In Tasmania

Part I: Father of Tasmania

… like the legendary uncle from Australia

Günter Grass, The Tin Drum

I

IN OUR THIRD YEAR ON DOLPHIN SANDS, A FRIEND TELEPHONED from England. Did you know you had a double in Tasmania?

He had contacted directory enquiries and been put through to N. Shakespeare in Burnie on the north coast, who told him: You got the wrong fella. In Argentina I had once met a Reynaldo Shakespeare, a photographer, but in four decades of wandering, I had never come across another Shakespeare with my initial. So I called him.

A young-sounding man answered. He was not put out to hear from me and the idea of meeting up appealed. I’m pretty poor on the family side, he warned. Not a family tree man.

A double is an invitation and a dare. I arranged to be in Burnie the following Sunday.

I found my namesake getting off a glittering black motorbike in the drive of a house behind the Old Surrey Road industrial estate. I’m in trouble, he grinned through his visor. He had gone to Smithton for a hoon, as he called his ride, and enjoyed himself so much – no distraction, just concentrating on the road and what the machine’s doing – that he had lost track of time.

I’ve only had him a week, he said.

What is he? I asked, feeling a stab of envy. I had never ridden on a motorbike, not even as a passenger.

Suzuki 750 GSXF, he said, with great fondness, enunciating each syllable. His parents had been dead set against him buying it. His father had worked as an apprentice turner and lost four of his friends on motorbikes. Motorbikies were known widely in Tasmania as temporary Australians.

It does look fast, I said.

Nah, good cheap little cruisy bike.

He took off his helmet and we shook hands. I looked into a decent, laid-back face, early thirties, framed by a thick black beard, brown eyes. I had no idea what he saw, but he knew well enough where I lived: he had installed the alarm for a house just down the road from us and had discussed with his wife buying a property there.

I asked, What does the N stand for?

Nevin.

Nevin Shakespeare ran his own one-man electrical business. Blocking the steep drive was a red van with the Chandos portrait stamped on the doors and the logo Shakespeare Electricals. Among his clients was the founder of the Delta Force, a New Yorker in his seventies who lived in Tasmania for his safety. He killed two of his own men so as not to leave them wounded and once had Qaddafi in his crosshairs when orders came not to shoot. Nevin had rewired his home. But he was cutting back on residential work. You’re always chasing the money.

His wife came out to tell him that he was late and he introduced me to Laurelle, whom he had met at a hockey match – while trying to get off with my sister, she said. Then their two sons: Garion, ten, and Martyn, six – both curious to see this interloper from England with a name like their Dad’s.

Does it interest you to know where you’re from? Nevin asked Garion.

Not really.

Nevin had also invited his parents, Gavin and Gloria. Gavin so resembled my own father that when I introduced them to each other a few months later, my father leaned across the table and said: I don’t know what I look like, but you look like what I think I look like.

Gavin had a stronger grip on family history than his son. His grand-father James Shakespeare came from Staffordshire in the nineteenth century and was a bricklayer in Sydney. In 1959, he left the Australian mainland to work in the paper mill in Burnie, where Nevin was born.

I’m darn pleased my parents didn’t call me Bill, Nevin said.

Were you teased? I wanted to know. In the army, my father was addressed as the effing swan of Avon, and at prep school I had had to endure everything from Shagspot to Shaggers.

I was Shakey, Gavin said.

I was Shakers, or Bill, Nevin said. ‘Good day, Bill. Do you write many songs?’ They say a lot of weird things here, a lot of misinformation. ‘No,’ I tell them, ‘he wrote plays.’

Speaking of the plays, Gavin said. I was the bottom of every class in English. It was my worst subject.

Mine, too, pretty much, Nevin said. That’s been passed on. Comes from the bricklayer’s side. Don’t have to write anything. Just get the bricks level.

We discussed other family traits. Gavin’s wife Gloria said, apropos of Nevin’s youngest son: "He’s a Shakespeare."

What do you mean? I asked.

Gloria said: You never argue with him.

Gavin said: My father wasn’t interested in arguments.

Nevin avoids arguments, Laurelle said.

No, don’t like confrontation, Nevin said.

Something that can be settled in two minutes he lets drag on for two months, that’s my pet hate.

