Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $9.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Some Reflections on Ethics
    Some Reflections on Ethics
    Some Reflections on Ethics
    Ebook65 pages55 minutes

    Some Reflections on Ethics

    By Dr. Ramendra

    3/5

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    "The aim of a rational ethics should be to maximize freedom and avenues of happiness and to minimize avoidable suffering."

    In this highly thought provoking and stimulating book, the author, Dr. Ramendra, has briefly and critically discussed the ethical ideas of G. E. Moore, Bertrand Russell, Lokayat, Buddha, Epicurus and John Stuart Mill before expounding his own ideas in a logical manner. The author has convincingly advocated a rational ethics based on human needs and desires.

    'Some Reflections on Ethics' was first published on the internet in 2008. It's first print edition was published in 2012. The author, Dr. Ramendra, made some changes for the print edition. Those changes have been retained in this second revised internet edition.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherDr. Ramendra
    Release dateMar 27, 2013
    ISBN9781301121120
    Some Reflections on Ethics
    Author

    Dr. Ramendra

    Dr. Ramendra (full name "Ramendra Nath") is presently working as a Professor in the Post Graduate Department of Philosophy of Patna University, Patna, India. He is a former Head of the Department of Philosophy of Patna College, Patna University. He has been now teaching philosophy in Patna University for more than thirty-seven years. He is a double gold medalist and double research degree holder from Patna University. His Ph. D was on "The Ethical Philosophy of Bertrand Russell" and his D. Lit. Was on "M. N. Roy's New Humanism and Materialism". Both these works have been published as books. Dr. Ramendra is the author of nearly forty books and booklets in Hindi and English, including 'Why I am Not a Hindu', 'Is God Dead?, 'The Myth of Unity of all Religions' and 'Some Reflections on Ethics'. Besides, he has written more than thousand articles in newspapers, magazines and journals. His works have been translated into Bhojpuri, Oriya, Gujarati, Telugu and Malyalam. Dr. Ramendra (born 1957) is married to Dr. Kawaljeet Kaur since 1981. Dr. Ramendra, along with his wife, is the co-founder of Buddhiwadi Samaj (Rationalist Society) and Buddhiwadi Foundation, two internationally known organizations for promoting rationalism and humanism. Dr. Ramendra's only daughter, Priya, is a software engineer and she works actively for the Buddhiwadi Foundation.

    Read more from Dr. Ramendra

    Related to Some Reflections on Ethics

    Related ebooks

    Philosophy For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Entreaty For Debate

      Apr 8, 2024

      Tautoko to Glenn Colquhoun for his letter to Act leader David Seymour (“Go north for a while”, April 6) . While Seymour fixates on personal freedom, Colquhoun writes, “We are individuals but we also share a collective existence.” Within hours of read

      7 min read

    • Article

      A Lesson of Virtue

      Jul 28, 2022

      Harvard Law School professor Adrian Vermeule recently launched his new book Common Good Constitutionalism. In last week’s edition of Beijing Review, Vermeule and John Pang, Malaysian senior fellow at Bard College in New York, described the shared cla

      4 min read

    • Article

      Fragile Freedom

      Mar 6, 2022

      Fragile Freedom
      2 min read

    • Article

      The End of Human Rights?

      Apr 9, 2018

      The End of Human Rights?
      7 min read

    • Article

      Sorry, No Wedding Bells

      Oct 21, 2023

      Sorry, No Wedding Bells
      3 min read

    • Article

      What Universities Owe to the Liberal Project

      Jan 25, 2023

      We live in an era fraught with challenge. From a global pandemic to rising authoritarianism and a European war, the world is as fundamentally unsettled as it has been in nearly a century. Domestically, Americans face rising levels of polarization and

      14 min read

    • Article

      Let the People Rule: How Direct Democracy Can Meet the Populist Challenge

      Mar 15, 2022

      By John G. Matsusaka Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2020. Pp. xii, 298. $29.95 hardcover. The resurgence of populism in recent years has generated a great deal of attention from academics and the media. Much of the discussion focuses on

      6 min read

    • Article

      The Benefits Of Learning From Home

      Jan 26, 2023

      IN BRITAIN, A PRIME MOTIVATION for going to university is to go away to study, to up sticks and enjoy a “student experience” far from your family and roots. The experience is sold in Britain for £28,000 a pop, and to those from abroad at sums north o

      8 min read

    • Article

      Gene Sharp and Social Movements: Contributions and Legacies

      Jul 25, 2023

      Gene Sharp significantly contributed to both the intellectual and practical advancement of nonviolent approaches to conflictual activity against oppressive sources of power. His seminal statement, The Politics of Nonviolent Action, published fifty ye

      21 min read

    • Article

      Our Decomposing Democracy

      Mar 31, 2019

      Our Decomposing Democracy
      8 min read

    • Article

      The Complex Relationship between Democracy and Freedom

      May 4, 2021

      The Cold War era, from the 1950s through the 1980s, saw a global ideological divide between the capitalist democracies of the Western bloc countries and the centrally planned dictatorships in the Eastern bloc. That ideological divide, both political

      30 min read

    • Article

      Gender Politics

      Feb 18, 2023

      Gender Politics
      7 min read

    • Article

      How Really Free Are We?

