraught with homoeroticism that it neither delighted nor entertained. I obsessively finish the books I start, but this one offered nothing page to page, no redeeming qualities. For a relatively short book it read tediously long too. A pleasant interesting armchair visit to a world long gone this certainly wasn't. This sort of thing definitely has an audience, quite possibly the sort of audience that enjoys incessant descriptions of male beauty over, for example, actual substance. Personally, though, waste of time.
February 25, 2024
if i was being exiled to a desert island and was only able to take with me the works of one author, of course it would be my girlfriend’s. who is not mary renault. but she may indeed be my second choice.
anyway, this is why i cannot be exiled to a desert island.
anyway, this is why i cannot be exiled to a desert island.
December 22, 2011
About four years ago, I participated in our library's adult winter reading program. It's a fun and easy contest that was started to complement the children's summer reading program that had been going on for years (at least as long as I had been taking my son to the library...and I'm sure it was well-established then). During the winter months (Jan-Feb), all one has to do is submit entries for every book read--name of book, author, and a simple rating. They hold a drawing every week of the program and winners get to select book prizes.
So...when I got a notice that I'd won in January of 2008, I looked over the books and, based on the blurb and cover and whatnot, I decided to bring The Praise Singer by Mary Renault home with me. It sounded interesting. It was historical fiction and would take me a little out of my comfort zone period-wise, but I thought that might be a good thing.
Um. Not so much. The back of book says: "Renault combines her vibrant imagination and her formidable knowledge of history to establish a sweeping, resilient vision of a golden century." Actually, she takes what ought to be an interesting story and makes it sound like a history lesson. For the most part, the writing is flat; the sentences are choppy; and I had a hard time finishing the book. I thought for a time that this was intentional--that perhaps she was trying to make it sound like it had been translated from the Greek. That was an interesting idea for about a chapter or so--after that, it was just a a distraction.
There are moments (way too brief) of what (given the praise I've read of some of her other works on Goodreads) may be her usual fluid, lyrical writing. But it's not sustained. What really grabbed me about the book was the character. I loved Simonides and really wanted to hear his story--how this "ugly duckling" (the least-favored of his father's children) turned into the swan. How he overcame a life as a herdsman to become one of the most well-known bards of his time. How he not only learns his craft, but also learns how to navigate through the shifting alliances of the time. He lives to see the Persian invasion of Ionia, the reign and overthrow of the of Polykrates, and the fall of the tyrants of the Athenian court. That was worth reading. I just wish that Renault had been more of the bard herself in this outing. Two stars. Mostly for character.
So...when I got a notice that I'd won in January of 2008, I looked over the books and, based on the blurb and cover and whatnot, I decided to bring The Praise Singer by Mary Renault home with me. It sounded interesting. It was historical fiction and would take me a little out of my comfort zone period-wise, but I thought that might be a good thing.
Um. Not so much. The back of book says: "Renault combines her vibrant imagination and her formidable knowledge of history to establish a sweeping, resilient vision of a golden century." Actually, she takes what ought to be an interesting story and makes it sound like a history lesson. For the most part, the writing is flat; the sentences are choppy; and I had a hard time finishing the book. I thought for a time that this was intentional--that perhaps she was trying to make it sound like it had been translated from the Greek. That was an interesting idea for about a chapter or so--after that, it was just a a distraction.
There are moments (way too brief) of what (given the praise I've read of some of her other works on Goodreads) may be her usual fluid, lyrical writing. But it's not sustained. What really grabbed me about the book was the character. I loved Simonides and really wanted to hear his story--how this "ugly duckling" (the least-favored of his father's children) turned into the swan. How he overcame a life as a herdsman to become one of the most well-known bards of his time. How he not only learns his craft, but also learns how to navigate through the shifting alliances of the time. He lives to see the Persian invasion of Ionia, the reign and overthrow of the of Polykrates, and the fall of the tyrants of the Athenian court. That was worth reading. I just wish that Renault had been more of the bard herself in this outing. Two stars. Mostly for character.
