Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $9.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Stasis: Civil War as a Political Paradigm
    Stasis: Civil War as a Political Paradigm
    Stasis: Civil War as a Political Paradigm
    Ebook80 pages1 hour

    Stasis: Civil War as a Political Paradigm

    By Giorgio Agamben and Nicholas Heron

    3/5

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    We can no longer speak of a state of war in any traditional sense, yet there is currently no viable theory to account for the manifold internal conflicts, or civil wars, that increasingly afflict the world's populations. Meant as a first step toward such a theory, Giorgio Agamben's latest book looks at how civil war was conceived of at two crucial moments in the history of Western thought: in ancient Athens (from which the political concept of stasis emerges) and later, in the work of Thomas Hobbes. It identifies civil war as the fundamental threshold of politicization in the West, an apparatus that over the course of history has alternately allowed for the de-politicization of citizenship and the mobilization of the unpolitical. The arguments herein, first conceived of in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, have become ever more relevant now that we have entered the age of planetary civil war.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherStanford University Press
    Release dateSep 9, 2015
    ISBN9780804797320
    Stasis: Civil War as a Political Paradigm

    Read more from Giorgio Agamben

    Related to Stasis

    Related ebooks

    Philosophy For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Chris Jennings

      Dec 8, 2020

      Chris Jennings
      3 min read

    • Article

      He’s Not The Messiah, He’s A Transwoman

      Mar 28, 2024

      IT IS NO FUN BEING ON THE WRONG SIDE OF “the trans debate”. Given the choice between rainbows and kindness or binary sex and bigotry, who’d want to align themselves with the latter? This is why so many feminists, troubled by the insistence that “tran

      4 min read

    • Article

      Foreign Affairs

      Dec 1, 2022

      Foreign Affairs
      24 min read

    • Article

      The End of Liberalism

      Jun 4, 2018

      The End of Liberalism
      7 min read

    • Article

      Climate Change: Lessons From The Past

      May 25, 2023

      WHAT IS HISTORY AND WHAT is it for? The first historians aimed to see that “the deeds of humanity should not be forgotten in time”, as the Greek Herodotus put it, and to provide an account of use to future generations: “a possession for all time” in

      4 min read

    • Article

      The Case Against Junipero Serra

      Oct 2, 2018

      The Case Against Junipero Serra
      6 min read

    • Article

      Some Strange Eruption: Watching ‘Station Eleven’ and Teaching ‘Hamlet’ to the Class of 2022

      Jul 6, 2022

      If they learn nothing else by the time their graduation caps land, I hope they learn this. The post Some Strange Eruption: Watching ‘Station Eleven’ and Teaching ‘Hamlet’ to the Class of 2022 appeared first on The Millions.

      7 min read

    • Article

      The Right To Move

      Dec 18, 2019

      The Right To Move
      10 min read

    • Article

      Phryne c371-316 BC

      Feb 15, 2024

      Phryne c371-316 BC
      2 min read

    • Article

      Red Poets’ Society

      Feb 11, 2022

      Red Poets’ Society
      13 min read

    • Article

      Reading Soviet Sci-Fi At The End Of The World

      Sep 26, 2022

      What I found was not a roadmap for escaping my circumstances but a strategy for how to operate within them. The post Reading Soviet Sci-Fi at the End of the World appeared first on The Millions.

      12 min read

    • Article

      In Defence Of The Dark Ages

      Sep 28, 2023

      In Defence Of The Dark Ages
      8 min read

    • Article

      The Arab World’s Star Student

      Apr 9, 2018

      The Arab World’s Star Student
      6 min read

    • Article

      E Pluribus Unum?

      Jun 1, 2021

      E Pluribus Unum?
      4 min read

    • Article

      ‘The Outlier’ Paints A Complex Portrait Of Jimmy Carter

      Aug 19, 2021

      Kai Bird’s “The Outlier: The Unfinished Presidency of Jimmy Carter” shows the president’s fierce intelligence, stubbornness, and decency.

      3 min read

    • Article

      José Donoso Saw the Future of Latin American Literature

      Nov 21, 2023

      American readers have largely forgotten the single greatest writer to come from the Latin American Boom: Chilean novelist José Donoso. The post José Donoso Saw the Future of Latin American Literature appeared first on The Millions.

      5 min read

    • Article

      Is Rohingya Crisis Changing West's 'Romanticized' View of Buddhism?

