Operation Pointblank 1944: Defeating the Luftwaffe
4/5
()
About this ebook
Operation Pointblank was the code name for the United States Army Air Force's attempt to destroy German fighter capability through the use of daylight strategic bombing in advance of the D-Day landings. Launched in 1943, the operation immediately met with severe problems, most notably the horrible attrition experienced by the US bomber forces. However, with the arrival of the P-51 Mustang, the United States was able to equip the fighters to fly on long-range-bomber escort missions and take the fight to the Luftwaffe in the skies over Germany.
Complete with maps, illustrations and photographs, this book examines the entire operation from both the Allied and the German perspectives, covering all the main decisions and technological innovations made by both sides in this epic struggle.
Steven J. Zaloga
Steven J. Zaloga received his BA in History from Union College and his MA from Columbia University. He has worked as an analyst in the aerospace industry for three decades, covering missile systems and the international arms trade, and has served with the Institute for Defense Analyses, a federal think tank. He is the author of numerous books on military technology and history, including NVG 294 Allied Tanks in Normandy 1944 and NVG 283 American Guided Missiles of World War II. He currently lives in Maryland, USA.
Read more from Steven J. Zaloga
Smashing Hitler's Panzers: The Defeat of the Hitler Youth Panzer Division in the Battle of the Bulge Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Companion to the Red Army 1939-45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5British Battle Tanks: American-made World War II Tanks Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Smashing Hitler's Guns: The Rangers at Pointe-du-Hoc, D-Day 1944 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUS Airborne Divisions in the ETO 1944–45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Kremlin's Nuclear Sword: The Rise and Fall of Russia's Strategic Nuclear Forces 1945-2000 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Operation Pointblank 1944
Titles in the series (100)
Waterloo 1815: The Birth of Modern Europe Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Salamanca 1812: Wellington Crushes Marmont Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Chickamauga 1863: The river of death Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Gallipoli 1915: Frontal Assault on Turkey Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Tet Offensive 1968: Turning point in Vietnam Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBalaclava 1854: The Charge of the Light Brigade Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFirst Ypres 1914: The graveyard of the Old Contemptibles Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vittoria 1813: Wellington Sweeps the French from Spain Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Alexander 334–323 BC: Conquest of the Persian Empire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Khartoum 1885: General Gordon's last stand Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gravelotte-St-Privat 1870: End of the Second Empire Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Louisbourg 1758: Wolfe’s first siege Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5First Bull Run 1861: The South's first victory Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5San Juan Hill 1898: America's Emergence as a World Power Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Chancellorsville 1863: Jackson's Lightning Strike Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Gettysburg 1863: High tide of the Confederacy Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Pearl Harbor 1941: The day of infamy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sekigahara 1600: The final struggle for power Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vimeiro 1808: Wellesley’s first victory in the Peninsular Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nagashino 1575: Slaughter at the barricades Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lorraine 1944: Patton versus Manteuffel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tel El-Kebir 1882: Wolseley's Conquest of Egypt Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Leipzig 1813: The Battle of the Nations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fredericksburg 1862: 'Clear The Way' Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Mons 1914: The BEF's Tactical Triumph Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Vicksburg 1863: Grant clears the Mississippi Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Lützen & Bautzen 1813: The Turning Point Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Corunna 1809: Sir John Moore’s Fighting Retreat Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5D-Day 1944 (1): Omaha Beach Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tarawa 1943: The turning of the tide Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Related ebooks
Junkers Ju 88 Kampfgeschwader on the Russian Front Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAces of Jagdgeschwader 3 'Udet' Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJagdgeschwader 52: The Experten Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5‘Down to Earth' Strafing Aces of the Eighth Air Force Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5P-47 Thunderbolt Units of the Twelfth Air Force Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBf 110 vs Lancaster: 1942–45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Operation Cobra 1944: Breakout from Normandy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Africa To The Alps: The Army Air Forces In The Mediterranean Theater [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJunkers Ju 87 Stukageschwader 1937–41 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5No 126 Wing RCAF Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSchweinfurt Raids And The Pause In Daylight Strategic Bombing Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJagdverband 44: Squadron of