Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $9.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Arms and the Man: Illustrated
    Arms and the Man: Illustrated
    Arms and the Man: Illustrated
    Ebook107 pages1 hour

    Arms and the Man: Illustrated

    By G. Bernard Shaw and Murat Ukray

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

      To the irreverent—and which of us will claim entire exemption from that comfortable classification?—there is something very amusing in the attitude of the orthodox criticism toward Bernard Shaw. He so obviously disregards all the canons and unities and other things which every well-bred dramatist is bound to respect that his work is really unworthy of serious criticism (orthodox). Indeed he knows no more about the dramatic art than, according to his own story in "The Man of Destiny," Napoleon at Tavazzano knew of the Art of War. But both men were successes each in his way—the latter won victories and the former gained audiences, in the very teeth of the accepted theories of war and the theatre. Shaw does not know that it is unpardonable sin to have his characters make long speeches at one another, apparently thinking that this embargo applies only to long speeches which consist mainly of bombast and rhetoric. There never was an author who showed less predilection for a specific medium by which to accomplish his results. He recognized, early in his days, many things awry in the world and he assumed the task of mundane reformation with a confident spirit. It seems such a small job at twenty to set the times aright. He began as an Essayist, but who reads essays now-a-days?—he then turned novelist with no better success, for no one would read such preposterous stuff as he chose to emit. He only succeeded in proving that absolutely rational men and women—although he has created few of the latter—can be most extremely disagreeable to our conventional way of thinking.
      As a last resort, he turned to the stage, not that he cared for the dramatic art, for no man seems to care less about "Art for Art's sake," being in this a perfect foil to his brilliant compatriot and contemporary, Wilde. He cast his theories in dramatic forms merely because no other course except silence or physical revolt was open to him. For a long time it seemed as if this resource too was doomed to fail him. But finally he has attained a hearing and now attempts at suppression merely serve to advertise their victim.
      It will repay those who seek analogies in literature to compare Shaw with Cervantes. After a life of heroic endeavor, disappointment, slavery, and poverty, the author of "Don Quixote" gave the world a serious work which caused to be laughed off the world's stage forever the final vestiges of decadent chivalry.
      The institution had long been outgrown, but its vernacular continued to be the speech and to express the thought "of the world and among the vulgar," as the quaint, old novelist puts it, just as to-day the novel intended for the consumption of the unenlightened must deal with peers and millionaires and be dressed in stilted language. Marvellously he succeeded, but in a way he least intended. We have not yet, after so many years, determined whether it is a work to laugh or cry over. "It is our joyfullest modern book," says Carlyle, while Landor thinks that "readers who see nothing more than a burlesque in 'Don Quixote' have but shallow appreciation of the work."
      Shaw in like manner comes upon the scene when many of our social usages are outworn. He sees the fact, announces it, and we burst into guffaws. The continuous laughter which greets Shaw's plays arises from a real contrast in the point of view of the dramatist and his audiences. When Pinero or Jones describes a whimsical situation we never doubt for a moment that the author's point of view is our own and that the abnormal predicament of his characters appeals to him in the same light as to his audience. With Shaw this sense of community of feeling is wholly lacking. He describes things as he sees them, and the house is in a roar. Who is right? If we were really using our own senses and not gazing through the glasses of convention and romance and make-believe, should we see things as Shaw does?
      Must it not cause Shaw to doubt his own or the public's sanity to hear audiences laughi
    LanguageEnglish
    PublishereKitap Projesi
    Release dateApr 3, 2015
    ISBN9786155529535
    Arms and the Man: Illustrated

    Related to Arms and the Man

    Related ebooks

    Classics For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Man About Town

      Oct 28, 2021

      AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MONTH, I burst my chains of domestic bondage, Samson-like, and escaped hotfoot to Soho to sip white wine with ruffians to celebrate Dan Jones’s excellent new book, Powers and Thrones. Jones is one of these prolific coves who c

