The Chess Toolbox: Practical Techniques Everyone Should Know

2018

PART I

Exchange your way to victory

Keep it simple!

The value of the pieces is one of the first things you learn when you start to play chess: one point for a pawn, three for the knight and bishop, five for the rook and nine for the queen. Children often use this knowledge to keep score during the game, usually with the pieces that have been captured, instead of the ones that are still on the board.

A strict interpretation of what pieces are worth can provide beginning players with order in the chaos. It really helps if you know that it pays off to trade your rook for a queen. It also safeguards you from worries about knights and bishops; they have the same value and can therefore be exchanged for each other whenever you like.

Exchanging as many pieces as possible is perfectly normal behaviour for beginning players. It helps you to keep things simple. Having the movements of the pieces still as your main concern, you should not make chess more complicated than necessary.

Exchange with care

Unfortunately, this phase does not last very long. If you take chess seriously, you will improve rapidly and start to face stronger opponents. From that moment on, the value of the pieces stops being static. You can no longer just dump your bishops because you like knights better. Nor will you get away with sacrificing a piece for three pawns without a decent follow-up. You will also learn that randomly exchanging pieces usually only benefits your opponent, for two reasons:

•With every exchange you make, you improve his recapturing piece;

•The easiest trades are your active pieces against his passives ones.

Before you know it, your main concern is not only which pieces to exchange, but also when, where and how.

High impact

The more you improve, the more you realize that decisions that involve an exchange of material are the hardest ones to take in chess. They also come with the highest impact. A piece trade is by definition irreversible and is therefore very likely to change the course of the game. If you analyse your games carefully, you will encounter many critical moments where you are required to make the right exchange. If you are not a computer, you are definitely going to find room for improvement in this respect.

But here is the good news: exchanging pieces can, when employed rightly, be a very powerful weapon, and I am going to show you exactly how.

The right exchange

Entire books could be written about when and why you should not exchange your pieces. But this would be the wrong approach. I always try to focus on the things you should do, since this will automatically point you in the right direction. Therefore, the best thing to remember when it comes to exchanging pieces is: only exchange pieces for a good reason!

These ‘reasons’ will be the subject of the first and only chapter in this Part. I will demonstrate five different techniques to use the exchange of pieces to your benefit. These techniques are:

1. Simplification;

2. Getting rid of an inferior piece;

3. Eliminating an important defender;

4. Changing the structure;

5. Lifting a blockade.

This list is not exhaustive. To stress this, we will finish the chapter with a quiz that is aimed at discovering new techniques for yourself.

The aim of this chapter is to help you transform the technique of exchanging a piece into a powerful weapon.

CHAPTER 1

Five powerful weapons

1.1 Simplification

Ever considered to implement a lean approach in your chess games? Then simplification is the place to start! With this technique, you focus on your favourite characteristic of the position and make it more prominent by eliminating everything else. It is the perfect tool for exploiting an advantage.

I will demonstrate the power of the simplification technique in the context of the following five ‘advantages’:

1.1.1 Material advantage;

1.1.2 Better equipped for an ending;

1.1.3 The buried piece (permanently);

1.1.4 The buried piece (temporarily);

1.1.5 Piece majority.

1.1.1 Material advantage

This is the most obvious advantage. If you are ahead in material and you see an opportunity to eliminate your opponent’s counterplay by trading pieces, you should definitely go for it.

Game 1

Zsuzsa Polgar

2560

Vasily Smyslov

2530

Vienna tt 1993

39.♕xa2! ♘xa2 40.♖c8+ ♔h7

41.♖h8+ ♔xh8 42.♘g6+ ♔h7 43.♘xh4 g5 44.♘g2

And White won the ending convincingly.

1.1.2 Better equipped for an ending

You do not necessarily need a material advantage to be able to simplify into a winning ending. Watch how Kasparov transformed the following position into a full point within two moves.

Game 2

Garry Kasparov

2595

Milan Vukic

2460

Skara Ech tt 1980 (7)

36.♗xf6 gxf6 37.♖d1!

