What do you think?
Rate this book
The Plantagenet and Tudor Novels #1
The Lady of the Rivers
Goodreads Choice Award
Nominee for Readers' Favorite Historical Fiction (2011)#1 New York Times bestselling author and “queen of royal fiction” ( USA TODAY ) Philippa Gregory brings to life the story of Jacquetta, Duchess of Bedford, a woman of passion and of legend who navigated a treacherous path through the battle lines in the War of the Roses to bring her family unimaginable power.
When the young and beautiful Jacquetta is married to the older Duke of Bedford, English regent of France, he introduces her to a mysterious world of learning and alchemy. Her only friend in the great household is the duke’s squire Richard Woodville, who is at her side when the duke’s death leaves her a wealthy young widow. The two become lovers and marry in secret, returning to England to serve at the court of the young King Henry VI, where Jacquetta becomes a close and loyal friend to his new queen.
The Woodvilles soon achieve a place at the very heart of the Lancaster court, though Jacquetta has visions of the growing threat from the people of England and the danger of their royal York rivals. Jacquetta fights for her king and queen, as she sees an extraordinary and unexpected future for her daughter Elizabeth: a change of fortune, the white rose of York, and the throne of England…
When the young and beautiful Jacquetta is married to the older Duke of Bedford, English regent of France, he introduces her to a mysterious world of learning and alchemy. Her only friend in the great household is the duke’s squire Richard Woodville, who is at her side when the duke’s death leaves her a wealthy young widow. The two become lovers and marry in secret, returning to England to serve at the court of the young King Henry VI, where Jacquetta becomes a close and loyal friend to his new queen.
The Woodvilles soon achieve a place at the very heart of the Lancaster court, though Jacquetta has visions of the growing threat from the people of England and the danger of their royal York rivals. Jacquetta fights for her king and queen, as she sees an extraordinary and unexpected future for her daughter Elizabeth: a change of fortune, the white rose of York, and the throne of England…
443 pages, Hardcover
First published October 28, 2011
About the author
Philippa Gregory
141 books35.2k followersDR PHILIPPA GREGORY studied history at the University of Sussex and was awarded a PhD by the University of Edinburgh where she is a Regent and was made Alumna of the Year in 2009. She holds an honorary degree from Teesside University, and is a fellow of the Universities of Sussex and Cardiff. Philippa is a member of the Society of Authors and in 2016, was presented with the Outstanding Contribution to Historical Fiction Award by the Historical Writers’ Association. In 2018, she was awarded an Honorary Platinum Award by Neilsen for achieving significant lifetime sales across her entire book output. In 2021, she was awarded a CBE for services to literature and to her charity Gardens for the Gambia. and was elected as a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society.
She welcomes visitors to her site www.PhilippaGregory.com.
Philippa's Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/PhilippaGregoryOfficial
She welcomes visitors to her site www.PhilippaGregory.com.
Philippa's Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/PhilippaGregoryOfficial
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 4,582 reviews
January 29, 2021
“Any woman who dares to make her own destiny will always put herself in danger.”
This was my first Philippa Gregory novel, and my first historical novel this year. (Although I tried to read Outlander. But I put it aside after 200 pages because it was sexist.) I fully enjoyed this book and am super intrigued to continue this series. The British Royals and their history always sparked an interest in me and while this novel satisfied me 100%, it also made my hunger even bigger. Since my knowledge of British (or basically any) history is basically nonexistent, historical books always manage to captivate me. Since the events are real and Google knows everything it's a challenge not to look everything up right away.
Philippa Gregory's writing is fantastic, romantic and wise. There are so many beautiful quotes in this book. Since it's an adult, historical novel in English it took me a while longer to read than your typical YA story, but I still loved it lots.
I also love the portrayal of the main character and any other woman in this book. Yes, it's the 15th century and women had no rights whatsoever. But while keeping everything historically accurate, the author still managed to write a powerful, independent and intelligent woman. Jacquetta was aware that, as a woman between many power-hungry men, she needed to tread carefully, but she never lost her dignity. (Not like some other female main character, who jumped back in time, and let her husband hit her just to forgive him a second later. And that was supposedly 300 years after Jacquetta lived. Never again tell me historical accuracy needs women to be disrespected.)
The never-ending power game, the back and forth between running and ruling are somewhat tiring but that isn't Philippa Gregory's fault. These royals are incredibly stubborn and often too stupid to rule a country.
What frightens me is the sheer size of this series. I doubt that I will finish it in the next few years, but I will continue it for sure.
Find more of my books on Instagram
This was my first Philippa Gregory novel, and my first historical novel this year. (Although I tried to read Outlander. But I put it aside after 200 pages because it was sexist.) I fully enjoyed this book and am super intrigued to continue this series. The British Royals and their history always sparked an interest in me and while this novel satisfied me 100%, it also made my hunger even bigger. Since my knowledge of British (or basically any) history is basically nonexistent, historical books always manage to captivate me. Since the events are real and Google knows everything it's a challenge not to look everything up right away.
Philippa Gregory's writing is fantastic, romantic and wise. There are so many beautiful quotes in this book. Since it's an adult, historical novel in English it took me a while longer to read than your typical YA story, but I still loved it lots.
I also love the portrayal of the main character and any other woman in this book. Yes, it's the 15th century and women had no rights whatsoever. But while keeping everything historically accurate, the author still managed to write a powerful, independent and intelligent woman. Jacquetta was aware that, as a woman between many power-hungry men, she needed to tread carefully, but she never lost her dignity. (Not like some other female main character, who jumped back in time, and let her husband hit her just to forgive him a second later. And that was supposedly 300 years after Jacquetta lived. Never again tell me historical accuracy needs women to be disrespected.)
The never-ending power game, the back and forth between running and ruling are somewhat tiring but that isn't Philippa Gregory's fault. These royals are incredibly stubborn and often too stupid to rule a country.
What frightens me is the sheer size of this series. I doubt that I will finish it in the next few years, but I will continue it for sure.
Find more of my books on Instagram
May 5, 2017
I have been fascinated by the Tudors and Plantagenets most of my life. I knew the various kings and queens, as well as how they ascended to the throne. But to focus on all the women behind the scenes and then in front of the scenes was a fantastic approach. Definitely will continue this series.
The setting and the descriptions are magical. You feel transported to the time frame. You are half in a bit of shock and a bit of concern, all knowing some of this actually happened. Of course, some of it is fully made up... but to know these people were real and these women gave birth to and raised Kings and Queens. And some even became Queen themselves.
I almost wish I could be a fly on a wall some 4oo+ years ago to see what was really going on!
About Me
For those new to me or my reviews... here's the scoop: I read A LOT. I write A LOT. And now I blog A LOT. First the book review goes on Goodreads, and then I send it on over to my WordPress blog at https://thisismytruthnow.com, where you'll also find TV & Film reviews, the revealing and introspective 365 Daily Challenge and lots of blogging about places I've visited all over the world. And you can find all my social media profiles to get the details on the who/what/when/where and my pictures. Leave a comment and let me know what you think. Vote in the poll and ratings. Thanks for stopping by. Note: All written content is my original creation and copyrighted to me, but the graphics and images were linked from other sites and belong to them. Many thanks to their original creators.
The setting and the descriptions are magical. You feel transported to the time frame. You are half in a bit of shock and a bit of concern, all knowing some of this actually happened. Of course, some of it is fully made up... but to know these people were real and these women gave birth to and raised Kings and Queens. And some even became Queen themselves.
I almost wish I could be a fly on a wall some 4oo+ years ago to see what was really going on!
About Me
For those new to me or my reviews... here's the scoop: I read A LOT. I write A LOT. And now I blog A LOT. First the book review goes on Goodreads, and then I send it on over to my WordPress blog at https://thisismytruthnow.com, where you'll also find TV & Film reviews, the revealing and introspective 365 Daily Challenge and lots of blogging about places I've visited all over the world. And you can find all my social media profiles to get the details on the who/what/when/where and my pictures. Leave a comment and let me know what you think. Vote in the poll and ratings. Thanks for stopping by. Note: All written content is my original creation and copyrighted to me, but the graphics and images were linked from other sites and belong to them. Many thanks to their original creators.
September 22, 2011
I have a problem with authors thinking that they have to reach a larger mass audience once they are popular. It is comparable to a musician who “sells out”. The Lady of the Rivers certainly portrayed a dummied down storyline which started with the immediate opener. Perhaps Gregory is so popular now, that she took away much of the magic so evident in some of her earlier works to reach a wider audience.
The theme of my complaints against The Lady of the Rivers is the lack of depth. Admittedly, this novel is a fast page-turner but solely because it is easy to read and has very short chapters (several were only one page); and not because it is overly intriguing or capturing. The book is rather slow in the beginning (even by page 109, I was bored) and it was obvious that this is because Gregory didn’t have much research to include. Is it a coincidence that the latter part of the book is more interesting and not as sparse when describing the battles? Not at all. Sadly, even the events which were described appeared glossed over which relates back to the lack of depth element.
Although Jacquetta is the main character, her character development is extremely weak, to say the least. Her inner feelings and actions never felt fully disclosed and understood, making her seem very one-dimensional. Moreover, many of the other female characters also felt very demeaned and ill-described. Joan of Arc was portrayed quite foolishly and Margaret of Anjou was even more annoying than usual. Margaret of Anjou is already “known” as being villainous but at least she has drama and depth. In The Lady of the Rivers, she just comes off as a spoiled teenager in a teen film. Plus, more of the book was about Margaret of Anjou than Jacquetta. I found this all to be disappointing because none of the characters were likable or encouraged support. Imagine a star-studded ensemble cast in a movie but with a terrible plot and poor acting. That is the best way to describe this book.
Sadly, even the proposed highlights were unsatisfying. Moments in the plot which were meant to be “strong” such as Richard Woodville declaring his love to Jacquetta; were elementary, rushed, and so predictable that I actually rolled my eyes. The inescapability caused the story to be very difficult to “get into”. I have to admit, there were SOME strong points throughout but I have to judge the novel on the whole, and overall, the momentous events covered (Hundred Years War, Wars of the Roses) were barely even scraped in potential by Gregory. The Lady of the Rivers is more of a summary of these events or YA novel.
Some contradictory points were also evident. For example: the novel stressed that the Earl of Suffolk opposed Margaret’s marriage to Henry but then about a page later said that he predicted its success. Um… sure. I also have to ask, did they actually say “hi” during this time period? Jacquetta surely did in this novel. I may not be a linguistic expert but never, ever, have I come across the word “hi” in any other Plantagenet or Tudor novel and I have read countless sources. This bothered me. Also, the churching ceremony appeared to be described in the manner of the rules set forth by Margaret Beaufort which she obviously didn’t do yet at the time of this novel.
Let’s not even get into the complaint which is evident by all readers across the board: the overuse of the titles (ie. “My lord, the Duke of Bedford”).
The end of the book was the best, similarly to how the Battle of Bosworth scene at the end of The Red Queen was surely the highlight and climax. It also set the lead-in to The White Queen quite seamlessly, especially if one would want to re-read it after The Lady of the Rivers.
I will give Gregory credit where credit is due that she attempted to cover a person who doesn’t have a million biographies or sources available on her. Jacquetta is a lesser known individual and I support bringing the “underdogs” to the table. I admit that I may be a little harsh and that I shouldn’t expect a thorough novel when such little information is available. However, Gregory should have instead transversed this as a novel about Margaret of Anjou, then. I do support the effort, however.
Overall, not AS terrible as I suspected but definitely a dummied down version. Either Gregory is losing her spark or I’m just slipping out of the target market.
The theme of my complaints against The Lady of the Rivers is the lack of depth. Admittedly, this novel is a fast page-turner but solely because it is easy to read and has very short chapters (several were only one page); and not because it is overly intriguing or capturing. The book is rather slow in the beginning (even by page 109, I was bored) and it was obvious that this is because Gregory didn’t have much research to include. Is it a coincidence that the latter part of the book is more interesting and not as sparse when describing the battles? Not at all. Sadly, even the events which were described appeared glossed over which relates back to the lack of depth element.
Although Jacquetta is the main character, her character development is extremely weak, to say the least. Her inner feelings and actions never felt fully disclosed and understood, making her seem very one-dimensional. Moreover, many of the other female characters also felt very demeaned and ill-described. Joan of Arc was portrayed quite foolishly and Margaret of Anjou was even more annoying than usual. Margaret of Anjou is already “known” as being villainous but at least she has drama and depth. In The Lady of the Rivers, she just comes off as a spoiled teenager in a teen film. Plus, more of the book was about Margaret of Anjou than Jacquetta. I found this all to be disappointing because none of the characters were likable or encouraged support. Imagine a star-studded ensemble cast in a movie but with a terrible plot and poor acting. That is the best way to describe this book.
Sadly, even the proposed highlights were unsatisfying. Moments in the plot which were meant to be “strong” such as Richard Woodville declaring his love to Jacquetta; were elementary, rushed, and so predictable that I actually rolled my eyes. The inescapability caused the story to be very difficult to “get into”. I have to admit, there were SOME strong points throughout but I have to judge the novel on the whole, and overall, the momentous events covered (Hundred Years War, Wars of the Roses) were barely even scraped in potential by Gregory. The Lady of the Rivers is more of a summary of these events or YA novel.