I’m with you, I said to Nevin. I hate arguments.

Then Gavin remembered another Shakespeare trait. My father wasn’t interested in family history.

Nevin had inherited this characteristic as well. Once they go, you’ve got no idea. It’s just a heap of old photos. It’s just history.

Even so, Nevin had been reading about Tasmania’s forthcoming bicentenary in the Burnie Advocate and he felt a grub of regret to realise how little he knew about his birthplace. We were never taught Tasmanian history at Parklands High School. We were told that Truganini was the last and that the Aborigines couldn’t light a fire, couldn’t swim and all hated each other anyway. We spent more time on English and European history, which at the end of the day means nothing.

How much do you know about the man they call the Father of Tasmania?

Who’s that?

Did they tell you about the settlement at York Town?

What settlement?

Do you know York Town?

Of course, I know York Town! Nevin had driven through it heaps of times. He had camped there and it was also where he had had the motor-bike accident that so alarmed his parents. He was overtaking a line of traffic when a car pulled out. I hit the brakes and high-sided, and went surfing on my hands and knees. The car didn’t stop, didn’t even know he’d caused an accident. But I ended up in Deloraine Hospital. Luckily, I knew the blokes because I’d serviced the ambulance station.

Well, York Town is near where the Europeans landed 200 years ago, I told him. It’s the first place they settled on this coast.

He shook his head. We knew nothing of it. You ask anyone in the street, they wouldn’t have much knowledge.

An idea was forming. I said to Nevin, Take me on your bike, and I’ll show you.

II

SEPARATED FROM THE AUSTRALIAN MAINLAND BY 140 MILES OF the treacherous pitch and toss of Bass Strait, Tasmania is a byword for remoteness. As with Patagonia, to which in geological prehistory it was attached, it is like outer space on earth and invoked by those at the centre to stand for all that is far-flung, strange and unverifiable.

Tasmania is in myth and in history a secret place, a rarely visited place. Those few who did make the journey compared it to Elysium, or sometimes to Hades. For the first 50 years of its settlement, it was, with the notorious Norfolk Island, Britain’s most distant penal colony and under the name of Van Diemen’s Land was open panopticon to 76,000 convicts gathered from many pockets of the Empire, the majority of them thieves. The average sentence for the transportees was seven years – to a destination that was described by English judges as beyond the seas and might take eight months to reach. They call it the end of the world, was one convict’s verdict, and for vice it is truly so. For here wickedness flourishes unchecked. Reports and fables of depravity and cannibalism sometimes made of Van Diemen’s Land a synonym for all kinds of terror and dread, but after 1856, under the new name of Tasmania, the island – which is the size of Ireland, Sri Lanka or West Virginia – became popular as a health resort. Its exceptional natural beauty, fertile soil and temperate climate attracted immigrants who were sick of the English weather and yet wanted to be reminded of home. The extinction of the original native Aboriginal population by 1876 further bolstered the illusion of a society that Anthony Trollope, dropping in on the way to visit his jackaroo son, described as more English than is England herself. Because it was so far away, it did its best to be very near.

First sighted by a European in 1642, when the Dutch navigator Abel Tasman mistook it for the mainland of Australia, Tasmania was not colonised by the British until the first years of the nineteenth century. It is a place that the Hollywood actress Merle Oberon was persuaded to claim as her birthplace, in which Errol Flynn and Viscount Montgomery of Alamein grew up, and into which all manner of felons and explorers and adventurous sorts disappeared, of whom perhaps the most interesting was a turbulent British officer called Anthony Fenn Kemp and among the most recent perhaps the fugitive Lord Lucan; a place where not even Iran’s fundamentalist police would dream of looking for you. In an essay that Salman Rushdie wrote after the fatwa, he quoted a joke that was circulating: What’s blonde, has big tits and lives in Tasmania? Answer: Salman Rushdie.

Until 9,000 years ago, Tasmania was connected to the Australian mainland, but at the end of the last Ice Age melt from the glaciers swamped the land bridge, on the other side halting species such as the dingo and koala at the water’s edge. Tasmania became an ark, and with one or two exceptions a very extraordinary animal and plant life was left to develop. The world’s oldest living organism, King’s Holly or Lamatia tasmanica, has grown on the south coast without interruption for 40,000 years.