Kasparov exchanged all the pieces for a good reason. The remaining pawn ending is winning. Black came to the same conclusion and resigned immediately. The game might have continued: 37…♖xd1 38.♔xd1 ♔d7 39.g5 fxg5 40.fxg5 ♔e8 41.gxh6 ♔f8 42.b4 ♔g8 43.b5 ♔h7 44.bxa6 bxa6 45.c5 1-0.

If we find a forcing line that simplifies into a winning ending, we often speak of liquidation. However, I always find the difference between simplification and liquidation a bit arbitrary. When can we consider a position winning?

I remember playing a very interesting rook ending. At least, that is what I thought. My opponent, a strong Dutch grandmaster, had already put his coat on and was impatiently waiting for me to resign. Unfortunately, his evaluation turned out to be correct.

1.1.3 The buried piece (permanently)

If your opponent has a piece that is permanently out of play, for instance because it is trapped in a corner of the board, we might speak of a material advantage as well. In that case, simplifying by exchanging pieces can again be a very effective tool. This will not only reduce his chances for counterplay, it will also increase the relative value of your advantage. Defending with four pieces against five is much easier than with one against two, as the following example shows.

Game 3

Zahar Efimenko

2702

Matej Sebenik

2518

Halkidiki Ech tt 2011 (1)

33.b6!

Forcing the knight into the corner. It looks like this will be its final destination.

33…♘a8 34.h4 h6 35.g4 ♖h7 36.♕a4 ♕d8

Black cannot really take the h-pawn, since it would severely damage his pawn structure. As a result, White has all the time in the world to optimize his pieces and wait for the right moment to open up the h-file. This favourable pawn configuration will return in Part II, where open files and the 7th rank are discussed.

37.♖h2 ♖dg7 38.♔f2 ♕e7 39.♖bh1 ♔f8 40.♔f3 ♔g8 41.♖h3

There is only one piece that needs further improvement: the white queen. She will get a spot on the h-file as well. With his last move, White started the creation of a so-called Alekhine’s gun, which consists of three major pieces on one file. The queen is put behind both rooks, since she is the most vulnerable one.

41…♕d8 42.♖1h2 ♕e7 43.♕d1 ♕d7 44.♕h1

The Gun is ready and… Black resigned! There is no rule that you should resign if your opponent has found the best spot for each of his pieces. So why did the game end so suddenly?

The answer is that Black is well aware of his opponent’s simplification strategy. It is about to start and there is nothing he can do against it.

A move like 44…♕e7 would allow White a very elegant finish: 45.hxg5! hxg5 46.♖xh7 ♖xh7 47.♖xh7 ♕xh7 48.♕xh7+ ♔xh7.

Now it is two against one if we do not count the black knight as a serious piece. The white bishop is not exactly a hero either, but that will change quickly after the beautiful 49.d4!!. A crucial move for the evaluation of this entire game fragment. Now Black can choose:

A) 49…cxd4 50.♗c1 ♔g7 51.♗a3 leaves Black effectively a piece down, deciding the game;

B) 49…exd4 loses in a similar fashion after 50.♗g1 ♔g7 51.♗h2, and the black pawns drop.

This was the simplification technique in its purest form, and a clear demonstration of an important rule when it comes to exchanging pieces:

Only the pieces that remain matter!

White had a clear goal in mind and was even willing to exchange his entire Alekhine’s Gun for it.

1.1.4 The buried piece (temporarily)

The knight on a8 was in a pretty bad shape in the previous example, allowing White all the time in the world to execute his strategy. It gets more complicated if a piece is only temporarily displaced. In that case, either you have to be very quick with taking advantage of it, or you have to keep your opponent busy, so he won’t find the time to reactivate his piece.

The stakes become even higher if we have sacrificed real material for our ‘temporary material advantage’.

Game 4

Csaba Daday

Leifur Vilmundarson

2044

Gardabaer 2010 (6)

Black is threatening 15…axb5 followed by 16…♗c3+, and White needs to develop his bishop quickly. The only question is: where to?