July 25, 2019
There is both the sense of the familiar and something that is quite a departure from her other books in Mary Renault’s The Praise Singer. The style of writing is the same; Renault’s marvellous ability to create an immersive ancient Greek world that almost feels palpable, as if the author instinctively intuits the everyday concerns and wider outlook of her characters, espousing what we might today call alien views and illuminating strange customs as though there could be nothing more natural. Renault was one of those rare writers who has always been able to whisk me off to a distant, long-forgotten world, while somehow engaging the reader in comprehending that world. Certainly, in historical fiction I’ve found few authors who seem to truly understand their subject, and I’ve had to put down far too many books where the voice was simply too modern and did not ring true.
What is surprising and fresh about The Praise Singer is that the substance is different. I’ve read Renault’s Theseus duology, and Alexander trilogy, and am now making my way through her three standalone novels set in the fifth and fourth centuries; The Praise Singer is the first, chronologically, and notable in that far from being carried by a larger-than-life hero, Renault’s protagonist is a bard, Simonides, who writes about the deeds of such figures. Other reviewers have noted that this does give the novel the feel of a history textbook dressed up in a semi-fictional (for Simonides and many of the named characters were real people) story – sugar to make the medicine go down, perhaps? I can understand such criticism, although I don’t agree entirely with it. Unless you really like your Greek poets, a reader might feel frustrated at reading about events through the perspective of a less enthralling ‘side character’ rather than directly sitting on the shoulders of the tyrants and oligarchs. I must admit to being less gripped by this novel than Renault’s aforementioned series. But Simonides is not just a conveniently long-lived eyewitness. One gets the impression that there is something of Renault herself in the depiction, a fascination on her part for a fellow story-teller.
8 out of 10
June 9, 2016
If you want a taste of what living in ancient Greece was really like then Renault is the writer to read. In this novel she eschews the heroics of Alexander and Theseus and instead focuses on the little-known epic poet/bard Simonides who sings Homer as he travels around the Greek world. He witnesses great events and introduces us to the people who make things happen, but he himself is content to sing of life rather than drive it.
Perhaps Renault's least popular Greek novel, this is a quiet, subtle book that somehow still manages to haunt once it's finished - superb.
Perhaps Renault's least popular Greek novel, this is a quiet, subtle book that somehow still manages to haunt once it's finished - superb.
January 2, 2022
“Anything can happen to anyone; I saw that in Ionia. Men born in riches have ended up washing a Persian’s floors.”
Historical fiction. Building on what little is known about sixth century BC Greece, Renault builds a sympathetic and engaging tale. Tells it as it should have been.
“He praised my ode. He was the first to mention the lines that I had liked best myself. (There is praise, after all, which makes one wonder what one did wrong, to have caught the fancy of such a fool.)”
Best read digitally with hot links, unless the reader is very familiar with ancient Greek geography, persons, and terminology. Other readers may find themselves adrift. Lyrical turns of the phrase.
'It is bitter to lose a friend to evil, before one loses him to death.'
Historical fiction. Building on what little is known about sixth century BC Greece, Renault builds a sympathetic and engaging tale. Tells it as it should have been.
“He praised my ode. He was the first to mention the lines that I had liked best myself. (There is praise, after all, which makes one wonder what one did wrong, to have caught the fancy of such a fool.)”
Best read digitally with hot links, unless the reader is very familiar with ancient Greek geography, persons, and terminology. Other readers may find themselves adrift. Lyrical turns of the phrase.
'It is bitter to lose a friend to evil, before one loses him to death.'
June 7, 2019
While Mary Renault writes very beautifully and is able to evoke ancient Greece as if you were standing in the middle of any event Simonides attends, it simply isn't that interesting a story. It's basically 2 stars for the story and 5 stars for the writing. The main issue is that nothing much happens. There is no conflict Simonides is a part of, there is emotional investment by him in anything or anyone and the entire novel then turns into a sort of collection of short stories about other character that Sim met. There a re a couple of chapters about his brother, or Polykrates and ending with the last Tyrants.
And I do not miss the point of the quasi bard being the one who sings about people, telling their stories, which makes his own story only ever standing in regard to the greatness of the songs about others and not his own. The last line in the novel puts it quite nicely, 'you sang it and he did it'. And I can appreciate the nuance and the intimate takes into the private quarters of the great men of the time period, but it simply isn't enough to string a whole bunch of those together to form a story that keeps the reader interested.
