Speculations on Thomism and Evolution
By Razie Mah
()
About this ebook
Over seven centuries ago, St. Thomas Aquinas explored Aristotle's works from a Christian world view. Evolution was not one of the issues on the agenda. Aquinas concluded that God made every form, except for the mule, which happens to be the product of two natural kinds, the horse and the ass.
Chaberek applies the logic of Thomism to the concepts of theistic evolution and finds the latter wanting. Austriaco rises to the defense of theistic - or even better, Thomistic - evolution.
Austriaco's rebuttal appears in an opinion piece published in March, 2018 (thepublicdiscourse.com/2018/03/20975). He considers each of Chaberek's five objections to theistic evolution. He does so both as a Dominican scholar and a research biologist, studying the evolution of snakes (among other things). The latter aspect weighs heavily in his argument.
This work speculates on how Austriaco's defense may be re-articulated using the category-based nested form. The speculation brings Peirce and Aquinas together in surprising ways. Both John Deely and Jacques Maritain struggled with similar syntheses.
How is biological evolution a sign of God?
The One Triune God is contiguous with His creation.
The living being is an intersection of adaptation and phenotype.
Razie Mah
See website for bio.
Read more from Razie Mah
Comments on David Reich's Book (2018) Who We Are and How We Got Here Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Five Views in the Book (2020) "Original Sin and the Fall" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on James DeFrancisco’s Essay "Original Sin and Ancestral Sin" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Robert Berwick and Noam Chomsky's Book (2016) Why Only Us? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Massimo Leone’s Article (2019) "Semiotics of Religion: A Map" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on David Graeber and David Wengrow's Book (2021) "The Dawn of Everything" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Religious Experience (1985) by Wayne Proudfoot Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Nicholas Berdyaev's Book (1939) Spirit and Reality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Fr. Thomas White’s Essay (2019) "Thomism for the New Evangelization" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Miguel Espinoza's Essay (2012) "Physics and the Intelligibility of Nature" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLessons 1-12 for Instructor’s Guide to An Archaeology of the Fall and Related Scriptures Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Cheong Lee's Essay (2018) "Peirce's Theory of Interpretation" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Sasha Newell's Article (2018) "The Affectiveness of Symbols" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Father Reniero Cantalamessa’s (2016) Fourth Advent Sermon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Robert Verrill’s Essay (2017) "Elementary Particles Are Not Substances" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Dennis Venema and Scot McKnight’s Book (2017) Adam and the Genome Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOriginal Sin and the Post-Truth Condition Part 3 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Joseph Carroll’s Chapter (2018) "Evolutionary Literary Theory" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Andrew Hollingsworth’s Paper (2016) Ecos of Meaning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Christy Hemphill’s Essay (2019) "All in a Week’s Work" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Mansoureh Tajik’s Articles (2020) "Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shi'a Islam" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Kim Sterelny’s Essay (2011) "From Hominins to Humans" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Richard Colledge’s Essay (2021) "Thomism and Contemporary Phenomenological Realism" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on David Melvin’s Essay (2010) "Divine Mediation And The Rise Of Civilization" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Derek Bickerton's Book (2014) More than Nature Needs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Manvir Singh’s Essay (2021) "Magic, Explanations and Evil" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Gregory Sandstrom’s Essay (2013) "Peace for Evolution's Puzzle" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Daniel Novotny’s Book (2013) Ens Rationis from Suarez to Caramuel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Speculations on Thomism and Evolution
Related ebooks
Comments on Michal Chaberek’s Essay (2019) "Classical Metaphysics and Theistic Evolution" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on “A Bio-Cultural-Historical Approach to the Study of Development (2016)” Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Mariusz Tabaczek’s Essay (2019) "What do God and Creatures Really Do in an Evolutionary Change?" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on John Barrett and Krystalli Damilati’s Essay (2004) "Some Light on the Early Origins of Them All" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExercises in Artistic Concordism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Robert Verrill’s Essay (2017) "Elementary Particles Are Not Substances" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Mariusz Tabaczek's Arc of Inquiry (2019-2024) Part 2 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Daniel De Haan’s Essay (2018) "Hylomorphism and the New Mechanist Philosophy" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Andrew Hollingsworth’s Paper (2016) Ecos of Meaning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Power of Paradox Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Human Niche Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Nicanor