15.♗g2

We will soon find out that this move has two serious drawbacks, and it would be perfectly justifiable to attach a question mark to it. However, I decided to omit question mark evaluations in this book in order to force myself to provide you with verbal explanations instead.

15…axb5 16.♕xa8 ♕b4+

Missing a chance to finish the game at once. Black could have played 16…♗c3+! 17.♔f1 ♕c2 when a white bishop on e2 would have been very welcome to support the rook.

17.♔f1 ♕xc4+

The second drawback of the move 15.♗g2 becomes clear. The white king is driven all the way to g1, after which the rook on h1 can serve as a nice illustration for our topic.

18.♔g1 ♘f6

This is where it gets interesting. White is an exchange up, but will effectively be a piece down for a while as we cannot really take the rook on h1 seriously. So, who will benefit most from simplification? The player with the real material advantage, or the player with the the temporary one?

19.♕c6

White still considers he is an exchange up and strictly follows the ‘rule’ of exchanging material in case of a material advantage. However, the answer was: Black benefits most! The fewer pieces there are on the board, the more White will be hampered by his temporary material deficit.

19.♕a3 would have been the best move: 19…♕c5 20.♕e3. White does not mind exchanging his queen on e3, as it would free the f2-square for his king and reactivate the rook.

19…♕xc6 20.dxc6 ♘h5 21.♖b1 ♖a8

Black has played really well. He did not hesitate to exchange queens, and now he realizes that as soon as the rook gets out, the tables will be turned.

22.♖xb5 ♗d4

22…♖xa2 would have given Black more than enough pawns to compensate for the exchange: 23.h4 ♗d4 24.♔h2 ♖xf2.

23.♖b4 ♘f4 24.a4 ♗c5

Missing a nice opportunity with 24…♗xf2+! 25.♔xf2 (25.♔f1 ♗c5 is a disaster for White) 25…♘d3+ 26.♔e3 ♘xb4. The rook is free to go, but Black has a large advantage.

25.♖c4 ♘d3 26.♖c2 ♖xa4 27.h4 h5 28.♗f1 ♖a1 29.♖d2 ♘e5

Notice how long it takes White to activate the rook on h1. Black keeps his opponent busy the whole time.

30.♔g2 ♖a3 31.♗e2 ♘xc6 32.♖b1

Finally, the rook is set free and White is a real exchange up. In the meantime, however, Black has picked up enough pawns.

32…♘d4 33.♗d1 ♘e6 34.♖b7 ♗b6 35.♖b2 ♗d4 36.♖c2 ♔f6 37.♖b5

37…♔g7

The black pieces are very well coordinated. He could have emphasized this by playing 37…♖a1 38.♗e2 ♘f4+ 39.♔h2 ♗e5, when things start to look really unpleasant for White.

38.♖d2 ♗f6 39.♔g3 ♘c5

The poor rook has finally managed to escape from the corner but is now almost trapped on d2.

40.♗c2 ♗e5+ 41.♔g2 ♗f4

41…♖a2 followed by …♗c3 and …♘c5-e6-d4 would have given White a very hard time: 42.♖b1 ♗f4.

42.♖e2 ♖c3

42…♘e6!.

43.♖b2 ♗e5 44.♖a2 ♘e6 45.♖e3 ♘f4+ 46.♔f1 ♖c5 47.♗b3 ♗f6

47…♗d4 was the final chance to get an advantage. In the game, a draw was inevitable once White managed to exchange rooks.

48.♖c2 ♖xc2 49.♗xc2 ♗xh4 50.♖c3 ♘e6 51.♗b3 ♘c5 52.♗d5 ♗f6 53.♖c2 ♗d4 54.♔g2 f5 55.♔g3 ♔f6 56.♖c4 ♗b2 57.♖c2 ♗d4 58.♖c4 ♗b2 59.♖c2 ♗d4 ½-½

1.1.5 Piece majority

The previous games showed us that simplification can be a very effective device if our opponent has an immobile piece and we can therefore claim a (temporary) material advantage. The more restricted the piece, the larger the impact.

