The Problem of Form in Painting and Sculpture
()
About this ebook
Hildebrand was born at Marburg, the son of Marburg economics professor Bruno Hildebrand. He studied at the Academy of Fine Arts Nuremberg, with Kaspar von Zumbusch at the Munich Academy and with Rudolf Siemering in Berlin. From 1873 he lived in Florence in the St Francesco Monastery, a secularized sixteenth-century monastery.
A friend of Hans von Marées, he designed the architectural setting for the painter's murals in the library of the German Marine Zoological Institute at Naples (1873). He spent a significant amount of time in Munich after 1889, executing a monumental fountain there, the Wittelsbacher Brunnen. He is known for five monumental urban fountains and for the Bismarck monument in Bremen, unveiled in 1910.
Hildebrand worked in a Neo-classical tradition, and set out his artistic theories in his book Das Problem der Form in der Bildenden Kunst ("The Problem of Form in Painting and Sculpture"), published in 1893.
He died in Munich in 1921.
Related to The Problem of Form in Painting and Sculpture
Related ebooks
Art and Production Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTransmedium: Conceptualism 2.0 and the New Object Art Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAesthetical Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEclectic Boundaries: Participatory and Collaborative Performance Methods Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Philosophy of Art Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAesthetical And Philosophical Essays by Frederick Schiller Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Relation of Art to Nature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Philosophy of Fine Art (Vol. 1-3): Complete Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDreaming Red: Creating ArtPace Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAbstraction in Reverse: The Reconfigured Spectator in Mid-Twentieth-Century Latin American Art Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA New Dictionary of Art: One word - 3000 definitions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKilling Men & Dying Women: Imagining Difference in 1950s New York Painting Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAncient Art and Ritual Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPaint it Blue Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArt, Truth and Time: Essays in Art Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScenes of the Obscene: The Non-Representable in Art and Visual Culture, Middle Ages to Today Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Hypertext of HerMe(s) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNietzsche and Other Exponents of Individualism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTheory Does Not Exist: Comparative Ancient and Modern Explorations in Psychoanalysis, Deconstruction, and Rhetoric Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVision Art and History of Art Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPainting, History and Meaning: Sites of Time Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThree Lectures on Aesthetic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Limits of Knowledge Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpaces of Feeling: Affect and Awareness in Modernist Literature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings"Am not I / A fly like thee?": Human-Animal Relations in William Blake's "Songs of Innocence and Experience" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEwa Partum's Artistic Practice: An Atlas of Continuity in Different Locations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn the Sublime and Beautiful Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFifteen Years of a Dancer's Life: With Some Account of her Distinguished Friends Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnimals and Other People: Literary Forms and Living Beings in the Long Eighteenth Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Venetian Painters Of The Renaissance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Art For You
Writing to Learn: How to Write - and Think - Clearly About Any Subject at All Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Everything Is F*cked: A Book About Hope Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art 101: From Vincent van Gogh to Andy Warhol, Key People, Ideas, and Moments in the History of Art Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Morpho: Anatomy for Artists Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Designer's Dictionary of Color Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Erotic Photography 120 illustrations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The History of Art in 50 Paintings (Illustrated) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Alchemist: A Graphic Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vanderbilt: The Rise and Fall of an American Dynasty Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Shape of Ideas: An Illustrated Exploration of Creativity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All the Beauty in the World: The Metropolitan Museum of Art and Me Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All About Love: New Visions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Creative Habit: Learn It and Use It for Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Story: Style, Structure, Substance, and the Principles of Screenwriting Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Photography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sketch like a Boss! Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Living: The Classical Mannual on Virtue, Happiness, and Effectiveness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Just Kids: An Autobiography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Boys: A Memoir of Hollywood and Family Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sketch Your World: A Guide to Sketch Journaling (Over 500 illustrations!) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Sketchnote: A Step-by-Step Manual for Teachers and Students Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5About Looking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Visual Guide to Classical Art Theory for Drawing and Painting Students Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Problem of Form in Painting and Sculpture
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Problem of Form in Painting and Sculpture - Adolf Von Hildebrand
© Braunfell Books 2023, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise without the written permission of the copyright holder.
Publisher’s Note
Although in most cases we have retained the Author’s original spelling and grammar to authentically reproduce the work of the Author and the original intent of such material, some additional notes and clarifications have been added for the modern reader’s benefit.
We have also made every effort to include all maps and illustrations of the original edition the limitations of formatting do not allow of including larger maps, we will upload as many of these maps as possible.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
ADOLF HILDEBRAND 4
FOREWORD TO THE THIRD EDITION 5
INTRODUCTION 8
I—VISION AND MOVEMENT 10
II—FORM AND APPEARANCE 19
III—THE IDEA OF SPACE AND ITS VISUAL EXPRESSION 26
IV—IDEAS OF PLANES AND DEPTH 35
V—THE CONCEPTION OF RELIEF 47
VI—FORM AS INTERPRETATION OF LIFE 59
VII—SCULPTURE IN STONE 73
THE PROBLEM OF FORM IN PAINTING AND SCULPTURE
BY
ADOLF HILDEBRAND
img2.pngADOLF HILDEBRAND{1}
was born in Marburg, Germany, October 6, 1847. His father, the economist, Bruno Hildebrand, was forced by the revolution of 1848 to seek in Switzerland freedom from political persecution. Having reached school age, the son attended the gymnasium of Bern, but did not show much enthusiasm for the abstract studies there offered to him. In 1861 his father was called to the University of Jena. The young man now showed such distinctive signs of artistic ability that he was sent by his father to Nuremberg, to take a course in the art school of that city.