Van Diemen’s Land’s most notable historian, the Victorian clergyman John West, would by and large still recognise the park-like lands, the brilliant skies, the pure river and the untainted breath of morning. The roads are superbly deserted, but at night they teem with strange nocturnal creatures: wombats, wallabies, quolls, Tasmanian devils and the ubiquitous possum – plus three varieties of snake that are all lethal. In the fierce light of the Tasmanian day, the emptiness of the landscape can sting with a melancholy that is unbearable. You never forget that the enchanted isle is also a haunted one, the last habitat of the Tasmanian tiger as well as of the Tasmanian Aborigines who knew it as Trowenna. Innumerable lakes throw back the doubles of huge eucalypts with a brilliance that can make their reflections appear more solid even than the trees themselves. The upheld arms of dead white ghost-gums stand in for a vanished population and the shrieks of yellow-tailed black cockatoos are said to be the lament of dead Aboriginal children. They had gone, writes the Tasmanian author and journalist Martin Flanagan, in the way that party guests are said to have gone and left a house feeling oddly empty.

What you also notice about the landscape is that, despite the desecration caused by overlogging, it is free from pollution. The Roaring Forties, after blowing unimpeded from Cape Horn, smack at full tilt into the west coast. The result: Tasmania has the purest air in the world as well as some of its cleanest rainwater.

Much of the island’s western half remains a protected wilderness of mountains, impenetrable rainforest and torrential rivers. A sailor told a newcomer who arrived a century ago: In half that wilderness no man has put foot since time began.

The majority of the population of just under half a million live in the southern capital Hobart and in Launceston in the north. Between these rival cities, the central plateaux, which the Tasmanians call tiers, are dotted with Georgian-style houses and churches set amid orchards and open farmland.

The east coast is fringed with bright white beaches and small inlets and has a Caribbean aspect. It is not the ruined coastline of most countries, and it would probably have looked much the same on the blustery November morning in 1804 when Anthony Fenn Kemp floundered out of the water under the bemused eye of the native population.

III

THE MAN WHO CAME ASHORE WAS A 31-YEAR-OLD CAPTAIN IN THE NEW SOUTH Wales Corps. He was a vigorous entrepreneur with a spot of charisma, and a great survivor. He became in fits and starts the Father of Tasmania.

Anthony Fenn Kemp, the son of a prominent wine and tobacco merchant, was born in London in 1773. After a brief spell working in the family business in Aldgate, he travelled to France in 1791 during the French Revolution. What he experienced turned him into a republican. His political sympathies hardened in the following year when he went to Charleston in South Carolina and met George Washington.

In 1793 he bought a commission, and in 1795 sailed to Port Jackson – as Sydney then was – probably in the same ship as George Bass and Matthew Flinders, both of whom also left their mark. Within a very few years, these two explorers would prove that Van Diemen’s Land was an island.

Kemp served for two years in Norfolk Island, but no record exists of his time there. By 1797, he was again in Port Jackson where he would become paymaster of his infantry company and later treasurer of the whole regiment. Like most of his fellow officers he was engaged in trade and in 1799 he opened a store on the north-east corner of King and George Street. He was a familiar and tyrannical figure in early Sydney, and had his finger in most pies. In September 1802, aboard a visiting French corvette, the Naturaliste, he was received into the grade of Antient Masonry: the first lodge known to have been convened in Australia.

Kemp’s dealings with the French put him in a position to alert his commanding officer, Colonel Paterson, of a plan to claim Van Diemen’s Land, largely ignored by Europeans since Tasman’s original visit of 1642. Startled by the rumour, Governor King of New South Wales directed an expeditionary force of 49 soldiers, free settlers and convicts to forestall the French and set up camp at Risdon, on the east bank of the Derwent River in the south of the island. A few months later, King ordered Paterson to establish a settlement at Port Dalrymple (so named by Matthew Flinders in 1798) in the north.

Four ships sailed from Sydney in June 1804, but gales blew them back. They set out again in October. On board were 181 people: 64 soldiers and marines (and 20 wives), 74 convicts (and two wives), 14 children, and seven officers – including Captain Anthony Fenn Kemp, second-in-command.