I will show you how the same technique can be applied if the pieces are not evenly distributed over the board and we can create a piece majority in a certain area; for instance, on the queenside.

Game 5

David Bronstein

Vladimir Simagin

Moscow ch-URS 1961

All the white pieces have more or less access to the queenside. That cannot be said from the black knight on e8 and the rook on f8. So, for the time being, White has a material advantage on the queenside. This means we can start using our simplification technique. White went for

16.c5

This pawn sacrifice opens both the c-file and the a6-f1 diagonal and prepares the exchange of at least the bishop and, hopefully, more pieces.

16…♗xd3 17.♕xd3 ♖xc5 18.♗e3 ♖d5!

Black wisely decides to leave the c-file, making it harder for White to force a rook exchange.

19.♕a6 ♘c6 20.♖fc1 ♘g7

It looks like Black has everything under control. The c-file is safely blocked and the f8-rook is on its way to join the defence of the queenside. This is, however, where the fun starts. This game became famous because of the following sequence:

21.♖xc6 ♖a5 22.♕xa5 bxa5 23.♖c7 h6 24.♖b1 ♘e8 25.♖xa7 g5 26.♗b6 ♕b8 27.♖xd7 ♕c8 28.♖e7

With a completely winning position for White.

This game has been in my database with training positions for a long time and I always liked the way White used his piece majority on the queenside to break through. I was therefore a bit surprised to find out that Stockfish was not so impressed when I checked this game with a computer for this book.

It comes up with the computer line 21…dxc6 22.♕xa7 c5 23.♖b1 ♕a8 24.♕xa8 ♖xa8 25.♖xb6 g5! (a crucial move, preparing …♖xa3) 26.♘xg5 h6 27.♘f3 ♖xa3 28.♖b8+ ♔h7 and claims Black is holding his own. That is the problem with computers, they never seem to appreciate beauty.

Normally, when a computer messes up one of my training examples, I dismiss the game and try to find a cleaner one. But this is where it gets interesting. Stockfish does like the starting position of this example. In fact, it comes up with a much stronger and cleaner suggestion, which illustrates our subject even better!

In turns out there is nothing wrong with sacrificing the c-pawn to open up the queenside. But we have to follow an important rule when it comes to exchanging pieces:

If possible, always let your opponent make the trade!

The best continuation is therefore:

16.♘d2! ♘xc4

Black can ignore the c-pawn, but White can always use his piece majority to push a4-a5 or c4-c5 whenever it suits him best. For instance, 16…♘b7 17.a4 ♘c5 18.♗e2 followed by ♘b3, with a very strong initiative. Black simply does not have enough pieces to hold the blockade.

17.♘xc4 ♗xc4

18.♗e3!

Again, the same technique. Let your opponent make the trade!

18…♗xd3

What else? ♖c1 was coming.

19.♕xd3 ♖c6 20.♖ac1 ♕a8 21.♖xc6 ♕xc6 22.♕a6 ♕a8 23.♖c1

Mission accomplished! With only the black queen as sole defender, the black queenside pawns are soon going to drop.

Conclusion

The simplification technique can be a very powerful weapon to convert an advantage into a full point. The key is to focus on the part where you have an advantage and eliminate the rest.

Use this technique with care and be quick when time matters!

1.2 Getting rid of an inferior piece

The simplification technique is all about focusing on the pieces that remain instead of the ones that are about to leave the board. However, sometimes it does help to identify a piece that by itself is worth exchanging. This could for instance be a very passive one. A limited scope of one of your pieces can justify an exchange. It may even pay off to invest a considerable amount of time in order to get rid of it.

Game 6

Dirk Wolfradt

2087

Hans Wacker

2113

Germany tt 2013/14 (6)

Black is a pawn up, but he has to do something about his bishop. The freeing push …e6-e5 is not possible at the moment, so he decides to organize an escape plan.

16…♗d7 17.♖a1 a6 18.♖b2 ♔e7 19.♔c2 ♗e8 20.♘d2 ♗g6 21.c4 dxc4 22.♘xc4 ♖ad8 23.♗xg6 hxg6

Black had no problems converting his advantage.

