Bacon and Shakspere
()
Read more from William Henry Burr
Bacon and Shakspere Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBacon and Shakspere Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Bacon and Shakspere
Related ebooks
Much Ado About Shakespeare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShakespeare's Family Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTo Be or Not To Be: ... and everything else you should know from Shakespeare Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Shakespeare's Family Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShakspere & Typography Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShakespeare's Sonnets Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Man, Shakespeare - And his Tragic Life Story Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTales from Shakespeare Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Biography of Edmund Spenser Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Collection of Scotch Proverbs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAntony and Cleopatra (MAXNotes Literature Guides) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Sonnets (Barnes & Noble Digital Library) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWho Wrote Shakespeare?: The Case for William Shakespeare of Stratford Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Shakespeare Quotes Ultimate Collection - The Wit and Wisdom of William Shakespeare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for William Shakespeare's "Seven Ages of Man" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeautiful stories from Shakespeare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMacbeth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Life of William Shakespeare with portraits and facsimiles Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shakespeare: Investigate the Bard's Influence on Today's World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTwelfth Night (MAXNotes Literature Guides) Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Venus and Adonis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Noble Spanish Soldier Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStudy Guide to Hamlet by William Shakespeare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRomeo and Juliet Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Naming Thy Name: Cross Talk in Shakespeare's Sonnets Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHenry V (MAXNotes Literature Guides) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStudy Guide to The Tempest by William Shakespeare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStudy Guide to Macbeth by William Shakespeare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHenry IV, Part I (MAXNotes Literature Guides) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Comedy of Errors Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Bacon and Shakspere
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Bacon and Shakspere - William Henry Burr
BACON AND SHAKSPERE
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license.
Title: Bacon And Shakspere
Author: William Henry Burr
Release Date: March 12, 2012 [EBook #39121]
Language: English
Character set encoding: UTF-8
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK BACON AND SHAKSPERE ***
Produced by David Widger.
BACON AND SHAKSPERE
By
William Henry Burr
PROOF THAT WILLIAM SHAKSPERE COULD NOT WRITE
BACON IDENTIFIED AS THE CONCEALED POET IGNOTO
1886
CONTENTS
PROOF THAT SHAKSPERE COULD NOT WRITE
NO TRUE LIKENESS OF SHAKSPERE
THE SONNETS OF SHAKSPERE
BACON IDENTIFIED AS THE CONCEALED POET IGNOTO
AS THE CONCEALED POET IGNOTO
BACON AND SHAKSPERE A CHRONOGRAPH
A CHRONOGRAPHIC PARALLEL
QUEEN ELIZABETH’S YOUNG LORD KEEPER.
FROM BUST.
[3]
PROOF THAT SHAKSPERE COULD NOT WRITE
No handwriting of Shakspere has ever been discovered except five autographs. In March 1613, when he was nearly 49 years old, he signed his name to a mortgage, and again to a deed relative to the same transaction. Three years later he subscribed his name to three briefs or sheets of his will. The five facsimiles are here reproduced:
They are all such signatures as an illiterate person, unaccustomed to write, would be likely to scrawl; and
[4]
they are so different that an acquaintance with one is little help to the recognition of another.
In the first signature he writes Wm. for William.
The second and third autographs have William written above Shakspere. Who but an illiterate person would sign his name thus?
In the last two signatures (being told perhaps that his name ought to be written on one line) he puts William before Shakspere; but the fourth William reads Willin.
See now how differently each letter is formed in the name Shakspere, beginning with the initial:
Did anybody ever write the first letter of his name so differently? After four attempts to form a capital S he succeeds tolerably well the fifth time. The second S, though of singular shape, appears to have been a customary one as early as 1598. (See examples of that year below.) Shakspere’s first attempt to form the crooked letter is a failure, but the second passably good. So again in 1616, when he has a different form to copy, his first attempt is futile, the second is passable, and the third quite successful.
But in attempting the next letter he makes it worse every time:
With the letter a he is more successful, making it legible three times out of five:
[5]
But the attempt to form a k is a signal failure:
With the long s he succeeds best the first time, and worst the second and third:
The letter p is legible the first time, but grows worse and worse to the last:
It seems as if in the first attempt to sign his name in 1613 he thought it was complete when he made it end with sp e; but being reminded that it lacked a letter or two he undertook to add one by putting an a over the e thus:
The next time, which was probably the same day,(1) he seems to have written his name Shaksper, though the terminal letters are uncertain:
The third time he gets it more like Shakspoze:
The deed to Shakspere and two other trustees is dated March 10 and signed Henry Walker. The mortgage from Shakspere and the other trustees is dated March 11. But for some unaccountable reason a duplicate verbatim copy of the deed from Henry Walker is signed by William Shakspere. This duplicate is in the Library of the city of London; the mortgage is in the British Museum. The duplicate deed we suspect was signed after the mortgage. Hence the improvement in the autograph; it was probably Shakspere’s second attempt to write. Compare it with the third.
[6]
The fourth time he seems to have tried to disguise the termination with awkward flourishes, making the letters totally illegible:
Finally, he omits the flourishes and comes nearer legibility, but still it is impossible to tell whether he meant to write ear, ere, or eare:
And