At the end of 1867 he left Germany for a prolonged stay in Italy. The influence of the masterpieces of art accumulated in that country proved to be infinitely more beneficial to his artistic development than the school instruction which he had practically out-grown when he entered the art school. In Rome Hildebrand became acquainted with Hans von Marées, whose independence of thought encouraged the younger artist to follow his own bent. After staying in Rome a year and a half Hildebrand returned to Germany and busied himself for some time with sculpture in Berlin. In 1872 he went again to Italy and for many years stayed in Florence, where he still spends a part of each year, his residence being an old monastery, San Francesco di Paola. His German home is in Munich. Whoever has visited this city in recent years cannot have failed to see and admire there one of Hildebrand’s monumental works, the Wittelsbacherbrunnen on the Maximiliansplatz.
The present book appeared in print for the first time in 1893. It has been published in four German editions and has also been translated into French.
FOREWORD TO THE THIRD EDITION
The leading idea.
This third and revised edition of my book affords me the opportunity of suggesting to the reader in a brief foreword the right mode of approach. I have, therefore, thought it advisable to present here in a few words the leading idea of my work.
The architectonic method.
Sculpture and painting in contrast with architecture are usually looked upon as imitative arts. This classification, however, expresses merely their differences and does not take into consideration their resemblances. Sculpture and painting are, indeed, imitative inasmuch as they are based on a kind of study of Nature. And this in a way ties down the artist; for it follows that the problems of form with which he has to deal when imitating emanate directly from his perception of Nature. But if these problems and no others, be solved, i.e., if the artist’s work claims attention merely on these grounds, it can never attain a self-sufficiency apart from Nature. To gain such self-sufficiency the artist must raise the imitative part of his work to a higher plane, and the method by which he accomplishes this I should like to call the Architectonic Method. Of course, I do not here use the word architectonic in its ordinary special significance. As in a drama or symphony, so here our perception enables us to realize a unity of form lacking in objects themselves as they appear in Nature. It is the quality essential to this realization which I wish to denote by the term architectonic.
The architectonic development of nature’s material.
The problems of form arising from this architectonic structure, though they are not given us immediately and self-evidently by Nature, are yet the true problems of art. Material acquired through a direct study of Nature is, by the architectonic process, transformed into an artistic unity. When we speak of the imitative aspect of art, we are referring to material which has not yet been developed in this manner. Through architectonic development, then, sculpture and painting emerge from the sphere of mere naturalism into the realm of true art.
The primacy of the architectonic conception and its relation to artistic individuality.
Reviewing the artistic production of earlier times, we find that the architectonic structure of a work of art stands out everywhere as the paramount factor, whereas mere imitation is a thing which has only gradually developed. It is, in fact, instinctive with us to combine the piece-work of perception into an ideal whole. Mere imitation, on the contrary, being dependent on long experience, can only be attained through a gradual study of Nature. It is significant of our scientific times that a work of art today seldom rises above the level of imitation. The architectonic feeling is either lacking entirely or is replaced by a purely external, more or less tasteful, arrangement of forms. It has been my aim in this treatise to force the idea of the architectonic structure into the focus of attention, to develop from this point of view the problems which form presents and to show their immediate dependence on our relation to Nature. Let it be noted, however, that this dependence does not exclude an artist’s individuality. Heart and lungs are requisite for life, yet this necessity does not preclude individual variations in the human body. A person’s individuality does not consist in the presence or absence of particular organs, but in their various degrees of development. Just as we are able to demonstrate on what the soundness of a body depends, so may we also demonstrate the nature of the general problems of art and their solutions without excluding the artist’s individuality. For, whatever his individuality may be, his work must give a true answer to the questions which Nature puts to him.
The anarchists of art.
It is evident that in accordance with the artist’s personal development this or that problem will dominate and become the main one to be solved. In no case, however, is artistic ability manifest in willfully ignoring the requirements of the material worked in. Those artists who deny any kind of objective demands are the anarchists of Art, and are not to be taken seriously. It is characteristic of these artists that their incapacity to develop in architectonic manner that which they strive to achieve through imitation alone, should awaken in them a vague sense of inefficiency; and that they should seek to compensate for this by the addition of something suggestive or symbolic, intending thereby to raise their work to a higher poetic plane. But sculpture and painting do not borrow their poetic force from other arts, nor do they exist merely to illustrate poetic subjects. What the artist has to grapple with is a problem of visual manifestation solely. The subjects which he selects for representation need have neither ethical nor poetic significance. What he does is to give them an esthetic significance which is distinctive and no less valuable.
The two functions of the eye.
Let us now leave these general considerations and turn to the special consideration of architectonic structure in painting and sculpture. In both these arts all forms, whether arising from imitative productivity or from architectonic structure, are of a spatial character. Hence the principles governing the