In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: When Czech filmmaker Jan Švankmajer released his film adaptation of the Faust legend in 1994, it was the culmination of a longstanding fascination with the story. His first...
moreIn lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:
When Czech filmmaker Jan Švankmajer released his film adaptation of the Faust legend in 1994, it was the culmination of a longstanding fascination with the story. His first screen credit was as a puppeteer on Emil Radok's short film Johannes Doktor Faust (1958), made during his time working as a director and designer at the Czech State Puppet Theatre. He had also staged a masked theatre production of Faust in 1962 for the Semafor Theatre in Prague. In the early 1980s, he attempted, unsuccessfully, to restage it at Prague's Laterna Magika, following his state-imposed ban from filmmaking (1972-79), after which he was permitted to work only from officially approved literary sources. By the time he came to make his own feature film version, the long-gestated project had come to encapsulate many of his aesthetic attitudes, as well as his relationship to his home city of Prague. As Švankmajer explained to Peter Hames in 2006:
"When any civilisation feels its end is growing near, it returns to its beginnings and looks to see whether the myths on which it is founded can be interpreted in new ways, which would give them a new energy and ward off the impending catastrophe. The myth of Faust is one of the key myths of this civilisation, and its interpretations are numerous. My Faust is intended to be one of these interpretative returns. I believe that Faust is one of the basic morphological or archetypal situations in which both individuals and civilisations find themselves. Sooner or later, everyone is faced with the same dilemma—either to live their life in conformity with the misty promises of institutionalised 'happiness', or to rebel and take the path away from civilisation, whatever the results. The second path always ends in individual failure, while the first ends in the failure of humanity as a whole. Or is it the other way round? The ambivalence makes no difference when it comes to the tragedy of human fate." (quoted in Hames 122)
Correspondingly, his film, Lekce Faust (although it was released as simply Faust in most territories, this full Czech title translates literally as A Faust Lesson, implying a reflexive examination of the legend itself ) is both a combination of multiple tellings of the story and a highly personal response, lodged firmly in the material realities of contemporary Czech culture. It therefore represents not an authoritative transliteration of a singular Faustus-text into the medium of film, but an indirect thesis on the contingencies of authorship, the chaos of interpretation, and the impossibility of direct adaptation.
It is certainly true that the Faust story has proven to be endlessly malleable for adaptation, appropriation, and revision across all media. The durability of the Faustus story is matched only by the sheer variety of media containers into which it has been poured. Švankmajer's Faust intervenes in this cacophony of retellings by functioning as a stylistic and semic pile-up of references. We are instructed to read the film as an assemblage of visions from different registers and sources, as opposed to an assimilated, re-authored composite that might ordinarily characterize a straightforward film adaptation. As a result, the film is a true chimera, refusing to blend its many textual and historical tributaries into a single stream of influence or definitive interpretation. In order to map some possible routes through this labyrinthine film, this essay first explores the ways in which Švankmajer relates the Faust legend to Prague through references to the story's historical and textual relationship to the city, including forms of folk puppetry and marionette theatre. This leads, via the figure of the puppet, towards an analysis of Švankmajer's use of animation as a way of representing the contested Faustian body as a site of violent conflict and social subjection. [...]