Almost all characters get replaced by new characters every other chapter or so. Everyone just comes and goes and does things and dies or leaves and then someone else comes and so forth. The only thing that really kept me invested was the simply beautiful prose by Renault. It's a boring story, but a well-written one, thus I'm looking forward to reading another novel of hers, hopefully more things happen that matter.
And I do not miss the point of the quasi bard being the one who sings about people, telling their stories, which makes his own story only ever standing in regard to the greatness of the songs about others and not his own. The last line in the novel puts it quite nicely, 'you sang it and he did it'. And I can appreciate the nuance and the intimate takes into the private quarters of the great men of the time period, but it simply isn't enough to string a whole bunch of those together to form a story that keeps the reader interested.
Almost all characters get replaced by new characters every other chapter or so. Everyone just comes and goes and does things and dies or leaves and then someone else comes and so forth. The only thing that really kept me invested was the simply beautiful prose by Renault. It's a boring story, but a well-written one, thus I'm looking forward to reading another novel of hers, hopefully more things happen that matter.
July 22, 2014
I love Mary Renault and the work she had done as an historian and novelist.
We, all of us, grow up within narrow confines of family, culture and class. The study of history and of cultural anthropology is a corrective to the limitations of our upbringing.
Renault was a homosexual living in a time and place when that was not acceptable. She made a career out of writing about another time and place when it was not only acceptable but highly idealized. Beyond that, the intimate investigation of antique Greek civilization challenges a whole host of practices our time. Renault's novels bring not only these conventions to light, objectively speaking, but also engender sympathy for the persons who held such values. And she does so within the compass of historical plausibility. People may have been actually like this, people like ourselves...
We, all of us, grow up within narrow confines of family, culture and class. The study of history and of cultural anthropology is a corrective to the limitations of our upbringing.
Renault was a homosexual living in a time and place when that was not acceptable. She made a career out of writing about another time and place when it was not only acceptable but highly idealized. Beyond that, the intimate investigation of antique Greek civilization challenges a whole host of practices our time. Renault's novels bring not only these conventions to light, objectively speaking, but also engender sympathy for the persons who held such values. And she does so within the compass of historical plausibility. People may have been actually like this, people like ourselves...
February 23, 2019
Fictional retelling of the story of Simonides, the ancient Greek lyric poet and bard. He allegedly wrote the epitaph to the fallen at Thermopylae. I've read several novels on Welsh bards of the Dark Ages; this novel was a departure for me--a bard in another time and place. Simonides tells his story from childhood, through apprenticeship to another bard to learn his trade, how he wins and keeps his fame, then the cycle starts again, with his travelling with his talented nephew as apprentice. Another of Renault's masterly works with ancient Greek theme.
September 29, 2014
I liked reading a story set in Ancient times that was not focused on a battle or a warrior.
Learning about the time and people through the perceptions of a traveling singer gave the story a different spin than I am used to. It was well written and enjoyable.
Learning about the time and people through the perceptions of a traveling singer gave the story a different spin than I am used to. It was well written and enjoyable.
November 17, 2024
I’m not usually one for historical fiction but Renault blew me away.
September 12, 2015
I don't usually read historical novels. They can be riddled with inaccuracies or simply historically otiose. This book, however, really wowed me. Renault follows the life of the ancient lyric poet, Simonides. Our historical knowledge of Simonides' life is thin, so Renault has to fill in a lot of gaps. Sometimes the events she postulates are not evidenced by our historical knowledge, but they always seem plausible within the narrative, and often also justify their absence from the historical record (e.g. a young Simonides spent time on Samos during the reign of Polycrates, but was never noticed by the tyrant or invited to perform in his court).
Large parts of the novel follow events that we couldn't possibly know, such as the details of his upbringing or his dalliance with common prostitutes. Other parts of the novel cover events that are the topic of much historical conjecture, such as the strange events surrounding the tyrannicides Harmodius and Aristogeiton. Some familiarity with ancient history and literature makes this book more fun. Seeing Cyrus the Great, Pisistratus, and Anacreon through the eyes of the narrator almost rivals the joy of getting into the head of Simonides himself.
The book gives a fair representation of many aspects of historical reality, and although it is based on scholarship that is dated by now, it still covers more than you might get from a survey of the 'great men' of the time. Those who read history usually read about the leaders and the generals, which this book doesn't ignore. But what does life look like for the traveling artist? Or for the lowly shepherd? What did an ancient festival mean to the participant? These are questions that this book tackles and its answers seem more meaningful than scholarly debates about the social function of ancient ritual.