Austriaco’s Essay (2018) "Defending Adam After Darwin" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Michael Tomasello's Arc of Inquiry (1999-2019) Part 1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSymbiotic Cosmos: A different Look at Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Philosophical, Scientific, and Historical Evidence for God: An Apologetic to the Glory of God Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEvolution: Its nature, its evidence, and its relation to religious thought Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Christopher Austin’s Essay (2018) "A Biologically Informed Hylomorphism" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Kim Sterelny’s Essay (2011) "From Hominins to Humans" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Joseph Trabbic’s Essay (2021) "Jean-Luc Marion and ... First Philosophy" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Joshua Lee Harris’s Essay (2017) Analogy in Aquinas Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Daniel Novotny’s Essay (2017) Izquierdo on Universals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Egil Asprem and Ann Taves’s Essay (2018) "Explanation and the Study of Religion" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Miguel Espinoza's Essay (2012) "Physics and the Intelligibility of Nature" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Joseph Carroll’s Chapter (2018) "Evolutionary Literary Theory" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Jacques Maritain's Book (1935) Philosophy of Nature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on George Murphy's Article (2018) "The Nuts and Bolts of Creation" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Richard Colledge’s Essay (2021) "Thomism and Contemporary Phenomenological Realism" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Marie George’s Essay (2019) "Aquinas Teachings on Concepts and Words" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Genesis of Nature and the Nature of Genesis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReflections on Creation, Original Sin, and “Big Evil”: A Theodicy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Philosophy For You
Humankind: A Hopeful History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Daily Laws: 366 Meditations from the author of the bestselling The 48 Laws of Power Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Burnout Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage To Be Disliked: A single book can change your life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lessons of History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why Buddhism is True: The Science and Philosophy of Meditation and Enlightenment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Discipline Is Destiny: A NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5On the shortness of life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I May Be Wrong: The Sunday Times Bestseller Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Being Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage to be Happy: True Contentment Is Within Your Power Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Communicating Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Memories, Dreams, Reflections: An Autobiography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Living: Peace and Freedom in the Here and Now Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Kama Sutra of Vatsyayana (Illustrated) Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Courage Is Calling: Fortune Favours the Brave Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Focus on What Matters: A Collection of Stoic Letters on Living Well Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Little Book of Stoicism: Timeless Wisdom to Gain Resilience, Confidence, and Calmness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Utopia for Realists: And How We Can Get There Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Think Like a Roman Emperor: The Stoic Philosophy of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Speculations on Thomism and Evolution
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Speculations on Thomism and Evolution - Razie Mah
Speculations on Thomism and Evolution
By Razie Mah
Published for Smashwords.com
2018
Notes on Text
This work speculates on an debate within philosophical circles, concerning how Thomism, which translates Aristotle into a Christian worldview, deals with evolution, the Neo-Darwinian synthesis explaining how living beings change through time. In particular, the question is framed around theistic evolution.
Does scholasticism (broadly speaking) offer a natural philosophical account of the scientific theory?
Michael Chaberek, O.P., says that Thomist principles rule out theistic evolution.
Nicanor Austriaco, O.P., disagrees, insisting that Thomism does not rule out theistic evolution.
Neither of these authors have any idea that their argument might be fodder for a very different approach that, oddly enough, was achieved in the twilight of scholasticism. The Baroque scholastic, John of St. Thomas, proposed the same definition of sign as Charles Sander's Peirce. A sign is a triadic relation.
The existence of triadic relations has consequences. Peirce figured out that there are three categories of existence: thirdness, secondness and firstness. The labels describe the minimum number of elements. They label the realms of normal context, actuality and possibility. These categories ground the category-based nested form.
So, my question is: Does the category-based nested form shed light on this argument.
And, if so, what does that imply?
Single quotes and italics are used to group words together.
Prerequisites include A Primer on the Category-Based Nested Form, A Primer on Sensible and Social Construction, plus the chapter on presence and the first interlude