Glock Reference Guide, 2nd Edition

INTRODUCTION

When Glock pistols burst onto the scene, very few pistols on the market could do what the Glock did: excel out of the box.

The debate about polymer is over, or at least it should be. Polymer is the material of the era, and test after test has shown it to be as strong and as durable as metal in many applications. About the only thing metal is better at is being subjected to the high pressures associated with a cartridge being fired. Yes, most metals have a higher melting point, but polymer has a far higher melting point than what your skin can stand, even when wearing a glove, and the firearm has to be held in order to be fired.

I still hear people say, steel or nothing in regard to their choice in firearms. Hey, I love all firearms whether they are made of polymer, alloy, steel or whatever. To each their own. I have steel handguns in my collection, and I love to shoot them. Some I might even carry on occasion. But to say steel guns are better than polymer guns is like saying the all-metal cars of yesteryear are better than the mostly plastic cars of today. We can all get nostalgic for old cars, and I think they’re great, but as for reliability, safety and function, they can’t compete with today’s cars. They’re not even in the same league. I’ve seen crash tests comparing old metal cars to new ones and it throws conventional thinking out the window.

It’s the same way with guns, all-metal handguns are great, but when it comes to out-of-the-box reliability, safety and function, polymer handguns have them beat. I’m sure this will torque some people off, and I’m going to preface it by reporting I’m a John Moses Browning devotee and love the 1911 handgun. If you want a great shooting range pistol and maybe even a competition gun, the 1911 is fine. If you want a fighting gun, buy a Glock.

I’m quite sure Browning would agree if he were still alive. He was a genius firearm designer whose innovations were ahead of their time. Which is why if he were still alive, he would be designing polymer pistols.

I’ve heard some people argue that the only reason companies make polymer guns is to save money. While polymer certainly is cheaper to produce than metal, the polymer used to make handguns has many qualities that are superior to metal. I know this is sacrilege, and those same people wouldn’t admit it, but it is true. For one, a polymer frame absorbs recoil better. It just does. This makes for better handling, especially in follow-up shots. Second, it allows for more rounds to be crammed into the magazines that are fed into the grips. The walls of a polymer grip are much thinner compared to the metal frame with plastic grips attached to it. Third, it’s lighter, which makes for more comfortable carry, especially if you carry all day, every day.

One top of that, if polymer is cheaper to produce and some of those savings get passed on to me, that’s even better. If a Glock was an all-metal handgun with the same features it has now, it would easily be an $800 to $1,000 gun. One only need look at the SIG line of metal pistols versus its polymer pistols to back this claim. If one compares out-of-the-box reliability and function of a Glock to that of the various 1911s on the market, who knows what the price would be? I’ve owned 1911s, and I’ve been around them, and up until recently, you couldn’t get one for a reasonable price with the reliability of a Glock. Eats through anything? Hardly. Maybe most hardball/FMJ, but getting one to feed reliably with hollowpoints wasn’t something you would come by cheaply.

I bought my first handgun in 1993, a Government Model 1911, for $320 at the Base Exchange on Marine Corps Base (MCB) 29 Palms. Aside from crappy magazines, it ate hardball ammunition like it was going out of style, but I don’t think I ever could get one full magazine of hollowpoints to feed through it. With that handgun, my method of carry was a hollowpoint in the chamber with the rest of the magazine filled with hardball. I knew the first round would do some damage, and the follow-up rounds would at least feed reliably. In the last few years, I’ve spent a lot of time with Ruger’s SR1911, and have been very impressed at how reliably it feeds all sorts of ammunition. Still, at around $800, and Ruger has a reputation for being very reasonably priced, it’s far more expensive than a Glock, and it’s still not quite as reliable. Most quality 1911s are priced at well above $1,000 and they’re nowhere near as reliable as a Glock.