Experten Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Junkers Ju 88 Kampfgeschwader in North Africa and the Mediterranean Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jagdgeschwader 54 'Grünherz' Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5D-Day 1944 (2): Utah Beach & the US Airborne Landings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bf 109 Aces of North Africa and the Mediterranean Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bf 109 F/G/K Aces of the Western Front Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The German Air Force versus Russia, 1942 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMission 85: The U.S. Eighth Air Force's Battle over Holland, August 19, 1943 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAces of the 78th Fighter Group Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsD-Day 1944 (1): Omaha Beach Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bf 109 Defence of the Reich Aces Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Bomber Command War Diaries: An Operational Reference Book, 1939-1945 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmerican Nightfighter Aces of World War 2 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Jagdgeschwader 2: 'Richthofen' Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fighters Over Russia Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Photographic History of Airborne Warfare, 1939–1945 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKosciuszko Squadron 1919-1921 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings359th Fighter Group Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Soviet MiG-15 Aces of the Korean War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Operation Pointblank 1944
4 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Operation Pointblank 1944 - Steven J. Zaloga
THE STRATEGIC SETTING
The USAAF’s Eighth Air Force began daytime heavy-bomber operations from England on August 17, 1942, with a raid by 12 B-17 bombers against Rouen, France. The scale of American bomber attacks in 1942 was small and experimental until the force could be built up enough to confront more stiffly defended targets deeper into Europe. Through the end of 1942 its operational strength averaged only about 100 bombers, and it was assigned only a single US fighter group for escort. Its build-up was slowed by the need to divert aircraft and personnel to the Twelfth Air Force to conduct combat operations in North Africa and Italy. The focus of the bomber attacks in early 1943 was the German submarine force, including submarine bases at Lorient and St Nazaire as well as submarine yards on Germany’s North Sea coast such as at Bremen and Wilhelmshaven. By April 1943 the Eighth Air Force had only 264 heavy bombers and 172 escort fighters in England. The first mission against a German aircraft factory was conducted on April 5, 1943, against the Erla plant in Antwerp in Belgium and the first mission against an aircraft factory in Germany itself was conducted on April 17, 1943, against the Fw-190 plant in Bremen.
B-24D Liberators of the 2nd Bombardment Wing attack shipyards in the Dunkirk area on February 15, 1943. French harbors and German targets along the North Sea coast were the most common targets in the first Eighth Air Force missions. (NARA)
Escort-fighter ranges
The Eighth Air Force in 1943 suffered a frequent dilution of strength because of frequent transfer of its bomber squadrons to the Mediterranean theater to support operations in North Africa, Sicily, and Italy. Jerk’s Natural,
a B-24D-1 of the 93rd Bombardment Group is seen here in England in 1943 after having returned from Mediterranean missions. It was lost over Austria on October 1, 1943. (NARA)
The short-range bomber missions from the autumn of 1942 through the spring of 1943 could be only partly protected by USAAF and RAF fighter escorts, which lacked the range of the heavy bombers. Missions into Germany could be escorted part of the way to the target area, and then during the return leg of the trip. Although losses during this initial period were sometimes costly, they were not heavy enough to cause US commanders to doubt the core idea of USAAF tactical doctrine: the viability of the self-defending bomber in daytime precision bombing. Losses in 1942 averaged 4.5 percent per mission, climbing to 7.1 percent in the first quarter of 1943 and 7.6 percent in the second quarter. Grossly exaggerated kill claims by the bombers’ gunners led to the mistaken belief that the attacks were causing severe losses to the German fighter force.
B-17F heavy bombers of 324th Squadron, 91st Bombardment Group, head out from their base at Bassingbourne to targets toward Rouen on March 17, 1943. The bomber in the center of this photo is the best-known aircraft of the early campaign, Memphis Belle.
Piloted by Captain Robert Morgan, its crew was the first in the Eighth Air Force to survive their 25-mission tour, on May 17, 1943. (NARA)
A core element of USAAF doctrine was the belief that heavy bombers had adequate defensive armament to fend off fighter attacks during daytime missions. This is the waist position of a B-17 showing Staff Sergeant Robert L. Taylor manning the .50-cal heavy machine gun. He is wearing electrically heated gloves and boots for high-altitude operations as well as a flak apron. (NARA)
As the pace of USAAF daytime attacks began to expand, the Luftwaffe responded by increasing the size of its day-fighter force. Much of the defense against the early USAAF bomber strikes came from forward-deployed fighter units of Luftflotte 3 (Air Fleet 3) in France and fighter units based in the Netherlands. The Luftwaffe’s heavy combat losses in the spring and summer of 1943 on the Russian and Mediterranean fronts made it difficult to form enough new fighter units, and much of the increase in Luftwaffe fighter strength in Germany came at the expense of the other theaters, with fighter units being drawn back into the Reich to deal with the American threat. The Luftwaffe day-fighter force for Reich defense continued to grow through 1943, though there was a spirited debate over whether day fighters, night fighters, or flak should receive priority.