      Sep 28, 2017

      When it comes to religious extremism, Buddhism has mostly escaped the scrutiny that Muslim militants, fundamentalist Christians, and Hindu nationalists in India have faced, observers say.

      6 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Stasis

    3/5

    3 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Stasis - Giorgio Agamben

      1. Stasis

      1.   It is generally acknowledged that a theory of civil war is completely lacking today, yet this absence does not seem to concern jurists and political scientists too much. Roman Schnur, who formulated this diagnosis as early as the 1980s, nonetheless added that the disregard of civil war went hand in hand with the advance of global civil war (Schnur 1983, 121, 156). At thirty years’ distance, this observation has lost none of its topicality: while the very possibility of distinguishing a war between States and an internecine war appears today to have disappeared, specialists continue to carefully avoid any hint at a theory of civil war. It is true that in recent years, owing to the upsurge of wars impossible to define as international, publications concerning so-called ‘internal wars’ have multiplied (above all, in the United States); even in these instances, however, the analysis was geared not toward an interpretation of the phenomenon, but—in accordance with a practice ever more widespread—toward the conditions under which an international intervention becomes possible. The paradigm of consensus, which today dominates both political action and theory, seems incompatible with the serious investigation of a phenomenon that is at least as old as Western democracy.

      ℵ There exists, today, both a ‘polemology’, a theory of war, and an ‘irenology’, a theory of peace, but there is no ‘stasiology’, no theory of civil war. We have already mentioned how, according to Schnur, this absence could be related to the advance of global civil war. The concept of ‘global civil war’ was introduced contemporaneously in 1963 in Hannah Arendt’s book On Revolution (in which the Second World War was defined as ‘a kind of civil war raging all over the earth’ [Arendt 1963, 8]) and in Carl Schmitt’s Theorie des Partisanen (Schmitt 2007), a book dedicated to the figure that marks the end of the conception of war of the Jus publicum Europaeum, which was grounded on the possibility of clearly distinguishing between war and peace, soldiers and civilians, enemies and criminals. Whatever date one wishes to trace this end back to, it is certain that today the state of war in the traditional sense has virtually disappeared. Even the Gulf War, the last conflict that still had the appearance of a war between States, was fought without the warring States declaring the state of war (which for some States, such as Italy, would have been unconstitutional). The generalisation of a model of war which cannot be defined as an international conflict, yet which lacks the traditional features of civil war, has led some scholars to speak of ‘uncivil wars’, which, unlike civil wars, appear to be directed not toward the control and transformation of the political system, but toward the maximisation of disorder (Snow 1996). The attention which scholars dedicated to these wars in the 1990s ultimately could not lead to a theory of civil war, but only to a doctrine of management, that is, of the administration, manipulation and internationalisation of internal conflicts.

      2.   One possible reason for the lack of interest in civil war was the increasing popularity of the concept of revolution (at least, up until the end of the 1960s), which was often substituted for civil war, yet without ever coinciding with it. It was Hannah Arendt who, in her book On Revolution, unreservedly formulated the thesis of the heterogeneity between the two phenomena. ‘[R]evolutions’, she writes,

      are the only political events which confront us directly and inevitably with the problem of beginning [. . .] Modern revolutions have little in common with the mutatio rerum of Roman history or the stasis, the civil strife which disturbed the Greek polis. We cannot equate them with Plato’s metabolai, the quasi-natural transformation of one form of government into another, or with Polybius’s politeiōn anakyklōsis, the appointed recurring cycle into which human affairs are bound by reason of their always being driven to extremes. Antiquity was well acquainted with political change and the violence that went with change, but neither of them appeared to it to bring about something new. (Arendt 1963, 13–14)

      Although it is likely that the difference between the two concepts is in fact purely nominal, it is certain that the concentration of attention on the concept of revolution (which for some reason seemed more respectable than that of stasis, even to a scholar as unprejudiced as Arendt), has contributed to the marginalisation of studies on civil war.

      3.   A theory of civil war is not among the possible objectives of this text. Instead, I will restrict myself to examining the topic as it appears within Western political thought at two moments in its history: in the testimonies of the philosophers and historians of Ancient Greece and in the thought of Thomas Hobbes. The two examples have not been selected by chance: I would like to suggest that they represent the two faces, so to speak, of a single political paradigm, which manifests itself, on the one hand, through the assertion of the necessity of civil war, and on the other, through the assertion of the necessity of its exclusion. That the paradigm is, in truth, single, means that the two opposed necessities maintain a secret

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1