Over the course of doing research for this book, I have fired every model Glock makes, except the G18 and G17L. Most models I have fired in both Gen4 and Gen3, and in the Short Frame models where offered; and I’ve fired all of the Gen5 and slimline models available. I have fired a lot of Glocks. And I’ve fired a lot of ammo through them, several thousand rounds. I’ve fired ammo from Federal, SIG, Black Hills, DoubleTap, Winchester and just about every major ammo maker available on our shores, plus some really good small manufacturers. My point in mentioning all of this is that after putting a lot of ammo through a whole bunch of Glock pistols, I have concluded that you can pull any Glock out of its box, put any brand or type of the appropriate caliber into it, and it will fire every time you pull the trigger. And it will last a long time, regardless of how you treat it.

NOTE TO THE READER:

In this book there will be instances where color is important, and this is a black-and-white photo book. In these instances, I’m going to post the photo on my Instagram feed, and in the book caption I’ll make note: (instagram.com/robb_manning). Or you can go to Instagram and search: #robb_manning.glock.book

CHAPTER 1:

GLOCK TIMELINE

TIMELINE:

1963: Glock KG is founded by Gaston Glock. In Austria (as well as other German-speaking countries), KG is the abbreviation for Kommanditgesellschaft, or limited partnership. Gaston is a chemical engineer specializing in plastics and thermal molding. The company makes a variety of odds and ends, such as shower curtain rods, hinges and doorknobs.

1970s: Glock KG starts designing and producing miscellaneous products for the Austrian military, such as practice grenade shells, field knives and machine gun belt links. The field knives are still being made to this day in two models; one with saw (Model 81) and one without (Model 78).

1980: Glock receives a formal invitation from the Austrian Army to develop a new pistol for the Austrian Army and compete in the field trials for selection.

1980: Glock KG is reformed into Glock G.m.b.H, which is the abbreviation for Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung, which means Company with Limited Liability, or what in the United States is called an LLC, or Limited Liability Company. This is the most common type of business in Austria and other German-speaking countries.

1981: Gaston Glock assembles a group of engineers to develop the new pistol. Weeks later a prototype is complete. The Model 81 Field Knife with saw goes into production.

1982: The Glock pistol competes in a rigorous battery of tests, and it distances itself from the other entrants. Glock comes in first and is awarded the contract.

1983: Glock delivers the first order of G17 pistols to the Austrian Army. The Glock E-Tool also goes into development and is still being made to this day.

1984: The Norwegian Army adopts the G17, and that same year deliveries begin.

1985: Export marketing is greatly expanded. Several companies vie for importation rights into the U.S. Glock instead chooses to form its own import entity, Glock USA, the following year.

1986: The G17 is accepted for import into the U.S. It’s a hit in both the U.S. law-enforcement and civilian markets.

1987: Glock develops the G18 select-fire pistol for use in Austrian Special Forces and anti-terrorism units. Glock opens a second Austrian factory in Ferlach.

1988: Production begins on the G19 and G17L.

1989: Second Generation frames are released. Glock hits the 350,000 pistols sold mark, with nearly half (150,000 units) being sold to U.S. law-enforcement agencies. Glock pistols are now being used by entities within 45 different countries.

1990: Production on the G20 and G21 gets bumped out of the way, so production of the G22 and G23 can commence. Later in the year, the G20 goes into production, and by the end of the year the G21 also goes into production. Both pistols are large-frame Glocks and offer two calibers that pack a lot of punch: one new, the 10mm, and one old, the .45 ACP.

1991: The Captured Recoil Spring is released.

1994: Production begins on the G24 and G24C.

1995: Production begins on the G25 .380. Not available to civilians in the United States, it would leave American consumers clamoring for a Glock in .380 for nearly 20 years. This is also the year of the subcompact, as the G26 and G27 go into production. They would become affectionately known as Baby Glocks.

1996: Production begins on the G28, another .380 that won’t make it to the U.S., at least not for consumers. The G17T is also released, a training pistol which shoots marking and target cartridges. Six years after the full-size 10mm and .45 ACP pistols go into production, production starts on the subcompact G29 and G30.

1997: Gen3 frames go into production, also known as FGR frames (Finger Groove and Rail).