Some contradictory points were also evident. For example: the novel stressed that the Earl of Suffolk opposed Margaret’s marriage to Henry but then about a page later said that he predicted its success. Um… sure. I also have to ask, did they actually say “hi” during this time period? Jacquetta surely did in this novel. I may not be a linguistic expert but never, ever, have I come across the word “hi” in any other Plantagenet or Tudor novel and I have read countless sources. This bothered me. Also, the churching ceremony appeared to be described in the manner of the rules set forth by Margaret Beaufort which she obviously didn’t do yet at the time of this novel.
Let’s not even get into the complaint which is evident by all readers across the board: the overuse of the titles (ie. “My lord, the Duke of Bedford”).
The end of the book was the best, similarly to how the Battle of Bosworth scene at the end of The Red Queen was surely the highlight and climax. It also set the lead-in to The White Queen quite seamlessly, especially if one would want to re-read it after The Lady of the Rivers.
I will give Gregory credit where credit is due that she attempted to cover a person who doesn’t have a million biographies or sources available on her. Jacquetta is a lesser known individual and I support bringing the “underdogs” to the table. I admit that I may be a little harsh and that I shouldn’t expect a thorough novel when such little information is available. However, Gregory should have instead transversed this as a novel about Margaret of Anjou, then. I do support the effort, however.
Overall, not AS terrible as I suspected but definitely a dummied down version. Either Gregory is losing her spark or I’m just slipping out of the target market.
February 24, 2023
Why I chose to listen to this audiobook:
1. over the years, I have read at least a dozen books by Philippa Gregory - some I really liked and some, not so much. I have read snippets about Lady Jacquetta Rivers, Henry VIII's great-grandmother, in other books. Many people believed that she was a descendant of Melusina, a female water spirit in European folklore. Occasionally she was thought of as a witch (although never outright accused of being one) because people claimed she had the ability to see visions of the future;
2. my free audiobook hold became available on Libby; and,
3. it has been quite a while since I've read any historical fiction involving British royalty.
Praises:
1. first of all, the narration by Bianca Amato is stunning! Her mature use of accents, pausing, various voices, and tone are all to be commended. She kept me riveted throughout the 19 hours!
2. beginning in 1431 with Joan of Arc's imprisonment and eventual execution, through the tumultuous reign of Henry VI and his French-born queen, Margaret of Anjou during The Hundred Years War, all the way to the beginning of the Wars of the Roses (1471), I learned a lot about historical events occurring in England and France through Jacquetta's eyes as she might have experienced them; and,
3. Gregory's descriptive prose had me feeling like I was a part of every scene. Her wording describing Joan of Arc's final moments and later, of Jacquetta's pain upon her young son's death, especially broke my heart.
Niggle:
Jacquetta was widowed after only two years of marriage to John, Duke of Bedford, and then married Sir Richard Woodville for love a few years later, bringing down her prestige quite a few notches. I found it annoying that Gregory would have Jacquetta "namedropping" by announcing herself as "Duchess of Bedford" whenever she was in a pickle, although she had been married to Woodville for several years and would have been recognized as Lady Rivers at this point.
Overall Thoughts:
Even though large parts of this story are obviously fictional, I did learn a lot about this time period and the people involved. Checking websites for more information is always a good sign of a "good read" for me.
Recommendation?
This historical fiction novel is a great introduction to early British royalty, especially during The Hundred Years War and the beginnings of the civil war between the Lancasters and the Yorks, known as The Wars of the Roses. I do highly recommend the audiobook!
1. over the years, I have read at least a dozen books by Philippa Gregory - some I really liked and some, not so much. I have read snippets about Lady Jacquetta Rivers, Henry VIII's great-grandmother, in other books. Many people believed that she was a descendant of Melusina, a female water spirit in European folklore. Occasionally she was thought of as a witch (although never outright accused of being one) because people claimed she had the ability to see visions of the future;
2. my free audiobook hold became available on Libby; and,
3. it has been quite a while since I've read any historical fiction involving British royalty.
Praises:
1. first of all, the narration by Bianca Amato is stunning! Her mature use of accents, pausing, various voices, and tone are all to be commended. She kept me riveted throughout the 19 hours!
2. beginning in 1431 with Joan of Arc's imprisonment and eventual execution, through the tumultuous reign of Henry VI and his French-born queen, Margaret of Anjou during The Hundred Years War, all the way to the beginning of the Wars of the Roses (1471), I learned a lot about historical events occurring in England and France through Jacquetta's eyes as she might have experienced them; and,
3. Gregory's descriptive prose had me feeling like I was a part of every scene. Her wording describing Joan of Arc's final moments and later, of Jacquetta's pain upon her young son's death, especially broke my heart.
Niggle:
Jacquetta was widowed after only two years of marriage to John, Duke of Bedford, and then married Sir Richard Woodville for love a few years later, bringing down her prestige quite a few notches. I found it annoying that Gregory would have Jacquetta "namedropping" by announcing herself as "Duchess of Bedford" whenever she was in a pickle, although she had been married to Woodville for several years and would have been recognized as Lady Rivers at this point.
Overall Thoughts:
Even though large parts of this story are obviously fictional, I did learn a lot about this time period and the people involved. Checking websites for more information is always a good sign of a "good read" for me.
Recommendation?
This historical fiction novel is a great introduction to early British royalty, especially during The Hundred Years War and the beginnings of the civil war between the Lancasters and the Yorks, known as The Wars of the Roses. I do highly recommend the audiobook!
January 17, 2022
3.5 Stars
I wanted to smack so many people in this book! I had a love hate relationship with the book. I couldn’t put it down at first and then I started to stress over people in the book. So many things. It was beautifully written though and I’m hiking to try to get to all if them so I can finally get to the Tudors.
Mel 🖤🐶🐺🐾
I wanted to smack so many people in this book! I had a love hate relationship with the book. I couldn’t put it down at first and then I started to stress over people in the book. So many things. It was beautifully written though and I’m hiking to try to get to all if them so I can finally get to the Tudors.
Mel 🖤🐶🐺🐾
February 15, 2016
I’ve always had a love hate relationship with Philippa Gregory. Sometimes she does what she does extraordinarily well, and sometimes she writes crap like this.
I really struggled with this one. I just found Jacquetta’s story SO uninteresting. When I was reading it I couldn’t help but wonder how better this series would have been if Margaret of Anjou had her own novel. This way another perspective of the wars would have been covered. Moreover, this isn’t even chronological with the previous two books or the one after it; it’s just a random prequel stuck in the middle. It’s strange, and, if anything, it disrupts the series.
I want more Margaret! Give me more Margaret!
This really isn’t the best reaction to have to a book of this type. If you’re immediately wishing for a different character, then you know something isn’t quite right. Jacquetta’s story had the potential to be interesting because of the suggestions of witchcraft. But, it was all too vague. The author couldn’t directly allude to the fact that she was or wasn’t a witch. Witchcraft is obviously fictional, and this is a realism novel so she couldn’t say she had magic. Nor could she say that she wasn’t because of the rumours. This resulted in a disappointing dynamic. I wish she went with either side of the picture because what we’re left is a character who doesn’t actually seem to know what she is or isn’t. It was a little bit weird.
This just needed more Margaret of Anjou. In the other books the characters view her as the villain; she is simply the “bad queen.” Only in this book does Philippa Gregory bother to show a glimpse of her story. I think it would have been incredibly interesting to see how she interpreted the events, and that way I think we would have had a fairly overall picture of the war. Well, at least from the perspective of the powerful women/queens. So far, York and the Tudor faction of the house of Lancaster have had their story told. But, Margaret of Anjou remains a quiet bystander to the events. Where is her voice? Where is her tale? Her minor part in this novel was not enough; this novel was not enough to establish her presence in this series.
A weak story when Margaret went
This book was also, undoubtedly, too long. Some of the chapters were packed out and far too long, the opening was terrible; it was the worse beginning in the series. The romance was okay. It felt secretive and at the same time realistic. But, I just didn’t care about it. It didn’t feel relevant to the major events. I wanted to see the Cousins War, the Wars of the Roses, and how it affected the lives of the overlooked women in positions of power and persuasion. This was a random tangent to the story, one that I needn’t have read. This was, definitely, the bad egg in this series.
I just felt that there was far too much wrong with this book for me to enjoy it. It lacked a lot of the politics, and conniving characters of the previous two books. It also lacked any sense of narrative drive; I had no real reason to carry on reading this after Margret left the scene. This was too unlike the rest of the series for it to feel like it was actually part of the series. Jacquetta’s characterisation was too weak and confused for it to evoke any investment. I didn’t like this book, but the rest of the series is really good. Well, except for the last book, The King’s Curse, but I’ll get to that at a later date.
The Cousin's War Series
1. The White Queen- A strong four stars
2. The Red Queen- A fair three stars
3. The Lady of the Rivers- A Margaretless two stars
I really struggled with this one. I just found Jacquetta’s story SO uninteresting. When I was reading it I couldn’t help but wonder how better this series would have been if Margaret of Anjou had her own novel. This way another perspective of the wars would have been covered. Moreover, this isn’t even chronological with the previous two books or the one after it; it’s just a random prequel stuck in the middle. It’s strange, and, if anything, it disrupts the series.
I want more Margaret! Give me more Margaret!
This really isn’t the best reaction to have to a book of this type. If you’re immediately wishing for a different character, then you know something isn’t quite right. Jacquetta’s story had the potential to be interesting because of the suggestions of witchcraft. But, it was all too vague. The author couldn’t directly allude to the fact that she was or wasn’t a witch. Witchcraft is obviously fictional, and this is a realism novel so she couldn’t say she had magic. Nor could she say that she wasn’t because of the rumours. This resulted in a disappointing dynamic. I wish she went with either side of the picture because what we’re left is a character who doesn’t actually seem to know what she is or isn’t. It was a little bit weird.
This just needed more Margaret of Anjou. In the other books the characters view her as the villain; she is simply the “bad queen.” Only in this book does Philippa Gregory bother to show a glimpse of her story. I think it would have been incredibly interesting to see how she interpreted the events, and that way I think we would have had a fairly overall picture of the war. Well, at least from the perspective of the powerful women/queens. So far, York and the Tudor faction of the house of Lancaster have had their story told. But, Margaret of Anjou remains a quiet bystander to the events. Where is her voice? Where is her tale? Her minor part in this novel was not enough; this novel was not enough to establish her presence in this series.
A weak story when Margaret went
This book was also, undoubtedly, too long. Some of the chapters were packed out and far too long, the opening was terrible; it was the worse beginning in the series. The romance was okay. It felt secretive and at the same time realistic. But, I just didn’t care about it. It didn’t feel relevant to the major events. I wanted to see the Cousins War, the Wars of the Roses, and how it affected the lives of the overlooked women in positions of power and persuasion. This was a random tangent to the story, one that I needn’t have read. This was, definitely, the bad egg in this series.
I just felt that there was far too much wrong with this book for me to enjoy it. It lacked a lot of the politics, and conniving characters of the previous two books. It also lacked any sense of narrative drive; I had no real reason to carry on reading this after Margret left the scene. This was too unlike the rest of the series for it to feel like it was actually part of the series. Jacquetta’s characterisation was too weak and confused for it to evoke any investment. I didn’t like this book, but the rest of the series is really good. Well, except for the last book, The King’s Curse, but I’ll get to that at a later date.
The Cousin's War Series
1. The White Queen- A strong four stars
2. The Red Queen- A fair three stars
3. The Lady of the Rivers- A Margaretless two stars
April 30, 2018
Ich bin durchweg positiv überrascht!
Aufgrund vieler Videos und Fotos zum Thema #makehistossexyagain in letzter Zeit hab ich mir letzten einfach mal "blind" die Mutter der Königin zugelegt. Ohne zu wissen um was es geht und jaaaaa ich bin auch nicht unbedingt sehr bewandert in der Geschichte der Rosenkriege, habe mich also völlig planlos in dieses Buch versinken können. Die ersten paar Kapitel war ich daher auch noch etwas verwirrt und überfordert von den vielen Namen und Titeln, auch wenn zu Anfang des Buches Karten und Stammbäume abgebildet sind, war da schon eine große Flut an Informationen.
Aber nach den anfänglichen Schwierigkeiten lief es dann, der Schreibstil war extrem angenehm und überraschend schnell zu lesen (hätte nie erwartet dass ich dieses doch recht dicke Buch in knapp 4 Tagen lese 😱). Auch unsere Protagonistin Jacquetta fand ich mehr als sympathisch und absolut rational in ihrem Handeln. Auch ihren zweiten Mann Richard mochte ich gerne, vor allem wie er mit seiner Frau umgeht und sein Anstand sowie seine Treue fand ich für die damalige Zeit sehr bewundernswert.