We do not always have the time or the opportunity for such an elaborate escape plan. In that case, a tactical resource may do the job.

Game 7

Miron Sher

2500

Vladimir Epishin

2620

Geneva 1993 (3)

19…♗d4! 20.♖ad1

20.exd4 exd4 21.♕c2 dxc3 22.♕xc3 ♖e2 would also have led to a level game.

20…♗xc3 21.♘xc3 b6

The half-open d-file made the pawn on d6 the only potential weakness in Black’s camp. Black discourages c4-c5 by covering the c5- and b4-squares.

22.♔g2 a5 23.h3 ♘d8

Improving his worst piece. Once the knight reaches e6, Black will have an easy game.

24.♖d2 ♘e6

Black is doing fine. In the game, he got a large advantage, but had to settle for a draw in the end.

Conclusion

There are many ways to get rid of a bad piece. The techniques can range from a simple exchange to a complex tactical combination or an elaborate strategic plan. They all share one characteristic: you will only be able to find the solution if you know what the problem is. It is therefore very useful to develop a feeling for your bad pieces and keep looking for ways to resolve them.

1.3 Eliminating an important defender

When looking for candidates for an exchange, we do not have to limit ourselves to our own pieces. We can also look at our opponent’s army, identify his most important piece, and try to exchange it. The target could be an annoying attacker. Swapping it off may make our life a lot easier. More of this in Part III, where we deal with attack and defence.

You can also aim at one of your opponent’s most important defenders. That is the subject of this section. The technique I would like to demonstrate is not just about exchanging this enemy piece. That would be the final step of the process. The key step is to search for the Achilles’ Heel in your opponent’s position. This means we have to understand where and how we can hurt our opponent the most.

The Achilles’ Heel

The weakest spot in our opponent’s position can come in many forms and shapes. To give you an impression, I have selected three different versions of an Achilles’ Heel:

1.3.1 Single square;

1.3.2 Weak colour complex;

1.3.3 Space ‘advantage’.

I want to show you how we can employ the technique of exchanging defenders to exploit these vulnerable areas.

1.3.1 Single square

Game 8

Rune Djurhuus

2536

Thomas Ernst

2479

Sweden tt 2001/02 (3)

White has set his sights on the f7-pawn, which is not only the weakest point in Black’s position, but also an important defender of the light squares. The normal approach would be to triple on the f-file, but this has only little effect as long as the bishop on e6 is in place. This brings us to a simple conclusion: we have to get rid of the defender!

19.♕f3 g6 20.♗h3 ♖de8 21.♕g3 ♗d8 22.♗xe6 ♖xe6

22…fxe6 23.♘f6 ♗xf6 24.gxf6 is also very unpleasant for Black.

23.♔b1 ♔b8

With the bishop gone, we can safely triple our major pieces.

24.♖f3 ♖ee8 25.♖hf1 ♕e6 26.♕f2

The pawn is lost.

1.3.2 Weak colour complex

A weak colour complex is a set of weakened squares that are all of the same colour. If we want to benefit from a weak colour complex in our opponent’s position, we should go after his bishop. This is the most natural defender of either the light or the dark squares. This sounds pretty straightforward. It gets more complicated if the squares have not been weakened yet.

The next example could fit nicely into the simplification paragraph. Blacks puts all his cards on his opponent’s dark squares and tries to eliminate the pieces that protect the rest.

Game 9

Raja Panjwani

2404

Yusnel Bacallao Alonso

2554

Medellin Ach 2017 (6)

16…♗g4!

An instructive move, provoking 17.f3. Every pawn that leaves the dark squares makes the bounty on the head of the e3-bishop go up. Soon it will become very attractive for Black to exchange it for our mediocre friend on e7.

17.f3 ♗e6 18.♘c4 ♗xc4

There was nothing wrong with this bishop, but as you already know: only the pieces that remain matter. Black is following the simplification technique. He has put his mind on the potentially vulnerable dark squares and is already starting to neutralize the rest.

