Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $9.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Very Truly Yours, Nikola Tesla
    Very Truly Yours, Nikola Tesla
    Very Truly Yours, Nikola Tesla
    Ebook184 pages4 hours

    Very Truly Yours, Nikola Tesla

    By Nikola Tesla

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    Nikola Tesla was a man of letters. He wrote many letters to the editors of the magazines and newspapers of his day. These letters give a fascinating glimpse into the mind of an eccentric genius. Collected here for the first time are more than forty of Nikola Tesla's letters. The subject matter ranges widely, as Tesla was interested in almost everything. In these letters he responds to Marconi and Edison, gives his thoughts on the wars of his day, corrects inconsistencies in news reports, and much much more. Nikola Tesla has been called the most important man of the 20th Century. Without Tesla's ground-breaking work we'd all be sitting in the dark without even a radio to listen to.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherStart Publishing LLC
    Release dateAug 24, 2015
    ISBN9781681463568
    Very Truly Yours, Nikola Tesla
    Author

    Nikola Tesla

    Nikola Tesla (1856–1943) was a Serbian-American inventor, writer, physicist, and engineer, best known for his work on the alternating current (AC) electricity supply system.

    Read more from Nikola Tesla

    Related to Very Truly Yours, Nikola Tesla

    Related ebooks

    Science & Mathematics For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Making SPARKS FLY!

      Oct 3, 2020

      Making SPARKS FLY!
      6 min read

    • Article

      How to Bench Test a Magneto

      Nov 12, 2021

      How to Bench Test a Magneto
      9 min read

    • Article

      Powerful Ideas

      Sep 26, 2023

      Powerful Ideas
      4 min read

    • Article

      Making SPARKS FLY!

      Jan 2, 2021

      Not all flywheel magnetos overwind their Low Tension ignition coils with the High Tension winding. Another option eventually appeared, using the'ignition'winding to power an external HT coil. The most obvious way was to connect as if it was a battery

      5 min read

    • Article

      Generation Electrification

      Feb 24, 2023

      Generation Electrification
      7 min read

    • Article

      Generation Electrification

      Feb 24, 2023

      Generation Electrification
      7 min read

    • Article

      THE Low-Tension Ignition System

      Sep 11, 2020

      THE Low-Tension Ignition System
      17 min read

    • Article

      Math’s Notes

      Mar 1, 2020

      While researching materials for this column, I came across information indicating how transistors gradually replaced vacuum tubes in electronic gear, but how similar (and different) they are from each other as well as some hybrid attempts. As you all

      6 min read

    • Article

      So, Exactly What Is A Watt?

      Oct 12, 2023

      So, Exactly What Is A Watt?
      4 min read

    • Article

      Breeze On!

      Oct 10, 2017

      Breeze On!
      8 min read

    • Article

      Latest Alternators

      Mar 1, 2024

      Latest Alternators
      6 min read

    • Article

      Voltage Value

      Jan 13, 2023

      Voltage Value
      8 min read

    • Article

      Ask Sail

      Apr 16, 2019

      Ask Sail
      4 min read

    • Article

      Power On Tap

      Feb 14, 2023

      Power On Tap
      7 min read

    • Article

      Battery Monitors

      Oct 31, 2023

      Battery Monitors
      7 min read

    • Article

      Return To The Charge

      Apr 28, 2023

      Return To The Charge
      8 min read

    • Article

      A Guide to Power Management

      Dec 6, 2023

      A Guide to Power Management
      7 min read

    • Article

      Dirty Stuff

      Jan 25, 2023

      WHEN you consider that a V8 rotating at 6000rpm needs 400 clean sparks per second to fire the fuel and air charges in every cylinder, you begin to understand why ignition systems are absolutely critical to the power performance of an engine. And beca

      3 min read

    • Article

      Math’s Notes

      Jun 1, 2020

      Math’s Notes
      4 min read

    • Article

      Assess Your Site for WIND POWER

      Jul 13, 2018

      Wind power in the form of windmills has been around for a long time. Relatively short towers once hosted large rotors with many blades to produce the power and torque needed for tasks such as grinding grains and running machinery. During the 1930s, w

      8 min read

    • Article

      Technologue: Might Self-excited Synchronous Motors Be The Next Big Thing?