1998: Production begins on the .357 SIG pistols, the G31, G32 and G33. Two pistols, made for competition, also are released: the G34 and G35. (The G31 and G32 also are offered in compensated models.)

1999: Glock hits the 2 million pistols sold mark. The G36 goes into production, as does another training pistol, the G17T AC.

2000: Glock unveils its new headquarters in Deutsch-Wagram.

2001: Glock starts production on some pistols that incorporate an integral lock, for states that require such a device.

2002: Glock jumps into the tactical light/laser market, with various models available. The three-pin G17 goes into production.

2003: Glock introduces a new cartridge, the .45 G.A.P. (Glock Automatic Pistol), and starts production on the G37. The G19 three-pin is released.

2005: Production begins on the two other .45 GAP pistols, the G38 and G39.

2006: Glock USA celebrates its 20th anniversary.

2007: Glock begins production of the Short Frame (SF) variants of its large frame pistols: the G20, G29, G21 and G30. Glock also hits the mark of 5,000,000 pistols sold worldwide.

2009: Glock begins production of the Gen4 pistols, called the Rough Texture Frames (RTF).

2010: Glock introduces and begins shipping Gen4 pistols, starting with the most popular law enforcement models: G17, G19, G26, G22, G23, G27, G31, G35 and G37.

2011: Glock USA marks 25 years in the U.S. market.

2014: Glock introduces and starts shipping on the G41 and G42.

2015: Glock introduces the G40 Gen4 in the MOS (Modular Optic System) configuration, as well as expanding the MOS line to include the G34, G35, and G41. Glock also introduces the G43, a single-stack 9mm, something consumers have been requesting for years.

2016: Glock celebrates 30 years in the U.S. market. Glock wins FBI contract with G17M and G19M, which begin shipping in August.

2017: Glock announces 5th Generation, with the G17 Gen5 and G19 Gen5.

2018: Gen5 lineup expands to include G26 and G34 MOS. The G19X is introduced, a hybrid of the G17 frame with G19 slide assembly. Glock adds MOS and Front Serrations (FS) to G17 Gen5 and G19 Gen5. The G45 is introduced, a black, commercial version of the G19X. America mourns the loss of U.S. Marine, actor and Glock spokesman R. Lee Ermey.

2019: Glock releases two new Slimline 9mm pistols: the G48 and G43X. The G47 is introduced for the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency. The MOS configuration is added to the G45. Glock names Chuck Norris as spokesman.

CHAPTER 2:

GLOCK SAFETY MECHANISMS

In order to fully understand the Glock, you must know how it functions and how the safety system operates. The Glock’s introduction was revolutionary: For the first time there was a handgun that was completely safe, in the sense that it absolutely could not fire a chambered round unless the trigger was intentionally pulled. It cannot fire from being bumped. It cannot fire from being dropped. It has been dropped from six feet, and it has been dropped from six stories. It has even been dropped from hundreds of feet out of a helicopter. It has been tied to the back of a truck and dragged down a gravel road. All of these were done with a round in the chamber (generally a cartridge with no bullet, just the primer), and never has it fired.

In fact, the striker (firing pin) is almost completely encapsulated and simply cannot touch the primer of the cartridge unless the trigger is pulled. Even if there was no striker block preventing it from striking the primer, it would still be physically impossible for the striker to bump the firing pin because the striker spring is at rest, not under tension, and can never be cocked unless the trigger is pulled. As soon as the trigger is released and allowed to move forward, it is uncocked.

The first and most obvious thing about the Glock, is that it has no manual external thumb safety, as did nearly all semi-automatic pistols prior to its introduction. This intimidates many people who are new to shooting, and even those who have been shooting for a long time, but are unfamiliar with Glocks. I was leery when I first became interested in carrying a Glock. I’ve been around guns my entire adult life, and spent a considerable amount of time carrying one. When I carried in a military capacity, the service sidearm I carried was a Beretta M9, and that’s the type of operating system I was used to: a safety/decocker SA/DA (single action/double action) pistol.