In the summer of 1943 Allied leaders authorized the initiation of the Combined Bomber Offensive, also known as Operation Pointblank. In fact, the name papered over the fundamental disagreement between the RAF and USAAF over the conduct of the strategic-bombing campaign. Air Marshal Arthur Harris of RAF Bomber Command insisted that night area attacks on German cities would lead to a collapse of German civilian morale and destroy enough housing to seriously impact German industry. The USAAF was convinced that daytime precision bombing of German industry was a more effective approach. Operation Pointblank tried to reorient the focus of the strategic-bombing campaign toward the intermediate
goal of defeating the Luftwaffe fighter force. The USAAF took up the Pointblank mission with enthusiasm since US doctrine considered the defeat of the Luftwaffe an essential prelude to a broader campaign against German war industries. The senior Allied army commanders wanted the Luftwaffe suppressed prior to the start of Operation Overlord, scheduled for the late spring of 1944, and so supported the Pointblank plan. Harris continued to insist on his indirect night-bombing approach, and so the burden of Pointblank‘s initial goal against the Luftwaffe fell on the USAAF.
One of the iconic images of the air war over Germany was taken during Mission 104 to Emden on September 27, 1943. In the center is B-17F Skippy
of the 570th Squadron, 390th Bombardment Group, which was later lost on a mission over France on February 5, 1944. Overhead are the contrails of P-47 fighters conducting their usual weaving maneuver to keep pace with the bombers. (NARA)
A pair of B-17Fs of 322nd Squadron, 91st Bombardment Group, over England in 1943. The bomber in the foreground, Mizpah/The Bearded Lady,
was lost over Schweinfurt during the first raid on August 17, 1943. (NARA)
By the summer of 1943 the USAAF had become confident enough to begin missions into central Germany, even without fighter escort on the main leg of the mission. The prime targets were aircraft-assembly plants and the ballbearing industry around Schweinfurt. Ball bearings had been selected for special attention since they were widely used in many military weapons, including aircraft engines, and the German industry was geographically concentrated. Since the USAAF bomber force was still small, there was a special interest in finding these bottlenecks in German industry, an approach that Harris derided as panacea targets.
On August 17, 1943, the Eighth Air Force staged its largest and deepest-penetrating mission so far, a combined attack against the ball-bearing plants at Schweinfurt and the Bf-109 plant at Regensburg using 367 B-17 bombers. The force lost 60 bombers - 19 percent of those that reached the drop zone - which was an unsustainable rate of loss.
DAY OF THE ROCKET GUNS: SCHWEINFURT, OCTOBER 14, 1943
By the autumn of 1943, the rocket-armed Bf-110 fighters of Zerstörergeschwader 26 and Zerstörergeschwader 76 had become one of the most effective tools to shatter the Viermot Pulk,
the B-17 combat box (1). Viermot
was the German pilots’ nickname for the American heavy bombers, a slang contraction of the words for a four-engine bomber. The term Pulk
means a throng in German but has long had a military meaning as a group; in the Slavic languages it means a regiment. The heavily armed Bf-110G-2/R3 seen here (2)was nicknamed the Pulkzerstörer
(Group Destroyer
) for its intended mission of breaking up the bomber combat boxes. The Bf-110G-2/R-3 was armed with four launch tubes for the 21cm WGr. 42 (3)air-to-air rocket. Derived from the Army’s 210mm Nebelwerfer artillery rocket, this projectile weighed 110kg (240lb) on launch and contained 10kg (22lb) of Amatol high explosive. Its time fuse was set to detonate at a predetermined range between 500–1,200m, and it also had an impact fuse in case of a direct hit. These weapons were nicknamed rocket guns
by American bomber crews, who were not aware of their actual