Rhythm Generation
2 Followers
Recent papers in Rhythm Generation
We investigated whether dorsal (DR) and ventral root (VR) stimulus trains engage common postsynaptic components to activate the central pattern generator (CPG) for locomotion in the neonatal mouse spinal cord. VR stimulation did not... more
We investigated whether dorsal (DR) and ventral root (VR) stimulus trains engage common postsynaptic components to activate the central pattern generator (CPG) for locomotion in the neonatal mouse spinal cord. VR stimulation did not activate the first order interneurons mediating the activation of the locomotor CPG by sacrocaudal afferent stimulation. Simultaneous stimulation of adjacent dorsal or ventral root pairs, subthreshold for evoking locomotor-like activity, did not summate to activate the CPG. This suggests that locomotor-like activity is triggered when a critical class of efferent or afferent axons is stimulated and does not depend on the number of stimulated axons or activated postsynaptic neurons. DR-and VR-evoked episodes exhibited differences in the coupling between VR pairs. In DR-evoked episodes, the coupling between the ipsilateral and contralateral flexor/extensor roots was similar and stronger than the bilateral extensor roots. In VR-evoked episodes, ipsilateral flexor/extensor coupling was stronger than both the contralateral flexor/extensor and the bilateral extensor coupling. For both types of stimulation, the coupling was greatest between the bilateral L1/L2 flexor-dominated roots. This indicates that the recruitment and/or the firing pattern of motoneurons differed in DR and VR-evoked episodes. However, the DR and VR trains do not appear to activate distinct CPGs because trains of DR and VR stimuli at frequencies too low to evoke locomotor-like activity did so when they were interleaved. These results indicate that the excitatory actions of VR stimulation converge onto the CPG through an unknown pathway that is not captured by current models of the locomotor CPG.
Though the mechanics of breathing differ fundamentally between amniotes and "lower" vertebrates, homologous rhythm generators may drive air breathing in all lunged vertebrates. In both frogs and rats, two coupled oscillators, one active... more
Though the mechanics of breathing differ fundamentally between amniotes and "lower" vertebrates, homologous rhythm generators may drive air breathing in all lunged vertebrates. In both frogs and rats, two coupled oscillators, one active during the inspiratory (I) phase and the other active during the preinspiratory (PreI) phase, have been hypothesized to generate the respiratory rhythm. We used opioids to uncouple these oscillators. In the intact rat, complete arrest of the external rhythm by opioid-induced suppression of the putative I oscillator, that is, pre-Bötzinger complex (PBC) oscillator, did not arrest the putative PreI oscillator. In the unanesthetized frog, the comparable PreI oscillator, that is, the putative buccal/ gill oscillator, was refractory to opioids even though the comparable I oscillator, the putative lung oscillator, was arrested. Studies in en bloc brainstem preparations derived from both juvenile frogs and metamorphic tadpoles confirmed these results and suggested that opioids may play a role in the clustering of lung bursts into episodes. As the frog and rat respiratory circuitry produce functionally equivalent motor outputs during lung inflation, these data argue for a close homology between the frog and rat oscillators. We suggest that the respiratory rhythm of all lunged vertebrates is generated by paired coupled oscillators. These may have originated from the gill and lung oscillators of the earliest air breathers.
Related Topics