IV

ONE HUNDRED AND NINETY-FIVE YEARS LATER, I LOOK OUT OVER A STRIP OF emerald boobyallas onto a deserted nine-mile beach. Through a glass wall of window, I can see a dorsal of pinkish granite jutting into the Tasman Sea. Below the house, there is a fenced-off garden planted with fruit trees, and a tin shed where I work.

One day I open a bag filled with letters which my father had given me at his house in England, and which he had unearthed from the basement of my grandmother’s house. Her father had left the letters to her and she had never, as far as my father knew, read them. My grandmother was by now 96.

I believe we may have a relative who went to Tasmania in the nineteenth century, my father said. A bit of a black sheep.

That was the first I had heard of a Tasmanian relative and I did not really take it in. The bag remained unopened for several months.

The thick plastic was the colour of old toenail – and the contents smelled of rotten vegetable, not quite fermented but earthy. The first thing I took out was a loose slip of paper, a cheque made out in 1815 against Kemp & Potter, brandy and tobacco merchants. Potter was my grandmother’s name and I remembered that our family had, long ago, been involved in the drinks trade. But the name Kemp meant nothing to me. Nor had my grandmother heard of the Kemps. All she remembered her father telling her was that the papers had belonged to a black sheep in the family who had gone to New South Wales.

Also in the bag was a bundle of about 30 letters written on stiff paper in the days before stamps. They were packed in chronological order: the first letter dated 1791, the last 1825. Occasionally they were signed with a woman’s name: Amy, Susanna, Elizabeth. But the bulk of the correspondence was between two men: William Potter and Anthony Fenn Kemp.

Kemp’s letters to Potter were sent from Brazil, Cape Town, Sydney, Hobart. The ink had faded to umber, but the handwriting remained distinctively slanted, the words scratched forcefully onto the page, with exaggerated tails to certain letters. By contrast, Potter’s responses – all from an address in Aldgate – were written in a neat, upright hand, and he had made copies of his own replies, so providing both sides of their correspondence.

I opened a red marbled business ledger dated March 25, 1789, the year of the French Revolution. The paper had the scent of nutmeg. On the first page, under the heading I Anthony Kemp being of Age have this day rec’d of Col John Arnott my guardian, there was a long list of what Kemp had inherited on his 16th birthday. It included properties in Surrey and central London, stocks and cash. Together it amounted to a fortune today worth several millions of pounds. I wondered what had become of it.

Kemp was a very rich young man, but as I read more of the ledger it became clear that, despite his wealth, he had worked as an apprentice in his father’s business at 87 Aldgate, the site today of a branch of Boots the chemist. He appears to have had a pretty free hand in its affairs, though. While the ledger recorded Kemp the father tramping with his samples to Biggleswade and Newport Pagnell, Kemp the son was ordering hogsheads of rum from Antigua, pipes of port from Lisbon and fine shag from plantations in Maryland. Nor did he restrict himself to buying only tobacco and rum. The purchases mounted until they culminated in the outfitting of an entire boat, the Neptune Galley, to bring a cargo of cinnamon, cochineal, sugar and silk from Jamaica. Then suddenly the ledger ran out. One of the last entries was in the younger Kemp’s handwriting: June 14, 1789 … lost by betting at an horse race £15.10.

It transpired that Kemp had run through his inheritance in two years. By 1791, he could not repay twelve crowns to a man called Page, instead organising for a very shabby insolent low-bred woman to march into Page’s favourite London coffee house and utter impertinencies about him at the top of her voice. Page reported this incident in a letter to Kemp’s father, whose reaction was furious. He wrote to his son – who had, it appeared, undoubtedly wisely, absented himself from Aldgate – threatening to sue him unless he reflected upon the situation that your early vice and infamy has placed you in. Only if Kemp admitted to his evil conduct and confessed his faults would he be welcome to return home to his father and mother. If this overture is rejected, expect that I shall take speedy and effective public measures to prevent further injury.

One week later, a letter was brought to Aldgate by an attorney of Clement’s Inn. Its delivery had been delayed by order of Anthony Fenn Kemp until its author was safely across the Channel. Kemp’s handwriting shoves aside the centuries. Hon. Sir and Madam, Behold my reply. At present I am not sensible of what distress is nor pray to God I ever shall and as to returning with compunction I hope when I do come I may.