Die Handlung erstreckt sich über die Jahre 1430 bis 1464, dementsprechend viel passiert auch und man rast nur so durch die Geschehnisse. An manchen stellen hätte ich mir aber noch etwas weniger Tempo und mehr Gefühl gewünscht. Aber alles in allem hab ich jetzt wohl Philippa Gregory und die Rosenkriege für mich entdeckt und freue mich, dass dazu schon so viele Bücher erschienen sind 🏰👑🌹🥀
Aufgrund vieler Videos und Fotos zum Thema #makehistossexyagain in letzter Zeit hab ich mir letzten einfach mal "blind" die Mutter der Königin zugelegt. Ohne zu wissen um was es geht und jaaaaa ich bin auch nicht unbedingt sehr bewandert in der Geschichte der Rosenkriege, habe mich also völlig planlos in dieses Buch versinken können. Die ersten paar Kapitel war ich daher auch noch etwas verwirrt und überfordert von den vielen Namen und Titeln, auch wenn zu Anfang des Buches Karten und Stammbäume abgebildet sind, war da schon eine große Flut an Informationen.
Aber nach den anfänglichen Schwierigkeiten lief es dann, der Schreibstil war extrem angenehm und überraschend schnell zu lesen (hätte nie erwartet dass ich dieses doch recht dicke Buch in knapp 4 Tagen lese 😱). Auch unsere Protagonistin Jacquetta fand ich mehr als sympathisch und absolut rational in ihrem Handeln. Auch ihren zweiten Mann Richard mochte ich gerne, vor allem wie er mit seiner Frau umgeht und sein Anstand sowie seine Treue fand ich für die damalige Zeit sehr bewundernswert.
Die Handlung erstreckt sich über die Jahre 1430 bis 1464, dementsprechend viel passiert auch und man rast nur so durch die Geschehnisse. An manchen stellen hätte ich mir aber noch etwas weniger Tempo und mehr Gefühl gewünscht. Aber alles in allem hab ich jetzt wohl Philippa Gregory und die Rosenkriege für mich entdeckt und freue mich, dass dazu schon so viele Bücher erschienen sind 🏰👑🌹🥀
December 31, 2019
The Lady of the Rivers (The Plantagenet and Tudor Novels, #1; Cousins War #3), Philippa Gregory
The Lady of the Rivers is a 2011 historical novel by Philippa Gregory, part of her series The Cousins' War. The story is narrated by Jacquetta of Luxembourg, mother of Elizabeth Woodville, and covers the reign of the Lancastrian King Henry VI. The novel serves as a prequel to Gregory's The White Queen (2009), the story of Elizabeth's reign as Queen consort of England.
Fourteen-year-old Jacquetta, whose noble family claims descendance from the water goddess Melusine, learns the secrets of her inherited powers from her great-aunt Jehanne, the Demoiselle of Luxembourg. Jacquetta befriends Joan of Arc, who is a prisoner at her uncle's castle, but later watches in horror as Joan is burned at the stake by the English-backed church. Three years later at age 17, Jacquetta is given in marriage to John, Duke of Bedford, the uncle to King Henry VI and the English regent in France. On their wedding night, however, the Duke explains that he wishes to keep her a virgin so that she may use the powers of her family in their purest form in his alchemical experiments seeking the ability to turn iron into gold. He later dies and leaves Jacquetta a wealthy widow at 20. She and the Duke's handsome squire Richard Woodville realize that they have fallen in love and become lovers. Returning to England, they marry in secret before the king can remarry her to someone else. Exiled from court in disgrace, Jacquetta and Richard soon have their first child, Elizabeth. ...
ا. شربیانی
The Lady of the Rivers is a 2011 historical novel by Philippa Gregory, part of her series The Cousins' War. The story is narrated by Jacquetta of Luxembourg, mother of Elizabeth Woodville, and covers the reign of the Lancastrian King Henry VI. The novel serves as a prequel to Gregory's The White Queen (2009), the story of Elizabeth's reign as Queen consort of England.
Fourteen-year-old Jacquetta, whose noble family claims descendance from the water goddess Melusine, learns the secrets of her inherited powers from her great-aunt Jehanne, the Demoiselle of Luxembourg. Jacquetta befriends Joan of Arc, who is a prisoner at her uncle's castle, but later watches in horror as Joan is burned at the stake by the English-backed church. Three years later at age 17, Jacquetta is given in marriage to John, Duke of Bedford, the uncle to King Henry VI and the English regent in France. On their wedding night, however, the Duke explains that he wishes to keep her a virgin so that she may use the powers of her family in their purest form in his alchemical experiments seeking the ability to turn iron into gold. He later dies and leaves Jacquetta a wealthy widow at 20. She and the Duke's handsome squire Richard Woodville realize that they have fallen in love and become lovers. Returning to England, they marry in secret before the king can remarry her to someone else. Exiled from court in disgrace, Jacquetta and Richard soon have their first child, Elizabeth. ...
ا. شربیانی
September 6, 2011
**This review may be considered slightly spoilerish so enter at your own risk**
Lady of the Rivers is the third book in Gregory's Cousins' War series, and focuses on Jacquetta of Luxembourg. While staying in France with her uncle, Jacquetta *meets* imprisoned Joan of Arc and the two share some BFF time together with the tarot cards and the wheel of fortune. After Joan meets her unhappy end, the beauteous Jacquetta catches the eye of the powerful Duke of Bedford, uncle to young king Henry VI. Jacquetta's worries about being ravished by her older husband come to naught as he's more interested in using Jacquetta's virginal qualities to aid his experiments - experiments that have something to do with alchemy, the philosopher's stone and the unicorn. If you are scratching your head over this, rest assured I was doing the same thing. I didn't understand it then and I don't understand it now.
Her older husband eventually dies and Jacquetta waits for the King's councilers to choose another husband after her year of mourning. John's squire Richard Woodville has other ideas, and Jacquetta is willing to risk the king's wrath for the sake of true love. The marriage is a fruitful one and Jacquetta spends lots of time in the country producing one baby after another (yawn). The wheel of fortune spins again when the king marries Margaret of Anjou and Jacquetta is summoned to serve the new Queen, but that marriage isn't exactly smooth sailing, and one thing leads to another until a little dispute erupts between the houses of Lancaster and York.
That's about as much plot summary you'll get from me, I'd rather discuss the reading experience, starting with the repetitive text. The Melusine count exceeded twenty, and that's not counting the water/river/fishy woman references or the tally would be much higher. There are times when nothing much happens in Jacquetta and Richard's lives (making babies, cooling heels in Calais for a year waiting for the king to do something), and it would have served the story better just to fast forward a few years with a brief mention rather than more tedious detail on what isn't happening.
I don't understand the great need to repeat same words three times in a single sentence, over and over and over again (can't quote examples from the ARC, sorry). Then there are the mind-numbing reminders to the reader of who is who via the *as you know, Bob* method. Any time Jacquetta mentions her first husband in a conversation he is always my Lord John, Duke of Bedford. Margaret will mention her uncle in a conversation with an intimate friend as my uncle, the king of France (I think everyone at court would know that she was niece to the king of France). And Richard of York, reviled by all the Lancastrians is always always always (see, I can do things in threes) Richard Duke of York. Every time. I got it the first time, and did not need to be clubbed over the head with it :(
The characters were all rather *meh*, neither good nor bad, just incredibly uninteresting. Instead of filling us in on the politics and intrigues of the court that caused these wars, we get endless exposition on the court on progress, as well as howEdmund Beaufort Duke of Somerset dotes on Margaret of Anjou, bringing her all those sweet little presents. All in all, a very disappointing read and not one I'd recommend for those wanting more background and insight into the Wars of the Roses - there are much better choices out there with Penman's fabulous Sunne in Splendor still being the gold standard. Library only, then buy it if you love it. Two stars.
**This review is based upon a digital ARC received from Net Galley and might differ from the final edition.
Lady of the Rivers is the third book in Gregory's Cousins' War series, and focuses on Jacquetta of Luxembourg. While staying in France with her uncle, Jacquetta *meets* imprisoned Joan of Arc and the two share some BFF time together with the tarot cards and the wheel of fortune. After Joan meets her unhappy end, the beauteous Jacquetta catches the eye of the powerful Duke of Bedford, uncle to young king Henry VI. Jacquetta's worries about being ravished by her older husband come to naught as he's more interested in using Jacquetta's virginal qualities to aid his experiments - experiments that have something to do with alchemy, the philosopher's stone and the unicorn. If you are scratching your head over this, rest assured I was doing the same thing. I didn't understand it then and I don't understand it now.
Her older husband eventually dies and Jacquetta waits for the King's councilers to choose another husband after her year of mourning. John's squire Richard Woodville has other ideas, and Jacquetta is willing to risk the king's wrath for the sake of true love. The marriage is a fruitful one and Jacquetta spends lots of time in the country producing one baby after another (yawn). The wheel of fortune spins again when the king marries Margaret of Anjou and Jacquetta is summoned to serve the new Queen, but that marriage isn't exactly smooth sailing, and one thing leads to another until a little dispute erupts between the houses of Lancaster and York.
That's about as much plot summary you'll get from me, I'd rather discuss the reading experience, starting with the repetitive text. The Melusine count exceeded twenty, and that's not counting the water/river/fishy woman references or the tally would be much higher. There are times when nothing much happens in Jacquetta and Richard's lives (making babies, cooling heels in Calais for a year waiting for the king to do something), and it would have served the story better just to fast forward a few years with a brief mention rather than more tedious detail on what isn't happening.
I don't understand the great need to repeat same words three times in a single sentence, over and over and over again (can't quote examples from the ARC, sorry). Then there are the mind-numbing reminders to the reader of who is who via the *as you know, Bob* method. Any time Jacquetta mentions her first husband in a conversation he is always my Lord John, Duke of Bedford. Margaret will mention her uncle in a conversation with an intimate friend as my uncle, the king of France (I think everyone at court would know that she was niece to the king of France). And Richard of York, reviled by all the Lancastrians is always always always (see, I can do things in threes) Richard Duke of York. Every time. I got it the first time, and did not need to be clubbed over the head with it :(
The characters were all rather *meh*, neither good nor bad, just incredibly uninteresting. Instead of filling us in on the politics and intrigues of the court that caused these wars, we get endless exposition on the court on progress, as well as how
**This review is based upon a digital ARC received from Net Galley and might differ from the final edition.
March 21, 2020
I really did enjoy reading this Cousins War installment featuring Jacquetta, The Lady Rivers, even though each time I had to key the name of the book into Goodreads, I typed “The Lady of Shallott” :) I'm a sucker for that poem!
My only grizzle is that being numbered Cousins War #3, you would think that it would be following in a chronological sense after The White Queen and The Red Queen but this is not so.
Currently, the chronological order that these books should be read in is: (as shown on https://www.goodreads.com/series/5542...)
The Lady of the Rivers
The Red Queen
The White Queen
The Kingmaker's Daughter
The White Princess
The Last Rose / The King's Curse (not yet released)
NOTE - where The Last Rose fits on this list is currently unknown.
BUT - The books are numbered (and show on Goodreads) in publication order.
The White Queen (Cousins War #1)
The Red Queen (Cousins War #2)
The Lady of the Rivers (Cousins War #3)
The Kingmaker's Daughter (Cousins War #4)
The White Princess (Cousins War #5)
The King's Curse (Cousins War #6)
So if you follow the publication order, like this foolish woman here did, you're all out of order! I didn't like leaping all over the place in time. Personally, I'd have liked to read the damn series in order! Be warned about this anomaly if you haven't read this really interesting and entertaining series by Ms P Gregory yet.
Okay, grizzle over, 4★
P.S. You could not have kept me at a royal court in England in the 15th and 16th century for all the money in the world. I like my head just where it is - planted very firmly on my shoulders, thank you very much.
My only grizzle is that being numbered Cousins War #3, you would think that it would be following in a chronological sense after The White Queen and The Red Queen but this is not so.
Currently, the chronological order that these books should be read in is: (as shown on https://www.goodreads.com/series/5542...)
The Lady of the Rivers
The Red Queen
The White Queen
The Kingmaker's Daughter
The White Princess
The Last Rose / The King's Curse (not yet released)
NOTE - where The Last Rose fits on this list is currently unknown.
BUT - The books are numbered (and show on Goodreads) in publication order.
The White Queen (Cousins War #1)
The Red Queen (Cousins War #2)
The Lady of the Rivers (Cousins War #3)
The Kingmaker's Daughter (Cousins War #4)
The White Princess (Cousins War #5)
The King's Curse (Cousins War #6)
So if you follow the publication order, like this foolish woman here did, you're all out of order! I didn't like leaping all over the place in time. Personally, I'd have liked to read the damn series in order! Be warned about this anomaly if you haven't read this really interesting and entertaining series by Ms P Gregory yet.
Okay, grizzle over, 4★
P.S. You could not have kept me at a royal court in England in the 15th and 16th century for all the money in the world. I like my head just where it is - planted very firmly on my shoulders, thank you very much.
February 24, 2023
Really enjoying reading Philippa Gregory books,enjoyed Jacquetta and her relationship with the queen.fantastic read looking forward to reading her next book.
October 12, 2018
I was really looking forward to reading this and was tragically disappointed.
This was my first Philippa Gregory novel. She's written so many that I'm keen to read, as I'm fascinated by this era of history, and this was recommended as the best one to start with, so that I can read the series' chronologically. I think maybe that was a mistake.
I feel like this is more of a supplementary novel, more entertaining for those who know what comes later. This story dragged so much for me, and I just wasn't invested. Firstly, it took over 100 pages just to get to the plot described in the blurb. Then it was a tedious cycle: Baby - war - baby - war ... this woman was popping out so many kids and none of them are given the time of day so why would I care? And then the wars are so repetitive, and back and forth, and the way that it's all told just makes it so bland.
