Shakespeare, Ben Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher
()
About this ebook
Samuel Taylor Coleridge
Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834), English lyrical poet, critic, and philosopher, whose Lyrical Ballads (1798), written with William Wordsworth, started the English Romantic movement. He was born in Ottery St Mary where his father was the vicar, and he was at school with Charles Lamb and Leigh Hunt, and spent two years at Jesus College, Cambridge. He is best known for his poems The Rime of the Ancient Mariner and Kubla Khan, but his critical work, especially on Shakespeare was highly influential, and he helped introduce German idealist philosophy to English-speaking culture. He also suffered from poor physical health that may have stemmed from a bout of rheumatic fever and other childhood illnesses. He was treated for these concerns with laudanum, which fostered a lifelong opium addiction.
Read more from Samuel Taylor Coleridge
Lyrical Ballads: 1800 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings50 Classic Love Poems You Have To Read (Golden Deer Classics) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Rime of the Ancient Mariner: Illustrated Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Aids to Reflection and the Confessions of an Inquiring Spirit Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPoems by Samuel Taylor Coleridge and William Wordsworth: Including Their Thoughts On Poetry Principles and Secrets Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Rime of the Ancient Mariner and Other Poems (with an Introduction by Julian B. Abernethy) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Biographia Literaria (Complete Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Complete Poems of Samuel Taylor Coleridge (Illustrated Edition) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNotes on Shakespeare - Lectures by Coleridge Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wordsworth & Coleridge: Lyrical Ballads and Other Poems: Including Their Thoughts on the Principles and Secrets of Poetry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Rime of the Ancient Mariner, Kubla Khan, Christabel, and the Conversation Poems Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Poetical Works Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Confessions of an Inquiring Spirit (Barnes & Noble Digital Library) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Best Poetry of Samuel Taylor Coleridge Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPoems of Coleridge Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lyrical Ballads Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChristabel & Kubla Khan: A Vision in a Dream (Unabridged) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsColeridge and Wordsworth: Lyrical Ballads & Other Poems: Including Their Thoughts on the Principles of Poetry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Shakespeare, Ben Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher
Related ebooks
Shakespeare, Ben Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMary Tudor Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Atlantic Monthly, Volume 02, No. 11, September, 1858 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Atlantic Monthly, Volume 14, No. 83, September, 1864 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHeadlong Hall Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTolstoy on Shakespeare: A Critical Essay on Shakespeare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mirror of Literature, Amusement, and Instruction Volume 20, No. 561, August 11, 1832 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Fairy Mythology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMontezuma: An Epic on the Origin and Fate of the Aztec Nation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPast and Present Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEssays — Second Series Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSHAKESPEARE, THE DRAMA & THE STAGE: Coleridge's Essays and Lectures on Shakespeare and Other Old Poets and Dramatists Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhaethon: Loose Thoughts for Loose Thinkers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMont-Saint-Michel and Chartres: A Study of Thirteenth-Century Unity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMont-Saint-Michel and Chartres Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Victorian Age in Literature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCOLERIDGE: Essays & Lectures on Shakespeare, Old Poets & Dramatists: With Introductory Matter on Poems and Plays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShakespeare; Or, the Poet Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5All for Love Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe International Magazine, Volume 2, No. 3, February, 1851 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHamlet and the Vision of Darkness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5On the Art of Writing Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdventures in Criticism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDrum-Taps Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine—Volume 62, No. 386, December, 1847 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLast Men in London Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Ways of Life: Two Stories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlackwood's Edinburgh Magazine — Volume 53, No. 328, February, 1843 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlackwood's Edinburgh Magazine — Volume 53, No. 328, February, 1843 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
History For You
The Mother Tongue: English and How it Got that Way Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lessons of History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killers of the Flower Moon: Oil, Money, Murder and the Birth of the FBI Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Do Humankind's Best Days Lie Ahead? Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Ultralearning: Master Hard Skills, Outsmart the Competition, and Accelerate Your Career Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Richest Man in Babylon: The most inspiring book on wealth ever written Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Make Good Art Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vanderbilt: The Rise and Fall of an American Dynasty Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Quite Nice and Fairly Accurate Good Omens Script Book: The Script Book Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A People's History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Short History of the World: The Story of Mankind From Prehistory to the Modern Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wordslut: A Feminist Guide to Taking Back the English Language Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lost City of Z: A Legendary British Explorer's Deadly Quest to Uncover the Secrets of the Amazon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The New Silk Roads: The Present and Future of the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The View from the Cheap Seats: Selected Nonfiction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5End of History and the Last Man Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5World History For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Line in the Sand: Britain, France and the struggle that shaped the Middle East Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Spy Among Friends: Now a major ITV series starring Damian Lewis and Guy Pearce Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Shakespeare, Ben Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Shakespeare, Ben Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher - Samuel Taylor Coleridge
Samuel Taylor Coleridge
Shakespeare, Ben Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher
Published by Good Press, 2022
EAN 4064066104399
Table of Contents
Shakespeare, With introductory matter on Poetry, the. Drama, and the Stage.
