Kandinsky
5/5
()
About this ebook
Read more from Mikhail Guerman
Wassily Kandinsky and artworks Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Marc Chagall - Vitebsk -París -New York Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMarc Chagall Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMikhail Vrubel. The Artist of the Eves Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRussian Impressionists and Post-Impressionists Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAlbert Marquet. The Paradox of Time Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Kandinsky
Related ebooks
Kandinsky Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Kandinsky Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Malevich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mondrian Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Point and Line to Plane Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Piet Mondrian Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Kandinsky, the Spiritual In Art Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dada Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Art History Cubism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFélix Vallotton and artworks Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDelphi Collected Works of Kandinsky Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Russian Avant-Garde Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Naive Art Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPost-Impressionism Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Art of the 20th century Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Gustav Klimt Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mondrian Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConcerning the Spiritual in Art and Painting in Particular Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIvan Shishkin Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Valentin Serov Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Nabis Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5August Macke and artworks Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5100 Drawings Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Lempicka and artworks Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Chagall and artworks Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Bonnard and the Nabis Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Changing Concept of Reality in Art Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsModern Artists on Art: Second Enlarged Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Paul Klee Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Paul Klee and artworks Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Art For You
Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Shape of Ideas: An Illustrated Exploration of Creativity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Writing to Learn: How to Write - and Think - Clearly About Any Subject at All Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Creative Habit: Learn It and Use It for Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Everything Is F*cked: A Book About Hope Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art 101: From Vincent van Gogh to Andy Warhol, Key People, Ideas, and Moments in the History of Art Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All About Love: New Visions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Alchemist: A Graphic Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Story: Style, Structure, Substance, and the Principles of Screenwriting Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The History of Art in 50 Paintings (Illustrated) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Designer's Dictionary of Color Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Living: The Classical Mannual on Virtue, Happiness, and Effectiveness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vanderbilt: The Rise and Fall of an American Dynasty Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Morpho: Anatomy for Artists Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Just Kids: An Autobiography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Delphi Complete Works of Vincent van Gogh (Illustrated) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All the Beauty in the World: The Metropolitan Museum of Art and Me Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Visual Guide to Classical Art Theory for Drawing and Painting Students Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Erotic Photography 120 illustrations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Photography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sketch like a Boss! Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Sketchnote: A Step-by-Step Manual for Teachers and Students Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Make Your Art No Matter What: Moving Beyond Creative Hurdles Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Complete Book of Drawing: Essential Skills for Every Artist Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Kandinsky
3 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Kandinsky - Mikhail Guerman
Notes
Exotic Birds, Tretyakow Gallery, Moscow.
Concentration
We are still — though in a somewhat free handwriting and a way that is upsetting enough to the bourgeois — painting the things of
reality: people, trees, country fairs, railroads, landscapes. In that respect we are still obeying a convention. The bourgeois calls those things
real which are seen and described pretty much the same way by everybody, or at least by many people.
–Hermann Hesse, Klingsor’s Last Summer
Not long ago it seemed that this century had not only begun with Kandinsky, but ended with him as well.[1] But no matter how often his name is cited by the zealots of new and fashionable interpretations, the artist has passed into history and belongs to the past and to the future to a greater degree, perhaps, than to the present. So much has been written and said about Kandinsky. His works, including his theoretical ones, are so well-known that this abundance of knowledge and commonplace opinions often hinders our seeing the artist in his individuality, in his real — not mythologized — significance. With a fresh gaze. From the threshold of the third millennium.
Weary of arch postmodernist games, the experienced and serious viewer today seeks in Kandinsky that which no one had seen in him earlier — and had not attempted to see: a buttress in an unstable world of artistic phantoms and fashionable shams. What just less than a hundred years ago was born as a bold revelation has now passed over into the category of eternal values. Among the titans of modernist art, Kandinsky was a patriarch. Matisse was born in 1869; Proust, in 1871; Malevich, in 1878; Klee, in 1879; Picasso, in 1881; Kafka, in 1883; Chagall, in 1887. Kandinsky himself was born in 1866, a year that also witnessed the birth of Romain Rolland and the publication of Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment. Anna Karenina had yet to be written and no one had yet pronounced the term Impressionism.
Kandinsky, in a word, was born in the very depths
of the nineteenth century. Kandinsky was twenty when the last exhibition of the Impressionists opened; he was thirty-four when Ambroise Vollard held the young Picasso’s first one-man show in his gallery. At the turn of the century Kandinsky was only just beginning to become a professional, his name was still unknown — and he did not yet know himself.
Gouspiar, Tretyakow Gallery, Moscow.
Prayer.
The Port of Odessa, late 1890s.
Oil on canvas, 65 x 45 cm,
Tretyakow Gallery, Moscow.
Kandinsky’s intellectualism and that of his art have constantly been noted by scholars and essayists. This situation is not typical: the young paladins of the avant-garde attracted their adepts not so much with knowledge and logic as with the radicalism and the spiritedness of their opinions; and, more often, with a meaningful incomprehensibility interspersed with brilliant revelations. The destiny of a master who linked his art with Russia, Germany and France; his work as a teacher in the celebrated Bauhaus; his prose, verse and theoretical writings; his unbending and determined path towards individuality — all of these things have made Kandinsky more than just another of the great artists of the twentieth century. In the culture of our age he has occupied a quite exceptional place: the place of an artist alien to vanity and with a desire to shock the viewer; the place of a master inclined to constant and concentrated meditation, to unswerving movement towards a synthesis of the arts, to the quest for more perfect, ascetic and strict formal systems. Moreover, Kandinsky’s art does not reflect (or, if one may say so, is not burdened by) the fate of other Russian avant-garde masters. He left Russia well before the semi-official Soviet esthetic turned its back on modernist art. He himself chose where he would live and how he would work. He was forced neither to struggle with fate nor to enter into conspiracy with it. His struggles
took place with himself
(Boris Pasternak). The persecutions to which leftist
artists in Russia were subjected left him untouched and did not complicate his life. Neither, however, was he was awarded a crown of thorns or the glory of a martyr, like the lot of those famous avant-garde artists who remained in Russia. His reputation is in no way obliged to fate — only to art itself. The culture of the past was for him precious and intelligible: he was not concerned with the smashing of idols. Creating the new occupied him entirely. He aspired neither to iconoclasm nor to scandalous behavior. It could hardly be said that his work lacked daring, but this was a daring saturated with