Renault makes her characters sensible to us by endowing them with many of the psychological and social characteristics that we identify with today. In some cases this may misrepresent the past. For example, a shepherd mentions sacrificing a goat for good luck in secret because he wanted to avoid reproach from his stingy estate owner. But how could you secretly sacrifice an animal? Once it is sacrificed, you would have a lot of meat to share with the community. Did he just discard the meat like a wasteful modern? It seems implausible that there were covert sacrifices of animals as large as a goat. This is a small critique though. More often the book succeeds in painting a picture of the ancient world that makes sense to modern eyes. And those are the only eyes that we can use to view the ancient world.
Large parts of the novel follow events that we couldn't possibly know, such as the details of his upbringing or his dalliance with common prostitutes. Other parts of the novel cover events that are the topic of much historical conjecture, such as the strange events surrounding the tyrannicides Harmodius and Aristogeiton. Some familiarity with ancient history and literature makes this book more fun. Seeing Cyrus the Great, Pisistratus, and Anacreon through the eyes of the narrator almost rivals the joy of getting into the head of Simonides himself.
The book gives a fair representation of many aspects of historical reality, and although it is based on scholarship that is dated by now, it still covers more than you might get from a survey of the 'great men' of the time. Those who read history usually read about the leaders and the generals, which this book doesn't ignore. But what does life look like for the traveling artist? Or for the lowly shepherd? What did an ancient festival mean to the participant? These are questions that this book tackles and its answers seem more meaningful than scholarly debates about the social function of ancient ritual.
Renault makes her characters sensible to us by endowing them with many of the psychological and social characteristics that we identify with today. In some cases this may misrepresent the past. For example, a shepherd mentions sacrificing a goat for good luck in secret because he wanted to avoid reproach from his stingy estate owner. But how could you secretly sacrifice an animal? Once it is sacrificed, you would have a lot of meat to share with the community. Did he just discard the meat like a wasteful modern? It seems implausible that there were covert sacrifices of animals as large as a goat. This is a small critique though. More often the book succeeds in painting a picture of the ancient world that makes sense to modern eyes. And those are the only eyes that we can use to view the ancient world.
May 21, 2007
It was excellent in the last short bit, but the rest of it was just so boring. Intelligent, yes, of course, and insightful, always - Mme Renault rarely produces characters without value, but it got to the point where I was finishing the book out of a sense of devotion to the author, rather than a sincere interest in the text.
August 4, 2022
Only now discovering what a genius is Mary Renault. She succeeded in transporting me back to that Greece before Euripides, even before Pindar. This life of Simonides is about poetry, about how a singing bard lived, about family obligations and about power politics. An author everyone must read.
August 15, 2018
“Swift is the dragon-fly's darting; swifter is fortune's change.”
*
“Long after this, when I had made my name, someone from Keos asked how it was I had not come to hate my brother, to whom it must have seemed the gods had given everything, leaving nothing for me. I answered that next to having the gods' gifts ourselves, it is best to honor them. If not, one must grow to hate them; and, Zeus be my witness, I have seen what can come of that.”
*
I've been wanting to read Renault, specifically one of her Socrates or Plato books, for several years now. I had been told they were good. At first I thought it would be little better than fanfiction or some such gratuitous nonsense, but as in so many things, I found myself to be wrong. First, in reading a little bit about Renault herself who was a fairly accomplished author who faced some adversity trying to write and publish books with homosexual relationships, but eventually found an easy way to write the 10 or so books she did set in the Ancient/Classical world (among others). Second, I think in my academic fervor, for lack of a better word, I had returned to adopt the oh so beloved dismissive air of judgment against historical fiction as being “unworthy,” when in fact it was true that in the past I had enjoyed and respected at least more than one book that could rightly be labeled as such. Nonetheless, disabusing myself of both notions that Renault was a subpar author and that historical fiction a subpar genre, I decided to read The Praise Singer, of all her books, because I happened to find it at a garage sale. Thank you once again Fate for handing me the things I ought to be handed. At any rate, I probably should have read the ones about Plato first since Plato is my guy, but this one came from Fate so there's really no questioning that. And to give Fate a little credit, my first love was Homer, not Plato. And since there are no Renault books about Homer, Simonides of Keos will have to do.