Most notable about a Glock: the absence of a manual thumb safety. This is both a selling point to some, and a detractor for others.

With proper training, Glock pistols are just as safe, if not safer than, other pistols. If you follow the commandments of safe shooting — chiefly, keep your finger off the trigger until ready to fire — there is no excuse for negligent discharge.

Train to properly clear your shirt from the mouth of the holster when re-holstering your pistol. This will prevent the shirt from entering the trigger guard and snagging the trigger. Also, take your time; there’s no need to rush the re-holster.

The first striker-fired pistol I purchased was a Ruger SR9, which has a thumb safety. When I finally decided to purchase a Glock, it was still not something I felt comfortable carrying. So, I put it to my own test. I handled it as much as possible and I carried it as much as possible, with no round in the chamber. As advertised, it never fired on that empty chamber. I started carrying it with a round in the chamber, and to my surprise, I found that I was more comfortable carrying it than I had been other handguns.

With handguns such as my 1911 being carried with the hammer cocked and the safety on, the thought of that safety being accidentally bumped in the holster, leaving it cocked and ready to fire was unnerving. I found myself constantly checking to see if the safety was on. I don’t worry about that with a Glock. I know what condition it’s in, and I know it’s safe and cannot fire unless I pull it out of the holster, stick my finger in the trigger guard, and pull the trigger to the rear.

If you fall into this boat, interested in a Glock, but unsure about the lack of manual safety, don’t be. Get some instruction, some range time, specifically Glock-time, and you’ll soon find your fears are all for naught.

I own a lot of Glocks, a Gen1, Gen2, Gen3, some Gen4s and some Gen5s, and have fired every model of Glock offered on the U.S. market, except for the G17L. Most models I’ve even fired every variant that is offered; Gen3, Gen4, SF (Short Frame), MOS, Gen5 and FS (Front Sight). Yet with all of those Glock pistols, not once has one negligently discharged. And they won’t. They are designed to be safe, hence the name: Safe Action Pistol.

The key to safety with firearms, all firearms, not just Glocks, is training. I would never hand a firearm to a person without knowing their level of training. If you’re handling a Glock, you must have finger/trigger awareness. You should know where your finger is at all times, and it should absolutely not be inside the trigger guard unless you are intentionally going to pull the trigger to the rear. The best place for your trigger finger is pointed straight ahead, alongside the frame, almost parallel with the bore. This is stressed in nearly every type of firearms training there is. If you keep your finger off the trigger until you are absolutely sure you are ready to fire a shot, (one of the 10 commandments of firearms safety) the lack of manual thumb safety is a moot point.

Probably the two most dangerous parts of firearms handling are unholstering and holstering. Negligent discharges while unholstering typically occur as the handgun leaves the holster and the trigger finger is not in proper position and the trigger is pulled. Some blame the holster in this, as it has occurred almost exclusively with holsters that require pressing a button or lever to release the handgun. The individual would press the button or lever with the tip of their finger, thus leaving their finger in a hook-shape, and as the pistol clears the holster the hooked finger enters the trigger guard. The answer is to leave the finger straight and press the button or lever with the underside of the finger, not the tip.

The other time of risk is holstering your Glock. If the shirt is not properly cleared from the mouth of the holster, as the handgun enters the holster, part of the shirt could enter the trigger guard, and become trapped between the trigger and holster, and as the Glock is pressed into the holster the shirt would press the trigger. The answer to this is to properly clear your shirt from the mouth of the holster by pulling it far enough away. This is an issue of training. Also, in a non-stress situation, there’s nothing wrong with feeling the mouth of the holster, as you re-holster, to ensure there’s nothing to snag. Just take your time re-holstering. This is real life, not a Hollywood Western, there’s no need to rush the re-holster.

So, if it doesn’t have a manual safety, what does it have? It has an automatic safety system consisting of three separate, passive mechanical safeties that come together to form the Glock Safe Action system. It is the purest safety available: In order to fire, one must deliberately stick a finger in the trigger guard and pull the trigger to the rear.