Definition Of Poetry.
Greek Drama.
Progress Of The Drama.
The Drama Generally, And Public Taste.
Shakespeare, A Poet Generally.
Shakespeare's Judgment equal to his Genius.
Recapitulation, And Summary. Of the Characteristics of Shakespeare's Dramas.
Outline Of An Introductory Lecture Upon Shakespeare.
Order Of Shakespeare's Plays.
Love's Labour's Lost.
Midsummer Night's Dream.
Comedy Of Errors.
As You Like It.
Twelfth Night.
All's Well That Ends Well.
Merry Wives Of Windsor.
Measure For Measure.
Cymbeline.
Titus Andronicus.
Troilus And Cressida.
Coriolanus.
Julius Cæsar.
Antony And Cleopatra.
Timon Of Athens.
Romeo And Juliet.
Shakespeare's English Historical Plays.
King John.
Richard II.
Henry IV.—Part I.
Henry IV.—Part II.
Henry V.
Henry VI.—Part I.
Richard III.
Lear.
Hamlet.
Macbeth.
Winter's Tale.
Othello.
Whalley's Preface.
Whalley's ‘ Life Of Jonson. ’
Every Man Out Of His Humour.
Poetaster.
Fall Of Sejanus.
Volpone.
Apicæne.
The Alchemist.
Catiline's Conspiracy.
Bartholomew Fair.
The Devil Is An Ass.
The Staple Of News.
The New Inn.
Harris's Commendatory Poem On Fletcher.
Life Of Fletcher In Stockdale's Edition, 1811.
Maid's Tragedy.
A King And No King.
The Scornful Lady.
The Custom Of The Country.
The Elder Brother.
The Spanish Curate.
Wit Without Money.
The Humorous Lieutenant.
The Mad Lover.
The Loyal Subject.
Rule A Wife And Have A Wife.
The Laws Of Candy.
The Little French Lawyer.
Valentinian.
Rollo.
The Wildgoose Chase.
A Wife For A Month.
The Pilgrim.
The Queen Of Corinth.
The Noble Gentleman.
The Coronation.
Wit At Several Weapons.
The Fair Maid Of The Inn.
The Two Noble Kinsmen.
The Woman Hater.
Advertisement.
"
Shakespeare, With introductory matter on Poetry, the Drama, and the Stage.
Table of Contents
Definition Of Poetry.
Table of Contents
Poetry is not the proper antithesis to prose, but to science. Poetry is opposed to science, and prose to metre. The proper and immediate object of science is the acquirement, or communication, of truth; the proper and immediate object of poetry is the communication of immediate pleasure. This definition is useful; but as it would include novels and other works of fiction, which yet we do not call poems, there must be some additional character by which poetry is not only divided from opposites, but likewise distinguished from disparate, though similar, modes of composition. Now how is this to be effected? In animated prose, the beauties of nature, and the passions and accidents of human nature, are often expressed in that natural language which the contemplation of them would suggest to a pure and benevolent mind; yet still neither we nor the writers call such a work a poem, though no work could deserve that name which did not include all this, together with something else. What is this? It is that pleasurable emotion, that peculiar state and degree of excitement, which arises in the poet himself in the act of composition;—and in order to understand this, we must combine a more than ordinary sympathy [pg 002] with the objects, emotions, or incidents contemplated by the poet, consequent on a more than common sensibility, with a more than ordinary activity of the mind in respect of the fancy and the imagination. Hence is produced a more vivid reflection of the truths of nature and of the human heart, united with a constant activity modifying and correcting these truths by that sort of pleasurable emotion, which the exertion of all our faculties gives in a certain degree; but which can only be felt in perfection under the full play of those powers of mind, which are spontaneous rather than voluntary, and in which the effort required bears no proportion to the activity enjoyed. This is the state which permits the production of a highly pleasurable whole, of which each part shall also communicate for itself a distinct and conscious pleasure; and hence arises the definition, which I trust is now intelligible, that poetry, or rather a poem, is a species of composition, opposed to science, as having intellectual pleasure for its object, and as attaining its end by the use of language natural to us in a state of excitement,—but distinguished from other species of composition, not excluded by the former criterion, by permitting a pleasure from the whole consistent with a consciousness of pleasure from the component parts;—and the perfection of which is, to communicate from each part the greatest immediate pleasure compatible with the largest sum of pleasure on the whole. This, of course, will vary with the different modes of poetry;—and that splendour of particular lines, which would be worthy of admiration in an impassioned elegy, or a short indignant satire, would be a blemish [pg 003] and proof of vile taste in a tragedy or an epic poem.