      Nov 17, 2023

      There’s a new electric motor type that could be the next big thing. Most electric vehicles today employ motors that work in one of two ways. The easy way packs a bunch of strong permanent magnets into a rotor and surrounds them with electric windings

      2 min read

    • Article

      Math’s Notes

      May 1, 2019

      Math’s Notes
      3 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Very Truly Yours, Nikola Tesla

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Very Truly Yours, Nikola Tesla - Nikola Tesla

      Mr. Nikola Tesla on Alternating Current Motors

      Electrical World — N. Y. — May 25, 1889

      To the Editor of The Electrical World:

      Sir: About a year ago I had the pleasure of bringing before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers the results of some of my work on alternate current motors. They were received with the interest which novel ideas never fail to excite in scientific circles, and elicited considerable comment. With truly American generosity, for which, on my part, I am ever thankful, a great deal of praise through the columns of your esteemed paper and other journals has been bestowed upon the originator of the idea, in itself insignificant. At that time it was impossible for me to bring before the Institute other results in the same line of thought. Moreover, I did not think it probable — considering the novelty of the idea — that anybody else would be likely to pursue work in the same direction. By one of the most curious coincidences, however, Professor Ferraris not only came independently to the same theoretical results, but in a manner identical almost to the smallest detail. Far from being disappointed at being prevented from calling the discovery of the principle exclusively my own, I have been excessively pleased to see my views, which I had formed and carried out long before, confirmed by this eminent man, to whom I consider myself happy to be related in spirit, and toward whom, ever since the knowledge of the facts has reached me, I have entertained feelings of the most sincere sympathy and esteem. In his able essay Prof. Ferraris omitted to mention various other ways of accomplishing similar results, some of which have later been indicated by 0. B. Shallenberger, who some time before the publication of the results obtained by Prof. Ferraris and myself had utilized the principle in the construction of his now well known alternate current meter, and at a still later period by Prof. Elihu Thomson and Mr. M. J. Wightman.

      Since the original publications, for obvious reasons, little has been made known in regard to the further progress of the invention; nevertheless the work of perfecting has been carried on indefatigably with all the intelligent help and means which a corporation almost unlimited in its resources could command, and marked progress has been made in every direction. It is therefore not surprising that many unacquainted with this fact, in expressing their views as to the results obtained, have grossly erred.

      In your issue of May 4, I find a communication from the electricians of Ganz & Co., of Budapest, relating to certain results observed in recent experiments with a novel form of alternate current motor. I would have nothing to say in regard to this communication unless it were to sincerely congratulate these gentlemen on any good results which they may have obtained, but for the article, seemingly inspired by them, which appeared in the London Electrical Review of April 26, wherein certain erroneous views are indorsed and some radically false assertions made, which, though they may be quite unintentional, are such as to create prejudice and affect material interests.

      As to the results presented, they not only do not show anything extraordinary, but are, in fact, considerably below some figures obtained with my motors a long time ago. The main stress being laid upon the proposition between the apparent and real energy supplied, or perhaps more directly, upon the ratio of the energy apparently supplied to, and the real energy developed by, the motor, I will here submit, with your permission, to your readers, the results respectively arrived at by these gentlemen and myself.

      If we compare these figures we will find that the most favorable ratio in Ganz & Co’s motor is 0.761, whereas in the Westinghouse, for about the same load, it is 0.836, while in other instances, as may be seen, it is still more favorable. Notwithstanding this, the conditions of the test were not such as to warrant the best possible results.

      The factors upon which the apparent energy is mainly dependent could have been better determined by a proper construction of the motor and observance of certain conditions. In fact, with such a motor a current regulation may be obtained which, for all practical purposes, is as good as that of the direct current motors, and the only disadvantage, if it be one, is that when the motor is running without load the apparent energy cannot be reduced quite as low as might be desirable. For instance, in the case of this motor the smallest amount of apparent energy was about 3,000 watts, which is certainly not very much for a machine capable of developing 90 h. p. of work; besides, the amount could have been reduced very likely to 2,000 watts or less.

      On the other hand, these motors possess the beautiful feature of maintaining an absolutely constant speed no matter how the load may vary. This feature may be illustrated best by the following experiment performed with this motor. The motor was run empty, and a load of about 200 h. p.., far exceeding the normal load, was thrown on suddenly. Both armatures of the motor and generator were seen to stop for an instant, the belts slipping over the pulleys, whereupon both came up to the normal speed with the full load, not having been thrown out of synchronism. The experiment could be repeated any number of times. In some cases, the driving power being sufficient, I have been enabled to throw on a load exceeding 8 to 9 times that which the motor was designed to carry, without affecting the speed in the least.