      Mar 27, 2018

      How Really Free Are We?
      7 min read

    • Article

      Deciphering Quotas

      Apr 22, 2023

      Deciphering Quotas
      2 min read

    • Article

      Why Marital Rape Qualifies as Rape

      May 21, 2022

      In the second week of May, the Delhi High Court passed a split verdict on the issue of whether the marital rape exception engrafted in Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was constitutional or not. Exception 2 to Section 375 reads as follows,

      4 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Some Reflections on Ethics

    3/5

    1 rating0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Some Reflections on Ethics - Dr. Ramendra

      Some Reflections on Ethics

      by Dr. Ramendra

      Internet edition first published in 2008, second revised edition 2013

      First print edition 2012

      Published by the Buddhiwadi Foundation

      Copyright Ramendra 2008-2013

      ###

      Smashwords Edition

      License Notes

      This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be resold or given away to other people.

      ###

      Cover design by Sagar

      ###

      Also by Dr. Ramendra, Published at Smashwords:

      Why I am Not a Hindu

      Is God Dead?

      The Myth of Unity of all Religions

      The Ethical Philosophy of Bertrand Russell

      ###

      Table of Contents

      Foreword

      Preface to the first internet edition

      Preface to the second internet edition

      Introduction

      Chapter 1. On G. E. Moore

      Chapter 2. Normative Ethics and Metaethics

      Chapter 3. On Lokayat

      Chapter 4. On Buddha

      Chapter 5. On Epicurus

      Chapter 6. On John Stuart Mill

      Chapter 7. Some False Dichotomies

      Appendix1 The Ethical Philosophy of Bertrand Russell

      Appendix 2 Ethics in my earlier writings

      Bibliography

      About the Author

      Some Reflections on Ethics

      Introduction

      My original interest in philosophy was stimulated by ethics. I became interested in ethics through my interest in social and political problems. In fact, I came to philosophy in search of a rational morality, at least as rational as possible. I believed, and still believe, that scientific method is the best method for resolving factual disagreements and arriving at conclusions regarding what is the case.

      However, I could not accept that the denotation of the term rational was the same as the denotation of the term scientific. I believed that there could be a method, not scientific in the empirical sense, yet rational, for resolving ethical disagreements or disagreements regarding what ought to be. The fact that the scientific method alone could not solve the fundamental problems of values, so I thought, in no way reduced the importance of such problems. They remain as fundamental and important as ever. On the other hand, the fact that the scientific method alone could not give an answer to the fundamental questions of ethics did not reduce in any way the importance of scientific method in the sphere of facts.

      I had hoped that studying philosophy could help me in finding a rational method for resolving ethical disagreements or, in other words, in arriving at a rational morality. A technical discussion of my ethical ideas is contained in the critical part of my research-paper The Ethical Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, which is based on my book of the same title.(See, Appendix 1)

      However, my ethical ideas are interwoven in all of my important philosophical writings, even when they do not deal directly or specifically with ethics.(See, Appendix 2 for details)

      In my research-paper on Bertrand Russell’s ethics, to begin with, I have supported Russell’s ethical non-cognitivism or the view that ethical statements cannot be true or false like factual ones. As I have said:

      It appears to me that, as far as Russell’s non-cognitivism is concerned, his arguments are incontrovertible. He is right in maintaining that in ethical disagreements of fundamental nature we cannot give arguments or evidence of the kind we can in scientific and factual disagreements. In addition, that this is so because ethical statements are not fact-stating even when expressed in indicative mood, though they have been confused as such by a long line of ethical philosophers. A statement like We ought to pursue happiness as an end or Happiness is good in itself is not a factual one, because it does not assert what is the case but recommends what ought to be the case.

      We call a factual statement true if there is a corresponding fact. However, since ethical statements do not state facts, there is no question of there being a corresponding fact or the statement being true or false in the sense in which factual statements are.

      Once we grant that non-cognitivism is true, we also have to admit that the attempts made by different cognitivist philosophers were misdirected to some extent, and that we have to make attempts in somewhat different direction, if we are to solve the problems of ethics at all.

      Ethics, it is true, owing to the very nature of its problems cannot be objective in the sense in which physical sciences are. This, however, does not mean that reason has no role to play in ethical matters. As far as means are concerned, reason certainly plays a role. Moreover, even the ends need not be totally arbitrary. Both ends and means have to be compatible with the reality.

      Besides,

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1