Margaret is a horrible person, and I mostly despised her. I really felt like Jacquetta and Richard were on the wrong side the entire time. They're fighting for terrible people, and I get that, but it's such a stated fact, there's no emotional investment so you kinda just question why?
I think the way the story is written in first person, present tense, made it completely emotionless. I felt nothing throughout this entire novel. I didn't really care who lived or died, what cities were lost or won ... zero emotional attachment from me. I wanted characters that I could really root for and admire and there were none to be found.
Overall, I'm glad to be done with this because it was just a massive disappointment. I'll continue reading the series, but I'm really hoping it improves.
This was my first Philippa Gregory novel. She's written so many that I'm keen to read, as I'm fascinated by this era of history, and this was recommended as the best one to start with, so that I can read the series' chronologically. I think maybe that was a mistake.
I feel like this is more of a supplementary novel, more entertaining for those who know what comes later. This story dragged so much for me, and I just wasn't invested. Firstly, it took over 100 pages just to get to the plot described in the blurb. Then it was a tedious cycle: Baby - war - baby - war ... this woman was popping out so many kids and none of them are given the time of day so why would I care? And then the wars are so repetitive, and back and forth, and the way that it's all told just makes it so bland.
Margaret is a horrible person, and I mostly despised her. I really felt like Jacquetta and Richard were on the wrong side the entire time. They're fighting for terrible people, and I get that, but it's such a stated fact, there's no emotional investment so you kinda just question why?
I think the way the story is written in first person, present tense, made it completely emotionless. I felt nothing throughout this entire novel. I didn't really care who lived or died, what cities were lost or won ... zero emotional attachment from me. I wanted characters that I could really root for and admire and there were none to be found.
Overall, I'm glad to be done with this because it was just a massive disappointment. I'll continue reading the series, but I'm really hoping it improves.
June 13, 2024
Re-read 2024
To let yourself know that you want something, that you yearn for it. Sometimes that’s the hardest thing to do. Because you have to have courage to know what you desire. You have to have courage to acknowledge that you are unhappy without it. And sometimes you have to find courage to know that it was your folly or your wrongdoing which lost it; before you make a spell to bring it back, you have to change yourself. That’s one of the deepest transformations that can be.
I read all the books in the Cousin's War series years ago but I couldn't resist a re-read. The story of Jacquetta and her journey from Luxembourg to England, watching events unfold at the royal court of King Henry and Margaret of Anjou was an enjoyable read.
I now see Jacquetta like Philippa Gregory does- a woman who should be much studied in history.
Philippa Gregory is another of those historical fiction writers that I believe must have time-travelled. Page by page, I was swept back into Lancaster and York. Although The Red Queen and The Kingmaker's Daughter are both tied for first as the faves of this series, I loved the unexplored territory of the life of Jacquetta.
Review published 13/06/24
To let yourself know that you want something, that you yearn for it. Sometimes that’s the hardest thing to do. Because you have to have courage to know what you desire. You have to have courage to acknowledge that you are unhappy without it. And sometimes you have to find courage to know that it was your folly or your wrongdoing which lost it; before you make a spell to bring it back, you have to change yourself. That’s one of the deepest transformations that can be.
I read all the books in the Cousin's War series years ago but I couldn't resist a re-read. The story of Jacquetta and her journey from Luxembourg to England, watching events unfold at the royal court of King Henry and Margaret of Anjou was an enjoyable read.
I now see Jacquetta like Philippa Gregory does- a woman who should be much studied in history.
Philippa Gregory is another of those historical fiction writers that I believe must have time-travelled. Page by page, I was swept back into Lancaster and York. Although The Red Queen and The Kingmaker's Daughter are both tied for first as the faves of this series, I loved the unexplored territory of the life of Jacquetta.
Review published 13/06/24
April 27, 2012
Where I got the book: review galley from NetGalley.
Philippa Gregory takes a step back farther in time with The Lady of the Rivers; after exploring the lives of the various Tudor women in a succession of novels, she now dives into the rich and complicated history of the Wars of the Roses. This was a period in the 1400s in which two branches of the Plantagenet royal family struggled for power over England (and various bits of France).
The protagonist in The Lady of the Rivers is Jacquetta of Luxembourg, who is not generally a well-known historical figure. The story covers Jacquetta's life from adolescence to middle age, and Gregory fans will realize that it ends with the beginning of Gregory's 2009 novel The White Queen.
I've been critical of Gregory's kings-and-queens novels in the past, mostly because I would like to see more pure fiction from her, but I enjoyed The Lady of the Rivers. As usual, though, I did not find the protagonist particularly interesting; I felt that she was an observer of history rather than being a participant in it. Of course, in those days a noblewoman's role was to run the house and lands while the men fought (Jacquetta does plenty of that) and produce children (Jacquetta had sixteen). So maybe the impression of passivity that I received was due to the necessity of sticking fairly close to historical fact. The bits of white magic that all of Gregory's heroines inevitably indulge in do not come across as exciting enough to compensate me for the lack of action.
And yet there were some definite improvements over recent novels in the series. For one thing, Jacquetta gets to travel around quite a bit, and even though she's not in the battles I did get a better sense of being near to the action than I usually do. And the supporting cast was good; I particularly liked Margaret of Anjou, Henry VI's queen, and I found the account of Henry VI's mental illness compelling. There were several other memorable characters; in fact, I now understand the Wars of the Roses a whole lot better. So if you read historical fiction for the history, you'll be satisfied.
I'm not going to say much about Gregory's writing idiosyncracies here, since what I was reading was a galley (which had not even been edited for capitalization and paragraph layout; that surprised me). I desperately want to send her the gift of a big bag of semicolons, though. Gregory is the undisputed queen of the comma splice.
One last comment; I have been reading Gregory for years, and am fascinated to note that the novels are getting less sensual as time goes on. This one was PG-rated.
Overall impression: a good Gregory, and recommended for lovers of English history.
Philippa Gregory takes a step back farther in time with The Lady of the Rivers; after exploring the lives of the various Tudor women in a succession of novels, she now dives into the rich and complicated history of the Wars of the Roses. This was a period in the 1400s in which two branches of the Plantagenet royal family struggled for power over England (and various bits of France).
The protagonist in The Lady of the Rivers is Jacquetta of Luxembourg, who is not generally a well-known historical figure. The story covers Jacquetta's life from adolescence to middle age, and Gregory fans will realize that it ends with the beginning of Gregory's 2009 novel The White Queen.
I've been critical of Gregory's kings-and-queens novels in the past, mostly because I would like to see more pure fiction from her, but I enjoyed The Lady of the Rivers. As usual, though, I did not find the protagonist particularly interesting; I felt that she was an observer of history rather than being a participant in it. Of course, in those days a noblewoman's role was to run the house and lands while the men fought (Jacquetta does plenty of that) and produce children (Jacquetta had sixteen). So maybe the impression of passivity that I received was due to the necessity of sticking fairly close to historical fact. The bits of white magic that all of Gregory's heroines inevitably indulge in do not come across as exciting enough to compensate me for the lack of action.
And yet there were some definite improvements over recent novels in the series. For one thing, Jacquetta gets to travel around quite a bit, and even though she's not in the battles I did get a better sense of being near to the action than I usually do. And the supporting cast was good; I particularly liked Margaret of Anjou, Henry VI's queen, and I found the account of Henry VI's mental illness compelling. There were several other memorable characters; in fact, I now understand the Wars of the Roses a whole lot better. So if you read historical fiction for the history, you'll be satisfied.
I'm not going to say much about Gregory's writing idiosyncracies here, since what I was reading was a galley (which had not even been edited for capitalization and paragraph layout; that surprised me). I desperately want to send her the gift of a big bag of semicolons, though. Gregory is the undisputed queen of the comma splice.
One last comment; I have been reading Gregory for years, and am fascinated to note that the novels are getting less sensual as time goes on. This one was PG-rated.
Overall impression: a good Gregory, and recommended for lovers of English history.
August 13, 2017
Hands down, Philippa Gregory is my favorite English historical novelist. She brings the era she is exploring to life and always tells the story from such a personal point of view that you feel you are, or at least know, the main character. I also love that she takes historical women who have been literally overlooked by historians and brings their stories, their stuggles, into the light.
The Lady of the Rivers is Jacquetta Woodville, lady-in-waiting to Margaret of Anjou, who becomes the Queen of England in 1445. Jacquetta is a fascinating person, wise and true and regal. She is a direct descendant of Melusina, the water goddess of legend, and this lineage gives her some powers that separate her from the everyday people around her. This aspect of the story is handled beautifully and without anything that makes it seem preposterous or unrealistic.
If there is anything more interesting or captivating (and sometimes more confusing) than the British royal house during the Wars of the Roses and the Tudor eras, I do not know what it would be. These times are gold in Gregory’s hands. Like some of her characters, she practices alchemy, she spins gold from paper pages.
I am gradually working my way through her canon, and having read them completely out of order, I keep wanting to begin at the beginning and read them chronologically. If God grants me the time, I will not grudge starting over. They are well-worth a second read.
The Lady of the Rivers is Jacquetta Woodville, lady-in-waiting to Margaret of Anjou, who becomes the Queen of England in 1445. Jacquetta is a fascinating person, wise and true and regal. She is a direct descendant of Melusina, the water goddess of legend, and this lineage gives her some powers that separate her from the everyday people around her. This aspect of the story is handled beautifully and without anything that makes it seem preposterous or unrealistic.
If there is anything more interesting or captivating (and sometimes more confusing) than the British royal house during the Wars of the Roses and the Tudor eras, I do not know what it would be. These times are gold in Gregory’s hands. Like some of her characters, she practices alchemy, she spins gold from paper pages.
I am gradually working my way through her canon, and having read them completely out of order, I keep wanting to begin at the beginning and read them chronologically. If God grants me the time, I will not grudge starting over. They are well-worth a second read.
May 22, 2018
The Lady of the Rivers was an okay kind of book. After watching the TV shows The White Queen and The White Princess I have been kind of dying to read this series. However, this book was just an okay kind of beginning to it.
Jacquetta of Luxembourg was a pretty interesting character to read about. Well, after so many chapters because the first half of this book was completely boring. Which is why I rated it what I did. It did start to pick up a little bit better after the half way point.. but there wasn't much to this book if I'm being honest.
The Lady of the Rivers was written like a diary. Again, it was mostly boring in my eyes. Probably because I've read some books that were kind of a diary and they were so much better. Maybe it's the whole genre being different than I usually read or just that there's not a lot of information out there about Jacquetta.. but I was just mostly bored in this book.
When Jacquetta was a young girl she married the duke of Bedford. From this connection, she was instantly dragged into the war of the roses. Cousins battling against one another for power and land. I didn't really like Jacquetta in the beginning of the book, but once the cousin war and more people were introduced I started to like her a little bit more.
Overall, it was okay. I wish this book was a little bit better so that I could be more excited about diving into the second book but I'll take what I can get at this point.
Jacquetta of Luxembourg was a pretty interesting character to read about. Well, after so many chapters because the first half of this book was completely boring. Which is why I rated it what I did. It did start to pick up a little bit better after the half way point.. but there wasn't much to this book if I'm being honest.
The Lady of the Rivers was written like a diary. Again, it was mostly boring in my eyes. Probably because I've read some books that were kind of a diary and they were so much better. Maybe it's the whole genre being different than I usually read or just that there's not a lot of information out there about Jacquetta.. but I was just mostly bored in this book.
When Jacquetta was a young girl she married the duke of Bedford. From this connection, she was instantly dragged into the war of the roses. Cousins battling against one another for power and land. I didn't really like Jacquetta in the beginning of the book, but once the cousin war and more people were introduced I started to like her a little bit more.
Overall, it was okay. I wish this book was a little bit better so that I could be more excited about diving into the second book but I'll take what I can get at this point.
July 15, 2022
"Lumea nu poate suporta femei care gandesc si simt. Femei ca mine."
Este cel de-al treilea roman din ciclul "Razboiul celor Doua Roze". Daca in prima parte am urmarit ascensiunea Reginei Elizabeth Woodville, iar in cea de-a doua parte am fost martori la destinul Reginei Rosii Margaret Beaufort, in cea de-a treia parte vom afla povestea superbei Jacquetta de Luxemburg, mama Elizabethei Woodville. O mare doamna, misterioasa, inteligenta, cu puteri mistice mostenite, se credea, de la insasi zeita sirena Melusina, a fost o femeie extraordinara cu un destin pe masura. Am remarcat-o inca din prima parte a trilogiei si m-am bucurat foarte mult ca am reusit sa citesc intr-un final si povestea ei.
Ca si la celelalte carti avem o harta cu arborele genealogic al Jacquettei, o harta a razboiului dintre cele doua Roze si una a Frantei din 1430, ca sa ne putem da seama care erau teritoriile franceze si engleze.
Actiunea debuteaza in 1430 la castelul Beaurevoir unde Jacquetta, fetita fiind, o cunoaste pe Ioana d'Arc care este ascunsa de englezi de catre stramatusa ei. Din pacate aceasta moare si astfel Ioana ajunge pe rug sub ochii Jacquettei, ea intelegand care este uneori soarta unor femei alese.