So what did I think? I really enjoyed the book! For a classical/ancient/Homeric Greece fanatic like me I loved every bit of it. Contrary to what you might expect there wasn't ever a moment where I said to myself, “Bullocks! No ancient Greek would ever say that. All of this is wrong. WRONG.” or “How dare she depict x historical figure in such a manner? Disgraceful!” I recently had a much much milder reaction like this to Colm Toibin's book House of Names (which is still a very good book, check out my review). I think this book is another example of what happens when a modern novel just happens to be set in the past. Renault mines her historical resources well, but also doesn't flout them. I think she's pretty temperate when it comes to pillaging the salacious moments in history. And she transforms them into events in the life of, our narrator, Simonides, affectionately known as Sim. So as far as the protagonist, the world, the narrative frame, the chapter pacing, the historical events and figures, the setting, and the fictionalized characters-everything is spot on. I've heard that Renault's depiction of women is not so great and while I can kind of see what critics are getting at, I'm not so sure this novel has that as a prominent flaw. I would really have to read more of her oeuvre to get a feel for the criticism myself. I don't have much in the way of criticizing her prose either. It's measured, tight prose that lends itself to its protagonist. Perhaps not as flowery as I truly delight in, but not enough that I feel like ranting about it. It is pretty clever in general.
Some strengths:
The characters and their relationships to Sim are engaging and vivid. He has a difficult, to put it lightly, relationship with his father, an overbearing but silent man. And the opposite is true with his god-blessed, amiable brother. I loved when he encounters historical figures like Pythagoras, Anacreon, and Pisistratus and his sons (Hippias and Hipparchus). Heraclitus gets a noteworthy, but very brief mention.
There is some talk of poetry and composing oral poetry in a period where writing was returning to be a useful technology for poets. Simonides has a gift for memory and subscribes to the old thinking that writing things down spoils the skill of the mind to remember. There are dinner parties and symposia. There's a chariot race and choral performances. Lots of cool historical scenes like that.
I found the intrigue of the book not to be gratuitous at all, but skillfully subtle. Like so many Greek tragedies, the most climactic action scenes happen off stage.
I would recommend this book to anyone who wants to try some historical fiction set in ancient Greece. You'll get a free pseudo-history lesson about the period. And it might just inspire you to read some actual history (or at least a wiki-page or two). For classicists, you might find some details frustrating, but if you have a generous heart like me-ha!-you might just end up enjoying them like I did. The book is certainly accessible to people outside the field, as might be obvious.
The one actually serious thing (and I haven't gone on about how she uses various details of the life of Simonides that we don't know are quite true, but they're interesting. Just one example, Simonides is supposed to have invented the whole "memory palace" thing which comes up in Sim's thoughts on writing as a technology for poetry. On the whole Renault brings these details into her story well, as I've said) is that Pindar never shows up! I think she should have had a whole thing with Pindar. Coulda been great. Oh well.
Quotes:
(Sim and his father)
“All in all I had been living very well; it had been foolish to let my accounting to my father hand over me for a month beforehand. He had a way of fidgeting while I spoke, so that I felt something was coming without knowing what. I had sometimes lied to him, but only about small things for the sake of peace; and to his profit, not his loss. yet these trifles had oppressed me, almost as if I were a boy who could still be beaten, even when I had just come from Athens with gold in my belt and praise in my ears. I went home after the funeral feeling as if a heavy mortgage had been paid off.”
*
“No matter. The Sight is rare. But the bonds of souls are for all men, as for every creature. Leave, when you can, your honorable grief. I foresee that you will live long. Even before your soul departs its present habitation, his in its new one may return, and you can repay your debt to him, as he, you may be sure, repaid to you some ancient kindness. In such ways we lift each other towards the light”
~ ~
“Not ours. We look for music, first in the heavens”–he pointed to the astrolabe–”then on earth in the laws of its creatures, chiefly in man; in himself, in his dealings with his fellows, in his body politic. That is as displeasing to tyrants as a doctor’s advice to a drunkard. Well, we have work to do, which we need to pursue in peace. There is a piece of coastal land in Italy, good land unused; I traveled there to find it. My students are coming with me. He will be glad to see us go.”