      4 min read

    • Article

      Holiday Reads By The Recently Departed

      Jul 27, 2023

      FOR THIS YEAR’S HOLIDAY READING special — where The Critic suggests some older fiction that might more profitably fill your beach-y or gîte-y afternoons than the latest screamers from the bestseller lists — the theme is, well, death in summer. We off

      6 min read

    • Article

      Books

      Oct 2, 2023

      Books
      5 min read

    • Article

      The Life of the Mind: On Helen DeWitt’s ‘Some Trick’

      May 31, 2018

      Helen DeWitt’s great subject is genius, an ambitious undertaking made less so by the fact that she may just be one herself. DeWitt is less concerned with the nature of genius, or if such a thing even exists—in her fiction, it undoubtedly does—than sh

      5 min read

    • Article

      Advice From A Critic: Read 'Erasure' Before Seeing 'American Fiction'

      Dec 12, 2023

      With the first Percival Everett-inspired screen adaptation American Fiction coming to theaters starting on Dec. 15, we're taking a moment to revisit his provocative and affecting satirical novel.

      6 min read

    • Article

      The Grueling, Painful, Beautiful Fiction of László Krasznahorkai

      Aug 8, 2017

      To misread Krasznahorkai as merely, or primarily, a political writer is to risk squandering the profoundly personal nature of his stories. More tragically, it is to foist a kind of sloppy activist, and determinately secular métier onto one of contemp

      9 min read

    • Article

      Table Talk

      Mar 1, 2019

      Table Talk
      10 min read

    • Article

      The Sentimental Sadist

      Feb 7, 2017

      The Sentimental Sadist
      8 min read

    • Article

      Oldies Make The Best Holiday Companions

      Jul 28, 2022

      ON THE PENETRATING QUESTION of what fiction to take on holiday, this year The Critic offers a novel approach. Why heft around the Dolomites the bulk of an untested hardback, by a wet-behind-the-ears author who isn’t even dead yet, when you can halve

      6 min read

    • Article

      Atticus Updated

      Apr 28, 2022

      Atticus Updated
      3 min read

    • Article

      The Timely Provocations of Matthew Gasda

      Sep 13, 2023

      'Dimes Square' portrays what it’s like for creatives—wherever they are—to survive in the competitive art ecosystem of today. The post The Timely Provocations of Matthew Gasda appeared first on The Millions.

      8 min read

    • Article

      Anne McElvoy on Theatre

      Sep 26, 2024

      TOM STOPPARD IS THE SIMONE BILES of playwrights: the star performer who has brought more exhilarating twists, puns and dimensions to stage language than any writer since Harold Pinter. Of his works, The Real Thing is the most complex and twisty in wo

      3 min read

    • Article

      If It Happened Here

      Mar 1, 2019

      If It Happened Here
      6 min read

    • Article

      The 15 Best Books of 2019

      Dec 24, 2019

      The 15 Best Books of 2019
      9 min read

    • Article

      Tuesday New Release Day: Starring Scott, Bucak, Zeh, Steinberg, and More

      Aug 20, 2019

      An intriguing near-future dystopian thriller, two innovative short story collections, and a remarkable portrait of Britain at its Brexit inflection point. The post Tuesday New Release Day: Starring Scott, Bucak, Zeh, Steinberg, and More appeared firs

      5 min read

    • Article

      Making The Case

      Jan 3, 2019

      Like her previous mordant and tantalizingly elliptical dissections of the bourgeoisie, Lucrecia Martel’s Zama tells a story of colonialism, this time through a Spanish functionary in a South American backwater who awaits a reprieve (return to the mot

      14 min read

    • Article

      A Fool’s Dream

      Aug 23, 2019

      A Fool’s Dream
      5 min read

    • Article

      Graphic Novels

      Nov 6, 2024

      Cemetery Kids Don’t Die. By Zac Thompson. Art by Daniel Irizarri and Brittany Peer. Dec. 2024. 112p. Oni, paper, $17.99 (9781637155202). 741.5. Facing a bleak future and a past filled with trauma, high-school student Birdie and her friends take out t