La 14 ani ducele de Bedford este fermecat de frumusetea ei la prima vedere si astfel ea ajunge ducesa de Bedford, prima doamna din Franta si din Anglia. Casnicia insa este neconsumata, caci sotul ei o luase doar pentru a-i folosi puterile mistice mostenite de la Melusina, dorind sa dezlege misterele alchimiei cu ajutorul ei.
Dupa ce ramane vaduva, constienta ca-si va pierde averea si pozitia, se casatoreste cu Richard Woodville, scutierul fostului ei sot. Casnicia este una ca de vis, ei iubindu-se enorm, iar ea nascandu-i o gramada de copii. Nu regreta niciodata ca renunta la statutul de ducesa si la avere pentru aceasta casnicie splendida.
Cu timpul este rechemata la curte unde va fi iarasi prima doamna, sfatuind-o pe Regina Margareta de Anjou. Cand casa Lancaster pierde tronul si Edward York devine rege, printr-o vraja a Melusinei Jacquetta isi pune fata pe tron.
Romanul mi-a placut si am selectat si o declaratie de dragoste a lui Richard Woodville care mi s-a parut frumoasa : "... te-am iubit onorabil, asa cum trebuie sa-si iubeasca un cavaler stapana, si te-am iubit patimas, cum iubeste un barbat o femeie. Iar acum, inainte sa plec de langa tine, vreau sa-ti spun ca te iubesc, te iubesc..."
Am retinut si o vraja in legatura cu sexul copilului nenascut, care se practica indeosebi la tara: se leaga verigheta de o ata si se tine deasupra pantecului, daca se roteste de la stanga la dreapta e baiat. Daca se roteste de la dreapta la stanga e fata.
In incheiere atasez cateva citate relevante care mi-au ramas in minte:
"Trebuie sa invatam a privi cu indiferenta si nenorocirea, si marele noroc. Asta e intelepciunea."
"De regula, cand un barbat intrezareste un mister, e mai bine sa-l lasi nedumerit. Nimanui nu-i plac femeile inteligente. "
"...dar vei fi ca toate femeile: stinghera in lumea barbatilor. Vei face tot ce-ti va sta in putinta - poate vei dobandi putere printr-o casatorie buna sau o mostenire buna -, dar vei descoperi mereu ca drumul de sub talpile tale e dur.
"Esti doamna mea si iubirea mea. Te voi feri de primejdie, Jacquetta! Nu se va intampla niciodata sa ma cauti si sa descoperi ca am disparut!"
"Vei putea avea orice va fi dispus sotul tau sa-ti ofere. Si vei invata in scurt timp cum sa-l convingi."
"Daca gasesti perechea perfecta, o pastrezi, spune el cu blandete. Cand te-am vazut prima oara, am stiut ca esti femeia pe care mi-o doresc pentru tot restul vietii."
"In aceste vremuri, cunoasterea e un lucru care, la fel ca multe altele, trebuie ascuns."
Este cel de-al treilea roman din ciclul "Razboiul celor Doua Roze". Daca in prima parte am urmarit ascensiunea Reginei Elizabeth Woodville, iar in cea de-a doua parte am fost martori la destinul Reginei Rosii Margaret Beaufort, in cea de-a treia parte vom afla povestea superbei Jacquetta de Luxemburg, mama Elizabethei Woodville. O mare doamna, misterioasa, inteligenta, cu puteri mistice mostenite, se credea, de la insasi zeita sirena Melusina, a fost o femeie extraordinara cu un destin pe masura. Am remarcat-o inca din prima parte a trilogiei si m-am bucurat foarte mult ca am reusit sa citesc intr-un final si povestea ei.
Ca si la celelalte carti avem o harta cu arborele genealogic al Jacquettei, o harta a razboiului dintre cele doua Roze si una a Frantei din 1430, ca sa ne putem da seama care erau teritoriile franceze si engleze.
Actiunea debuteaza in 1430 la castelul Beaurevoir unde Jacquetta, fetita fiind, o cunoaste pe Ioana d'Arc care este ascunsa de englezi de catre stramatusa ei. Din pacate aceasta moare si astfel Ioana ajunge pe rug sub ochii Jacquettei, ea intelegand care este uneori soarta unor femei alese.
La 14 ani ducele de Bedford este fermecat de frumusetea ei la prima vedere si astfel ea ajunge ducesa de Bedford, prima doamna din Franta si din Anglia. Casnicia insa este neconsumata, caci sotul ei o luase doar pentru a-i folosi puterile mistice mostenite de la Melusina, dorind sa dezlege misterele alchimiei cu ajutorul ei.
Dupa ce ramane vaduva, constienta ca-si va pierde averea si pozitia, se casatoreste cu Richard Woodville, scutierul fostului ei sot. Casnicia este una ca de vis, ei iubindu-se enorm, iar ea nascandu-i o gramada de copii. Nu regreta niciodata ca renunta la statutul de ducesa si la avere pentru aceasta casnicie splendida.
Cu timpul este rechemata la curte unde va fi iarasi prima doamna, sfatuind-o pe Regina Margareta de Anjou. Cand casa Lancaster pierde tronul si Edward York devine rege, printr-o vraja a Melusinei Jacquetta isi pune fata pe tron.
Romanul mi-a placut si am selectat si o declaratie de dragoste a lui Richard Woodville care mi s-a parut frumoasa : "... te-am iubit onorabil, asa cum trebuie sa-si iubeasca un cavaler stapana, si te-am iubit patimas, cum iubeste un barbat o femeie. Iar acum, inainte sa plec de langa tine, vreau sa-ti spun ca te iubesc, te iubesc..."
Am retinut si o vraja in legatura cu sexul copilului nenascut, care se practica indeosebi la tara: se leaga verigheta de o ata si se tine deasupra pantecului, daca se roteste de la stanga la dreapta e baiat. Daca se roteste de la dreapta la stanga e fata.
In incheiere atasez cateva citate relevante care mi-au ramas in minte:
"Trebuie sa invatam a privi cu indiferenta si nenorocirea, si marele noroc. Asta e intelepciunea."
"De regula, cand un barbat intrezareste un mister, e mai bine sa-l lasi nedumerit. Nimanui nu-i plac femeile inteligente. "
"...dar vei fi ca toate femeile: stinghera in lumea barbatilor. Vei face tot ce-ti va sta in putinta - poate vei dobandi putere printr-o casatorie buna sau o mostenire buna -, dar vei descoperi mereu ca drumul de sub talpile tale e dur.
"Esti doamna mea si iubirea mea. Te voi feri de primejdie, Jacquetta! Nu se va intampla niciodata sa ma cauti si sa descoperi ca am disparut!"
"Vei putea avea orice va fi dispus sotul tau sa-ti ofere. Si vei invata in scurt timp cum sa-l convingi."
"Daca gasesti perechea perfecta, o pastrezi, spune el cu blandete. Cand te-am vazut prima oara, am stiut ca esti femeia pe care mi-o doresc pentru tot restul vietii."
"In aceste vremuri, cunoasterea e un lucru care, la fel ca multe altele, trebuie ascuns."
September 6, 2011
In The Lady of the Rivers, Philippa Gregory continues her Wars of the Roses saga (I balk at calling it the Cousins’ War) with the story of Jacquetta, Duchess of Bedford, mother to Edward IV’s queen, Elizabeth Woodville. Like her daughter Elizabeth, Jacquetta is possessed of supernatural powers.
First, I did strongly appreciate one aspect of this novel: the sympathetic portrayal of Jacquetta and the Woodville family. Most novels about the Wars of the Roses portray the Woodvilles negatively, to the point of making them into cardboard villains, and it was refreshing to see Gregory take a different tack.
Unfortunately, there’s not much else about this book I liked. Jacquetta’s first husband, John, Duke of Bedford, who served as Regent of France during Henry VI’s minority, was an interesting man faced with the very difficult task of holding on to England’s possessions in France while at the same time dealing with political infighting in England. Gregory turns him into a rather pathetic sort who marries pretty young Jacquetta only to make use of her gift of seeing into the future. Other important players of the time, such as John’s younger brother, Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester, and his ambitious wife, Eleanor, make appearances, but their dramatic potential is never realized. Margaret of Anjou shows promise when she first appears in the novel, but soon becomes the she-wolf, complete with budding psychotic son, familiar to anyone who's read a lot of Wars of the Roses fiction.
Early on in the book, the widowed Jacquetta makes a scandalous marriage to her first husband’s squire, Richard Woodville. The novel then quickly jumps ahead into the court of the grown Henry VI and his French bride, Margaret of Anjou, whom Jacquetta serves. At this point, Jacquetta is reduced to the role of standing by and shaking her head as Henry and Margaret drag the country into civil war. Except to read the occasional Tarot card and to give Margaret sound advice, which is usually ignored, Jacquetta plays almost a minor role in her own novel.
The writing in this novel simply isn't up to the standard of some of Gregory's earlier efforts. I thoroughly enjoyed The Boleyn Inheritance, especially Katherine Howard's chapters, which I thought caught the voice of the ditzy young queen perfectly. The first-person present tense here is simply mind-numbing, with needless repetition. Too often, Jacquetta says something, then tells us what she said.
For me, however, the novel’s biggest flaw was what was not inside it—Jacquetta’s later years. The most dramatic events of Jacquetta’s life, her being accused and exonerated of witchcraft, the murders of her husband and her son John, and her flight into sanctuary with her daughter, belong to this period, as does the controversial role the Woodvilles allegedly played in the trial of Sir Thomas Cook, but Gregory chose to end her novel well before these things occurred. It’s her novel and her choice, but I for one would have loved to have seen how Jacquetta reacted to the controversy her family’s sudden rise generated, how she fought the charges against her, and how she dealt with the murders of her husband and John. With this missing, the impression as we close the book (or turn off the Kindle, in my case) is that of a pleasant but rather milquetoast Jacquetta: Wendy the Good Little Witch.
I received an electronic review copy of this novel from Net Galley.
First, I did strongly appreciate one aspect of this novel: the sympathetic portrayal of Jacquetta and the Woodville family. Most novels about the Wars of the Roses portray the Woodvilles negatively, to the point of making them into cardboard villains, and it was refreshing to see Gregory take a different tack.
Unfortunately, there’s not much else about this book I liked. Jacquetta’s first husband, John, Duke of Bedford, who served as Regent of France during Henry VI’s minority, was an interesting man faced with the very difficult task of holding on to England’s possessions in France while at the same time dealing with political infighting in England. Gregory turns him into a rather pathetic sort who marries pretty young Jacquetta only to make use of her gift of seeing into the future. Other important players of the time, such as John’s younger brother, Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester, and his ambitious wife, Eleanor, make appearances, but their dramatic potential is never realized. Margaret of Anjou shows promise when she first appears in the novel, but soon becomes the she-wolf, complete with budding psychotic son, familiar to anyone who's read a lot of Wars of the Roses fiction.
Early on in the book, the widowed Jacquetta makes a scandalous marriage to her first husband’s squire, Richard Woodville. The novel then quickly jumps ahead into the court of the grown Henry VI and his French bride, Margaret of Anjou, whom Jacquetta serves. At this point, Jacquetta is reduced to the role of standing by and shaking her head as Henry and Margaret drag the country into civil war. Except to read the occasional Tarot card and to give Margaret sound advice, which is usually ignored, Jacquetta plays almost a minor role in her own novel.
The writing in this novel simply isn't up to the standard of some of Gregory's earlier efforts. I thoroughly enjoyed The Boleyn Inheritance, especially Katherine Howard's chapters, which I thought caught the voice of the ditzy young queen perfectly. The first-person present tense here is simply mind-numbing, with needless repetition. Too often, Jacquetta says something, then tells us what she said.
For me, however, the novel’s biggest flaw was what was not inside it—Jacquetta’s later years. The most dramatic events of Jacquetta’s life, her being accused and exonerated of witchcraft, the murders of her husband and her son John, and her flight into sanctuary with her daughter, belong to this period, as does the controversial role the Woodvilles allegedly played in the trial of Sir Thomas Cook, but Gregory chose to end her novel well before these things occurred. It’s her novel and her choice, but I for one would have loved to have seen how Jacquetta reacted to the controversy her family’s sudden rise generated, how she fought the charges against her, and how she dealt with the murders of her husband and John. With this missing, the impression as we close the book (or turn off the Kindle, in my case) is that of a pleasant but rather milquetoast Jacquetta: Wendy the Good Little Witch.
I received an electronic review copy of this novel from Net Galley.
January 16, 2021
4.5/5
Reread notes from January 2021: I loved every second of this reread!! I could talk for a long time about the women in Philippa Gregory's stories. The first time I read this book, I learned a lot about Jacquetta of Luxembourg and her marriage-for-love to Richard Woodville, after losing her first husband John, Duke of Bedford. This time, I was able to focus more on her role at Queen Margaret's court and the swiftly-moving politics of that time. This story takes place just before and at the beginning of the Wars of the Roses.
This year, I'm reading through Philippa Gregory's Plantagenet and Tudor novels in chronological order. Next up is The White Queen, which features Jacquetta's daughter, Elizabeth Woodville.