      This will be easily understood from the manner in which the current regulation is effected. Assuming the motor to be running without any load, the poles of the armature and field have a certain relative position which is that of the highest self-induction or counter electromotive force. If load be thrown on, the poles are made to recede; the self-induction or counter electromotive force is thereby diminished and more current passed trough the stationary or movable armature-coils. This regulation is very different from that of a direct current motor. In the latter the current is varied by the motor losing a certain number of revolutions in proportion to the load, and the regulation would be impossible if the speed would be maintained constant; here the whole regulation is practically effected during a fraction of one revolution only. From this it is also apparent that it is a practical impossibility to throw such a motor out of synchronism, as the whole work must be done in an instant, it being evident that if the load is not sufficient to make a motor lose a fraction of the first revolution it will not be able to do so in the succeeding revolutions. As to the efficiency of these motors, it is perfectly practicable to obtain 94 to 95 per cent.

      The results above given were obtained on a three-wire system. The same motor has been started and operated on two wires in a variety of ways, and although it was not capable of performing quite as much work as on three wires, up to about 60 h. p. it gave results practically the same as those above-mentioned. In fairness to the electricians of Ganz & Co., I must state here that the speed of this motor was higher than that used in their experiments, it being about 1,500. I cannot make due allowance for this difference, as the diameter of the armature and other particulars of the Ganz & Co. motor were not given.

      The motor tested had a weight of about 5,000 lbs. From this it will be seen that the performance even on two wires was quite equal to that of the best direct current motors. The motor being of a synchronous type, it might be implied that it was not capable of starting. On the contrary, however, it had a considerable torque on the start and was capable of starting under fair load.

      In the article above referred to the assertion is made that the weight of such alternate current motor, for a given capacity, is several times larger than that of a direct current motor. In answer to this I will state here that we have motors which with a weight of about 850 pounds develop 10 h. p. with an efficiency of very nearly 90 per cent, and the spectacle of a direct current motor weighing, say 200 – 300 pounds and performing the same work, would be very gratifying for me to behold. The motor which I have just mentioned had no commutator or brushes of any kind nor did it require any direct current.

      Finally, in order to refute various assertions made at random, principally in the foreign papers, I will take the liberty of calling to the attention of the critics the fact that since the discovery of the principle several types of motors have been perfected and of entirely different characteristics, each suited for a special kind of work, so that while one may be preferable on account of its ideal simplicity, another might be more efficient. It is evidently impossible to unite all imaginable advantages in one form, and it is equally unfair and unreasonable to judge all different forms according to a common standard. Which form of the existing motors is best, time will show; but even in the present state of the art we are enabled to satisfy any possible demand in practice.

      Nikola Tesla

      Pittsburgh, Pa.

      The Losses Due to Hysteresis in Transformers

      The Electrical Engineer - N. Y. — April 9, 1890

      In your issue of April 2, in referring to certain remarks made by me at the recent meeting of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers on the subject of hysteresis you make the statement: It is this constancy of relation that, as Mr. Tesla pointed out may ultimately establish the correctness of the hypothesis advanced, that in reality there is no loss due to hysteresis, and that the changes of magnetization represent a charging and discharging of molecular energy without entailing an actual expenditure of energy.

      I do not recollect having made such a statement, and as I was evidently misunderstood, you will greatly oblige me in inserting the following few lines, which express the idea I meant to advance:

      Up to the present no satisfactory explanation of the causes of hysteresis has been given. In the most exhaustive and competent treatise on the theory of transformers, by Fleming, static hysteresis is explained by supposing that the magnetic molecules or molecular magnets, the arrangement of which constitutes magnetization, move stiffly, and the dissipation of energy is the work done in making the necessary magnetic displacement against a sort of magnetic friction. Commonly it is stated that this is a distinct element in the loss of energy in an iron core undergoing magnetic changes entirely independent of any currents generated therein.

      Now it is difficult to reconcile these views with our present notions on the constitution of matter generally. The molecules or iron cannot be connected together by anything but elastic forces, since they are separated by an intervening elastic medium through which the forces act; and this being the case is it not reasonable to assume that if a given amount of energy is taken up to bring the molecules out of their original position an equivalent amount of energy should be restored by the molecules reassuming their original positions, as we know is the case in all molecular displacements? We cannot imagine that an appreciable amount of energy should be wasted by the elastically connected molecules swinging back and forth from their original positions, which they must constantly tend to assume, at least within the limit of elasticity, which in all probability is rarely surpassed. The losses cannot be attributed to mere displacement, as this would necessitate the supposition that the molecules are connected rigidly, which is quite unthinkable.

      A current cannot act upon the particles unless it acts upon currents in the same, either previously existing or set up by it, and since the particles are held together by elastic forces the losses must be ascribed wholly to the current generated. The remarkable discovery of Ewing that the magnetization is greater on the descent than on the ascent for the same values of magnetizing force strongly points to the fact that hysteresis is intimately connected with the generation of currents either in the molecules individually or in groups of them through the space intervening. The fact observed accords perfectly

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1