      18 min read

    • Article

      Their Lives Go On Until They Don’t: The Trouble with Refugee Novels

      Jan 28, 2019

      If art is in one sense the processing of reality, how can an artist hope to process that which, in all its horror and incoherence, resists interpretation? The post Their Lives Go On Until They Don’t: The Trouble with Refugee Novels appeared first on

      8 min read

    • Article

      Writing Sideways: Edith Wharton, the Postmodernists, and Social Satire

      Jul 13, 2020

      Familiarity may breed contempt, but in fiction it is a productive contempt The post Writing Sideways: Edith Wharton, the Postmodernists, and Social Satire appeared first on The Millions.

      7 min read

    • Article

      An Actor’s Story Is A Late Career Marvel

      Oct 31, 2024

      Our Evenings Alan Hollinghurst (Picador, £22) The Proof of My Innocence Jonathan Coe (Viking, £20) Barrowbeck Andrew Michael Hurley (John Murray, £16.99) IN THE PANTHEON OF THE ENGLISH NOVEL, few releases are as high status or as eagerly awaited as a

      6 min read

    • Article

      'James' Revisits Huck Finn's Traveling Companion, Giving Rise To A New Classic

      Mar 18, 2024

      In a fever dream of a retelling, America's new reigning king of satire has turned a loved classic, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, upside down, placing Huck's enslaved companion Jim at the center.

      6 min read

    • Article

      The Roar of Raging Nothing: The Uncanny Resemblance Between Sean Penn and Amanda McKittrick Ros

      Jun 14, 2018

      The difficulty of writing a novel means there are a lot of rotten novels out there, published or not. But sometimes writing is bad in a grand, towering way; sometimes the badness of a novel is so overwhelming that it warrants recording and rememberin

      8 min read

    • Article

      Behind the Masks of Jean Lorrain’s ‘Monsieur de Bougrelon’

      Aug 30, 2017

      With his flamboyant costuming, elaborate décor and rhapsodic reminiscences, Lorrain is not applying lipstick to the pig of reality, but trying to elevate artifice and anachronism to a way of being in the world. The post Behind the Masks of Jean Lorra

      4 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Arms and the Man

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Arms and the Man - G. Bernard Shaw

      Arms and the Man

      [ILLUSTRATED]

      By

      G. Bernard Shaw

      Illustrated by Murat Ukray

      ILLUSTRATED &

      PUBLISHED BY

      e-KİTAP PROJESİ & CHEAPEST BOOKS

      www.cheapestboooks.com

      www.facebook.com/EKitapProjesi

      Copyright, 2014 by e-Kitap Projesi

      Istanbul

      ISBN: 978-6155529-535

      Arms and the Man

      by

      George Bernard Shaw

      Arms and the Man

      Introduction

      Act I

      Act II

      Act III

      Introduction

      To the irreverent—and which of us will claim entire exemption from that comfortable classification?—there is something very amusing in the attitude of the orthodox criticism toward Bernard Shaw. He so obviously disregards all the canons and unities and other things which every well-bred dramatist is bound to respect that his work is really unworthy of serious criticism (orthodox). Indeed he knows no more about the dramatic art than, according to his own story in The Man of Destiny, Napoleon at Tavazzano knew of the Art of War. But both men were successes each in his way—the latter won victories and the former gained audiences, in the very teeth of the accepted theories of war and the theatre. Shaw does not know that it is unpardonable sin to have his characters make long speeches at one another, apparently thinking that this embargo applies only to long speeches which consist mainly of bombast and rhetoric. There never was an author who showed less predilection for a specific medium by which to accomplish his results. He recognized, early in his days, many things awry in the world and he assumed the task of mundane reformation with a confident spirit. It seems such a small job at twenty to set the times aright. He began as an Essayist, but who reads essays now-a-days?—he then turned novelist with no better success, for no one would read such preposterous stuff as he chose to emit. He only succeeded in proving that absolutely rational men and women—although he has created few of the latter—can be most extremely disagreeable to our conventional way of thinking.