***
Full review from 4.3.20: Tidelands was my first Philippa Gregory reading experience and I cannot stop thinking about it. Since I still have a few months before the second Tidelands novel becomes available, I decided to start on some of Ms. Gregory's other books, which I am reading in the combined Plantagenet and Tudor Novels order.
The Lady of the Rivers is the story of Jacquetta of Luxembourg and her marriages, first to John the Duke of Bedford, and then to Richard Woodville. Jacquetta is a descendant of the water spirit Melusina, which means that she has a special Sight. It is because of this unique ability that John, the Duke of Bedford, marries her but it turns out that he is uninterested in her as a person. He only wants to use her Sight for his advancement. After his death, her marriage to John's squire Richard Woodville is one that is born out of love, and this is where Jacquetta begins her family line.
Jacquetta works at court for Queen Margaret, which is trying on her personally and also trying on her family. Jacquetta is reluctant to use her Sight when the Queen asks, but she occasionally does, and she also travels around with the Queen when she goes to stay in her various houses. This keeps her away from her own family for months at a time, but she is still a loving mother to her children. Richard Woodville also works in King Henry VI's military, which keeps him away from her for large portions of time because the King is currently at war over control of the English throne. Their marriage really appealed to me because when Jacquetta married Richard, she married down socially, which was not something that was usually done and it was very risky for her. Their relationship was very romantic and normal (as normal as it could be back then), which was wonderful because marriage back then was nothing like it is now and often people were put together in order to seal an agreement or combine riches.
I loved this story so much. There's something about Philippa Gregory's writing that wraps all around you and makes you feel like you're there. The language is beautiful and descriptive, and I crave it when I'm not reading it. This isn't a light story by any means-there is drama and war and romance and death and issues of class. But court politics and political intrigue are some of my favorite parts of fiction, particularly in medieval fiction, and I'm thrilled to get to experience aspects of world history that I'm not very knowledgeable about. Taking small breaks from the story so I could go research people, places, events in Jacquetta's story was the best part. I was meant to be entertained by this book, but I also feel like I learned a lot.
I will say that I liked this one slightly less than Tidelands (which I have RAVED over to anyone that will listen). I think that's because the cast of characters is much larger because of all of the people that cross Jacquetta's path while at court. I had a bit of a time keeping the names straight (Richard of York, John of Bedford, Margaret of Anjou, etc) but once I figured it all out, it was a bit easier in the reading. There were also a couple of chapters toward the end that were battle-heavy, and this dragged the story a little bit, to the point where I had to reread those chapters.
Overall, the attention to the details of the 1400's was magnificent. Just delicious. And I loved Jacquetta's second marriage to Richard Woodville SO MUCH; they were so loving and supportive to one another and they cared so deeply for their family. The next book in the series is The White Queen, which follows Jacquetta's oldest daughter Elizabeth and her marriage to Edward IV.
Audiobook Notes: I alternated listening to the audiobook with reading the print copy, and I just want to say that it was wonderfully done and a pleasure to listen to. Narrated by Bianca Amato, I loved hearing her read in her beautiful accent. And her pronunciation of the places and names was splendid. I've noticed that she does not narrate the entire series, but I really wish she did.
Title: The Lady of the Rivers by Philippa Gregory
Series: The Plantagenet and Tudor Novels #1
Narrated by: Bianca Amato
Length: 19 hours, 7 minutes, Unabridged
Publisher: Simon & Schuster Audio
Reread notes from January 2021: I loved every second of this reread!! I could talk for a long time about the women in Philippa Gregory's stories. The first time I read this book, I learned a lot about Jacquetta of Luxembourg and her marriage-for-love to Richard Woodville, after losing her first husband John, Duke of Bedford. This time, I was able to focus more on her role at Queen Margaret's court and the swiftly-moving politics of that time. This story takes place just before and at the beginning of the Wars of the Roses.
This year, I'm reading through Philippa Gregory's Plantagenet and Tudor novels in chronological order. Next up is The White Queen, which features Jacquetta's daughter, Elizabeth Woodville.
***
Full review from 4.3.20: Tidelands was my first Philippa Gregory reading experience and I cannot stop thinking about it. Since I still have a few months before the second Tidelands novel becomes available, I decided to start on some of Ms. Gregory's other books, which I am reading in the combined Plantagenet and Tudor Novels order.
The Lady of the Rivers is the story of Jacquetta of Luxembourg and her marriages, first to John the Duke of Bedford, and then to Richard Woodville. Jacquetta is a descendant of the water spirit Melusina, which means that she has a special Sight. It is because of this unique ability that John, the Duke of Bedford, marries her but it turns out that he is uninterested in her as a person. He only wants to use her Sight for his advancement. After his death, her marriage to John's squire Richard Woodville is one that is born out of love, and this is where Jacquetta begins her family line.
Jacquetta works at court for Queen Margaret, which is trying on her personally and also trying on her family. Jacquetta is reluctant to use her Sight when the Queen asks, but she occasionally does, and she also travels around with the Queen when she goes to stay in her various houses. This keeps her away from her own family for months at a time, but she is still a loving mother to her children. Richard Woodville also works in King Henry VI's military, which keeps him away from her for large portions of time because the King is currently at war over control of the English throne. Their marriage really appealed to me because when Jacquetta married Richard, she married down socially, which was not something that was usually done and it was very risky for her. Their relationship was very romantic and normal (as normal as it could be back then), which was wonderful because marriage back then was nothing like it is now and often people were put together in order to seal an agreement or combine riches.
I loved this story so much. There's something about Philippa Gregory's writing that wraps all around you and makes you feel like you're there. The language is beautiful and descriptive, and I crave it when I'm not reading it. This isn't a light story by any means-there is drama and war and romance and death and issues of class. But court politics and political intrigue are some of my favorite parts of fiction, particularly in medieval fiction, and I'm thrilled to get to experience aspects of world history that I'm not very knowledgeable about. Taking small breaks from the story so I could go research people, places, events in Jacquetta's story was the best part. I was meant to be entertained by this book, but I also feel like I learned a lot.
I will say that I liked this one slightly less than Tidelands (which I have RAVED over to anyone that will listen). I think that's because the cast of characters is much larger because of all of the people that cross Jacquetta's path while at court. I had a bit of a time keeping the names straight (Richard of York, John of Bedford, Margaret of Anjou, etc) but once I figured it all out, it was a bit easier in the reading. There were also a couple of chapters toward the end that were battle-heavy, and this dragged the story a little bit, to the point where I had to reread those chapters.
Overall, the attention to the details of the 1400's was magnificent. Just delicious. And I loved Jacquetta's second marriage to Richard Woodville SO MUCH; they were so loving and supportive to one another and they cared so deeply for their family. The next book in the series is The White Queen, which follows Jacquetta's oldest daughter Elizabeth and her marriage to Edward IV.
Audiobook Notes: I alternated listening to the audiobook with reading the print copy, and I just want to say that it was wonderfully done and a pleasure to listen to. Narrated by Bianca Amato, I loved hearing her read in her beautiful accent. And her pronunciation of the places and names was splendid. I've noticed that she does not narrate the entire series, but I really wish she did.
Title: The Lady of the Rivers by Philippa Gregory
Series: The Plantagenet and Tudor Novels #1
Narrated by: Bianca Amato
Length: 19 hours, 7 minutes, Unabridged
Publisher: Simon & Schuster Audio
September 26, 2020
The novels begin with Jacquetta of Luxembourg's friendship with Joan of Arc, in her final days of imprisonment before being burned at the stake, and Jacquetta's powers as a seeress.
Jacquetta is at 17 given as a bride to the Duke of Bedford, whos'e interest in her is purely for her psychic abilities and how she can be of indispensable help to him in the world of alchemy and divination.
After his death, Jacquetta marries Richard Woodville, a true love match, and becomes the friend of confidante of Queen Margaret, the fiery and vengeful queen of the pious, neurotic and effete Henry VI. The fortunes of Richard and Jacquetta are swept up in the War of Roses, and the saga ends with their change of allegiance to the House of York, and the betrothal of Jacquetta's daughter, Elizabeth Woodville, to Edward March of York (to be Edward IV).
Like the master of English historical fiction before her, Jean Plaidy, Phillipa Gregory is s specialist in bringing to life the sagas of strong women at the center of events of English medieval and Tudor history, and their trials and tribulations in struggling to preserve their place and of their that of their children, in the sweeping saga of a court and events essentially controlled by men. This is one of Gregory's best novels yet, and a prequel to The White Queen, in fact if you have not read any of her Cousins War series it would be recommended to read this one first as it sets the scene perfectly for The White Queen. Lively, vibrant, sensitive, descriptive, captures key events and struggles in the War of Roses.
Jacquetta is at 17 given as a bride to the Duke of Bedford, whos'e interest in her is purely for her psychic abilities and how she can be of indispensable help to him in the world of alchemy and divination.
After his death, Jacquetta marries Richard Woodville, a true love match, and becomes the friend of confidante of Queen Margaret, the fiery and vengeful queen of the pious, neurotic and effete Henry VI. The fortunes of Richard and Jacquetta are swept up in the War of Roses, and the saga ends with their change of allegiance to the House of York, and the betrothal of Jacquetta's daughter, Elizabeth Woodville, to Edward March of York (to be Edward IV).
Like the master of English historical fiction before her, Jean Plaidy, Phillipa Gregory is s specialist in bringing to life the sagas of strong women at the center of events of English medieval and Tudor history, and their trials and tribulations in struggling to preserve their place and of their that of their children, in the sweeping saga of a court and events essentially controlled by men. This is one of Gregory's best novels yet, and a prequel to The White Queen, in fact if you have not read any of her Cousins War series it would be recommended to read this one first as it sets the scene perfectly for The White Queen. Lively, vibrant, sensitive, descriptive, captures key events and struggles in the War of Roses.
February 1, 2018
3.5 stars
Full review is here:https://amelianamora18.wixsite.com/am...
Overall I did enjoy this book.
Full review is here:https://amelianamora18.wixsite.com/am...
Overall I did enjoy this book.
March 15, 2020
I thoroughly enjoyed The Lady of the Rivers. I love historical books that draw from real history, and this was a good one. I'm not overly familiar with the events covered in this story, so I can't give a full assessment as to its historical accuracy, but its attention to even the smallest details was both plausible and engaging. Of course, there's no doubt that many of the day-to-day activities were heavily embroidered with fiction, but that's necessary when telling a story of characters who died almost six hundred years ago.
The main protagonist, Jacquetta (later lady in waiting to Margaret of Anjou, who became queen of England when she married Henry VI) was interesting and likeable. Her journey from innocent young girl given in marriage to a man far older than her, to a woman who had a lot of influence in England's royal court was fascinating and opened my eyes to historical events that I'd only previously viewed briefly and distantly. This book brought me close to those events and made me feel as though I was witnessing them firsthand, which was an experience I enjoyed immensely.
If you love history interwoven with fiction, you should give this book a try.
The main protagonist, Jacquetta (later lady in waiting to Margaret of Anjou, who became queen of England when she married Henry VI) was interesting and likeable. Her journey from innocent young girl given in marriage to a man far older than her, to a woman who had a lot of influence in England's royal court was fascinating and opened my eyes to historical events that I'd only previously viewed briefly and distantly. This book brought me close to those events and made me feel as though I was witnessing them firsthand, which was an experience I enjoyed immensely.
If you love history interwoven with fiction, you should give this book a try.
October 28, 2011
Two and a half stars
The Lady of the Rivers follows the story of Jacquetta, the mother of Elizabeth Woodville, (who becomes Queen of England), from a privileged child of the family Luxemburg in France, a family descended from the goddess Melusina; through her encounter with Joan of Arc; an early marriage to the Duke of Bedford, regent of France, uncle to King Henry of Lancaster, who exposes her to alchemy and secret books of forbidden knowledge, and subsequently, accusations of witchcraft. Upon the Dukes death, Jacquetta follows her heart and against royal consent, marries Richard Woodville and is banished to the country side, descending from a Duchess to the wife of a squire. When Margaret of Anjou is brought over to England to marry King Henry of Lancaster, Jacquetta, as her relative, is retrieved from the countryside to befriend the new Queen. Jacquetta is soon the constant companion of Queen Margaret and privy to the secrets and intrigues that surround the throne of the unfortunate, King Henry. Witchcraft, alchemy, being best friends with a much malaligned Queen, this has all the elements to be a great read, but…
First, I must tell you that I am a fan of Philippa Gregory as my bookcases will attest. I have almost all her books and the last four are in hardcover. So, as you can imagine, I was shocked when in the midst of The Lady of the Rivers to find myself not enjoying this story very much at all. Why, I started to wonder. Have I just read too much historical fiction? Have I overloaded on the genre? I had always thought I could read about history, and especially about different view points in history, until, well… my eyes bled. I do not expect historical fiction to be completely accurate, after all the second word in that genre is fiction. And, when you really put your mind to it all history is fiction to a certain extent, as history is the story left behind by the victors or simply by those in power. It is the propaganda and slander of the day carried forward to the present. So within historical fiction is the opportunity to present another side of the story. I mistakenly believed that, finally, I would be given the Lancastrian point of view during the war of the roses.