On the envelope an unknown hand has scribbled First elopement. Kemp’s story was just beginning.

The next letter was written on the day that he arrived in Calais and sent not to his father but to a friend called Frank. Kemp, clearly, was having a whale of a time, parading the streets in a National Cockade and finding everything very Cheap – a Partridge for Fourpence, a Hare for Sixpence, a bottle Burgundy 3/3, Champaigne 4/3. He betrayed no symptom of wanting to return to Aldgate. I receiv’d a letter from my Father the other day but couch’d in such high terms that I could not accede to them nor do not think I ever shall if I am so well off as I am at present. More attractive even than the low prices were the French women. Every day here is high Mass perform’d where all the Fish Women assemble with Pettycoats up their thighs which make them cut a very droll figure. I hope before I leave the continent I shall pick up some Heiress. He asked Frank: Pray remember me to all inquiring friends.

I riffled through the letters to find out what else Kemp got up to in France, but there was a gap of several years in the correspondence. The next letter I unfolded was dated March 1816 and the address was Hobart Town, Van Diemen’s Land.

On our first afternoon, my wife and I had walked 300 yards to the beach. There was a hot equinoctial wind warming the sea and a clear sky over the hills above Swansea. We threw off our clothes and jumped into the surf and afterwards ran back to the house, startling a young wallaby on the path. It stared at us, then bounded off through the boobyallas, its feet thumping the warm sand with a sound like a heavy fruit dropping.

I would go fishing for flathead at the mouth of the Swan River, where one evening I fell into conversation with an old fisherman who asked my name.

Shakespeare? He looked at me, excited, as if he doubted what he had heard. Not Shakespeare? You couldn’t possibly be related to the family who make the fishing tackle?

I had never been interested in gardening before. For the first time in my life I planted seeds, bought trees, learned about mulching. I was bemused when I found myself, away from the garden, still wanting to dig.

One day, at my desk in my shed with the bag of letters in front of me, I counted out the relationships that I had discovered: Potter, my great-great-great-grandfather; Kemp, my great-great-great-great-uncle. Their letters had revealed that they were more than business partners: they were brothers-in-law. To me, their story was about two ways of being in the world. On the one hand there was Kemp, roistering, opportunistic, peripatetic, corrupt. (The name Kemp, I found out, derived from a Saxon word meaning combat, competitive drinker, a contemptible, rascally fellow). On the other was the sedentary, abstemious Potter.

I was still going through their letters. In 1791, the 18-year-old Kemp was being groomed to take over the family firm. But after he left England, his father turned to William Potter, the man who had married Kemp’s elder sister Amy. He invited Potter to move into the Aldgate premises and granted him a third share of the business. On the death of Kemp senior, Potter took over the running of the firm. It had become Kemp & Potter.

There are those who go to New South Wales and there are those who mind the store. Potter inched off the page – in his handwriting and in his character – as the opposite of his brother-in-law: a cautious, fussy, meticulous man, forever advising his family how to behave. The following pieces of advice all appeared in letters to his son: "Never play cards in Grantham or in any other place with strangers; Remember one above sees and knows all and will reward or punish as we deserve; Be careful at Brighton. It’s a rotten place. And – oddly (or perhaps not) for a man in the liquor business – there were various admonitions about drink. Drink no more than you can help, he counselled; on the same theme, in a letter warning his son about which public houses in Ware were safe: We must be very careful what we are about … the owner of the Little White Lion likes you to spend an hour with him in the evening, which calls for a bottle of wine which you may mix with water."

By contrast, his absentee partner out in Australia was peddling family connections with the rum trade for all they were worth. Or not worth, for Kemp’s letters – despite their charm – had revealed that he was a feckless businessman. He borrowed a vast sum from Potter, and never repaid it. He wrote out several cheques in the name of Kemp & Potter, which he never redeemed. His letters took up to 14 months to reach London and each and every one contained an excuse.

I found it painful to observe Potter’s struggles to cope with Kemp’s escalating debts. For 18 months I have had weekly applications from one or another of your creditors for the amount of bills made payable at our house, and yet not a farthing has arrived [from Kemp], which I am much astonished at. Not even nineteenth-century etiquette can disguise his frustration. I do not consider ‘Kemp & Potter’ has anything to do with it. I am now completely sick of shipping goods to you.