It is remarkable, by the way, that Milton in three incidental words has implied all which for the purposes of more distinct apprehension, which at first must be slow-paced in order to be distinct, I have endeavoured to develope in a precise and strictly adequate definition. Speaking of poetry, he says, as in a parenthesis, which is simple, sensuous, passionate.
How awful is the power of words!—fearful often in their consequences when merely felt, not understood; but most awful when both felt and understood!—Had these three words only been properly understood by, and present in the minds of, general readers, not only almost a library of false poetry would have been either precluded or still-born, but, what is of more consequence, works truly excellent and capable of enlarging the understanding, warming and purifying the heart, and placing in the centre of the whole being the germs of noble and manlike actions, would have been the common diet of the intellect instead. For the first condition, simplicity,—while, on the one hand, it distinguishes poetry from the arduous processes of science, labouring towards an end not yet arrived at, and supposes a smooth and finished road, on which the reader is to walk onward easily, with streams murmuring by his side, and trees and flowers and human dwellings to make his journey as delightful as the object of it is desirable, instead of having to toil with the pioneers and painfully make the road on which others are to travel,—precludes, on the other hand, every affectation and morbid peculiarity;—the second condition, sensuousness, [pg 004] insures that framework of objectivity, that definiteness and articulation of imagery, and that modification of the images themselves, without which poetry becomes flattened into mere didactics of practice, or evaporated into a hazy, unthoughtful, day-dreaming; and the third condition, passion, provides that neither thought nor imagery shall be simply objective, but that the passio vera of humanity shall warm and animate both.
To return, however, to the previous definition, this most general and distinctive character of a poem originates in the poetic genius itself; and though it comprises whatever can with any propriety be called a poem (unless that word be a mere lazy synonym for a composition in metre), it yet becomes a just, and not merely discriminative, but full and adequate, definition of poetry in its highest and most peculiar sense, only so far as the distinction still results from the poetic genius, which sustains and modifies the emotions, thoughts, and vivid representations of the poem by the energy without effort of the poet's own mind,—by the spontaneous activity of his imagination and fancy, and by whatever else with these reveals itself in the balancing and reconciling of opposite or discordant qualities, sameness with difference, a sense of novelty and freshness with old or customary objects, a more than usual state of emotion with more than usual order, self-possession and judgment with enthusiasm and vehement feeling,—and which, while it blends and harmonizes the natural and the artificial, still subordinates art to nature, the manner to the matter, and our admiration of the poet to our [pg 005] sympathy with the images, passions, characters, and incidents of the poem:—
"Doubtless, this could not be, but that she turns
Bodies to spirit by sublimation strange,
As fire converts to fire the things it burns—
As we our food into our nature change!
"From their gross matter she abstracts their forms,
And draws a kind of quintessence from things,
Which to her proper nature she transforms
To bear them light on her celestial wings!
"Thus doth she, when from individual states
She doth abstract the universal kinds,
Which then reclothed in divers names and fates
Steal access thro' our senses to our minds."
[pg 007]
Greek Drama.