The trigger safety prevents the trigger from being pulled all the way to the rear. Notice I’m pushing on the trigger, but not the trigger safety.

Here I’m pressing the trigger safety, and it has cleared the trigger.

Top view of the firing pin safety at rest. It completely blocks the firing pin from moving forward and striking the primer.

The firing pin safety at rest. The trigger bar is also at rest and is not touching the firing pin safety.

The trigger has been pulled all the way to the rear, moving the trigger bar back, which pressed the firing pin safety up and out of the way, so that the firing pin may move forward to fire the gun.

The firing pin safety is up and out of the way, and the firing pin has moved forward to strike the primer.

SAFETY DEVICES

TRIGGER SAFETY

This is one of the first things people notice, after the lack of manual safety. It’s one of the things that made the Glock famous when it first hit the scene. It consists of a lever incorporated into the trigger, and is, essentially, a trigger for the trigger. In its state of rest, it physically blocks the trigger from being pulled rearward. The trigger safety must be pulled to the rear at the same time as the trigger to disengage the safety and allow the gun to fire. If the trigger safety is not depressed, the trigger cannot be pulled to the rear, thus the weapon cannot be fired. It prevents unintentional firing as a result of being dropped or sideways pressure.

FIRING PIN SAFETY

The firing pin safety is a spring-loaded cylinder that in its untouched state presses into the firing pin channel, blocking the firing pin and preventing it from being able to touch a cartridge primer. The firing pin safety is disengaged by the trigger bar as the trigger and trigger safety are pulled to the rear. It prevents unintentional firing due to firing pin inertia.

DROP SAFETY

In order for the Glock to fire, the rear of the trigger bar must drop down, engaging the connector, thus releasing the striker. It looks like a step molded into the trigger mechanism housing (think of it as a drop safety) and prevents the trigger bar from dropping until the trigger is pulled rearward to a specific point. As the trigger bar moves rearward, the cruciform-shaped arm comes off the step and drops down. This is where you get the trigger break. The striker cannot be released until the trigger gets to that point.

This is the trigger mechanism housing engaged (at rest) in the safe position. The trigger is forward. The trigger bar cruciform rests on the step, which prevents it from releasing down. The arrow points to the cruciform, in the safe position.

Here the trigger has been pulled all the way to the rear, and the trigger bar cruciform has moved all the way to the rear, passed the step, and drops down so the striker is released.

Here is another view of the cruciform all the way to the rear, where it dropped down. The arrow shows the step where the cruciform rests when the trigger is forward, in the safe position.

The firing pin lug (A) is resting on the rear of the trigger bar cruciform (B). The drop safety is engaged, in the safe position. Once the trigger is pulled, the cruciform will drop down out of the way of the firing pin lug, and the firing pin will snap forward, firing the Glock. You can also see the trigger spring (C) connected to the trigger bar cruciform leg (D).

CHAPTER 3:

PARTS IS PARTS

If you were alive from 1983 to 1984 you might remember a Wendy’s marketing campaign called Parts is Parts. In these popular commercials, a customer ordering food at a competitor’s nondescript fast-food chain is told their chicken sandwich is made from parts of chickens. The customer asks, Which parts? to which the man behind the counter responds, Parts is Parts.

The point is, it doesn’t matter which parts of the chicken you use, because parts is parts. Though in the commercial Wendy’s pokes fun at this, for non-food goods such as Glock pistols, this is a smart business practice. I doubt Gaston would have seen that commercial air in Austria, but you would think he had, because that’s one of the brilliant manufacturing methods used by his company: make as many parts interchangeable between models as possible.