19.♕xc4 ♖ac8 20.♕e2

Black has skilfully turned the dark squares into the Achilles’ Heel of the white position. He probably did not need much time for his next move.

20…♗c5! 21.♗xc5 ♕xc5+ 22.♕f2 ♖d4!

Simplification does not mean you have to exchange all your pieces. The black queen is much stronger than its counterpart and has a bright future on the open d-file or the weakened dark squares.

23.♖e1 ♕d6 24.♖e2 ♘d7!

Again, very well played! Black is in control and can afford to spend some time on improving his worst piece.

25.g3 ♘c5 26.♗a2

26…♘xa2!

It is very instructive to see how the dominance of the black major pieces increases with every set of minor pieces that is being exchanged.

27.♖xa2 ♘b3! 28.♖c2

Black has total control. There are many ways in which he can improve his position, but the most effective technique is often to create a second front. I will come back to this technique in Part II Chapter 4, where we deal with open files.

28…h5 29.♔g2 h4 30.♖a3

30…♖d3!

A very subtle combination. Black is threatening both 31…♖xc3 and 31…♘d4. White is forced to give up the exchange.

31.♖xb3 h3+ 32.♔xh3 ♕e6+ 33.♔g2 ♕xb3 34.♖d2 ♖d4

Black has kept his dominant position and is now an exchange up. He won the game convincingly:

35.h4 ♖xd2 36.♕xd2 ♕b4 37.♔h3 ♕d4 38.♕g5 ♕d7+ 39.g4 ♕d3 40.♔g3 ♕d4 41.h5 ♖c6 42.♔g2 b5 43.axb5 axb5 44.♘d5 ♖c2+ 45.♔h3 ♕g1 46.♘e7+ ♔h8 47.♘g6+ ♔h7 48.♕xe5 ♕h1+ 0-1

An impressive strategic performance by Black!

The technique of weakening the dark squares and eliminating the defending bishop shortly after can of course also be applied in a concrete tactical way.

Game 10

Emil Sutovsky

2646

Daniel Forcen Esteban

2545

Minsk Ech 2017 (9)

20.♘b4!

This would have been the most convincing continuation. The black bishop on d8 does not realize it yet, but it is soon going to be the most important defender in the black camp.

20…♕c7 21.h6! g6

The bishop just got appointed as the sole guard of the dark squares. But not for long.

22.♖xd8!

Not your traditional exchange of equal pieces, but the effect is the same. The defender is gone and it is game over after, for instance:

22…♕xd8 23.♗g5 ♕e8 24.♗f6+ ♔g8 25.♘d5 ♖a7 26.♗g7

In the game, White went for 20.♘f4, after which Black erred with 20…h6 (20…♗e6 would have been the only way to stay in the game). White continued with the forcing 21.♘g6+!, opening up the h-file and herewith bringing the rook to the attack: 21…fxg6 22.hxg6 ♕e4 23.♗xh6 ♕g4 24.♗g5+ and Black gets mated, so he resigned.

1.3.3 Space ‘advantage’

Most players like to possess a lot of space on the board. Having many options for the development of their pieces and the opportunity to switch plans easily provides them with a sense of freedom. That is why, in some opening lines, White rapidly starts seizing as much space as possible – sometimes even at the expense of piece development. This can, however, be a highly dangerous strategy.

Take for instance the following game, played by my brother. We were playing in the same team at that time and I remember I was curious how his opponent’s aggressive set-up would work out.

Game 11

Jochem Aubel

2249

Jeroen Willemze

2393

Netherlands tt 2009/10 (2)

1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 ♗f5 4.h4 ♕b6 5.g4 ♗d7 6.h5 e6 7.f4

Only try this at home. Black has an impressive score in this line.

7…c5 8.c3

One of the most powerful rules in chess is: open up the position when you are ahead in development. From now on, Black gradually increases the pressure on the centre and waits for the right moment to break it open.

8…♘c6 9.♘f3 ♖c8!

This rook will prove to be useful later.