      As a last resort, he turned to the stage, not that he cared for the dramatic art, for no man seems to care less about Art for Art's sake, being in this a perfect foil to his brilliant compatriot and contemporary, Wilde. He cast his theories in dramatic forms merely because no other course except silence or physical revolt was open to him. For a long time it seemed as if this resource too was doomed to fail him. But finally he has attained a hearing and now attempts at suppression merely serve to advertise their victim.

      It will repay those who seek analogies in literature to compare Shaw with Cervantes. After a life of heroic endeavor, disappointment, slavery, and poverty, the author of Don Quixote gave the world a serious work which caused to be laughed off the world's stage forever the final vestiges of decadent chivalry.

      The institution had long been outgrown, but its vernacular continued to be the speech and to express the thought of the world and among the vulgar, as the quaint, old novelist puts it, just as to-day the novel intended for the consumption of the unenlightened must deal with peers and millionaires and be dressed in stilted language. Marvellously he succeeded, but in a way he least intended. We have not yet, after so many years, determined whether it is a work to laugh or cry over. It is our joyfullest modern book, says Carlyle, while Landor thinks that readers who see nothing more than a burlesque in 'Don Quixote' have but shallow appreciation of the work.

      Shaw in like manner comes upon the scene when many of our social usages are outworn. He sees the fact, announces it, and we burst into guffaws. The continuous laughter which greets Shaw's plays arises from a real contrast in the point of view of the dramatist and his audiences. When Pinero or Jones describes a whimsical situation we never doubt for a moment that the author's point of view is our own and that the abnormal predicament of his characters appeals to him in the same light as to his audience. With Shaw this sense of community of feeling is wholly lacking. He describes things as he sees them, and the house is in a roar. Who is right? If we were really using our own senses and not gazing through the glasses of convention and romance and make-believe, should we see things as Shaw does?

      Must it not cause Shaw to doubt his own or the public's sanity to hear audiences laughing boisterously over tragic situations? And yet, if they did not come to laugh, they would not come at all. Mockery is the price he must pay for a hearing. Or has he calculated to a nicety the power of reaction? Does he seek to drive us to aspiration by the portrayal of sordidness, to disinterestedness by the picture of selfishness, to illusion by disillusionment? It is impossible to believe that he is unconscious of the humor of his dramatic situations, yet he stoically gives no sign. He even dares the charge, terrible in proportion to its truth, which the most serious of us shrinks from—the lack of a sense of humor. Men would rather have their integrity impugned.

      In Arms and the Man the subject which occupies the dramatist's attention is that survival of barbarity—militarism—which raises its horrid head from time to time to cast a doubt on the reality of our civilization. No more hoary superstition survives than that the donning of a uniform changes the nature of the wearer. This notion pervades society to such an extent that when we find some soldiers placed upon the stage acting rationally, our conventionalized senses are shocked. The only men who have no illusions about war are those who have recently been there, and, of course, Mr. Shaw, who has no illusions about anything.

      It is hard to speak too highly of Candida. No equally subtle and incisive study of domestic relations exists in the English drama. One has to turn to George Meredith's The Egoist to find such character dissection. The central note of the play is, that with the true woman, weakness which appeals to the maternal instinct is more powerful than strength which offers protection. Candida is quite unpoetic, as, indeed, with rare exceptions, women are prone to be. They have small delight in poetry, but are the stuff of which poems and dreams are made. The husband glorying in his strength but convicted of his weakness, the poet pitiful in his physical impotence but strong in his perception of truth, the hopelessly de-moralized manufacturer, the conventional and hence emotional typist make up a group which the drama of any language may be challenged to rival.

      In The Man of Destiny the object of the dramatist is not so much the destruction as the explanation of the Napoleonic tradition, which has so powerfully influenced generation after generation for a century. However the man may be regarded, he was a miracle. Shaw shows that he achieved his extraordinary career by suspending, for himself, the pressure of the moral and conventional atmosphere, while leaving it operative for others. Those who study this play—extravaganza, that it is—will attain a

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1