--Pythagoras
*
“Long after this, when I had made my name, someone from Keos asked how it was I had not come to hate my brother, to whom it must have seemed the gods had given everything, leaving nothing for me. I answered that next to having the gods' gifts ourselves, it is best to honor them. If not, one must grow to hate them; and, Zeus be my witness, I have seen what can come of that.”
*
I've been wanting to read Renault, specifically one of her Socrates or Plato books, for several years now. I had been told they were good. At first I thought it would be little better than fanfiction or some such gratuitous nonsense, but as in so many things, I found myself to be wrong. First, in reading a little bit about Renault herself who was a fairly accomplished author who faced some adversity trying to write and publish books with homosexual relationships, but eventually found an easy way to write the 10 or so books she did set in the Ancient/Classical world (among others). Second, I think in my academic fervor, for lack of a better word, I had returned to adopt the oh so beloved dismissive air of judgment against historical fiction as being “unworthy,” when in fact it was true that in the past I had enjoyed and respected at least more than one book that could rightly be labeled as such. Nonetheless, disabusing myself of both notions that Renault was a subpar author and that historical fiction a subpar genre, I decided to read The Praise Singer, of all her books, because I happened to find it at a garage sale. Thank you once again Fate for handing me the things I ought to be handed. At any rate, I probably should have read the ones about Plato first since Plato is my guy, but this one came from Fate so there's really no questioning that. And to give Fate a little credit, my first love was Homer, not Plato. And since there are no Renault books about Homer, Simonides of Keos will have to do.
So what did I think? I really enjoyed the book! For a classical/ancient/Homeric Greece fanatic like me I loved every bit of it. Contrary to what you might expect there wasn't ever a moment where I said to myself, “Bullocks! No ancient Greek would ever say that. All of this is wrong. WRONG.” or “How dare she depict x historical figure in such a manner? Disgraceful!” I recently had a much much milder reaction like this to Colm Toibin's book House of Names (which is still a very good book, check out my review). I think this book is another example of what happens when a modern novel just happens to be set in the past. Renault mines her historical resources well, but also doesn't flout them. I think she's pretty temperate when it comes to pillaging the salacious moments in history. And she transforms them into events in the life of, our narrator, Simonides, affectionately known as Sim. So as far as the protagonist, the world, the narrative frame, the chapter pacing, the historical events and figures, the setting, and the fictionalized characters-everything is spot on. I've heard that Renault's depiction of women is not so great and while I can kind of see what critics are getting at, I'm not so sure this novel has that as a prominent flaw. I would really have to read more of her oeuvre to get a feel for the criticism myself. I don't have much in the way of criticizing her prose either. It's measured, tight prose that lends itself to its protagonist. Perhaps not as flowery as I truly delight in, but not enough that I feel like ranting about it. It is pretty clever in general.
Some strengths:
The characters and their relationships to Sim are engaging and vivid. He has a difficult, to put it lightly, relationship with his father, an overbearing but silent man. And the opposite is true with his god-blessed, amiable brother. I loved when he encounters historical figures like Pythagoras, Anacreon, and Pisistratus and his sons (Hippias and Hipparchus). Heraclitus gets a noteworthy, but very brief mention.
There is some talk of poetry and composing oral poetry in a period where writing was returning to be a useful technology for poets. Simonides has a gift for memory and subscribes to the old thinking that writing things down spoils the skill of the mind to remember. There are dinner parties and symposia. There's a chariot race and choral performances. Lots of cool historical scenes like that.
I found the intrigue of the book not to be gratuitous at all, but skillfully subtle. Like so many Greek tragedies, the most climactic action scenes happen off stage.
I would recommend this book to anyone who wants to try some historical fiction set in ancient Greece. You'll get a free pseudo-history lesson about the period. And it might just inspire you to read some actual history (or at least a wiki-page or two). For classicists, you might find some details frustrating, but if you have a generous heart like me-ha!-you might just end up enjoying them like I did. The book is certainly accessible to people outside the field, as might be obvious.
The one actually serious thing (and I haven't gone on about how she uses various details of the life of Simonides that we don't know are quite true, but they're interesting. Just one example, Simonides is supposed to have invented the whole "memory palace" thing which comes up in Sim's thoughts on writing as a technology for poetry. On the whole Renault brings these details into her story well, as I've said) is that Pindar never shows up! I think she should have had a whole thing with Pindar. Coulda been great. Oh well.
