What do you think?
Rate this book
304 pages, Kindle Edition
First published August 14, 2018
"Jonathan had become increasingly disillusioned with living in New York. Something along the lines of: the city, New York fucking City, tedious and boring, its charms as illusory as its façade of authenticity. Its lines were too long. Everything was a status symbol and everything cost too much. There were so many on-trend consumers, standing in lines for blocks to experience a fad dessert, gimmicky art exhibits, a new retail concept store. We were all making such uninspired lifestyle choices."I definitely get the point. As exciting as it sounds to be in the city. The experience culminates to something more vacuous than invigorating. But through the quotes you can see Ma is branching out from urban living to…living. With our nonsensical, material based routines. Candace is intelligent but uninspired to do anything. She's a ne'er do well. Capable but not driven because in this tale there is no consequence to failure and very minimal benefit to success. Or rather in this tale, the benefits to success are intrinsic but the definition of success changes when the system changes. This is the system we have. If it's not what we want, why on earth is the system the way that it is? Or rather from Ma's point of view, why would we tolerate it?
"“To live in a city is to live the life that it was built for, to adapt to its schedule and rhythms, to move within the transit layout made for you during the morning and evening rush, winding through the crowds of fellow commuters. To live in a city is to consume its offerings. To eat at its restaurants. To drink at its bars. To shop at its stores. To pay its sales taxes. To give a dollar to its homeless. To live in a city is to take part in and to propagate its impossible systems. To wake up. To go to work in the morning. It is also to take pleasure in those systems because, otherwise, who could repeat the same routines, year in, year out?”
“the end begins before you are ever aware of it. it passes as ordinary.”
New York is possibly the only place in which most people have already lived, in some sense, in the public imagination, before they ever arrive.
...
I have always lived in the myth of New York more than in its reality. It is what enabled me to live there for so long, loving the idea of something more than the thing itself. But toward the end, in those weeks of walking and taking pictures, I came to know and love the thing itself.
...
To live in a city is to take part in and to propagate its impossible systems. To wake up. To go to work in the morning. It is also to take pleasure in those systems because, otherwise, who could repeat the same routines, year in, year out?
...
The first place you live alone, away from your family, he said, is the first place you become a person, the first place you become yourself.
New York has a way of forgetting you.
“To live in a city is to take part in and to propagate its impossible systems. To wake up. To go to work in the morning. It is also to take pleasure in those systems because, otherwise, who could repeat the same routines, year in, year out?”