The York rise to the throne of England was yet another power grab in England’s long history of power grabs. The Celt took England from the prehistoric people, who were invaded by the Saxons and Danes, who lost power to the Romans who came and went, and, finally, William the Conqueror came long and established Norman rule, setting the stage for the Plantagenet’s and their eventual power squabbles that led to the war of the roses. With all this history of conquest in England, I do not understand the need for writers to be so protective of the house of York. The house of Lancaster was the ruling house, how is that they were defeated? That story would be well worth reading about. We all know that the Woodville’s changed sides following the York victory of Edward IV in 1461, and, of the fateful meeting in 1464 of Elizabeth Woodville and King Edward, if only because we all read Gregory’s The White Queen. But in The Lady of Rivers, I wanted to read the Lancastrian point of view, read about their story. Unfortunately I am still waiting.
The underlying theme, or lesson, of The Lady of the Rivers is one of caution for strong women who seek power. Those women who crossed the line from ornamental to power seeking were taken down either through accusations of witchcraft, adultery or being ‘unnatural.’ And, I applaud Gregory for presenting this premise. Gregory presents Joan of Arc, who as we all know was burned at the stake, as an example early in the book, of what historically happened to women when they seeked and assumed power during the middle ages. Another example is the sister in law of Jacquetta, Duchess of Gloucester, Eleanor, who married to the Uncle and heir to King Henry of Lancaster, assumes too much power and privilege, and consequently, is accused of witchcraft and sent to convent from which she never leaves. Jacquetta, herself, with her family history of magic and witchcraft must walk a careful line and avoids being to publically forward in her opinions and actions in order to avoid the scrutiny of the male powers of the time.
So, I naturally believed, as similarly to other of Gregory’s books, this book, while told from the first person point of view of Jacquetta, was in fact the story of Queen Margaret of Anjou. A small point, the woman on the cover of the book has red coppery coloured hair like Margaret, while Jacquetta is supposed to have had white blond hair which she passed down to her daughter Elizabeth. So who is this book about? This should be, as framed by Gregory herself, the story of Margaret, a woman fighting to save the throne for her son against the male powers of the time and being beaten down and defamed by those same men who grab the throne and the power of the land for themselves. But, instead of Margaret’s point of view of a woman disempowered, we are given the same old Yorkist slander of adultery and unnatural female behaviour, Margaret the wolf. I confess to being greatly disappointed, as I believed Philippa Gregory had indeed set out writing a potentially great inspiring novel of one woman’s tragic struggle against overwhelming odds, only to turn her into a cartoon.
In, closing, as Jacquetta abandons her friend Margaret for the house of York, so too, does Philippa Gregory abandon a much defamed Queen to the slanders of history.
The Lady of the Rivers follows the story of Jacquetta, the mother of Elizabeth Woodville, (who becomes Queen of England), from a privileged child of the family Luxemburg in France, a family descended from the goddess Melusina; through her encounter with Joan of Arc; an early marriage to the Duke of Bedford, regent of France, uncle to King Henry of Lancaster, who exposes her to alchemy and secret books of forbidden knowledge, and subsequently, accusations of witchcraft. Upon the Dukes death, Jacquetta follows her heart and against royal consent, marries Richard Woodville and is banished to the country side, descending from a Duchess to the wife of a squire. When Margaret of Anjou is brought over to England to marry King Henry of Lancaster, Jacquetta, as her relative, is retrieved from the countryside to befriend the new Queen. Jacquetta is soon the constant companion of Queen Margaret and privy to the secrets and intrigues that surround the throne of the unfortunate, King Henry. Witchcraft, alchemy, being best friends with a much malaligned Queen, this has all the elements to be a great read, but…
First, I must tell you that I am a fan of Philippa Gregory as my bookcases will attest. I have almost all her books and the last four are in hardcover. So, as you can imagine, I was shocked when in the midst of The Lady of the Rivers to find myself not enjoying this story very much at all. Why, I started to wonder. Have I just read too much historical fiction? Have I overloaded on the genre? I had always thought I could read about history, and especially about different view points in history, until, well… my eyes bled. I do not expect historical fiction to be completely accurate, after all the second word in that genre is fiction. And, when you really put your mind to it all history is fiction to a certain extent, as history is the story left behind by the victors or simply by those in power. It is the propaganda and slander of the day carried forward to the present. So within historical fiction is the opportunity to present another side of the story. I mistakenly believed that, finally, I would be given the Lancastrian point of view during the war of the roses.
The York rise to the throne of England was yet another power grab in England’s long history of power grabs. The Celt took England from the prehistoric people, who were invaded by the Saxons and Danes, who lost power to the Romans who came and went, and, finally, William the Conqueror came long and established Norman rule, setting the stage for the Plantagenet’s and their eventual power squabbles that led to the war of the roses. With all this history of conquest in England, I do not understand the need for writers to be so protective of the house of York. The house of Lancaster was the ruling house, how is that they were defeated? That story would be well worth reading about. We all know that the Woodville’s changed sides following the York victory of Edward IV in 1461, and, of the fateful meeting in 1464 of Elizabeth Woodville and King Edward, if only because we all read Gregory’s The White Queen. But in The Lady of Rivers, I wanted to read the Lancastrian point of view, read about their story. Unfortunately I am still waiting.
The underlying theme, or lesson, of The Lady of the Rivers is one of caution for strong women who seek power. Those women who crossed the line from ornamental to power seeking were taken down either through accusations of witchcraft, adultery or being ‘unnatural.’ And, I applaud Gregory for presenting this premise. Gregory presents Joan of Arc, who as we all know was burned at the stake, as an example early in the book, of what historically happened to women when they seeked and assumed power during the middle ages. Another example is the sister in law of Jacquetta, Duchess of Gloucester, Eleanor, who married to the Uncle and heir to King Henry of Lancaster, assumes too much power and privilege, and consequently, is accused of witchcraft and sent to convent from which she never leaves. Jacquetta, herself, with her family history of magic and witchcraft must walk a careful line and avoids being to publically forward in her opinions and actions in order to avoid the scrutiny of the male powers of the time.
So, I naturally believed, as similarly to other of Gregory’s books, this book, while told from the first person point of view of Jacquetta, was in fact the story of Queen Margaret of Anjou. A small point, the woman on the cover of the book has red coppery coloured hair like Margaret, while Jacquetta is supposed to have had white blond hair which she passed down to her daughter Elizabeth. So who is this book about? This should be, as framed by Gregory herself, the story of Margaret, a woman fighting to save the throne for her son against the male powers of the time and being beaten down and defamed by those same men who grab the throne and the power of the land for themselves. But, instead of Margaret’s point of view of a woman disempowered, we are given the same old Yorkist slander of adultery and unnatural female behaviour, Margaret the wolf. I confess to being greatly disappointed, as I believed Philippa Gregory had indeed set out writing a potentially great inspiring novel of one woman’s tragic struggle against overwhelming odds, only to turn her into a cartoon.
In, closing, as Jacquetta abandons her friend Margaret for the house of York, so too, does Philippa Gregory abandon a much defamed Queen to the slanders of history.
August 29, 2021
After more than ten years of eyeing Philippa Gregory's novels in bookstores, I finally read my first one and it was everything I thought it would be and more.
I had no idea Jacquetta even existed, much less that she was such an interesting historical figure. This book is going on my favourites shelf for sure.
As much as I wish that I'd read the books earlier, I'm glad I didn't, so that I can comfortably read at my own pace and enjoy this beautiful world without rushing to finish them all before the next one is out.
I think Gregory really did her best here, with limited resources, and that The Lady of the Rivers is a perfect blend of legends, witchcraft, facts and fiction.
I had no idea Jacquetta even existed, much less that she was such an interesting historical figure. This book is going on my favourites shelf for sure.
As much as I wish that I'd read the books earlier, I'm glad I didn't, so that I can comfortably read at my own pace and enjoy this beautiful world without rushing to finish them all before the next one is out.
I think Gregory really did her best here, with limited resources, and that The Lady of the Rivers is a perfect blend of legends, witchcraft, facts and fiction.
August 9, 2013
Where to begin...It had been a while since I'd read a Philippa Gregory book (and I'd liked her books in the past--The Other Boleyn Girl being my favorite), so I was looking forward to reading The Lady of the Rivers after I won it through First-Reads. After starting it, I quickly realized PG's writing has become a shadow of its former self. Devoting an entire book to Jacquetta was questionable to begin with; for all the royal goings-on that she was privy to, her life really wasn't all that exciting. The novel consisted a lot of such-and-such happened and then I went into confinement and had another baby (I believe the grand total was 14). Since not as much is widely known about Jacquetta as, say, Anne Boleyn, I was expecting some further character development and insight into who she was. Unfortunately, PG does extremely little character development and for most of the book I couldn't ascertain if Jacquetta was just stupidly ignorant or so innocent that she couldn't quite grasp political implications. All of the other characters were as equally one dimensional and you really couldn't love or hate any of them because they were just...there. PG should have just written a non-fiction book about Jacquetta since she really didn't offer any insight into Jacquetta which, in my mind, is part of the point of historical fiction. But, oh yeah, Jacquetta's life isn't really that interesting to begin with! The beginning of the novel was really reminiscent of an Arthurian legend to me: Jacquetta is married to John of Lancaster, 1st Duke of Bedford (a.k.a. Arthur), but she is really in love with Richard Woodville, the Duke's Chamberlain (a.k.a. Lancelot). All of the magical infusions in the story really made this seem even more so. When Jacquetta finally realizes she is to be parted with Richard, her verbal reaction was incredibly stilted. I would compare it to a modern woman finding out that she was going to have to live without her cell phone, "But, I've always had a cellphone...what will I ever do without one?" After Richard got a taste of Jacquetta's virginal, unicorn beckoning magical huha, Bam! they were inseparable and there really wasn't any more to their relationship than that. Well, in PG's imagination at least.
Two other major gripes I had with the book were the constant reminders of who characters were. Within pages it was literally, "Duchess Eleanor", "The duchess", and then "Eleanor, the duchess". Readers aren't that stupid that they can't remember who one of the main characters is and what title they hold! Also, I really didn't understand why PG had Lewis die at age 12 when the family tree says he died in infancy. Now I know infancy is a loose term, but shouldn't it be 'adolescence' or 'childhood' by that age? Maybe not, but it seemed so to me.
Overall, the story was okay and even entertaining in parts with the King and Margaret. I don't think this novel could ever have been a 5 star book considering the subject alone, but it definitely would have garnered a higher rating if PG had just explored her characters more and had fun writing it. I really got the feeling that the book was more of a chore for PG to write rather than a pleasure. I wish she could tap into her imagination like she used to to at least write a page-turner with some scandalous and interesting people. 2 stars.
Two other major gripes I had with the book were the constant reminders of who characters were. Within pages it was literally, "Duchess Eleanor", "The duchess", and then "Eleanor, the duchess". Readers aren't that stupid that they can't remember who one of the main characters is and what title they hold! Also, I really didn't understand why PG had Lewis die at age 12 when the family tree says he died in infancy. Now I know infancy is a loose term, but shouldn't it be 'adolescence' or 'childhood' by that age? Maybe not, but it seemed so to me.
Overall, the story was okay and even entertaining in parts with the King and Margaret. I don't think this novel could ever have been a 5 star book considering the subject alone, but it definitely would have garnered a higher rating if PG had just explored her characters more and had fun writing it. I really got the feeling that the book was more of a chore for PG to write rather than a pleasure. I wish she could tap into her imagination like she used to to at least write a page-turner with some scandalous and interesting people. 2 stars.
July 25, 2017
Rating: 5.0/5.0
Philippa Gregory is one of my favorite authors. I love how she mixes historical facts with fiction in a very delicious and interesting way. The Lady of the Rivers gets full marks from me. It has everything I love, historical events, love, treason, courts, fantasy and beautifully written. It took me a month to read this because I did not want it to finish. I gave it the time it needed and enjoyed it tremendously.
In this novel we follow the story of Jacquetta from her teenage days and how she goes on to marry two men one of them is a noble. The story starts with how wheel of fortune takes its up and down turns and beautifully ends with the same. This book is a must read specially for those who are into historical fictions.
Philippa Gregory is one of my favorite authors. I love how she mixes historical facts with fiction in a very delicious and interesting way. The Lady of the Rivers gets full marks from me. It has everything I love, historical events, love, treason, courts, fantasy and beautifully written. It took me a month to read this because I did not want it to finish. I gave it the time it needed and enjoyed it tremendously.
In this novel we follow the story of Jacquetta from her teenage days and how she goes on to marry two men one of them is a noble. The story starts with how wheel of fortune takes its up and down turns and beautifully ends with the same. This book is a must read specially for those who are into historical fictions.
August 1, 2019
3.5 zvezdica
Knjiga je u sustini dobra. Radnja romana je dinamicna, drzi paznju, a mape i rodoslovi na pocetku romana pomazu da se pohvataju svi konci i vizuelizuju razna mesta desavanja. Atmosfera je odlicno preneta i tokom citanja sam uvek imala utisak da sam u srednjovekovnoj Engleskoj. Nisam mogla a da se ne setim Raderfurdovog Londona kada su se pominjale neke kapije ili delovi grada. Odmah su mi u secanje dolazile mape Londona iz njegovih knjiga. :)
Ono sto mi je smetalo je povremena suvoparnost u nacinu pripovedanja i povremena ponavljanja nekih cinjenica i dogadjaja iako su na bukvalno prethodnoj strani ispricani.