This interchangeability of parts is one of the hallmarks of Glock. For ease of manufacturing, the parts are standardized across the largest possible array of models. There are, of course, going to be some differences, but you can bet that whenever a new model is being developed, if it can use the same part as other models, Glock will use it. It’s important, because anytime you minimize the number of parts in your company’s inventory it streamlines the manufacturing process. Probably the most radical changes came with the G42 and G43 models, which Glock then incorporated those changes as the basis for the Gen5 models (more on that in later chapters). Glock is also very consistent about uniformity of parts. If you have 10 different G22s, you can completely disassemble all 34 parts (there are actually more than 34 parts, more on that later), put each part in its own bin, mix the parts up, reassemble the 10 G22s with the mixed up parts, and all parts will fit perfectly, and all handguns will perform perfectly. There is zero percent hand fitting needed.

That simplicity is part of the beauty of Glock. Everything about it is as simple as it possible. This is a boon for everyone. It’s great for Glock, because it makes manufacture as simple and cost-effective as possible. It’s good for the end-user, because the fewer parts there are, the fewer parts there are to break, and the more reliable the firearm. Plus, it’s good for everyone in the entire supply chain, from Glock to armorers to the end-user, because as parts do wear or break, fewer parts makes it easier to get the part and fix it.

Furthermore, if a part is added to one model as an improvement, such as the locking block pin as a third pin to the .40 caliber models (G22, G23 and G27), it is often added to all models for standardization. And, just the same, when Glock decided (for the unforeseeable future) the Gen5 would not include any of the .40 caliber models, the locking block pin was removed from all Gen5 models.

Aside from the few parts that are not interchangeable, an armorer can have a tackle-box tray full of parts and when it comes time to fix a Glock, just grab the required part, swap it out and send the customer on his or her way.

It’s important to note there are some parts that are listed as not interchangeable, and it’s not because they wouldn’t fit, it’s because you just shouldn’t swap them out. The perfect example are the compensated models, such as the 17C. It’s not that you couldn’t swap out the barrel of a 17C with a 17, but it would be completely unsafe to do so. You never want a compensated barrel on a non-compensated slide.

Glock officially lists 34 parts in its Gen5 pistol (Glock numbers it up to #35, but part #30, the locking block pin, doesn’t exist in Gen5 models), but this isn’t really an accurate number. First off, it lists the rear sight, front sight and screw as one part (#16, #16a, #16b, respectively). It’s not really one part, and in inventory it used to be that they were sold together and couldn’t be purchased separately, but now the front sight and rear sight can be purchased separately. This makes even more of an argument that they are separate parts. Second, the magazine floor plate and magazine insert used to be listed as one part (#32 and #32a, respectively), but are now two separate parts (#34 and #35). Plus, with the Gen5, the trigger spring (#25) is now in reality an assembly comprised of three parts. (Just because something is called an assembly doesn’t mean it’s only one part. Otherwise we could just call the slide and all the internal parts an assembly and list it as only one part.) Some people argue that the spring cup (#8) is two parts, but I disagree. It’s one part with two halves.

Also, take into account the trigger with trigger bar is listed as one part (#26), but in reality it’s an assembly that’s comprised of four parts: trigger, trigger safety, trigger safety pin and trigger bar. This trigger assembly will never come as separate parts, and is considered a permanent assembly, so Glock labels it as one part. But if you did consider it as four separate parts, this would put the total number of parts at 41. Forty-one doesn’t sound as good as 34, but it’s still an incredibly low number of parts.

The original G17 Gen1 field-stripped into five major parts groups: the slide, frame, barrel, recoil spring assembly and magazine.

To put this into context, you have to compare it to the number of parts other popular sidearms were comprised of in the era that the Glock was designed. The beloved 1911 Government Model has 52 parts. The Beretta 92F has 62 parts. In law enforcement, the firearms the Glock 17 replaced had even more parts. The Smith & Wesson J Frame revolvers have between 86 and 90 parts. Smith & Wesson semi-autos, the Series 39, 59 and 69, had 99 parts.

When the schematics of these firearms are held next to the one for the Glock, the simplicity of the Glock makes one question why these other designs require so many parts? Perhaps as manufacturers raced to outdo each other, their answer to Can we make it better? was to add more parts. Parts led to