Yet Potter could not cut off his brother-in-law. I could imagine him sitting at night at his mahogany double-desk, wearing a calico nightcap. I could feel his sense of responsibility, born of duty, blood, grudging envy and just enough imagination to believe in his brother-in-law’s schemes.

I was in my shed one morning when I heard a scratching in the ceiling. The noise ceased the moment I crawled into the attic, but something was rotten in the roof, and a putrid smell and pyramids of chewed cardboard suggested that possums or bush rats had nested in boxes stacked with the previous owner’s red and yellow moodscapes. I telephoned Helen, from whom we had bought the house. She did not care what I did with the boxes. At her suggestion I contacted Peter, a builder, who agreed to take them to the tip as well as to get rid of the animals. A month later, Peter had not turned up. The smell had sharpened, and when I telephoned him again he promised to call by soon.

I did wonder if I would ever see him. A hundred years before, a local vicar warned the newly arrived Anglican Bishop, Henry Montgomery, to watch out for the languor which here soon attacks, as a dry rot, most works of all kinds after they have settled down.

Before Peter could come, my wife woke up with a toothache. It got worse, so I drove her to a dentist in Hobart. The two-hour drive along the coast took us through the county of Glamorgan, to Pembroke, to Buckingham, through countryside eerily similar to that of where we had lived in England: Georgian sandstone houses with deep windows – fingertip to ankle; rose gardens and wicket fences; names like Kelvedon and Lisdillon and Bust-Me-Gall Hill. The Tasmanians in their loyalty are all English mad, wrote Anthony Trollope, who was tempted to pitch my staff here permanently – he liked in particular the mulberry jams. And yet we were most certainly not in England. Though the landscape might resemble an English nobleman’s park, beyond the bourgeois topiaries there was sadness. Anyone with ambition, I had been told, followed the example of Errol Flynn, who got out as soon as he could. Young Tasmanians took their leaving as a rite of passage. The old and the very young were left behind.

V

TASMANIA’S CAPITAL IS A TIDY, UNSELFCONSCIOUS PORT WHOSE WATER ROCKS with smooth reflections of white sails, bright façades and a dramatic barn-shaped mountain. (My predominant recollection is of its apples, its jams, its rose-cheeked girls, wrote Errol Flynn in My Wicked, Wicked Ways.) Once the most southerly city in the world and the final port of call for Antarctic explorers, Hobart seems more deserving than Auckland of Kipling’s line: Last, loneliest, loveliest, exquisite, apart … In 1889, Henry Montgomery’s first reaction on learning that he had been appointed Bishop to Hobart was to dash to an atlas to see where it was.

I first read of Hobart at my prep school in a novel about the end of the world written by a former pupil, Nevil Shute. In On the Beach, a Melbourne scientist evokes the creeping spread of radiation following a nuclear war. After we’re gone, Tasmania may last another fortnight – although life would still be on earth in the form of rabbits. Faced with impending catastrophe, one character muses: Say I was to move to Hobart …

Hobart was considered out of reach of nuclear fallout but also of God. In its direst days as a penal colony, the Irish rebel John Mitchel refused to let his daughter be baptised here, not till she reaches Christendom. A perception lingers even to this day that Tasmania floats in a latitude outside the jurisdiction of normal religious and civic laws.

Tasmania may have been the last place that Iranian bounty-hunters considered looking for him, but until 2001 a Salman Rushdie in drag would have risked arrest under the 1935 Police Offences Act which made it an offence for a man to be seen in a public place dressed up as a woman between sunset and sunrise. Homosexuality was illegal until 1997 and the crime of blasphemy still carried a prison sentence of 21 years. But under the premiership of Jim Bacon (1998–2004) many antiquated laws were scrapped, and the state now boasted legislation that was the most liberal in Australia. Lesbian Love Bus Triangle was the Hobart Mercury’s headline on the day after the Madrid bombing in March 2004.