10.a3 f6 11.♖h2 ♘h6 12.♗h3

Black has taken all preparatory measures, now it is time for the harvest.

12…cxd4 13.cxd4 fxe5 14.fxe5 ♘xd4! 15.♘xd4 ♖xc1 16.♕xc1 ♕xd4

The smoke has cleared and White finds himself in a hopeless position. Without pieces to cover his land, his space ‘advantage’ has turned into a serious liability. There are simply too many weak squares to cover and the unsafe king and uncoordinated pieces are not really helpful either.

17.♖e2 ♗e7 18.♘d2 ♗h4+ 19.♔f1 0-0+ 20.♔g2 ♕d3 21.♕d1 ♗b5 0-1

The conclusion we can draw here is that a large territory comes with a large responsibility. From the very start of the game, White raised the bets without having the right cards. He got badly punished for it.

There is nothing wrong with aiming for a space advantage, but you have to make sure you develop your pieces accordingly. At the same time, keep your ranks closed to prevent your opponent from starting to swap off pieces.

The player with less space benefits from an exchange of pieces in two different ways:

First, it grants his remaining pieces more breathing space, making it easier to manoeuvre them to the right squares. The analogy with a small room stacked with a lot of furniture is often made.

Second, having less space often implies that your opponent’s territory covers the larger part of the board. The fewer defending pieces he has, the harder it gets for him to keep this area under control.

In the next example, Black was well aware of this, and convincingly demonstrated how exchanging minor pieces can be a dangerous weapon.

Game 12

Brede Alexander Kvisvik

2330

Karol Ulanowski

2133

Olomouc 2016 (4)

If White were to play, he could close down the position with ♘d4, after which his space advantage would grant him very comfortable play. Unfortunately for him, it is Black’s turn, and he knows exactly what to do.

‘When you are attacked on the flank, react in the centre’ was one of the most important lessons I learned from my first trainer, the late Rob Brunia. In this case, the aim is to swap as many pieces as possible and see how your opponent is going to protect all the weak spots.

27…d4! 28.♘xd4 ♘xd4 29.♗xd4 ♘e6

The most straightforward plan would have been 29…♗xg2! 30.♔xg2 ♕b7+ 31.♔h2 ♘e6 32.♘e2 ♗f8, followed by …♗c5.

30.♗xb7 ♕xb7 31.♘e2 ♕e4

It always strikes me that as soon as the centre starts to burst, there is really no way back. And after a more or less forced sequence, White is again stuck with weak spots, an unsafe king and uncoordinated pieces. The rest of the game speaks for itself.

32.hxg6 hxg6 33.♘c3 ♕f5 34.♘b5 ♘xf4 35.♕f3 ♗xe5 36.♗xe5 ♖xd1+ 37.♖xd1 ♖xd1+ 38.♕xd1 ♕xg5+ 39.♔f2 ♕xe5 40.♕d8+ ♔g7 41.♕xb6 ♕e2+ 42.♔g3 g5 43.♕c6 ♘h5+ 44.♔h3 ♘f4+ 45.♔g3 ♘h5+ 46.♔h3 g4+ 47.♔h4 ♘f6 48.♘d6 ♔g6 49.♔g3 ♘h5+ 50.♔h4 ♕h2+ 51.♔xg4 ♕g3# 0-1

Conclusion

Aiming your exchanging activities at your opponent’s most important defenders can be a very dangerous weapon. This technique usually starts with locating your opponent’s Achilles’ Heel. As soon as you understand where you can hurt him the most, identifying the key defenders will follow next.

1.4 Changing the structure

In this section, I will show you several ways in which an exchange of pieces can affect the pawn structure.

You can use an exchange to:

1.4.1 Improve your own structure;

1.4.2 Damage your opponent’s structure;

1.4.3 Create a passed pawn.

1.4.1 Improve your own structure

In the first example, White could have used several piece exchanges to polish up his pawn structure.

Game 13

Sergei Dolmatov

2550

Vereslav Eingorn

2450

Tashkent 1983

Just like the Bronstein-Simagin game we