Knjiga je u sustini dobra. Radnja romana je dinamicna, drzi paznju, a mape i rodoslovi na pocetku romana pomazu da se pohvataju svi konci i vizuelizuju razna mesta desavanja. Atmosfera je odlicno preneta i tokom citanja sam uvek imala utisak da sam u srednjovekovnoj Engleskoj. Nisam mogla a da se ne setim Raderfurdovog Londona kada su se pominjale neke kapije ili delovi grada. Odmah su mi u secanje dolazile mape Londona iz njegovih knjiga. :)
Ono sto mi je smetalo je povremena suvoparnost u nacinu pripovedanja i povremena ponavljanja nekih cinjenica i dogadjaja iako su na bukvalno prethodnoj strani ispricani.
May 6, 2019
The history and the politics in this novel are very readable. I really appreciate that this story focuses on the women and their part in history. That alone makes it worth reading, as far as I’m concerned, though you will have to endure the ooey, gooey love between Jacquetta and Richard 🤮. Jacquetta of Luxembourg is an obscure historical figure but a very interesting one. Hope I can get to others in this series.
December 26, 2015
Read This Review & More Like It On My Blog!
Though not nearly as hair-pullingly irritating as its predecessor The Red Queen, (which irritated me so much I didn't even review it. Who wants to read four+ paragraphs of "UGH" and "WHY DOES SHE DO THIS!" and "Shouldn't Margaret of Anjou be the Red Queen NOT Margaret Beaufort?") The Lady of the Rivers has its fair share of problems. This time the story follows Jacquetta of Luxembourg, Dowager Duchess of Bedford, historically remembered most as the mother of Elizabeth Woodville, the wife of King Edward IV of England. This novel has an additional focus on witchcraft/charms/herbs that the previous novels lack (exception: The Queen's Fool [Tudor Series #4] has a supernatural element for the main character as well, but less hackneyed and also less of a deux ex machina) - and a move I cannot fully support. Using the legend of the mermaid-like Melusine/a as an ancestor to Jacquetta's House (a "fact" which was repeated ad nauseam - one reviewer was keeping a count of mentions and I stopped paying attention after #20) to justify this fantastical element, Jacquetta is shown to be quite adept as well as having considerable powers. I felt that reducing Jacquetta's hard-won influence and knowledge to a charlatan-like propensity to "read the cards" did the character a serious disservice. If the author wants to write a strong, determined historical fiction about a woman in the 1500s - by all means do so! But don't reduce her accomplishments and feats by flavoring the success with "magic". I also was out off by some inconsistencies within the novel (I am not even touching historical inaccuracies) such as Richard being referred to as a squire, a knight, and then a squire once more without any mention as to a knighting ceremony or why he would've been reduced to the status of a squire after achieving knighthood.
Self-important and strident, Jacquetta is not the typical woman of her times (the novel begins in 1430) and the message that she, and strong, commanding women like her, are not welcome and face death for their knowledge. Gregory uses several famous women to illustrate this point - repeatedly - throughout the novel. Joan of Arc(!), Duchess Eleanor of Gloucester, and the even the proud Cecily Neville are all brought low before her eyes, seemingly just to teach Jacquetta caution. I can't say I cared too much for this version of Jacquetta, though I did warm to her particularly in the last fifty pages of the book. She rarely demonstrates a feeling or idea, most of this entire novel is "told" rather than shown. Having married her first husband's squire (Robert Woodville) for love, I found a sad lack of chemistry between the two. Example: how do I know Jacquetta loves Richard? She says she does. That's it, that's all; no real emotion or demonstrances of genuine affection. Stiff and awkward dialog along with clunky exposition do the two lovers no favors either. The first-person perspective was well-used, and Gregory even manages to show a battle scene without randomly/abruptly changing perspective and locales. It also helps that Jacquetta, though often annoying and slightly ridiculous is far easier to read than Margaret Beaufort's cold arrogance in The Red Queen.
Gregory does a fine job with the atmosphere of the story, as she usually does. There's a decent amount of tension constantly teeming around Jacquetta: her witchcraft/magic abilities, her illegal marriage, her husband is far sent away (again and again), birthing 16 (!!!!) children, running from battles, her fear of persecution, etc. For all my complaints, I will say that this is far from a staid novel; the kickoff to the War of Roses is excellent fodder for suspense and ridiculous amounts of tension between royal houses. The frequent and bloody battle scenes add much to the feel of the novel, creating a dark and foreboding air. Intrigue among the court is what Gregory does best and the novel succeeds the most when it is within the confines of the scheming court. While the writing itself can be stiff and overly formal, I noticed less and less over the book. Whether it's because the quality of the writing itself improved or I adjusted to Gregory's "style" is up for debate. I do find the random jumps in the chronology (a year here, three years there) to be very distracting from the flow of the narrative and also FULL of info-dumping. Short, very pointed chapters explain away the missing years but left me feeling very dissatisfied. For instance after Jacquetta marries Robert without permission (a rather big no-no for a Duchess), the story completely skips over the intervening years of poverty and struggle and instead flashes forward to when the newlyweds are re-welcomed at Court. I felt slightly cheated by this particular jump; Jacquetta struggling to earn a living versus the entitled pampered life she led before would have provided a nice dichotomy between the lifestyles of the rich and the poor of England.
A novel that both entertains and irritates, Gregory uses a lot of the same "tricks" that so many deride her over. There is the constant repetition of names with titles, of past accomplishments, who is related to whom... as if she has no faith in her readership to tell characters apart. Added to explanations of "why" and "how" people do things instead of showing them, Gregory can be frustrating to read. I know it's frowned upon to quote from an ARC but this passage exemplifies many readers issues with Gregory:
Instead of just using "Edmund" or "Beaufort" or even "Somerset", the man's name has to be supplied twice, along with his title and his most recent accomplishment in the novel. Furthermore, the author even explains why the Duke is so beloved instead of showing so and trusting her readers to pick up on the plotline. Gregory clearly buys into the "Somerset + Margaret of Anjou = Edward, Prince of Wales" theory so why not try to SHOW such instead of having a character narrate the information? I understand this is a historical fiction, so dates/events might get mixed around and changed but underestimating your readers to the point you have to hammer in every title, every detail is insulting.
The ending felt, to me, rather abrupt and uneven. The finale of this novel transitions to the very beginning of The White Queen: with Jacquetta's beautiful daughter Elizabeth Woodville standing by the road looking to enchant King Edward IV. I had hoped for more time with Jacquetta. I would've preferred less focus on the early years in order to see what Gregory would do with this character later on in the century; I was much more interested in what would happen after the Rivers family switched from Lancaster to the York side. I also wonder why this novel was published third, when it would make the most sense to read first in the series. Not only is it chronologically first,but it is a stronger effort than The Red Queen or The White Queen. I think I may be running out of time and affection for Ms. Gregory. I loved her Tudor novels when I first read them sixish years ago (though I'd probably not in a re-read now) but this series has so far done little to make me fall in love. With such a drama-filled, absolutely interesting and dynamic era, I can't help but feel there should be more substance and less drama/dresses to The Lady in the Rivers.
Though not nearly as hair-pullingly irritating as its predecessor The Red Queen, (which irritated me so much I didn't even review it. Who wants to read four+ paragraphs of "UGH" and "WHY DOES SHE DO THIS!" and "Shouldn't Margaret of Anjou be the Red Queen NOT Margaret Beaufort?") The Lady of the Rivers has its fair share of problems. This time the story follows Jacquetta of Luxembourg, Dowager Duchess of Bedford, historically remembered most as the mother of Elizabeth Woodville, the wife of King Edward IV of England. This novel has an additional focus on witchcraft/charms/herbs that the previous novels lack (exception: The Queen's Fool [Tudor Series #4] has a supernatural element for the main character as well, but less hackneyed and also less of a deux ex machina) - and a move I cannot fully support. Using the legend of the mermaid-like Melusine/a as an ancestor to Jacquetta's House (a "fact" which was repeated ad nauseam - one reviewer was keeping a count of mentions and I stopped paying attention after #20) to justify this fantastical element, Jacquetta is shown to be quite adept as well as having considerable powers. I felt that reducing Jacquetta's hard-won influence and knowledge to a charlatan-like propensity to "read the cards" did the character a serious disservice. If the author wants to write a strong, determined historical fiction about a woman in the 1500s - by all means do so! But don't reduce her accomplishments and feats by flavoring the success with "magic". I also was out off by some inconsistencies within the novel (I am not even touching historical inaccuracies) such as Richard being referred to as a squire, a knight, and then a squire once more without any mention as to a knighting ceremony or why he would've been reduced to the status of a squire after achieving knighthood.
Self-important and strident, Jacquetta is not the typical woman of her times (the novel begins in 1430) and the message that she, and strong, commanding women like her, are not welcome and face death for their knowledge. Gregory uses several famous women to illustrate this point - repeatedly - throughout the novel. Joan of Arc(!), Duchess Eleanor of Gloucester, and the even the proud Cecily Neville are all brought low before her eyes, seemingly just to teach Jacquetta caution. I can't say I cared too much for this version of Jacquetta, though I did warm to her particularly in the last fifty pages of the book. She rarely demonstrates a feeling or idea, most of this entire novel is "told" rather than shown. Having married her first husband's squire (Robert Woodville) for love, I found a sad lack of chemistry between the two. Example: how do I know Jacquetta loves Richard? She says she does. That's it, that's all; no real emotion or demonstrances of genuine affection. Stiff and awkward dialog along with clunky exposition do the two lovers no favors either. The first-person perspective was well-used, and Gregory even manages to show a battle scene without randomly/abruptly changing perspective and locales. It also helps that Jacquetta, though often annoying and slightly ridiculous is far easier to read than Margaret Beaufort's cold arrogance in The Red Queen.
Gregory does a fine job with the atmosphere of the story, as she usually does. There's a decent amount of tension constantly teeming around Jacquetta: her witchcraft/magic abilities, her illegal marriage, her husband is far sent away (again and again), birthing 16 (!!!!) children, running from battles, her fear of persecution, etc. For all my complaints, I will say that this is far from a staid novel; the kickoff to the War of Roses is excellent fodder for suspense and ridiculous amounts of tension between royal houses. The frequent and bloody battle scenes add much to the feel of the novel, creating a dark and foreboding air. Intrigue among the court is what Gregory does best and the novel succeeds the most when it is within the confines of the scheming court. While the writing itself can be stiff and overly formal, I noticed less and less over the book. Whether it's because the quality of the writing itself improved or I adjusted to Gregory's "style" is up for debate. I do find the random jumps in the chronology (a year here, three years there) to be very distracting from the flow of the narrative and also FULL of info-dumping. Short, very pointed chapters explain away the missing years but left me feeling very dissatisfied. For instance after Jacquetta marries Robert without permission (a rather big no-no for a Duchess), the story completely skips over the intervening years of poverty and struggle and instead flashes forward to when the newlyweds are re-welcomed at Court. I felt slightly cheated by this particular jump; Jacquetta struggling to earn a living versus the entitled pampered life she led before would have provided a nice dichotomy between the lifestyles of the rich and the poor of England.
A novel that both entertains and irritates, Gregory uses a lot of the same "tricks" that so many deride her over. There is the constant repetition of names with titles, of past accomplishments, who is related to whom... as if she has no faith in her readership to tell characters apart. Added to explanations of "why" and "how" people do things instead of showing them, Gregory can be frustrating to read. I know it's frowned upon to quote from an ARC but this passage exemplifies many readers issues with Gregory:
"'Edmund Beaufort Duke of Somerset...'
[...]
'You mean Edmund Beaufort Duke of Somerset? The man who lost us Normandy [...] but for the King's unswerving belief in his kinsman and the Queen's misplaced affection...
[...]
'I'll be commanded by the man who gave away Normandy. '"
Instead of just using "Edmund" or "Beaufort" or even "Somerset", the man's name has to be supplied twice, along with his title and his most recent accomplishment in the novel. Furthermore, the author even explains why the Duke is so beloved instead of showing so and trusting her readers to pick up on the plotline. Gregory clearly buys into the "Somerset + Margaret of Anjou = Edward, Prince of Wales" theory so why not try to SHOW such instead of having a character narrate the information? I understand this is a historical fiction, so dates/events might get mixed around and changed but underestimating your readers to the point you have to hammer in every title, every detail is insulting.
The ending felt, to me, rather abrupt and uneven. The finale of this novel transitions to the very beginning of The White Queen: with Jacquetta's beautiful daughter Elizabeth Woodville standing by the road looking to enchant King Edward IV. I had hoped for more time with Jacquetta. I would've preferred less focus on the early years in order to see what Gregory would do with this character later on in the century; I was much more interested in what would happen after the Rivers family switched from Lancaster to the York side. I also wonder why this novel was published third, when it would make the most sense to read first in the series. Not only is it chronologically first,but it is a stronger effort than The Red Queen or The White Queen. I think I may be running out of time and affection for Ms. Gregory. I loved her Tudor novels when I first read them sixish years ago (though I'd probably not in a re-read now) but this series has so far done little to make me fall in love. With such a drama-filled, absolutely interesting and dynamic era, I can't help but feel there should be more substance and less drama/dresses to The Lady in the Rivers.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 4,582 reviews