Something about Tasmania nonetheless continued to give the impression that it was an outpost, a little like Tangiers, where you went when everything went wrong: when you killed your nanny, when the Ayatollah delivered a death sentence, or when you could not find the right therapist. I owe a lot to good therapy, said an English celebrity interviewed in Hello!. I probably wouldn’t be here without it. I’d weigh about 400 pounds and be living in Tasmania. The island still had a reputation as the kind of place where fugitives of one kind or another, who wanted nothing more than to disappear, washed up. Marilyn’s love child in Tassie – so began an article about how Marilyn Monroe’s 43-year-old daughter – the result of a brief affair with a musician – was living as a recluse under the name Nancy Greene. Tasmania was a promise of anonymity. Louisa Meredith, whose family once owned our land, was told by the nineteenth-century naturalist Joseph Jukes that he had decided to omit Tasmania altogether from his travel book because no one will read what anyone may write about it. Among those who had also bought property on our same beach were the spy catcher Peter Wright, who spent his last years in Tasmania; a woman running away from her husband who used to answer to Sue, but now to Ellen; a solicitor who had defrauded his clients; and a lesbian couple, escapees from the rat race who had started a café already famous for its lemon tarts.

Another local, so it is said, was Lord Lucan, who for ten months rented a two-bedroom cottage on a farm, Glen Gala, five miles from our Swansea home. Pleased to discover that he shared my fondness for fishing at the mouth of the Swan River, I asked his landlady what truth there was in the Launceston Examiner story entitled Did Lord Lucan live in Tassie?

Patricia Greenhill has a frank, reliable face. She had never heard of Lord Lucan, nor about the murder of his children’s nanny, when in July 1992 a figure rode up on an old yellow bicycle saying that he was looking for a quiet place to rent where he could write a book. She recalled a man in his battered late fifties – tallish build, clear face, brown hair going grey and nails that were always clean. Obviously he’d never had to look after himself much – and yet he didn’t have anything in the way of possessions. He wore ordinary clothes and was living on unemployment benefit. He had come to Glen Gala after staying in Swansea at the Oyster Bay Guest House, at the time run by our electrician, Mike Tierney. Mike arrived home after being away awhile to find a hole in his supply of alcohol and James, as he called himself, smelling of whisky, dear boy, lots of it, dear boy. The next day, James bicycled down the road and rented the cottage at Glen Gala. Patricia said: It was really hard to get a tenant, and so I was pleased to leave him alone. When he came to pay rent, he’d walk over in the middle of the day, always when no-one else was about. He was very private, but he’d sometimes sit and have a sherry, and talk in a posh voice about trout fishing, and volunteer information about his fishing gear at home in England. So I lent him a rod and he used to go to a creek and catch some small ones.

Mike had intended to employ him as washer-up, but one day in 1993 he left without a word. Patricia found the cottage in a hideous mess. He’d vacuumed up water with the Hoover and there were carpet burns.

How do you know it was him?

The editor of the Examiner had sent a photograph of Lord Lucan taken in 1967. Patricia said: I’m sure it was him. I was later even more convinced when I read somewhere how Lord Lucan behaved in South Africa. It was the same behaviour.

I dropped my wife off at the dentist and went for a walk in Hobart. Opposite the cathedral is the hotel where Roald Amundsen was initially refused entry after returning from his journey to the South Pole. Treated as a tramp, my peaked cap and blue sweater – given a miserable little room, he wrote in his diary. Residents of Sandy Bay had waved ships off to the icecap for a century. They were not thunderstruck by Amundsen’s achievement so much as irritated by the barking of his sledge dogs. Even today, there is something unimpressable about the people of Hobart, as if there is nothing they have not witnessed, no eventuality for which they have not, at some time, prepared themselves – including a Russian invasion. Fortifications, erected in panic after the Crimean War, are to be found up and down the Derwent River, at Sandy Bay, Tinderbox, Rosny Hill, the Cenotaph, Bellerive. But despite the presence of these curious stone battlements, Hobart feels more like an English market town than a nervous outpost on the rim of the world. Mark Twain, on a lecture tour in 1895, thought it the neatest town that the sun shines on; and I incline to believe that it is also the cleanest. This was still true: I could not stop marvelling at the clarity of the sunlight. Mainlanders put the transparency down to the frazzled ozone layer, but whatever the cause, the light was so clear and over-exposed that there seemed no gauze between it and the first settlers.

If my enthusiasm seemed over-the-top, it was well supported by earlier tourists. In 1830, Elizabeth Fenton, recently arrived