Quotes:
(Sim and his father)
“All in all I had been living very well; it had been foolish to let my accounting to my father hand over me for a month beforehand. He had a way of fidgeting while I spoke, so that I felt something was coming without knowing what. I had sometimes lied to him, but only about small things for the sake of peace; and to his profit, not his loss. yet these trifles had oppressed me, almost as if I were a boy who could still be beaten, even when I had just come from Athens with gold in my belt and praise in my ears. I went home after the funeral feeling as if a heavy mortgage had been paid off.”
*
“No matter. The Sight is rare. But the bonds of souls are for all men, as for every creature. Leave, when you can, your honorable grief. I foresee that you will live long. Even before your soul departs its present habitation, his in its new one may return, and you can repay your debt to him, as he, you may be sure, repaid to you some ancient kindness. In such ways we lift each other towards the light”
~ ~
“Not ours. We look for music, first in the heavens”–he pointed to the astrolabe–”then on earth in the laws of its creatures, chiefly in man; in himself, in his dealings with his fellows, in his body politic. That is as displeasing to tyrants as a doctor’s advice to a drunkard. Well, we have work to do, which we need to pursue in peace. There is a piece of coastal land in Italy, good land unused; I traveled there to find it. My students are coming with me. He will be glad to see us go.”
--Pythagoras
January 2, 2024
In the first read-through, this is a 3 star book. That said, this is one of those books you sort of HAVE to re-read in order to really have a grasp on what the author is trying to say. When that happens, I can see myself upping the rating quite a bit, which is pretty unusual for me.
I read a Jo Walton post on Tor about this book before I read it, and she's right on the money when she says that this is a historical fiction book for fantasy readers. The world building is so darn interesting, and even though our MC is basically there to float from major event to major event, it doesn't feel like it in the moment. You *want* the MC the move around more, just so you can keep up with the delicate political balance being discussed. ITS a neat trick, and not something a lesser author could have pulled off.
I read a Jo Walton post on Tor about this book before I read it, and she's right on the money when she says that this is a historical fiction book for fantasy readers. The world building is so darn interesting, and even though our MC is basically there to float from major event to major event, it doesn't feel like it in the moment. You *want* the MC the move around more, just so you can keep up with the delicate political balance being discussed. ITS a neat trick, and not something a lesser author could have pulled off.
June 22, 2023
I’ve read all of Mary Renault’s Ancient Greek fictions except Apollo’s Mask, and I enjoy them more as I’ve gotten older. The hardest part of reading her is she so often refers to ancient events in such an oblique manner that if you don’t know the history, you don’t know what she’s talking about. Reading her makes keeping your phone or google next to you an imperative. I don’t know if Ancient Greek history was taught more in depth in the 1930-1940’s, but I had a minor in classical history, and still hadn’t learned many of these events she discusses.
Also, she uses a more Hellenistic spelling so it took me a while to catch on that Kyros was actually the Persian King Cyrus.
Her books would be better with an informative foreword in the beginning but if you don’t mind researching as you read (which I don’t), the stories are pretty good.
Also, she uses a more Hellenistic spelling so it took me a while to catch on that Kyros was actually the Persian King Cyrus.
Her books would be better with an informative foreword in the beginning but if you don’t mind researching as you read (which I don’t), the stories are pretty good.
October 31, 2018
Classic Mary Renault: a historical novel of (early) classical Greece in the time just before the Persian invasions, filled with strong characterization, wonderfully evoked setting, lots of gay and straight eroticism, and not a ton of plot. Maybe slightly longer than it should be, but a very fun read.
July 10, 2023
I loved the way Mary Renault describes life in Ancient Greece, even though it seems a touch too romantic.
My problem with the book is that it is unfocused - until the end I thought that I was reading a story about the poet’s life, but the last few pages turned it into a story about the fall of tyranny. I wish I could follow the rest of Simonides’s life instead.
My problem with the book is that it is unfocused - until the end I thought that I was reading a story about the poet’s life, but the last few pages turned it into a story about the fall of tyranny. I wish I could follow the rest of Simonides’s life instead.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
May 17, 2022
Brilliant account of the life of the classical Greek lyric poet, Simonides.