Table of Contents
It is truly singular that Plato,—whose philosophy and religion were but exotic at home, and a mere opposition to the finite in all things, genuine prophet and anticipator as he was of the Protestant Christian æra,—should have given in his Dialogue of the Banquet, a justification of our Shakespeare. For he relates that, when all the other guests had either dispersed or fallen asleep, Socrates only, together with Aristophanes and Agathon, remained awake, and that, while he continued to drink with them out of a large goblet, he compelled them, though most reluctantly, to admit that it was the business of one and the same genius to excel in tragic and comic poetry, or that the tragic poet ought, at the same time, to contain within himself the powers of comedy. Now, as this was directly repugnant to the entire theory of the ancient critics, and contrary to all their experience, it is evident that Plato must have fixed the eye of his contemplation on the innermost essentials of the drama, abstracted from the forms of age or country. In another passage he even adds the reason, namely, that opposites illustrate each other's nature, and in their struggle draw forth the strength of the combatants, and display the conqueror as sovereign even on the territories of the rival power.
Nothing can more forcibly exemplify the separative spirit of the Greek arts than their comedy as opposed to their tragedy. But as the immediate [pg 008] struggle of contraries supposes an arena common to both, so both were alike ideal; that is, the comedy of Aristophanes rose to as great a distance above the ludicrous of real life, as the tragedy of Sophocles above its tragic events and passions,—and it is in this one point, of absolute ideality, that the comedy of Shakespeare and the old comedy of Athens coincide. In this also alone did the Greek tragedy and comedy unite; in every thing else they were exactly opposed to each other. Tragedy is poetry in its deepest earnest; comedy is poetry in unlimited jest. Earnestness consists in the direction and convergence of all the powers of the soul to one aim, and in the voluntary restraint of its activity in consequence; the opposite, therefore, lies in the apparent abandonment of all definite aim or end, and in the removal of all bounds in the exercise of the mind,—attaining its real end, as an entire contrast, most perfectly, the greater the display is of intellectual wealth squandered in the wantonness of sport without an object, and the more abundant the life and vivacity in the creations of the arbitrary will.
The later comedy, even where it was really comic, was doubtless likewise more comic, the more free it appeared from any fixed aim. Misunderstandings of intention, fruitless struggles of absurd passion, contradictions of temper, and laughable situations there were; but still the form of the representation itself was serious; it proceeded as much according to settled laws, and used as much the same means of art, though to a different purpose, as the regular tragedy itself. But in the old comedy the very form itself is whimsical; the whole work is one great jest, comprehending a [pg 009] world of jests within it, among which each maintains its own place without seeming to concern itself as to the relation in which it may stand to its fellows. In short, in Sophocles, the constitution of tragedy is monarchical, but such as it existed in elder Greece, limited by laws, and therefore the more venerable,—all the parts adapting and submitting themselves to the majesty of the heroic sceptre:—in Aristophanes, comedy, on the contrary, is poetry in its most democratic form, and it is a fundamental principle with it, rather to risk all the confusion of anarchy, than to destroy the independence and privileges of its individual constituents,—place, verse, characters, even single thoughts, conceits, and allusions, each turning on the pivot of its own free will.
The tragic poet idealizes his characters by giving to the spiritual part of our nature a more decided preponderance over the animal cravings and impulses, than is met with in real life: the comic poet idealizes his characters by making the animal the governing power, and the intellectual the mere instrument. But as tragedy is not a collection of virtues and perfections, but takes care only that the vices and imperfections shall spring from the passions, errors, and prejudices which arise out of the soul;—so neither is comedy a mere crowd of vices and follies, but whatever qualities it represents, even though they are in a certain sense amiable, it still displays them as having their origin in some dependence on our lower nature, accompanied with a defect in true freedom of spirit and self-subsistence, and subject to that unconnection by contradictions of the inward being, to which all folly is owing.
[pg 010]
The ideal of earnest poetry consists in the union and harmonious melting down, and fusion of the sensual into the spiritual,—of man as an animal into man as a power of reason and self-government. And this we have represented to us most clearly in the plastic art, or statuary; where the perfection of outward form is a symbol of the perfection of an inward idea; where the body is wholly penetrated by the soul, and spiritualized even to a state of glory, and like a transparent substance, the matter, in its own nature darkness, becomes altogether a vehicle and fixture of light, a means of developing its beauties, and unfolding its wealth of various colours without disturbing its unity, or causing a division of the parts. The sportive ideal, on the contrary, consists in the perfect harmony and concord of the higher nature with the animal, as with its ruling principle and its acknowledged regent. The understanding and practical reason are represented as the willing slaves of the senses and appetites, and of the passions arising out of them. Hence we may admit the appropriateness to the old comedy, as a work of defined art, of allusions and descriptions, which morality can never justify, and, only with reference to the author himself, and only as being the effect or rather the cause of the circumstances in which he wrote, can consent even to palliate.