April 18, 2024
First person narrative of the Greek poet Simonides, circa 600BC, and his account of the rule of the Pisistratos and his two tyrant sons; foundational characters in the history of Athens. Renault is one of the few historical authors who fully embraces the pre-christianity mindset, and tells her story from that fascinating vantage. This is a lesser work compared to her remarkable volumes on Theseus and Alexander, but still a joy for her fans. The story is not as epic, nor the throughline as well developed, as those works, but still this is an interesting read for Renault fans.
March 6, 2017
We lay at sundown, Aphrodite's rites performed, watching the last light shine gold on the vine around the window, sharing a flask of Thracian wine cold from the well, lazily talking.
August 15, 2016
THE PRAISE SINGER (1978) by Mary Renault is historical fiction based on the long life of Simonides, the Greek bard. The story opens in sixth-century BCE Keos, the Archaic era before the Golden Age of Athens. A teen-aged Simonides prefers to compose and sing poems than to be a shepherd on his father's prosperous farm. At a wedding he is introduced to Kleobis, a master singer. After Kleobis persuades Simonides's parents to let the boy go, Simonides takes off to learn the trade, traveling through Ionia, Samos, and Delos, to Athens. Renowned Greeks such as Pythagoras the mathematician, Anakreon the poet, Theodoros of Samos the architect, and Pisistratos of Athens and his sons also enter the narrative, told by eighty-three-year-old Simonides. The historical period sees many changes of oligarchs and tyrants, and Renault describes the social mores of everyday life and court life. Readers will also find scenes set at athletic games and chariot races as well as at festivals and processions. The Author's Note mentions that Simonides, though of independent wealth, would have had to ply his trade at court and that, though literate and numerate, he favored memorization of epics to writing them down. Besides "The Praise Singer" Renault has written several other novels set in ancient Greece.
June 26, 2015
Renault is an excellent writer. Before I read her biography of Alexander earlier this year, I'd never come across her, but she has a real knack for making history come alive. Ancient Greece isn't the easiest time to write about: the names are funny, lots of the places no longer exist, society has completely different mores and standards. It's a lot easier to make a good fist of the Middle Ages, for example. This book is the story of the bard Simonides and Renault fills out his life very convincingly and interestingly. Not much happens to him, and most of the large events happen elsewhere and simply impact on his life, which makes the fact that she's written such an engrossing tale so much more surprising. The only thing I'd criticise it for is that the ending wasn't too satisfying - I'd have liked a coda of some sort: we're introduced to Simonides in his old age and he remembers his life and then it's dropped when a big event happens and he's only about forty. I'd have liked a short chapter detailing the rest of his life, but it was a thoroughly enjoyable book.
(#28 in my Year of Reading Women)
(#28 in my Year of Reading Women)
February 25, 2011
Renault follows the life of poet (and real historical figure) Simonides of Ceos, as he lives through the reign of the Samian pirate king Polykrates and the fall of the Pisistratid dynasty in Athens. I didn't find this as enthralling as The Mask of Apollo, though I liked it. I felt that she didn't spend enough time spent with each character, so some of the famous historical figures (Aischylos and Pythagoras, for example) felt like cameos, there for the sake of being there. Renault's eye for historical detail is still penetrating, though, and conveys Simonides' life and times excellently.
September 29, 2016
I'm re-reading some of my all time favourite books at the moment and I'm on a Mary Renault binge.
I love the Archaic Period of Greek history and this book is wonderfully evocative of the period. Mary's skill as a writer has the words flow with a lyricism that very much suits the subject of the life of a famous but little known Archaic Lyric poet.
As with all her historical novels this is well researched and beautifully filled out to bring those ancient lives to full rounded realisation. A wonderful evocation of the last of the great Archaic tyrannies, the age of the Peisistratids in Athens.
I love the Archaic Period of Greek history and this book is wonderfully evocative of the period. Mary's skill as a writer has the words flow with a lyricism that very much suits the subject of the life of a famous but little known Archaic Lyric poet.
As with all her historical novels this is well researched and beautifully filled out to bring those ancient lives to full rounded realisation. A wonderful evocation of the last of the great Archaic tyrannies, the age of the Peisistratids in Athens.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 126 reviews