The old comedy rose to its perfection in Aristophanes, and in him also it died with the freedom of Greece. Then arose a species of drama, more fitly called dramatic entertainment than comedy, but of which, nevertheless, our modern comedy (Shakespeare's altogether excepted) is the genuine descendant. Euripides had already brought tragedy lower [pg 011] down and by many steps nearer to the real world than his predecessors had ever done, and the passionate admiration which Menander and Philemon expressed for him, and their open avowals that he was their great master, entitle us to consider their dramas as of a middle species, between tragedy and comedy,—not the tragi-comedy, or thing of heterogeneous parts, but a complete whole, founded on principles of its own. Throughout we find the drama of Menander distinguishing itself from tragedy, but not as the genuine old comedy, contrasting with, and opposing it. Tragedy, indeed, carried the thoughts into the mythologic world, in order to raise the emotions, the fears, and the hopes, which convince the inmost heart that their final cause is not to be discovered in the limits of mere mortal life, and force us into a presentiment, however dim, of a state in which those struggles of inward free will with outward necessity, which form the true subject of the tragedian, shall be reconciled and solved;—the entertainment or new comedy, on the other hand, remained within the circle of experience. Instead of the tragic destiny, it introduced the power of chance; even in the few fragments of Menander and Philemon now remaining to us, we find many exclamations and reflections concerning chance and fortune, as in the tragic poets concerning destiny. In tragedy, the moral law, either as obeyed or violated, above all consequences—its own maintenance or violation constituting the most important of all consequences—forms the ground; the new comedy, and our modern comedy in general (Shakespeare excepted as before) lies in prudence or imprudence, enlightened or misled self-love. The whole moral [pg 012] system of the entertainment exactly like that of fable, consists in rules of prudence, with an exquisite conciseness, and at the same time an exhaustive fulness of sense. An old critic said that tragedy was the flight or elevation of life, comedy (that of Menander) its arrangement or ordonnance.
Add to these features a portrait-like truth of character,—not so far indeed as that a bona fide individual should be described or imagined, but yet so that the features which give interest and permanence to the class should be individualized. The old tragedy moved in an ideal world,—the old comedy in a fantastic world. As the entertainment, or new comedy, restrained the creative activity both of the fancy and the imagination, it indemnified the understanding in appealing to the judgment for the probability of the scenes represented. The ancients themselves acknowledged the new comedy as an exact copy of real life. The grammarian, Aristophanes, somewhat affectedly exclaimed:—O Life and Menander! which of you two imitated the other?
In short the form of this species of drama was poetry, the stuff or matter was prose. It was prose rendered delightful by the blandishments and measured motions of the muse. Yet even this was not universal. The mimes of Sophron, so passionately admired by Plato, were written in prose, and were scenes out of real life conducted in dialogue. The exquisite feast of Adonis (Συρακούσιαι ῆ Ἀδωνιάζουσαι) in Theocritus, we are told, with some others of his eclogues, were close imitations of certain mimes of Sophron—free translations of the prose into hexameters.
It will not be improper, in this place, to make a [pg 013] few remarks on the remarkable character and functions of the chorus in the Greek tragic drama.
The chorus entered from below, close by the orchestra, and there, pacing to and fro during the choral odes, performed their solemn measured dance. In the centre of the orchestra, directly over against the middle of the scene, there stood an elevation with steps in the shape of a large altar, as high as the boards of the logeion or moveable stage. This elevation was named the thymele (θυμέλη), and served to recall the origin and original purpose of the chorus, as an altar-song in honour of the presiding deity. Here, and on these steps the persons of the chorus sate collectively, when they were not singing; attending to the dialogue as spectators, and acting as (what in truth they were) the ideal representatives of the real audience, and of the poet himself in his own character, assuming the supposed impressions made by the drama, in order to direct and rule them. But when the chorus itself formed part of the dialogue, then the leader of the band, the foreman, or coryphæus, ascended, as some think, the level summit of the thymele in order to command the stage, or, perhaps, the whole chorus advanced to the front of the orchestra, and thus put themselves in ideal connection, as it were, with the dramatis personæ there acting. This thymele was in the centre of the whole edifice, all the measurements were calculated, and the semi-circle of the amphitheatre was drawn from this point. It had a double use, a